at section
>> in the upgrade docs. So, the link is broken.
>>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Stephen Mallette
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Dezember 2020 14:37
>> An: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] code freeze 3.4.9
n: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] code freeze 3.4.9
>
> I've pushed the 3.4.9-SNAPSHOT documentation for those interested in doing
> a review:
>
> https://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.4.9-SNAPSHOT/
>
> The upgrade docs are especially full this release. Defi
-
Von: Stephen Mallette
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Dezember 2020 14:37
An: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] code freeze 3.4.9
I've pushed the 3.4.9-SNAPSHOT documentation for those interested in doing a
review:
https://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.4.9-SNAPSHOT/
The upgrade doc
I've pushed the 3.4.9-SNAPSHOT documentation for those interested in doing
a review:
https://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.4.9-SNAPSHOT/
The upgrade docs are especially full this release. Definitely the longest
list of improvements on 3.4.x since 3.4.0:
https://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.4.9-SNAP
Following up on TINKERPOP-2438 - I think I've addressed the performance
issue that was noted. It's not a perfect solution but it was easy/obvious
and I feel safe enough to merge:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1368
I've formed the pull request for review with the intention to merge it f
As we roll into 3.4.9 code freeze week we can use this thread for any
issues or concerns that are found related to testing this week.
To get the ball rolling, a regression has been noticed in performance
around low-latency scripts and seems to be related to the new
GremlinASTChecker. My earlier te
