Hi
On 10/07/12 12:15, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Sergey Beryozkinsberyoz...@gmail.com
wrote:
As far as CXF is concerned, I'm biased but I also believe getting Tika
server supporting CXF was the right decision. CXF, like JAX-RS, is only
going to become better,
Hi All,
On 01/07/12 17:27, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hey Jukka,
On Jul 1, 2012, at 5:09 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
I looked at tika-server in a bit more detail, and I'm a bit concerned
about the dependency overhead it needs for the JAX-RS support:
+-
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as CXF is concerned, I'm biased but I also believe getting Tika
server supporting CXF was the right decision. CXF, like JAX-RS, is only
going to become better, with things like the good support for
Hi,
I looked at tika-server in a bit more detail, and I'm a bit concerned
about the dependency overhead it needs for the JAX-RS support:
+- org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-frontend-jaxrs:jar:2.5.2
+- org.apache.cxf:cxf-common-utilities:jar:2.5.2
| +-
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
On Jul 1, 2012, at 5:09 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Sergey Beryozkin (who I'm CC'ing on this email since I'm not sure
he's subscribed to dev@) helped by providing guidance on the CXF
side while I
Hey Jukka,
On Jul 1, 2012, at 12:01 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
On Jul 1, 2012, at 5:09 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Sergey Beryozkin (who I'm CC'ing on this email since I'm not sure
he's
On Sun, 1 Jul 2012, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
I also plan to spin a 1.2 release candidate at some point in the next
week or so. I realize the metadata stuff isn't done yet, but it's better
to simply release early and often, and then when stuff is ready it can
be included. Releasing is a
Hey Nick,
On Jul 1, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jul 2012, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
I also plan to spin a 1.2 release candidate at some point in the next week
or so. I realize the metadata stuff isn't done yet, but it's better to
simply release early and often, and
Is there any consensus on TIKA-930 [1]? I don't want to wipe out properties
that others feel are critical or include non-ratified standards if that's
outside of policy.
If there's no objection to what's outlined in that issue I can commit those
changes tomorrow morning (GMT -4).
Regards,
Hi Ray,
I'd say what you proposed is fine by me. Doesn't seem to have generated
objections so please move forward.
Cheers,
Chris
On Jul 1, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Ray Gauss II wrote:
Is there any consensus on TIKA-930 [1]? I don't want to wipe out properties
that others feel are critical or
10 matches
Mail list logo
