Re: struts-faces problem not invoking Action class displaying blank page

2007-07-03 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 7/3/07, sadasivarao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I am using struts and JSF using struts-faces 1.3.8.jar file and using WSAD 5.1.2 My jsf page is like this As soon as I click on submit button blank page displaying.

Re: struts-faces integration problem with existing struts based application?

2007-05-24 Thread Laurie Harper
Please post questions about using Struts to the Struts Users list only. The Struts Dev list is for discussing the development and enhancement of Struts itself. http://struts.apache.org/mail.html vijendra wrote: I am trying to integrate struts-faces in my previous struts based application. i a

Re: struts-faces integration problem with existing struts based application?

2007-05-21 Thread vijendra
I am trying to integrate struts-faces in my previous struts based application. i am unable to get required results. the libraries i am using are:-(mainly) commons-beanutils-1.7.0, commons-chain-1.1, commons-digester-1.8, commons-lang-2.3, struts-faces-1.3.8, tomahawk-1.1.5, log4j-1.2.8, myfaces-ap

Re: [Struts-Faces] commandLink obsolete ?

2006-10-28 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
The bug is still in the RI (1.1._02) so s:commandLink is not obsolate. the "bug" in s:commandLink is, that it is not working w/ Trinidad http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2966 -M On 10/28/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/28/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Struts-Faces] commandLink obsolete ?

2006-10-28 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 10/28/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: the bug, so can sb apply the patch ? On 10/28/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wow, it is still there :) What patch? If it's something in the Struts JIRA, add a comment to the issue. -- Wendy ---

Re: [Struts-Faces] possible Bug in FormRenderer

2006-10-28 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
> a) is this the right place to ask questions on Struts-Faces, or where ? It's the right place for dev type questions ... the Struts User list for user type questions :-). :) I was more concerned about "Faces stuff" in Struts-dev ;) Not sure if that lib will be maintained. ;) In other words

Re: [Struts-Faces] possible Bug in FormRenderer

2006-10-28 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 10/26/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey, two things. a) is this the right place to ask questions on Struts-Faces, or where ? It's the right place for dev type questions ... the Struts User list for user type questions :-). if so b) the demos of struts faces show a

Re: [Struts-Faces] commandLink obsolete ?

2006-10-28 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
the bug, so can sb apply the patch ? On 10/28/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: wow, it is still there :) On 10/27/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > commandLink was create in 2004, b/c of a RI bug. > I guess (or assume) that it has been fixed there. > wor

Re: [Struts-Faces] commandLink obsolete ?

2006-10-28 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
wow, it is still there :) On 10/27/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: commandLink was create in 2004, b/c of a RI bug. I guess (or assume) that it has been fixed there. works fine w/ MyFaces. however inside trinidad/adf the commandLink will not work ... -M -- Matthias Wessen

Re: Struts-Faces: Is this a bug?

2006-05-11 Thread A. Alonso Dominguez
A created a new issue about this bug: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2873 2006/5/11, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 5/9/06, A. Alonso Dominguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi there! > > I'm trying to use the new struts-action framework, version 1.3.3 with > tiles > and

Re: Struts-Faces: Is this a bug?

2006-05-10 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 5/9/06, A. Alonso Dominguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi there! I'm trying to use the new struts-action framework, version 1.3.3 with tiles and faces. I'm following the example applications but I found possibly a bug when rendering a struts-based FormBean. The jsp code that I was using is

Re: Struts Faces - what to do?

2006-04-14 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 4/14/06, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Isn't the rule that this should have [faces] or something like that in the > subject matter? It is a convention, not a rule. And it is more for the user list than the dev list -- people subscribed here are presumed to have a clue :-). Craig

Re: Struts Faces - what to do?

2006-04-14 Thread Dakota Jack
Isn't the rule that this should have [faces] or something like that in the subject matter? On 4/13/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Perhaps Craig can shed some light on this, but are we going to > continue to support the struts-faces project? If so, can someone > please fix the f

Re: Struts Faces - what to do?

2006-04-13 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 4/13/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, I believe things have settled down. Although I'm still working > changes in the struts-scripting webapp. > > The error I was getting when deploying the faces-example1 app was: > javax.faces.FacesException: Undefined component type > or

Re: Struts Faces - what to do?

2006-04-13 Thread James Mitchell
Yes, I believe things have settled down. Although I'm still working changes in the struts-scripting webapp. The error I was getting when deploying the faces-example1 app was: javax.faces.FacesException: Undefined component type org.apache.struts.faces.Html I was under the assumption that t

Re: Struts Faces - what to do?

2006-04-13 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 4/13/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Perhaps Craig can shed some light on this, but are we going to > continue to support the struts-faces project? We should. There will be people who want to have a few JSF components on a few pages (or they want to migrate) -- and using thi

Re: Common build file issues (was Re: struts-faces won't compile)

2005-08-14 Thread James Mitchell
ing / Freelance EdgeTech, Inc. http://www.edgetechservices.net/ 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 8:27 AM Subject: Common bu

Re: Common build file issues (was Re: struts-faces won't compile)

2005-08-14 Thread James Mitchell
ing / Freelance EdgeTech, Inc. http://www.edgetechservices.net/ 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 8:27 AM Subject: Common bu

Common build file issues (was Re: struts-faces won't compile)

2005-08-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
Wendy wrote: But there are things in the common build file that are *not* common to all subprojects. We needs a way to make sure that core/taglib/el/apps/plugins are all using the same versions of their dependencies, without imposing those dependencies on 'standalone' subprojects. How about:

Re: struts-faces won't compile

2005-08-11 Thread Wendy Smoak
From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +import org.apache.struts.util.ModuleUtils; -RequestUtils.selectModule(request, servletContext); +ModuleUtils.getInstance().selectModule(request,servletContext); Conceptually that fix makes sense in that it solves the compilation problem ... but I

Re: struts-faces won't compile

2005-08-11 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 8/11/05, Michael Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Craig, > I know this issue came up about a year ago that struts-faces > wouldn't compile against the latest version of Struts (I think it was > a validator issue). It makes sense to me that it should always work > with the latest version

Re: struts-faces won't compile

2005-08-11 Thread Michael Rasmussen
Craig, I know this issue came up about a year ago that struts-faces wouldn't compile against the latest version of Struts (I think it was a validator issue). It makes sense to me that it should always work with the latest version of Struts. I think it would serve the project well to cut a *.0 r

Re: Struts-Faces build (was Re: Vote: ANT or Maven ... )

2005-08-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Craig wrote: There was talk on some thread or another ... hmm, I seem to remember a certain advocate for a compromise position :-) ... that you could have it both ways by simply generating a build.xml file from Maven. I advocated for both... but not

Re: Struts-Faces build (was Re: Vote: ANT or Maven ... )

2005-08-08 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 8/8/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Still builds with Ant? That's the key for the nightlies. > > Did it ever NOT build with Ant? This whole thing started because Faces > wouldn't build for me with Maven. (And how did it get on

Re: struts-faces won't compile

2005-08-08 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 8/8/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Maybe the Maven mavens can figure out a way to share the build > > infrastructure without sharing the dependency information? > > Not a problem... just change the dependency in project.xml. Loo

Re: struts-faces won't compile

2005-08-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Maybe the Maven mavens can figure out a way to share the build infrastructure without sharing the dependency information? Not a problem... just change the dependency in project.xml. Looks like it needs at least 1.2.2 to compile. (It won't compile

Re: struts-faces won't compile

2005-08-08 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 8/8/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Faces is using a formerly deprecated, and now removed, method in > RequestUtils. This breaks the Maven build, which works against > struts-core-1.3.0-dev. > > Is this the correct fix? > Conceptually that fix makes sense in that it solves the c

RE: [struts-faces] JSF integration into Struts

2004-12-24 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
> already shown, for example, that you can use Tiles and > Commons Validator directly with JSF (without using the Struts > controller architecture) -- and these are capabilities I > already know how to integrate into Shale. Servlet Filters Nice to hear! Is a thing, that will be *public* nex

Re: [struts-faces] JSF integration into Struts

2004-12-24 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 22:24:28 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think, Don, that this "integration" is a bit smoke and mirrors > Really what the integration is, if I understand it right, is just a > switch to use either JSF or Struts. They really cannot work together > because JSF h

Re: [struts-faces] JSF integration into Struts

2004-12-23 Thread Dakota Jack
I think, Don, that this "integration" is a bit smoke and mirrors. Really what the integration is, if I understand it right, is just a switch to use either JSF or Struts. They really cannot work together because JSF has a page based controller which is inconsistent with everything Struts as we kno

Re: [struts-faces] JSF integration into Struts

2004-12-23 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 18:04:18 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Craig McClanahan wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 12:31:19 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>If that is correct, would it be possible to implement JSF within Struts > >>chain? Could a JSF implementation be de

Re: [struts-faces] JSF integration into Struts

2004-12-23 Thread Don Brown
Craig McClanahan wrote: On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 12:31:19 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If that is correct, would it be possible to implement JSF within Struts chain? Could a JSF implementation be decomposed into chain commands, and therefore allow the user to mix and match? You'd have

Re: [struts-faces] JSF integration into Struts

2004-12-23 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 12:31:19 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pardon the ignorance, but as I understand it, the struts-faces > integration library allows Struts components to be executed within the > JSF framework. JSF handles the request, then using special adapters, > actions are ex

Re: struts-faces bug

2004-10-29 Thread Craig McClanahan
Yah, that's definitely broken. Could you please submit a bug report to our issue tracking system? http://cvs.apache.org/bugzilla/ As to the intent, this wrapper was proposed by the MyFaces folks -- it's not needed for the library to work with the JSF RI ... maybe one of those guys can comment on

Re: struts-faces maven build

2004-10-15 Thread Craig McClanahan
Just starting to play with the proposed patch now, but to answer your question ... On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 07:17:35 -0700, Ben Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One other thing - I finally got example1 working, but I had to add > validator-rules.xml, which was absent. This needs to be there, cor

Re: struts-faces maven build

2004-10-15 Thread Ben Anderson
> > One issue is that no jsf artifacts exist on ibiblio. It turns out they are already on bluesunrise (You'll set this in the project.properties) > That file actually gets generated as part of the build (along with the > documentation file describing the tag library. In a binary > distribution, y

Re: struts-faces maven build

2004-10-14 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:36:59 -0700, Ben Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > In the spirit of converting struts to maven as well as my desire to begin using > (or testing, or whatever point it's at) struts-faces. I've created the > necessary maven files to > 1) create struts-faces.jar > 2)

Re: struts-faces binary?

2004-10-08 Thread Niall Pemberton
There are nightly builds here: http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts-faces/ Niall - Original Message - From: "Ben Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 4:35 PM Subject: struts-faces binary? > Hi, > Debated about wheth

Re: [Struts-Faces] wrapping a HttpServletRequest

2004-07-08 Thread Craig McClanahan
Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Craig, i tried the struts-faces-example with myfaces and RI (worked out of the box) this happens with myfaces: i clicked LINK "editRegistration.do?action=Create" and become IllegalArgumentException: could not find pathMapping for servletPath = /editRegistration.do request

RE: [Struts-Faces] wrapping a HttpServletRequest

2004-07-08 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
th myfaces and of course RI so perhaps you have other hints on that? Matthias > -Original Message- > From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 3:27 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: R

Re: [Struts-Faces] wrapping a HttpServletRequest

2004-07-07 Thread Craig McClanahan
Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi, i tried the faces-struts-lib with RI. It works. Matthias, Could you please explain in more detail exactly what appears to you to be a bug in the struts-faces library that requires this wrapper, and also what unspecified behavior in the RI is being relied on? Thi

RE: Struts-faces

2004-07-07 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
anahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 2:07 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Struts-faces > > > Matthias Weßendorf wrote: > > >see http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts-faces/ > > > >the night

Re: Struts-faces

2004-07-06 Thread Craig McClanahan
Matthias Weßendorf wrote: see http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts-faces/ the nightly build is empty again, so is there a logfile, where i can check, why it is not build successful? The 20040706 build was successful. http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/strut

Re: Struts-faces

2004-07-06 Thread Ted Husted
For 1.3.x, I'd like to reorganize the source tree so that it follows the Maven best practices. I agree that we should still provide Ant build files too, so that Maven it not required. I think a good portion of the Committers and other developers would (and do) build Struts with Maven locally, s

RE: Struts-faces

2004-07-06 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
> But I'm -1 on including MyFaces in any Struts distribution > until it has > passed the TCK tests to certify that it is a compatible > implementation > of JavaServer Faces. Assistance in making that happen is one of the > benefits you'll get by becoming an Apache project (once > MyFaces pas

Re: Struts-faces

2004-07-05 Thread Craig McClanahan
Matthias Wessendorf wrote: In principle, this makes perfect sense. It'll be easy if you've split the MyFaces jars into api and impl classes (like the RI does), because then it's just a matter of setting up your own build.properties file and defining "jsf-api.jar" and "jsf-impl.jar" appropria

RE: Struts-faces

2004-07-05 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
> In principle, this makes perfect sense. It'll be easy if > you've split > the MyFaces jars into api and impl classes (like the RI > does), because > then it's just a matter of setting up your own > build.properties file and > defining "jsf-api.jar" and "jsf-impl.jar" appropriately. no, no

Re: Struts-faces

2004-07-05 Thread Craig McClanahan
Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Michael, I looked and maven is pulling servlet 2.2. I would assume that faces is using that same servlet.jar. I just rebuilt faces against 2.3 and the problems seem to have gone away. I haven't tried 2.4, but it seems that it should work fine there. It is my gu

RE: Struts-faces

2004-07-05 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Michael, > I looked and maven is pulling servlet 2.2. I would assume > that faces is using that same servlet.jar. I just rebuilt > faces against 2.3 and the problems seem to have gone away. I > haven't tried 2.4, but it seems that it should work fine > there. It is my guess after trying t

Re: Struts-faces

2004-07-05 Thread Craig McClanahan
Craig McClanahan wrote: Note: my nightly build scripts use Ant, not Maven ... and I'm in the process of cleaning that up. I should clarify what I really meant to say :-). I'm cleaning up my Ant-based build scripts to be more explicit about which versions of dependent projects I use in the nightl

Re: Struts-faces

2004-07-05 Thread Craig McClanahan
Michael Rassmussen wrote: I looked and maven is pulling servlet 2.2. I would assume that faces is using that same servlet.jar. I just rebuilt faces against 2.3 and the problems seem to have gone away. I haven't tried 2.4, but it seems that it should work fine there. It is my guess after trying

Re: Struts-faces

2004-07-05 Thread Michael Rassmussen
I looked and maven is pulling servlet 2.2. I would assume that faces is using that same servlet.jar. I just rebuilt faces against 2.3 and the problems seem to have gone away. I haven't tried 2.4, but it seems that it should work fine there. It is my guess after trying to build struts-faces in e

Re: Struts-faces

2004-07-05 Thread Michael Rassmussen
atthias > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 7:03 PM > > To: Struts Developers List > > Subject: RE: Struts-faces > > > > > > I believe that Michael Ra

Re: Struts-faces

2004-07-05 Thread Craig McClanahan
Ted Husted wrote: I imagine Craig has Struts-Faces compiling against 2.4 to make sure it stays in synch with Tomcat 5. It is indeed, but that's actually a mistake. It needs to compile against the 2.3 version, since that's what JSF specifies as a minimum platform. I'll fix that in tonight's

RE: Struts-faces

2004-07-05 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
) :-) regards, Matthias > -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 7:03 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: RE: Struts-faces > > > I believe that Michael Rasmussen submitted a patch so that > Struts Fac

RE: Struts-faces

2004-07-05 Thread Ted Husted
is a known issue) > FormComponent.java has a problem with method > "createDynaActionFormClass()" of class "DynaActionFormClass" > > Matthias > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Monday, J

RE: Struts-faces

2004-07-05 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
is a known issue) FormComponent.java has a problem with method "createDynaActionFormClass()" of class "DynaActionFormClass" Matthias > -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 5:17 PM > To: Struts Develo

RE: Struts-faces

2004-07-05 Thread Ted Husted
I imagine Craig has Struts-Faces compiling against 2.4 to make sure it stays in synch with Tomcat 5. But, the question is whether we want to mandate that Struts-Faces can only compile against 2.3 (and not 2.4)? Or vice-versa. Or is there a way to write the class so it compiles under either? I

RE: Struts-faces

2004-07-05 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
James, i also guess it is the result of the commitment. i submitted (first) a wrapper, that builds against 2.4 reason is, the build-porperties had *default* to 2.4 okay ted asks for a 2.3-wrapper, so i created that candidate. i think the wrapper should compile agains 2.3 since jsf is able to run

RE: Struts-faces

2004-07-05 Thread James Holmes
I think it is happening because of the changes I committed for your fix for MyFaces. If you look at when the builds stopped, it's right after I made the commits on 6/29. It must be an issue of what version of servlet.jar that the HttpServletRequestWrapper class is being compiled against. Is it n

RE: [Struts-Faces] wrapping a HttpServletRequest

2004-06-29 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
, June 29, 2004 3:29 PM > To: 'Struts Developers List' > Subject: RE: [Struts-Faces] wrapping a HttpServletRequest > > > Matthias, > > Did you see Ted's note attached to your Bugzilla ticket for > Struts-Faces? He wants the code to work with the prev

RE: [Struts-Faces] wrapping a HttpServletRequest

2004-06-29 Thread James Holmes
x27;Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: [Struts-Faces] wrapping a HttpServletRequest One i missed to mention, this *solution* is not bound to MyFaces, it works also with the RI shipped by Sun... :-) Cheers, > -Original Message- > From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [Struts-Faces] wrapping a HttpServletRequest

2004-06-25 Thread James Holmes
List' Subject: RE: [Struts-Faces] wrapping a HttpServletRequest One i missed to mention, this *solution* is not bound to MyFaces, it works also with the RI shipped by Sun... :-) Cheers, > -Original Message- > From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thur

RE: [Struts-Faces] wrapping a HttpServletRequest

2004-06-25 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
One i missed to mention, this *solution* is not bound to MyFaces, it works also with the RI shipped by Sun... :-) Cheers, > -Original Message- > From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 7:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subje

RE: Struts-faces examples work for me

2004-06-17 Thread Michael Rasmussen
elopers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Struts-faces examples work for me Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:02:21 -0400 I believe the duplicate component-id is still occurring even without the tags in the JSPs. -James

RE: Struts-faces examples work for me

2004-06-17 Thread James Holmes
I believe the duplicate component-id is still occurring even without the tags in the JSPs. -James -Original Message- From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 11:57 AM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: Struts-faces examples w

RE: Struts-faces examples work for me

2004-06-17 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
James, what's up with your duplicated component-id? mine are still there, since i didn't touch the samples... ;-) Cheers, > -Original Message- > From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 6:54 PM > To: 'Struts Developers

RE: Struts-faces examples work for me

2004-06-17 Thread James Holmes
Yep, you are experiencing exactly what I experienced yesterday. Basically the problem with the base tag (from what I can tell) is that it is rendering an invalid value. I'm not sure where it gets its value from. If you look at the code in the BaseRenderer class it should only be outputting the "

RE: struts-faces (commons-validator.jar)

2004-06-17 Thread James Holmes
7:03 AM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: struts-faces (commons-validator.jar) James, okay. i read the thread and thought i should be build against 1.2 ... but i guess i missed something ... your feelings are right, both work... btw. the example is wrong registrationForm

RE: struts-faces (commons-validator.jar)

2004-06-17 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
4 1:13 PM > To: 'Struts Developers List' > Subject: RE: struts-faces (commons-validator.jar) > > > The reason is because Struts-Faces is currently built against > Struts 1.1 which uses validation 1.0.2. There was some > discussion last week about whether or not Str

RE: struts-faces (commons-validator.jar)

2004-06-17 Thread James Holmes
The reason is because Struts-Faces is currently built against Struts 1.1 which uses validation 1.0.2. There was some discussion last week about whether or not Struts-Faces should be built against the latest version of Struts (CVS head) or Struts 1.1. My feeling is that it should work with both.

RE: struts-faces nightlies

2004-06-16 Thread Michael Rasmussen
into this further this evening. Michael -Original Message- From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 5:18 PM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: struts-faces nightlies What browser are you testing under? In IE the base tag seems to

RE: struts-faces nightlies

2004-06-16 Thread James Holmes
base href. I am looking into this and hope to fix it soon. If you have any more info please let me know. -James -Original Message- From: Michael Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: struts-faces nightlies Actually the

RE: struts-faces nightlies

2004-06-15 Thread Michael Rasmussen
t that the FacesRequestProcessor was supposed to route all navigation requests back to struts? Michael From: "James Holmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROT

RE: struts-faces nightlies

2004-06-15 Thread James Holmes
What error are you seeing? I was away for the weekend, but am ready now to pickup with this stuff and get any issues ironed out. -James -Original Message- From: Michael Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 6:33 PM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: struts

RE: Struts-faces works on jsf 1.1

2004-06-10 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
what a question ... ;-) > -Original Message- > From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 11:04 PM > To: 'Struts Developers List' > Subject: RE: Struts-faces works on jsf 1.1 > > > right, > > i tested th

RE: Struts-faces works on jsf 1.1

2004-06-10 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
right, i tested the same. by compiling it via 1.1 of jsf and used it in an sample-application (mine was Struts 1.1) is this message based on the CVS (aka Struts 1.2.X) ? Cheers, > -Original Message- > From: Michael Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 3:0

RE: struts faces compiles on jsf 1.1

2004-06-10 Thread Michael Rasmussen
sly not generate compile time errors as it is not strongly typed. So it could be the problem. Michael From: "James Holmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTE

RE: struts faces compiles on jsf 1.1

2004-06-10 Thread Michael Rasmussen
is a struts tag isn't it? Not a jsf tag? I will give it a try and see next week. I will be out of town this weekend so... From: "James Holmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Developers

RE: struts faces compiles on jsf 1.1

2004-06-09 Thread James Holmes
Thanks for the heads up. I was going to test that out tonight. Have you experienced any problems with the sample applications like those mentioned in this posting: http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=427&thread=500294 I am seeing the same problems that are posted in the forum. I'm plann

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

2004-06-09 Thread Ted Husted
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 08:59:38 -0500, Joe Germuska wrote: > Someone needs to apply the patches to the VALIDATOR_1_1_2_BRANCH. > I'm not sure if Ted still has time to spend or not. I've got some time scheduled to work on this Thursday night, or, if this isn't done, setting up my credentials to sign

Re: struts-faces - which version of Struts

2004-06-09 Thread Niall Pemberton
: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 2:55 PM Subject: RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts > The issue with the validator that prevents the struts-faces code from > working with Struts 1.1 and CVS head is the removal of .ValidatorUtil > and the creation of .util.ValidatorUtils. S

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

2004-06-09 Thread Joe Germuska
At 9:55 AM -0400 6/9/04, James Holmes wrote: The issue with the validator that prevents the struts-faces code from working with Struts 1.1 and CVS head is the removal of .ValidatorUtil and the creation of .util.ValidatorUtils. Struts 1.1 use ValidatorUtil and the CVS head uses util.Validat

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

2004-06-09 Thread James Holmes
to replace the ValidatorUtil class and just make it deprecated. I believe it was that way for some time. -James -Original Message- From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 8:35 AM To: Struts Developers List Subject: RE: struts-faces - which version of

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

2004-06-09 Thread Joe Germuska
At 11:00 PM -0400 6/8/04, James Holmes wrote: Good question. Depending on how long you've been paying attention to Struts and the dev list in particular, you may know that things tend to move pretty slow in the Struts development/release cycle world. Mostly this is because the committers (I'm ver

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

2004-06-09 Thread Michael Rasmussen
gt; To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 08:50:32 -0400 I'm not using Struts Faces in production, but that shouldn't matter. The point is that 99% of Struts users don't us

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

2004-06-09 Thread James Holmes
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 11:20 PM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts James, Maybe some feedback should be collected from the users list. Are you using Struts-faces in production now? If so what version of Stru

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

2004-06-08 Thread Michael Rasmussen
From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 11:00 PM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts Good question. Depending on how long you've been paying attention to Struts and the dev list in particular, you may k

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

2004-06-08 Thread Michael Rasmussen
--- From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 11:21 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: struts-faces - which version of Struts I thought the change I made to FormComponent and DynaActionFormClass means that the backward compatibility issue should have n

Re: struts-faces - which version of Struts

2004-06-08 Thread Niall Pemberton
IL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 3:50 AM Subject: RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts > Fair enough. What type of branch would you suggest implementing? The only > place I know of that a change HAS to break the build is in > FormComponent.java. The others can

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

2004-06-08 Thread James Holmes
S head. -James -Original Message- From: Michael Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 9:51 PM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts Fair enough. What type of branch would you suggest implementing? The only plac

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

2004-06-08 Thread Michael Rasmussen
- From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:49 PM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts Agreed, that will probably fix the nightly build issue, but I don't want to leave Struts 1.1 users out in the dar

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

2004-06-08 Thread James Holmes
g. -James -Original Message- From: Michael Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 9:38 PM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts This is from the faces build file. Why making changes to faces that reflect 1.2 will

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

2004-06-08 Thread Michael Rasmussen
: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts Well I think they will only fail if the dependency is on struts 1.1. If it moves to the 1.2 jar it will build won't it? -Original Message- From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

2004-06-08 Thread Michael Rasmussen
Well I think they will only fail if the dependency is on struts 1.1. If it moves to the 1.2 jar it will build won't it? -Original Message- From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:36 PM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: RE: strut

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

2004-06-08 Thread James Holmes
I don't disagree that struts-faces should stay up to date with the latest code. Right now, however, if we do that, the nightly builds for struts-faces will continue to be broken. That is a bad thing. I think we need to discuss a more formal strategy for what should happen with struts-faces. Str

RE: struts-faces target which v of struts

2004-06-02 Thread Joe Germuska
Since there are no existing struts-faces users, I don't think we should make our lives difficult or boring :^) I should clarify "since there are no existing users of a released version of struts-faces..." Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blog.germuska.com "In fact,

RE: struts-faces target which v of struts

2004-06-02 Thread Joe Germuska
I see no reason why struts-faces shouldn't track the development of Struts. It should always build against CVS HEAD and the same dependencies. Maybe at some point in the future we'd need a "maintenance" branch of struts-faces, but I don't think enough people use it yet for us to get hung up o

RE: struts-faces target which v of struts

2004-06-02 Thread Michael Rasmussen
I am wondering if the reason that this post has not been answered is because nobody really knows the answer. Is that the case? is there no "roadmap" for struts faces? I can't seem to find one anywhere. I think you assign too much formality to struts-faces. Craig is super busy, and he is the

RE: struts-faces target which v of struts

2004-06-02 Thread Joe Germuska
At 2:16 PM + 6/2/04, Michael Rasmussen wrote: I am wondering if the reason that this post has not been answered is because nobody really knows the answer. Is that the case? is there no "roadmap" for struts faces? I can't seem to find one anywhere. I think you assign too much formality to

  1   2   >