Alpha and beta releases on ibiblio (for maven purposes) works for me.
Final releases on the ASF mirror network.
Sean
On 3/28/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/27/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/26/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
On 3/27/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/26/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It was implicitly evident on the dev list, but not announced on the user
> > list because that was my understanding of non-GA releases at the time.
> > Subsequently, I believe we det
On 3/26/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It was implicitly evident on the dev list, but not announced on the user
> list because that was my understanding of non-GA releases at the time.
> Subsequently, I believe we determined that we'd announce the vote results
> for any quality
>From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On 3/27/06, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> > On 3/27/06, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry for the late vote - my vote is for "alpha" quality as well, mainly
> > > for
> > > the same "standalone tiles is not released" reason cited by others,
On 3/27/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/27/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry for the late vote - my vote is for "alpha" quality as well, mainly
> > for
> > the same "standalone tiles is not released" reason cited by others, but
> > also
> > because
On 3/27/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry for the late vote - my vote is for "alpha" quality as well, mainly
> for
> the same "standalone tiles is not released" reason cited by others, but
> also
> because of the way Commons Validator has been implemented. It appears that
> t
Sorry for the late vote - my vote is for "alpha" quality as well, mainly for
the same "standalone tiles is not released" reason cited by others, but also
because of the way Commons Validator has been implemented. It appears that
the implementation was done based on an old version of validator where
On 3/26/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The vote results are as follows:
>
> Binding PMC Member votes:
>Wendy Smoak - Alpha
>Gary VanMatre - Alpha
>Craig McClanahan - Alpha
>
> Non-binding:
>Sean Schofield - Alpha
>
> Therefore, Shale 1.0.2 is designated as "Alpha" qu
The vote results are as follows:
Binding PMC Member votes:
Wendy Smoak - Alpha
Gary VanMatre - Alpha
Craig McClanahan - Alpha
Non-binding:
Sean Schofield - Alpha
Therefore, Shale 1.0.2 is designated as "Alpha" quality.
Craig, as far as I can tell, there was never an announcement for
On 3/22/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After correcting packaging problems with the Shale 1.0.1 test build,
> and following the release plan which is available on the Wiki,
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102
>
> the Struts Shale v1.0.2 test build has been completed
+1 (non binding) for Alpha
On 3/23/06, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for Alpha as well. Outside of the one known issue with the sql-browser
> application, it looks good. Nice work Wendy.
>
> Gary
>
> -- Original message --
> From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PRO
+1 for Alpha as well. Outside of the one known issue with the sql-browser
application, it looks good. Nice work Wendy.
Gary
-- Original message --
From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> After correcting packaging problems with the Shale 1.0.1 test build,
> and fo
After correcting packaging problems with the Shale 1.0.1 test build,
and following the release plan which is available on the Wiki,
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102
the Struts Shale v1.0.2 test build has been completed and deployed to
http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0
13 matches
Mail list logo
