DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43394] New: - Some of application resouces are not being updated until debug mode startup

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r575617 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/juli/ClassLoaderLogManager.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Author: pero Date: Fri Sep 14 04:01:06 2007 New Revision: 575617 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=575617&view=rev Log: Handle more then one system property replacement at file logging.properties. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/juli/ClassLoaderLogManager.java tomcat/t

Re: [PATCH] jasper - enum support for tag libs

Hey, On 9/13/07, Andrew J Snodgrass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The attached patch adds support for the direct use of enums in the > attributes of tags. Cool idea. Is it in Bugzilla? Yoav - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43377] - RequestDumperValve garbles POST data

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43394] - Some of application resouces are not being updated until debug mode startup

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PATCH] jasper - enum support for tag libs

Yoav Shapira wrote: Hey, On 9/13/07, Andrew J Snodgrass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The attached patch adds support for the direct use of enums in the attributes of tags. Cool idea. Is it in Bugzilla? I agree it seems like a good idea, but if it is not in the specification, then there's no

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41797] - CNFE/NPE thrown from function mapper when externalizing

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43396] New: - Tomcat src requires ant 1.7.0 to build

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43397] New: - shutdown script malfunctions on fedora core 7

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PATCH] jasper - enum support for tag libs

Yoav Shapira wrote: Hey, On 9/13/07, Andrew J Snodgrass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The attached patch adds support for the direct use of enums in the attributes of tags. Cool idea. Is it in Bugzilla? I agree, think it is very useful. Would you mind opening a bugzilla, http://issu

Re: svn commit: r575332 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/naming/resources/FileDirContext.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Remy Maucherat wrote: It's not a real veto anyway, but no proper review mechanism exists at the moment, and it's hard to integrate feature additions in 6.0.x without prior discussion. I did review the patch: - the syntax seems appropriate - I don't know if it allows redirecting a single fine,

Re: [PATCH] jasper - enum support for tag libs

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Yoav Shapira wrote: Hey, On 9/13/07, Andrew J Snodgrass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The attached patch adds support for the direct use of enums in the attributes of tags. Cool idea. Is it in Bugzilla? I agree, think it is very useful. Would you mind

svn commit: r575741 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/juli/src/java/org/apache/juli/ClassLoaderLogManager.java

Author: pero Date: Fri Sep 14 09:20:23 2007 New Revision: 575741 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=575741&view=rev Log: Handle more then one system property replacement at file logging.properties. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/juli/src/java/org/apache/juli/ClassLoaderLogManager.java

svn commit: r575742 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Author: pero Date: Fri Sep 14 09:20:28 2007 New Revision: 575742 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=575742&view=rev Log: Handle more then one system property replacement at file logging.properties. Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Modified: tomcat/container/tc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43377] - RequestDumperValve garbles POST data

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PATCH] jasper - enum support for tag libs

Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Yoav Shapira wrote: Hey, On 9/13/07, Andrew J Snodgrass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The attached patch adds support for the direct use of enums in the attributes of tags. Cool idea. Is it in Bugzilla? I agree, think it is very

Re: svn commit: r575332 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/naming/resources/FileDirContext.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

The basic concept behind the logic is: - Look for prefix - Replace with new base path The new path replacement is done before the symlink and case check is done so those checks are still preserved. (Just with the new path alias). If there is a security manager in play - it should already be bl

Re: svn commit: r575332 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/naming/resources/FileDirContext.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

I'm not sure the security discussion is that simple, this seems quite a dangerous change. Currently the user is restricted to the webapps/ directory ( well, he can add a context with the base in /etc and expose passwd I guess - but hopefully if a deploy tool is used or some automation is done on

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43400] New: - enum support for tag libs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43400] - enum support for tag libs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r575332 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/naming/resources/FileDirContext.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Costin Manolache wrote: I'm not sure the security discussion is that simple, this seems quite a dangerous change. Currently the user is restricted to the webapps/ directory ( well, he can add a context with the base in /etc and expose passwd I guess - but hopefully if a deploy tool is used or

Re: svn commit: r575332 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/naming/resources/FileDirContext.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

On Sep 14, 2007, at 3:30 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: I'm not sure the security discussion is that simple, this seems quite a dangerous change. Currently the user is restricted to the webapps/ directory ( well, he can add a context with the base in /etc an

Re: svn commit: r575332 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/naming/resources/FileDirContext.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

On Sep 14, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Costin Manolache wrote: It may also have some implications on other use cases - deployment ( the current pattern is that all files for a webapp are in one place ), replication ( i.e. if someone wants same webapps on a pool of servers ). To me this is an im

Re: svn commit: r575332 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/naming/resources/FileDirContext.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Jim Jagielski wrote: On Sep 14, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Costin Manolache wrote: It may also have some implications on other use cases - deployment ( the current pattern is that all files for a webapp are in one place ), replication ( i.e. if someone wants same webapps on a pool of servers ). To

Re: svn commit: r575332 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/naming/resources/FileDirContext.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Remy Maucherat wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: On Sep 14, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Costin Manolache wrote: It may also have some implications on other use cases - deployment ( the current pattern is that all files for a webapp are in one place ), replication ( i.e. if someone wants same webapps on

Re: svn commit: r575332 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/naming/resources/FileDirContext.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

On Sep 14, 2007, at 3:50 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: On Sep 14, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Costin Manolache wrote: It may also have some implications on other use cases - deployment ( the current pattern is that all files for a webapp are in one place ), replication ( i.e. if

Re: svn commit: r575332 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/naming/resources/FileDirContext.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Yes, this is hard to compare to httpd, as in the case of Tomcat, there is precise specification which defines a portable web application packaging. I see the latest changes have all aimed at breaking portability, and I don't like that at all

Re: svn commit: r575332 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/naming/resources/FileDirContext.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

On Sep 14, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Writing a portable webapp, is doable, and essentially has nothing to do with the optional feature set in Tomcat. If you want a portable webapp, simply don't use the non portable features in Tomcat. It's an

Re: svn commit: r575332 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/naming/resources/FileDirContext.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Yes, this is hard to compare to httpd, as in the case of Tomcat, there is precise specification which defines a portable web application packaging. I see the latest changes have all aimed at breaking portability, and I

Re: svn commit: r575332 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/naming/resources/FileDirContext.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Jim Jagielski wrote: Filip agreed that if it went against the specification then the patch had no place being committed. In fact, I think everyone did :) If, however, the specification is moot, then the decision on "how much to add in response to user or developer desire" is, I think we all agre

Re: svn commit: r575332 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/naming/resources/FileDirContext.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: I totally accept that you dont like the policy, but it doesn't justify vetos. and that has been one of the core of the issues. the one time it would fly for a veto would be when, a) others feel the same, b) no one likes the feature I detailed a number of reason f

svn commit: r575793 - in /tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/java/org/apache: coyote/http11/Http11NioProtocol.java tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.java

Author: fhanik Date: Fri Sep 14 14:10:11 2007 New Revision: 575793 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=575793&view=rev Log: Use a truststore if defined bz http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43356 Modified: tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11NioProtocol

svn commit: r575798 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache: coyote/http11/Http11NioProtocol.java tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.java

Author: fhanik Date: Fri Sep 14 14:30:29 2007 New Revision: 575798 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=575798&view=rev Log: Backport from earlier fix http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43356 Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11NioProtocol.java

Re: svn commit: r575332 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/naming/resources/FileDirContext.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Hopefully I can get all the concerns in one email ... [Pardon me if this is not the most coherent - I been on vacation this week and I was staining and putting sealer or some wood furniture and got too many fumes to the head ... but don't let that reflect badly on the patch ... that was done we

Re: [PATCH] jasper - enum support for tag libs

On Sep 14, 2007, at 10:34 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: - adding methods or altering the signature of the javax. APIs is clearly illegal yes, that would not be spec compliant, that's essentially what spec compliant means, that we pass the signature test (which we haven't done for a co

Re: svn commit: r575332 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/naming/resources/FileDirContext.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Peter Rossbach wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I like this FileDirContext extension. It is a very nice way to include >> external content without symlinks! > > I'm not hot about it, and this seems like a a sort of superset of the

Re: svn commit: r575332 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/naming/resources/FileDirContext.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Bill Barker wrote: Now, I'd prefer that TC is just the Servlet/JSP container that it is meant to be, and not try to add on proprietary features. But that is just me ;). You are not the only one ;) Seems we have lost the clear vision of the project somewhere in the flame wars. It has beco

Re: svn commit: r575798 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache: coyote/http11/Http11NioProtocol.java tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.java

HI Filip, can you please add your changes at changelog.xml (BUG 43356) Peter Am 14.09.2007 um 23:30 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Author: fhanik Date: Fri Sep 14 14:30:29 2007 New Revision: 575798 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=575798&view=rev Log: Backport from earlier fix http://issue

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43366] - Session Statistics command in manager fails with "Unknown command /sessions"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43338] - Setting '*' as the servlet-name in filter-mapping causes IllegalArgumentException.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu