Hi,
It's a few months since 0.9 and our Tika in Action book is soon ready
for print, so I think it's good time to start planning for the 1.0
release.
There are a few odds and ends that I'd still like to sort out in the
trunk, but overall I think we're in a pretty much ready for the switch
from 0.
On Fri, 20 May 2011, Jukka Zitting wrote:
There are a few odds and ends that I'd still like to sort out in the
trunk, but overall I think we're in a pretty much ready for the switch
from 0.x to 1.x.
I'd like to get an updated POI release in first, along with the few
patches that are waiting f
Hi Jukka,
A 1.0 release sounds like a great idea.
On my list of things I'd like to straighten out by then:
1. There are still a number of HTML parser issues that I'd like to resolve
first.
Many of these are assigned to me :) Hoping to have some free time after
mid-June.
2. I've got vague con
Hey Jukka et al.,
> It's a few months since 0.9 and our Tika in Action book is soon ready
> for print, so I think it's good time to start planning for the 1.0
> release.
Looking forward to not writing anything for a while :-) I doubt it'll happen
knowing how things go, but also really really hap
Hi
It's a few months since 0.9 and our Tika in Action book is soon ready
> for print, so I think it's good time to start planning for the 1.0
> release.
>
> There are a few odds and ends that I'd still like to sort out in the
> trunk, but overall I think we're in a pretty much ready for the switch
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback! It sounds like we should be good to go for
the 1.0 release in about a month from now.
The release doesn't need to be perfect as we can always do 1.1 and
other releases after that, so I wouldn't put any single issue as a
blocker. On the other hand this will probably be
Hi Jukka, looking forward to working on this with you and Sally...
Cheers,
Chris
On May 23, 2011, at 3:45 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the feedback! It sounds like we should be good to go for
> the 1.0 release in about a month from now.
>
> The release doesn't need to be perfe
Hi Chris,
I think your plan to improve the netCDF and HDF parsing is a great one. The
richness of a full ncdump of netCDF metadata and a full ncdump HDF-EOS
metadata would be an excellent addition to the 1.0 release of Tika. I have
discussed Tika to several science data user and they usually ask
Hey Steve!
Nice to see you show up on the list :-) Yep, I totally agree, I have a couple
of useful additions I'm going to create issues for and contribute back to Tika:
1. MinODL parser for ODL files themselves and also used in 2 below;
2. ParseContext properties identifying:
- groups that a
Hi Chris,
Chris, do you have a good reference for ODL files? It sounds like MinODL
parser will allow you to traverse from Group to Group Data Fields to
dimensions and the variables in an HDF-EOS file
netcdf
/Users/saulenbach/dev/tikaModisTest/MOD15A2.A2010209.h09v04.005.2010219082157.hdf
{
vari
Hey Steve,
> Chris, do you have a good reference for ODL files?
The NASA Planetary Data System (PDS) Standards Reference and Chapter 12 on ODL
is the best one I know:
http://pds.nasa.gov/tools/standards-reference.shtml
> It sounds like MinODL
> parser will allow you to traverse from Group to
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the ODL reference. I'm working through it now.
Steve
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Hey Steve,
>
>
> > Chris, do you have a good reference for ODL files?
>
> The NASA Planetary Data System (PDS) Standards
Hi,
As one of those new "1.0" users Jukka mentioned, I am busy learning Tika. To
get a better handle on all Tika does, I ran a commercial tool against
revision 1130663. It identified a few missing files in /tika-parsers. In
case it is useful for the 1.0 release plans, here is the list.
/tika-pars
13 matches
Mail list logo
