https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52261
hemant jaiswal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|due to |test
|org.apach
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52259
Rainer Jung changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhouyanm...@gmail.com
--- Comment #9
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52276
Rainer Jung changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52261
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|test|due to
|
Hi,
Sorry ..i dont know whether this mail group is valid for this discussion or
not but i am facing one issue:
after looking into hs_err_pid log file
th emain issue is in
*org.apache.jasper.compiler.TldLocationsCache.tldScanJar*
method
Can you tell me what should i do ?
regards
kailash
# ja
All,
This may be a waste of time, but it's worth suggesting IMO.
We have lots of users who try to upgrade between major versions of
Tomcat by simply installing the new Tomcat somewhere, copying their
configuration over (primarily server.xml), dumping their webapps into
webapps/, starting the serv
Mark,
On 12/1/11 2:02 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 01/12/2011 17:54, Zampani, Michael wrote:
>> Should this mentioned somewhere on the changelog as a known bug with a
>> workaround?
>
> It already is.
Yes and no: it's in the changelog, but the changelog currently published
on the website doesn't
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-trunk-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Sounds like a job for a LifeCycleListener. (and therefore easy to backport)
-Tim
Tim,
On 12/2/11 11:19 AM, Tim Funk wrote:
> Sounds like a job for a LifeCycleListener. (and therefore easy to backport)
I'm concerned about back-porting because anyone starting with Tomcat
7.0.x will not likely have such a version number, and we don't want to
complain that the version number is m
2011/12/2 Christopher Schultz :
> All,
>
> This may be a waste of time, but it's worth suggesting IMO.
>
> We have lots of users who try to upgrade between major versions of
> Tomcat by simply installing the new Tomcat somewhere, copying their
> configuration over (primarily server.xml), dumping th
2011/12/2 Christopher Schultz :
> Mark,
>
> On 12/1/11 2:02 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 01/12/2011 17:54, Zampani, Michael wrote:
>>> Should this mentioned somewhere on the changelog as a known bug with a
>>> workaround?
>>
>> It already is.
>
> Yes and no: it's in the changelog, but the changelo
On 12/2/2011 10:11 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/12/2 Christopher Schultz:
All,
This may be a waste of time, but it's worth suggesting IMO.
We have lots of users who try to upgrade between major versions of
Tomcat by simply installing the new Tomcat somewhere, copying their
configuration
Konstantin,
On 12/2/11 12:11 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/12/2 Christopher Schultz :
>>
>> I was thinking that we could add a "version" attribute to server.xml's
>> element that could allow Tomcat to bomb on startup if the
>> version wasn't correct/compatible.
>>
>
> -1
>
> 1. I strongl
Filip,
On 12/2/11 12:26 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Chris, this would be your [cue] to rethink the solution one step further
> down the line.
> Not too long ago, I add in a property validator. Tomcat used to silently
> ignored invalid attributes, so misspellings such as
>
>
>
> This us
On 2 December 2011 17:35, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> Filip,
>
> On 12/2/11 12:26 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>> Chris, this would be your [cue] to rethink the solution one step further
>> down the line.
>> Not too long ago, I add in a property validator. Tomcat used to silently
>> ignored
On 02/12/2011 15:59, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 12/1/11 2:02 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 01/12/2011 17:54, Zampani, Michael wrote:
>>> Should this mentioned somewhere on the changelog as a known bug
>>> with a workaround?
>>
>> It already is.
>
> Yes and no: it's in the changelog
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52278
Bug #: 52278
Summary: An invalid Lifecycle transition was attempted
([before_start]) for component [StandardServer[18005]]
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: 7.0.23
Platform
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52278
--- Comment #1 from Tosh 2011-12-02 20:07:35 UTC ---
A slight update to the details I posted earlier.
The default port number is 8005.
The 'out of the box' failure to start the server is:-
Out of the box start failed with :-
Throwable occur
Author: slaurent
Date: Fri Dec 2 20:34:29 2011
New Revision: 1209683
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1209683&view=rev
Log:
synced svn ignores to git ignores
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/.gitignore
Modified: tomcat/trunk/.gitignore
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/.gitignore?r
Propchange:
tomcat/trunk/test/webapp-3.0-virtual-webapp/src/main/webapp2/rsrc/resourceH.properties
--
svn:eol-style = native
Added:
tomcat/trunk/test/webapp-3.0-virtual-webapp/src/main/webapp2/rsrc2/resourceJ.propert
On 02/12/2011 20:49, slaur...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: slaurent
> Date: Fri Dec 2 20:49:50 2011
> New Revision: 1209686
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1209686&view=rev
> Log:
> bug 51741: Eclipse WTP "Serve modules without publishing" broken with
> tc7, needs patch in tomcat
> http
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/2564
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source St
On 02/12/2011 21:08, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 02/12/2011 20:49, slaur...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: slaurent
>> Date: Fri Dec 2 20:49:50 2011
>> New Revision: 1209686
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1209686&view=rev
>> Log:
>> bug 51741: Eclipse WTP "Serve modules without publishing"
good catch. Actually I did perform a ant test to check that all tests pass, but
the "validate" target is not run by default. Why isn't it enabled by default ?
Sylvain
On 2 déc. 2011, at 22:08, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 02/12/2011 20:49, slaur...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: slaurent
>> Date: Fri
On 02/12/2011 21:20, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 02/12/2011 21:08, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 02/12/2011 20:49, slaur...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: slaurent
>>> Date: Fri Dec 2 20:49:50 2011
>>> New Revision: 1209686
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1209686&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> bug 5174
Author: markt
Date: Fri Dec 2 21:25:49 2011
New Revision: 1209694
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1209694&view=rev
Log:
Fix checkstyle errors
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/loader/WebappClassLoader.java
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/naming/resources/VirtualDirContex
On 02/12/2011 21:25, Sylvain Laurent wrote:
> good catch. Actually I did perform a ant test to check that all tests
> pass, but the "validate" target is not run by default. Why isn't it
> enabled by default ?
Because Checkstyle uses a license (LGPL?) that is not AL2 compatible so
we require explic
Author: slaurent
Date: Fri Dec 2 22:16:33 2011
New Revision: 1209731
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1209731&view=rev
Log:
bug 51741: Eclipse WTP "Serve modules without publishing" broken with
tc7, needs patch in tomcat
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
fixed checks
should be fixed with r1209731
On 2 déc. 2011, at 22:19, build...@apache.org wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while
> building ASF Buildbot.
> Full details are available at:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/2564
>
> Buildbot URL: http://
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
--- Comment #10 from Sylvain Laurent 2011-12-02 22:41:25
UTC ---
patch commited on trunk : 1209686 + 1209694 + 1209731
I'll apply to tc 7 in a couple of days
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=ema
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/2566
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-tc7.0.x-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
33 matches
Mail list logo
