Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

//markorodriguez.com > > > > > > > >> On Jul 19, 2016, at 12:45 PM, Robert Dale <robd...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> There's also Path that can be returned from a query. It looks like > >> GraphSON 1.0 handles this today in the REST API but i

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

is is a question for Stephen. > > Otherwise looks good! Thanks for the feedback. > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:05 PM, gallardo.kev...@gmail.com > <gallardo.kev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 2016-07-15 16:25 (+0100), > > "gallardo.kev...@

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

is probably handled automatically but is this working > > with multiple cardinalities on properties? > > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:05 PM, gallardo.kev...@gmail.com < > > gallardo.kev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

On 2016-07-15 16:25 (+0100), "gallardo.kev...@gmail.com"<gallardo.kev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 2016-07-09 16:48 (+0100), Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > > With all the work on GLVs and the recent work on GraphSON 2.0, I think it

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

On 2016-07-15 21:32 (+0100), Robert Dale wrote: > Responding to Marko and Kevin... > > Marko wrote: > > SIDENOTE: This serves as a foundation for when we move to GraphSON 2.0. In > > terms of numbers, I think, unfortunately, we have to stick with int32, > > int64, float,

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

On 2016-07-09 16:48 (+0100), Stephen Mallette wrote: > With all the work on GLVs and the recent work on GraphSON 2.0, I think it's > important that we have a solid, efficient, programming language neutral, > lossless serialization format. Right now that format is GraphSON

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

On 2016-07-15 15:52 (+0100), "gallardo.kev...@gmail.com"<gallardo.kev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 2016-07-15 14:44 (+0100), Robert Dale <robd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It looks to me like a self-inflicted problem because the things that > > a

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

On 2016-07-15 16:07 (+0100), "gallardo.kev...@gmail.com"<gallardo.kev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 2016-07-15 15:52 (+0100), > "gallardo.kev...@gmail.com"<gallardo.kev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 2016-07-15 14:44 (

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

On 2016-07-13 13:17 (+0100), Robert Dale wrote: > Marko, I agree that empty object properties should not be represented. > I think if you saw that in an example then it was probably for > demonstration purposes. > > Kevin, can you expand on this comment: > > > the format