gt; Property
> > Path
> > TraversalExplanation
> > TraversalMetrics
> > Traversal (i.e. Bytecode)
> > Traverser (object + bulk at minimum)
> >
> > Marko.
> >
> > http://markorodriguez.com
> >
> >
> >
>
s is a
question for Stephen.
>
> Otherwise looks good!
Thanks for the feedback.
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:05 PM, gallardo.kev...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2016-07-15 16:25 (+0100),
> > "gallardo.kev...@gmail.com" wrote:
> >&
with multiple cardinalities on properties?
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:05 PM, gallardo.kev...@gmail.com <
> > gallardo.kev...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2016-07-15 16:25 (+0100), "gallardo.kev...@gmail.com&quo
On 2016-07-15 16:25 (+0100),
"gallardo.kev...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
>
> On 2016-07-09 16:48 (+0100), Stephen Mallette wrote:
> > With all the work on GLVs and the recent work on GraphSON 2.0, I think it's
> > important that we have a solid, eff
On 2016-07-15 21:32 (+0100), Robert Dale wrote:
> Responding to Marko and Kevin...
>
> Marko wrote:
> > SIDENOTE: This serves as a foundation for when we move to GraphSON 2.0. In
> > terms of numbers, I think, unfortunately, we have to stick with int32,
> > int64, float, double, etc. given g
On 2016-07-09 16:48 (+0100), Stephen Mallette wrote:
> With all the work on GLVs and the recent work on GraphSON 2.0, I think it's
> important that we have a solid, efficient, programming language neutral,
> lossless serialization format. Right now that format is GraphSON and it
> works for tha
On 2016-07-15 15:52 (+0100),
"gallardo.kev...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
>
> On 2016-07-15 14:44 (+0100), Robert Dale wrote:
> > It looks to me like a self-inflicted problem because the things that
> > are typed are already native to json so it's redunda
On 2016-07-15 16:07 (+0100),
"gallardo.kev...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
>
> On 2016-07-15 15:52 (+0100),
> "gallardo.kev...@gmail.com" wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2016-07-15 14:44 (+0100), Robert Dale wrote:
> > > It looks to me like a sel
everything that is a HashMap is really a Vertex, Edge, or Property.
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:03 AM, gallardo.kev...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2016-07-13 13:17 (+0100), Robert Dale wrote:
> >> Marko, I agree that empty object properties should no
On 2016-07-13 13:17 (+0100), Robert Dale wrote:
> Marko, I agree that empty object properties should not be represented.
> I think if you saw that in an example then it was probably for
> demonstration purposes.
>
> Kevin, can you expand on this comment:
>
> > the format you suggest would lea
10 matches
Mail list logo
