Re: Freekmarker vs. Velocity

2008-03-27 Thread David Durham, Jr.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/freemarker.html > > I don't use either, but I've read various opinions that Freemarker is > much better than velocity, but this sounds like we think they're > comparable. Anyone got

Re: Freekmarker vs. Velocity

2008-03-26 Thread Jonathan Revusky
Jeromy Evans wrote: I have been of two minds whether to pursue this conversation and make certain points. I strongly disagree with some of things you're saying here, so, finally, I'll just make the points that I think need to be made on this topic. I don't think there's a need for any further

Re: Freekmarker vs. Velocity

2008-03-25 Thread Haroon Rafique
On Today at 12:27pm, BP=>Brian Pontarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: BP> [..snip..] BP> BP> All EAPs are available from JetBrains.net. You just have to hunt BP> around to find them. They are full working versions that expire after BP> 30 days. Usually they expire before or during the next EAP r

Re: Freekmarker vs. Velocity

2008-03-25 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Haroon Rafique wrote: On Yesterday at 11:37am, BP=>Brian Pontarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: BP> BP> BTW, some of the JetBrains folks said that FreeMarker support will be BP> in 8 and should be available in EAP soon! This will definitely help BP> move me farther away from JSPs. :) BP> BP>

Re: Freekmarker vs. Velocity

2008-03-25 Thread Philip Luppens
On 3/25/08, Haroon Rafique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Yesterday at 11:37am, BP=>Brian Pontarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > BP> > BP> BTW, some of the JetBrains folks said that FreeMarker support will be > BP> in 8 and should be available in EAP soon! This will definitely help > BP> mo

Re: Freekmarker vs. Velocity

2008-03-25 Thread Haroon Rafique
On Yesterday at 11:37am, BP=>Brian Pontarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: BP> BP> BTW, some of the JetBrains folks said that FreeMarker support will be BP> in 8 and should be available in EAP soon! This will definitely help BP> move me farther away from JSPs. :) BP> BP> -bp This is a topic nea

Re: Freekmarker vs. Velocity

2008-03-24 Thread Thomas Micheline
It is already available and has FreeMarker support, though I haven't tested it yet. tom On Mar 24, 2008, at 1:37 PM, Brian Pontarelli wrote: BTW, some of the JetBrains folks said that FreeMarker support will be in 8 and should be available in EAP soon! This will definitely help move me

Re: Freekmarker vs. Velocity

2008-03-24 Thread Brian Pontarelli
BTW, some of the JetBrains folks said that FreeMarker support will be in 8 and should be available in EAP soon! This will definitely help move me farther away from JSPs. :) -bp Jeromy Evans wrote: Jonathan Revusky wrote: Thanks for the detailed argument Jonathon. Jeromy Evans wrote: Nia

Re: Freekmarker vs. Velocity

2008-03-24 Thread Jeromy Evans
Jonathan Revusky wrote: Thanks for the detailed argument Jonathon. Jeromy Evans wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: I just saw the following comment "FreeMarker is very similar to Velocity, as both are template languages that can be used outside of a Servlet container. The framework utilizes FreeM

Re: Freekmarker vs. Velocity

2008-03-23 Thread Jonathan Revusky
Jeromy Evans wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: I just saw the following comment "FreeMarker is very similar to Velocity, as both are template languages that can be used outside of a Servlet container. The framework utilizes FreeMarker because FreeMarker has better error reporting. However, both are

Re: Freekmarker vs. Velocity

2008-03-22 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Jeromy Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > I just saw the following comment > > > > "FreeMarker is very similar to Velocity, as both are template > > languages that can be used outside of a Servlet container. The > > framework utilizes

Re: Freekmarker vs. Velocity

2008-03-20 Thread Jeromy Evans
Niall Pemberton wrote: I just saw the following comment "FreeMarker is very similar to Velocity, as both are template languages that can be used outside of a Servlet container. The framework utilizes FreeMarker because FreeMarker has better error reporting. However, both are good alternatives to

Freekmarker vs. Velocity

2008-03-20 Thread Niall Pemberton
I just saw the following comment "FreeMarker is very similar to Velocity, as both are template languages that can be used outside of a Servlet container. The framework utilizes FreeMarker because FreeMarker has better error reporting. However, both are good alternatives to JSP." on this page: ht