[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #479: TINKERPOP-1434 Block calls on "remote" traversal to ge...

Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/479 Unfortunately I still get the same errors. Looks like they always happen in `RemoteGraphGroovyTranslatorProcessStandardTest`. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1434) Block calls to traversal side-effects until read is complete

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15631430#comment-15631430 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1434: --- Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #471: TINKERPOP-1506: Optional/Coalesce should not allow sid...

Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/471 All tests pass with `docker/build.sh -t -n -i` VOTE +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1506) Optional/Coalesce should not allow sideEffect traversals.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15631157#comment-15631157 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1506: --- Github user spmallette commented on the issue:

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1543) Create a distinct language archetype.

Marko A. Rodriguez created TINKERPOP-1543: - Summary: Create a distinct language archetype. Key: TINKERPOP-1543 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1543 Project: TinkerPop

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-1372) ImmutablePath should not use Java recursion (call stacks are wack)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marko A. Rodriguez closed TINKERPOP-1372. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.2.4 > ImmutablePath should not use

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-1506) Optional/Coalesce should not allow sideEffect traversals.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marko A. Rodriguez closed TINKERPOP-1506. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.3.0 > Optional/Coalesce should not

[jira] [Assigned] (TINKERPOP-1506) Optional/Coalesce should not allow sideEffect traversals.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marko A. Rodriguez reassigned TINKERPOP-1506: - Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez > Optional/Coalesce should not allow

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1506) Optional/Coalesce should not allow sideEffect traversals.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15631055#comment-15631055 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1506: --- Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1506) Optional/Coalesce should not allow sideEffect traversals.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15631021#comment-15631021 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1506: --- Github user twilmes commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #471: TINKERPOP-1506: Optional/Coalesce should not allow sid...

Github user twilmes commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/471 Nice find. Looks good. VOTE: +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1542) Add Path.isEmpty() with a default implementation.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15630781#comment-15630781 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1542: --- GitHub user okram opened a pull request:

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #480: TINKERPOP-1542: Add Path.isEmpty() with a defau...

GitHub user okram opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/480 TINKERPOP-1542: Add Path.isEmpty() with a default implementation. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1542 Added `Path.isEmpty()` and `Path.head()` with default

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #479: TINKERPOP-1434 Block calls on "remote" traversa...

GitHub user spmallette opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/479 TINKERPOP-1434 Block calls on "remote" traversal to get side-effects https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1434 This prevents calls for side-effects that are not yet ready

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1434) Block calls to traversal side-effects until read is complete

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15630562#comment-15630562 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1434: --- GitHub user spmallette opened a pull request:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #473: TINKERPOP-1372: ImmutablePath should not use Java recu...

Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/473 All tests pass with `docker/build.sh -t -n -i` VOTE +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1372) ImmutablePath should not use Java recursion (call stacks are wack)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15630475#comment-15630475 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1372: --- Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #473: TINKERPOP-1372: ImmutablePath should not use Ja...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/473 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1372) ImmutablePath should not use Java recursion (call stacks are wack)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15630469#comment-15630469 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1372: --- Github user spmallette commented on the issue:

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1541) Should repeated objects be returned for the same label?

Marko A. Rodriguez created TINKERPOP-1541: - Summary: Should repeated objects be returned for the same label? Key: TINKERPOP-1541 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1541

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1540) Create a set of marker interfaces that define step behavior

Marko A. Rodriguez created TINKERPOP-1540: - Summary: Create a set of marker interfaces that define step behavior Key: TINKERPOP-1540 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1540

[jira] [Assigned] (TINKERPOP-1434) Block calls to traversal side-effects until read is complete

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette reassigned TINKERPOP-1434: --- Assignee: stephen mallette > Block calls to traversal side-effects until

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1474) API Alignment Between Java Gremlin Graph Structure and GLVs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15630039#comment-15630039 ] Kevin Gallardo commented on TINKERPOP-1474: --- It sounds important to make the distinction

[jira] [Updated] (TINKERPOP-887) FastNoSuchElementException hides stack trace in client code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-887: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 3.3.0) > FastNoSuchElementException hides stack trace in

[jira] [Reopened] (TINKERPOP-887) FastNoSuchElementException hides stack trace in client code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette reopened TINKERPOP-887: > FastNoSuchElementException hides stack trace in client code >

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-887) FastNoSuchElementException hides stack trace in client code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-887. -- Resolution: Fixed Removed 3.3.0 - fix is implied by 3.2.4 >

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-887) FastNoSuchElementException hides stack trace in client code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15629665#comment-15629665 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-887: -- Github user okram commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #470: TINKERPOP-887 Conversion of FastNoSuchElementEx...

Github user BrynCooke closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/470 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-887) FastNoSuchElementException hides stack trace in client code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15629671#comment-15629671 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-887: -- Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #470: TINKERPOP-887 Conversion of FastNoSuchElementException...

Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/470 Great thanks --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so,

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #470: TINKERPOP-887 Conversion of FastNoSuchElementException...

Github user okram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/470 I think I already merged before your rebase. Can you simply close this as we have pushed tp32. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-887) FastNoSuchElementException hides stack trace in client code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15629625#comment-15629625 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-887: -- Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #470: TINKERPOP-887 Conversion of FastNoSuchElementException...

Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/470 Retargeting at tp32. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #468: TINKERPOP-1420 Removal of previously deprecated gremli...

Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/468 3.3.0 has been discussed as one for breaking changes so I think we should come away with a release that is free of deprecation if we can. I think we should just be methodical about it and not

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #468: TINKERPOP-1420 Removal of previously deprecated gremli...

Github user okram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/468 Huh. Cool. Are we removing deprecations for 3.3.0? If so, should I be doing similar things in the "process" areas of the codebase? VOTE +1. --- If your project is set up for it, you can

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #470: TINKERPOP-887 Conversion of FastNoSuchElementException...

Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/470 All tests pass with `docker/build.sh -t -n -i` VOTE +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-887) FastNoSuchElementException hides stack trace in client code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15629534#comment-15629534 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-887: -- Github user spmallette commented on the issue:

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1256) Remove Traverser.split(R r, Step<T,R> step)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15629527#comment-15629527 ] Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-1256: --- I tried going down this ticket and it

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1490) Provider a Future based Traversal.async(Function<Traversal,V>) terminal step

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15629514#comment-15629514 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1490: --- Github user spmallette commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #478: TINKERPOP-1490 Implemented promise API for Traversal

Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/478 > CoreTraversalTest is that it uses mutating steps and thus, not subject to OLAP testing Ah - didn't think to check if that was fully ignored. I'll fix that up. --- If your project

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1490) Provider a Future based Traversal.async(Function<Traversal,V>) terminal step

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15629456#comment-15629456 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1490: --- Github user spmallette commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #478: TINKERPOP-1490 Implemented promise API for Traversal

Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/478 > Why do you ignore promise tests for GroovyTranslator and JavaTranslator. Seems we would want that to work as well. I thought I was getting errors because of the lambda i use to

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1534) Gremlin Server instances leaking in tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15629349#comment-15629349 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1534: --- Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1490) Provider a Future based Traversal.async(Function<Traversal,V>) terminal step

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15629431#comment-15629431 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1490: --- Github user jorgebay commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #478: TINKERPOP-1490 Implemented promise API for Traversal

Github user okram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/478 Wow. This is cool. Questions/comments: 1. Why do you ignore promise tests for `GroovyTranslator` and `JavaTranslator`. Seems we would want that to work as well. 2. Why not have a

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1490) Provider a Future based Traversal.async(Function<Traversal,V>) terminal step

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15629373#comment-15629373 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1490: --- Github user okram commented on the issue:

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-1534) Gremlin Server instances leaking in tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1534. --- Resolution: Fixed > Gremlin Server instances leaking in tests >

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #469: TINKERPOP-1534 Improve GraphProvider ability to...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/469 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-932) Add ability to cancel script execution associated with a Gremlin Server Session

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15629333#comment-15629333 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-932: -- Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-932) Add ability to cancel script execution associated with a Gremlin Server Session

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-932. -- Resolution: Done > Add ability to cancel script execution associated with a Gremlin

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #461: TINKERPOP-932 Added "force" option on session c...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/461 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1372) ImmutablePath should not use Java recursion (call stacks are wack)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15629324#comment-15629324 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1372: --- Github user okram commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #473: TINKERPOP-1372: ImmutablePath should not use Java recu...

Github user okram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/473 @pietermartin -- I think my last commit is another optimization you discussed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1490) Provider a Future based Traversal.async(Function<Traversal,V>) terminal step

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15629262#comment-15629262 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1490: --- GitHub user spmallette opened a pull request:

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #478: TINKERPOP-1490 Implemented promise API for Trav...

GitHub user spmallette opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/478 TINKERPOP-1490 Implemented promise API for Traversal https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1490 Added two promise() methods that return `CompletableFuture` on `Traversal`.

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1539) Create a ComplexTraversalTest with crazy nested gnarly traversals.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15629163#comment-15629163 ] Daniel Kuppitz commented on TINKERPOP-1539: --- Yup, but I don't think we should go too crazy

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1539) Create a ComplexTraversalTest with crazy nested gnarly traversals.

Marko A. Rodriguez created TINKERPOP-1539: - Summary: Create a ComplexTraversalTest with crazy nested gnarly traversals. Key: TINKERPOP-1539 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1539

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-1384) Description of filter function in traversal documentation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marko A. Rodriguez closed TINKERPOP-1384. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.2.4 3.3.0 Yes,

[jira] [Assigned] (TINKERPOP-1384) Description of filter function in traversal documentation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marko A. Rodriguez reassigned TINKERPOP-1384: - Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez > Description of filter function in

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1243) MatchStep should be a FilterStep, not a MapStep

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15629068#comment-15629068 ] Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-1243: --- Dah. This is not as easy as I thought.

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1292) TinkerGraphComputer VertexProgramInterceptors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15629024#comment-15629024 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1292: --- Github user twilmes commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #476: TINKERPOP-1292: TinkerGraphComputer VertexProgramInter...

Github user twilmes commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/476 VOTE: +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if

The cost of ==, equals, and instaceof for static classes.

Hi, The root traversal of a traversal is the one whose traversal.getParent() instanceof EmptyStep. In our strategies we use: traversal.getParent().equals(EmptyStep.instance()) traversal.getParent() == EmptyStep.instance() traversal.getParent() instanceof EmptyStep Which way is fastest?

[jira] [Assigned] (TINKERPOP-1508) Add choose(predicate,trueTraversal)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marko A. Rodriguez reassigned TINKERPOP-1508: - Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez > Add choose(predicate,trueTraversal) >

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-1508) Add choose(predicate,trueTraversal)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marko A. Rodriguez closed TINKERPOP-1508. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.2.4 3.3.0 > Add

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1508) Add choose(predicate,trueTraversal)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15628858#comment-15628858 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1508: --- Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #472: TINKERPOP-1508: Add choose(predicate,trueTraver...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/472 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-887) FastNoSuchElementException hides stack trace in client code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15628849#comment-15628849 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-887: -- Github user spmallette commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #470: TINKERPOP-887 Conversion of FastNoSuchElementException...

Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/470 did anyone run a full docker build on this - i didn't see that in the comments? i have one running nowi think we should wait for that before merge. --- If your project is set up for it,

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-887) FastNoSuchElementException hides stack trace in client code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15628818#comment-15628818 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-887: -- Github user PommeVerte commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #470: TINKERPOP-887 Conversion of FastNoSuchElementException...

Github user PommeVerte commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/470 looks good and is a nice addition *I will definitely enjoy this* : VOTE +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1508) Add choose(predicate,trueTraversal)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15628811#comment-15628811 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1508: --- Github user PommeVerte commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #472: TINKERPOP-1508: Add choose(predicate,trueTraversal)

Github user PommeVerte commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/472 VOTE +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-965) Optimize TraversalStrategy application

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15628710#comment-15628710 ] Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-965: -- Any more developments in this area? If

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1372) ImmutablePath should not use Java recursion (call stacks are wack)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15628695#comment-15628695 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1372: --- Github user okram commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #473: TINKERPOP-1372: ImmutablePath should not use Java recu...

Github user okram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/473 @pietermartin voted +1 on the dev@ mailing list for this ticket. In the future, @pietermartin, can you VOTE on the GitHub pull request comment thread? --- If your project is set up for it, you can

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1473) Given PathRetractionStrategy, PathProcessorStrategy can be extended to support partial where() inlining.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15628684#comment-15628684 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1473: --- GitHub user okram opened a pull request:

Re: [jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1372) ImmutablePath should not use Java recursion (call stacks are wack)

Perused the code. Looks good. I noticed there is a travis failure on GroupCountTest however the same test passes on my machine on branch TINKERPOP-1372. VOTE +1 On 01/11/2016 16:41, ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA) wrote: > [ >