So it's done :-)
2013/9/17 Johannes Geppert :
> +1 for go ahead with the new version.
>
> Great Work and Kudos to Christian.
>
> Johannes
>
> #
> web: http://www.jgeppert.com
> twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
>
>
>
> 2013/9/17 Rene Gielen
>
>> +1
+1 for go ahead with the new version.
Great Work and Kudos to Christian.
Johannes
#
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
2013/9/17 Rene Gielen
> +1
> Am 17.09.2013 10:53 schrieb "Lukasz Lenart" :
>
> > It just came up
+1
Am 17.09.2013 10:53 schrieb "Lukasz Lenart" :
> It just came up to my mind - it's almost over a week when the new site
> is available via staging and people were commenting and suggesting
> changes all the time :-) No one disagreed or was against it, so I'd
> like to hit the [Publish Site] toda
It just came up to my mind - it's almost over a week when the new site
is available via staging and people were commenting and suggesting
changes all the time :-) No one disagreed or was against it, so I'd
like to hit the [Publish Site] today's afternoon - at least allow
Christian to do it :-)
Re
Done!
Can we start with silence consensus process to push the new site to production?
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
2013/9/15 Rene Gielen :
> Am 15.09.13 10:46, schrieb Lukasz Lenart:
>> 2013/9/14 bphill...@ku.edu :
>>> For the Documentation menu items why not us
Am 15.09.13 10:46, schrieb Lukasz Lenart:
> 2013/9/14 bphill...@ku.edu :
>> For the Documentation menu items why not use Struts 2 and Struts 1 as menu
>> choices instead of Struts 2.3.x and Struts 1.3.x. When we release Struts
>> 2.4 we'll have to change those. The page those menu items link to (
2013/9/14 bphill...@ku.edu :
> For the Documentation menu items why not use Struts 2 and Struts 1 as menu
> choices instead of Struts 2.3.x and Struts 1.3.x. When we release Struts
> 2.4 we'll have to change those. The page those menu items link to (which
> right now is not working) can specify t
2013/9/14 bphill...@ku.edu :
> On the main page of the new site:
>
> We welcome your help! If you want to more about how to build and patch the
> Struts 2 codebase, please read the Developer Docs
>
> Should the above be:
>
> We welcome your help! If you want to *learn *more about how to build and
>
.15.1).
Bruce
--
View this message in context:
http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Docs-Working-on-Struts-main-tp5713719p5713854.html
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
the Developer Docs
Bruce
--
View this message in context:
http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Docs-Working-on-Struts-main-tp5713719p5713853.html
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e
2013/9/13 Rene Gielen :
> As this a major change, a formal vote might be a valid option.
I'd rather go with silence consensus here. Announcing Struts1 EOL
wasn't a big shock, there are still links to download the latest
version of it and to the archive site and to the EOL announcement
itself. All
2013/9/13 Brian Holzer :
> I checked out that staging site and one thing I found is that on the
> Documentation dropdown on the main page, the links to the Struts 2.3X
> and Struts 1.3X were both broken. Not sure that's what you were going
> for.
This is ok as those links are managed outside Apac
I checked out that staging site and one thing I found is that on the
Documentation dropdown on the main page, the links to the Struts 2.3X
and Struts 1.3X were both broken. Not sure that's what you were going
for.
Brian
>>> Rene Gielen 13/09/2013 11:22 AM >>>
http://struts.staging.apache.org/
http://struts.staging.apache.org/
Am 13.09.2013 18:35 schrieb "Paul Benedict" :
> Where can I see the "new" website before it goes live?
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Rene Gielen
> wrote:
>
> > As this a major change, a formal vote might be a valid option.
> > Am 12.09.2013 11:26 schrie
Where can I see the "new" website before it goes live?
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Rene Gielen wrote:
> As this a major change, a formal vote might be a valid option.
> Am 12.09.2013 11:26 schrieb "Lukasz Lenart" :
>
> > Can we go live?
> >
> > 2013/9/11 Lukasz Lenart :
> > > I think we c
As this a major change, a formal vote might be a valid option.
Am 12.09.2013 11:26 schrieb "Lukasz Lenart" :
> Can we go live?
>
> 2013/9/11 Lukasz Lenart :
> > I think we can go live with the new website even now - it looks much
> > better the old one and the rest can be improved in meantime.
>
Am 12.09.13 11:25, schrieb Lukasz Lenart:
> Can we go live?
Currently I have nothing important to add. Of course there are glitches,
but as you said, we can fix them "at runtime".
+1 from me
>
> 2013/9/11 Lukasz Lenart :
>> I think we can go live with the new website even now - it looks much
>> be
Can we go live?
2013/9/11 Lukasz Lenart :
> I think we can go live with the new website even now - it looks much
> better the old one and the rest can be improved in meantime.
>
> 2013/9/10 Christian Grobmeier :
>> Am 10.09.13 18:11, schrieb Rene Gielen:
>>> If I'd use [Publish Site] now in the Bo
I think we can go live with the new website even now - it looks much
better the old one and the rest can be improved in meantime.
2013/9/10 Christian Grobmeier :
> Am 10.09.13 18:11, schrieb Rene Gielen:
>> If I'd use [Publish Site] now in the Bookmarklet, the site gets - well -
>> published. So b
Am 10.09.13 18:11, schrieb Rene Gielen:
> If I'd use [Publish Site] now in the Bookmarklet, the site gets - well -
> published. So better nobody would hit this unless we are sure to launch the
> reworked site. Also, we are currently not able to publish "small changes"
> such as release announcement
Am 10.09.13 19:09, schrieb Dave Newton:
>> The Apache Struts web framework is a free open-source solution for creating
>> elegant and modern Java web applications. The framework is designed to
>> favor convention over configuration and support applications built using
>> the MVC pattern. Struts c
>
> The Apache Struts web framework is a free open-source solution for creating
> elegant and modern Java web applications. The framework is designed to
> favor convention over configuration and support applications built using
> the MVC pattern. Struts can be extended using a plugin architecture
If I'd use [Publish Site] now in the Bookmarklet, the site gets - well -
published. So better nobody would hit this unless we are sure to launch the
reworked site. Also, we are currently not able to publish "small changes"
such as release announcements without rolling out the full new site. I just
I would remove the references to Struts 1 in the main banner paragraph.
Tell the user why they want to use Struts, they probably haven't used
Struts 1 if they don't know what Struts is.
The Apache Struts web framework is a free open-source solution for creating
elegant and modern Java web applica
Am 10.09.13 14:40, schrieb Lukasz Lenart:
> 2013/9/10 Rene Gielen :
>> You guys are aware that we cannot publish to live anymore now? We would
>> rollout the new site then.
If you mean that "view diff" gives a "no result", this was prior the
changes. I thought it was a hickup at infra.
I have tried
2013/9/10 Rene Gielen :
> You guys are aware that we cannot publish to live anymore now? We would
> rollout the new site then.
What you mean by that?
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscrib
Uh... uh... osm :-)
2013/9/10 Christian Grobmeier :
> Am 10.09.13 14:18, schrieb Lukasz Lenart:
>> OSM! :-)
>>
>> I'd just move social buttons to dedicated row, just below IRC channel.
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
> Good idea, its done!
>
>
> ---
You guys are aware that we cannot publish to live anymore now? We would
rollout the new site then.
2013/9/10 Lukasz Lenart
> Uh... uh... osm :-)
>
> 2013/9/10 Christian Grobmeier :
> > Am 10.09.13 14:18, schrieb Lukasz Lenart:
> >> OSM! :-)
> >>
> >> I'd just move social buttons to dedicated ro
Am 10.09.13 14:18, schrieb Lukasz Lenart:
> OSM! :-)
>
> I'd just move social buttons to dedicated row, just below IRC channel.
>
>
> Thanks!
Good idea, its done!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For ad
OSM! :-)
I'd just move social buttons to dedicated row, just below IRC channel.
Thanks!
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
2013/9/10 Christian Grobmeier :
> Am 10.09.13 09:31, schrieb Lukasz Lenart:
>> Maybe instead of using branch you can apply changes directly to trunk?
>>
Am 10.09.13 09:31, schrieb Lukasz Lenart:
> Maybe instead of using branch you can apply changes directly to trunk?
> Then we can see changes directly on http://struts.staging.apache.org/
> and I think we introduce them anyway ;-)
Here we go:
http://struts.staging.apache.org/
Am 10.09.13 09:31, schrieb Lukasz Lenart:
> Maybe instead of using branch you can apply changes directly to trunk?
> Then we can see changes directly on http://struts.staging.apache.org/
> and I think we introduce them anyway ;-)
OK I can/will do that :-)
But you have been warned - I was really to
Maybe instead of using branch you can apply changes directly to trunk?
Then we can see changes directly on http://struts.staging.apache.org/
and I think we introduce them anyway ;-)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Makes sense, I changed everything as you said. Thanks, and keep the
comments coming!
Am 09.09.13 13:39, schrieb Rene Gielen:
> While this isn't a full review, some first impressions:
>
> - Landing page: Key Technologies section (left bottom div) is redundant
> given the Technology Primer link in t
While this isn't a full review, some first impressions:
- Landing page: Key Technologies section (left bottom div) is redundant
given the Technology Primer link in the hero bar. I would rather
recommend to place the most important announcement (such as security
announcement / latest release info)
Hello folks,
given our recent discussions on the documentation I have started to
rework the Struts main page.
Please find it here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/site/branches/next/
I have already pinned a lot of my "visions" here and would like to
invite you to check it out and help mak
36 matches
Mail list logo
