Greetings comrades,
reading [0] got me into thinking, if we need some plain new
terminology to make suckless more usable for the press. Suck-
less by now is just a repository of tools or a philosophy.
This does not sell. Instead a whole environment could be pro-
moted, which is usable across
The very use of the phrase Desktop Environment betrays your
low-lying commitment to the capitalist patriarchal conspiracy to
restrict social mobility of non-institutional entity-computer
interfaces. Your attempt to sidetrack philosophical advances by
creating a cult of information around your
Can I vote this best of?
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
The very use of the phrase Desktop Environment betrays your
low-lying commitment to the capitalist patriarchal conspiracy to
restrict social mobility of non-institutional entity-computer
On 7 November 2011 20:21, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote:
Greetings comrades,
reading [0] got me into thinking, if we need some plain new
terminology to make suckless more usable for the press. Suck-
less by now is just a repository of tools or a philosophy.
This does not sell.
Somebody claiming to be Christoph Lohmann wrote:
Greetings comrades,
reading [0] got me into thinking, if we need some plain new
terminology to make suckless more usable for the press. Suck-
less by now is just a repository of tools or a philosophy.
This does not sell. Instead a whole
* Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net [2011-11-07 20:23]:
terminology to make suckless more usable for the press. [...] Instead
a whole environment could be promoted, which is usable across
platforms.
Why?
Promote to whom?
What is your final goal: to educate the masses in order to get better
Another remark:
On 7 November 2011 20:21, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote:
reading [0] got me into thinking, if we need some plain new
terminology to make suckless more usable for the press. Suck-
less by now is just a repository of tools or a philosophy.
This does not sell. Instead a
On 7 November 2011 15:13, Sean Howard sil...@callysto.com wrote:
The idea would be to first have an identity, the »Suckless
Desktop«, which needs a logo, some texts and then links to
the various parts of suckless. This would be the entrypoint
for new users, where they can decide, what to
Greetings.
I am just answering Anselm, but try to answer the open questions
of the other postings too.
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
Another remark:
On 7 November 2011 20:21, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote:
reading [0] got me into thinking, if we need some plain new
terminology to make
On 7 November 2011 21:34, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote:
It is not about adding something real. Suckless should stay as-is,
but clarify (as done in this thread) its ideals – as you try to, too.
Such rules then can be used to define what »suckless« really is.
But the question is, if
On 11/07/11 at 09:34pm, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
But yes, the users we want in suckless should be sophisticated
enough to find this out on their own. We are taking the subset of
users from the Ubuntu[0]-educated crowd and filter them for the
real suckless users, that could spread our ideas. If
While I agree that a collection of suckless tools under one roof
wouldbe pretty awesome (especially something like sta.li or witch
linux), I'mnot sure that marketing as a desktop environment is the
right thing to do.
I'm part of a small project called tudor[0] that aims to replicate a
DE
(I apologize for my MUA failing as hard as it does...)
Suckless should stay as-is,
but clarify (as done in this thread) its ideals – as you try to, too.
Such rules then can be used to define what »suckless« really is.
To suck less is about subjectivity. It's a matter of taste.
Suckless.org is about software tools available for everybody.
Not about
Dibs on writing the keyboard vs mouse for porn viewing documentation.
We could sneak it in as an extra man page with DWM. man porn
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net wrote:
Of course we have huge disparities and holy fights, like how
to edit text or if it is more
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Justin Pogue pogue.jus...@gmail.com wrote:
man porn
All pornography is male-oriented and oppressive.
--
# Kurt H Maier
I'm in favor of this man porn.
On Nov 7, 2011 5:12 PM, Justin Pogue pogue.jus...@gmail.com wrote:
Dibs on writing the keyboard vs mouse for porn viewing documentation.
We could sneak it in as an extra man page with DWM. man porn
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Christoph Lohmann 2...@r-36.net
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim jfs.wo...@gmail.com
wrote:
hm. I see. So your argument was to disown wmii, because this *specific*
configuration - and NOT wmii itself - requires ruby. Alright.
No, I
On Thu 03 Nov 2011 09:57:19 AM PDT, Kurt H Maier wrote:
There is nothing suckless about any aspect of modern wmii
I thought Suckless folks were enthusiastic about Plan9 technologies;
has this changed? If so, why?
And how is modern wmii different from its, let's say, pre-modern
phase? From my
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:28:59 -0800
Suraj N. Kurapati sun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu 03 Nov 2011 09:57:19 AM PDT, Kurt H Maier wrote:
There is nothing suckless about any aspect of modern wmii
I thought Suckless folks were enthusiastic about Plan9 technologies;
has this changed? If so, why?
And
20 matches
Mail list logo
