Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.2 Release

2016-09-08 Thread Stephen Mallette
Just to close the loop on this thread, the new VOTE thread is here: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3182f5995f5e5ab0cb210553124501d1544bfffbf3d4109242da988a@%3Cdev.tinkerpop.apache.org%3E On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Daniel Kuppitz wrote: > > > > The moral of the story: Use this (carefu

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.2 Release

2016-09-07 Thread Daniel Kuppitz
> > The moral of the story: Use this (carefully) when you hear someone say > "we" and you need to count yourself out. I don't need to count myself out, since I was just waiting for you, so I can rebase and merge the other fixes ;) https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/commits/master On Thu, S

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.2 Release

2016-09-07 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Who is this “we” kemosabe? http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WhoDoYouMeanWeKemoSabe Marko. > On Sep 7, 2016, at 3:53 PM, Daniel Kuppitz wrote: > > The last issue just got fixed in master/. Damn, we can be so fast & > effective :). > > On Wed, Sep

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.2 Release

2016-09-07 Thread Daniel Kuppitz
The last issue just got fixed in master/. Damn, we can be so fast & effective :). On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Daniel Kuppitz wrote: > The aforementioned issues are fixed, but now we've just found another bug: > > gremlin> g.withBulk(false).withSack(1.0f,sum).V(1).local(outE('knows' > ).barr

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.2 Release

2016-09-07 Thread Daniel Kuppitz
The aforementioned issues are fixed, but now we've just found another bug: gremlin> g.withBulk(false).withSack(1.0f,sum).V(1).local(outE('knows' ).barrier(normSack).inV()).in('knows').barrier().sack() //*(6)* ==>1.0 ==>1.0 ==>1.0 ... The 1.0's go on and on. Unfortunately one more reason to delay

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.2 Release

2016-09-07 Thread Stephen Mallette
Yes - thanks for that reminder - i will do that too. On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Robert Dale wrote: > Stephen, did you see the other pull request to fix the 'option' section? > It would be great if you could pull that in if you are also rebuilding the > docs. > > On Wednesday, September 7, 2

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.2 Release

2016-09-07 Thread Robert Dale
Stephen, did you see the other pull request to fix the 'option' section? It would be great if you could pull that in if you are also rebuilding the docs. On Wednesday, September 7, 2016, Stephen Mallette wrote: > This VOTE is cancelled - we have to scrap this build. Weak. > > Kuppitz has a bug f

[CANCEL][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.2 Release

2016-09-07 Thread Stephen Mallette
This VOTE is cancelled - we have to scrap this build. Weak. Kuppitz has a bug fix under test right now. On top of his fix, I will officially correct the "bad link" to GLVs that Robert found (thanks for reviewing/voting btw). Expect a new VOTE thread later today once this is all settled. Note that