On 10/14/2011 02:01 AM, David Blevins wrote:
We've been using plain Tomcat zips for creating TomEE in the OpenEJB maven
build for a while now. So far that has been done by publishing the Tomcat zips
to a maven repo in svn. Not the best idea to have them in svn, so we're trying
to get them
On 10/14/2011 09:17 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011, at 12:07 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 10/14/2011 02:01 AM, David Blevins wrote:
We've been using plain Tomcat zips for creating TomEE in the OpenEJB maven
build for a while now. So far that has been done by publishing
On 10/13/2011 07:26 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Hi!
Re-reading the security pages I have several notes
http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html
http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html
1) security-6.html and others have the following text:
Please send comments or corrections for these
On 10/11/2011 04:00 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Hi!
Now that JavaOne is over and people are back to their homes, maybe it
is time to roll 6.0.34?
I plan to do that next week.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe,
Hi,
Do we want to organize a Tomcat meetup during the ApacheCon?
See http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/ApacheMeetupsNa11 for space and
already used slots.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
that looks good, arrange the formatting and create a bugzilla so it is
not forgotten.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 10/01/2011 03:03 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 7.0.22
It seems the maven repo doesn't have it yet, is that normal?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To
On 09/08/2011 11:58 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/9/9 Christopher Schultzch...@christopherschultz.net:
On 9/8/2011 11:47 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 08/09/2011 16:13, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All, https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51698
Mark's official report to the
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.33 stable.
Apache Tomcat 6.0.33 is primarily a security and bug fix release. All
users of older versions of the Tomcat 6.0 family should upgrade to 6.0.33.
Note that is version has 4 zip binaries: a generic one
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.33/
According to the release process, the 6.0.33 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_33 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 08/12/2011 03:23 PM, Petr Sumbera wrote:
Jean-frederic Clere-3 wrote:
On 07/27/2011 07:07 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/07/2011 17:31, Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi guys,
We're stuck with Tomcat 6.0.32 with this bug
(https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189).
Did there is any
On 08/05/2011 04:04 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 04/08/2011 23:32, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 08/04/2011 10:13 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 29/07/2011 11:06, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
Native 1.1.22 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.21 it just fix typos in docs and the packaging
On 08/01/2011 03:06 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/8/1 Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de:
- Binaries build against old APR 1.3.12 (recent ist 1.4.5)
and OpenSSL 0.9.8r (recent ist 1.0.1d).
Is that intentional?
(I think you meant 1.0.0d. That is what the latest version is [1]. )
1.
On 07/31/2011 11:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
It is unclear to me, what the current state is. It looks like we support
the unsafe legacy reneg whenever the OpenSSL used during build time
supports it. There is no configuration option to switch it off during
runtime. Right?
Yep it needs a patch in
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat Native 1.1.22 stable.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/miscellaneous/changelog.html
Downloads:
http://tomcat.apache.org/download-native.cgi
Thank you,
--
The
On 08/04/2011 10:13 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 29/07/2011 11:06, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
Native 1.1.22 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.21 it just fix typos in docs and the packaging script.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from
On 07/28/2011 09:23 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
So here's the vote.
It will be closed in about 72 hours
(or sooner if enough votes are encountered)
There is no configure available into jni/native this time ?
I mention that because buildconf require APR source directory whereas
I used to build it
On 07/29/2011 01:09 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Yep I will retagged and reroll the release tomorrow morning, my tests now
looks ok :D
I get the source from the tags and tried to build them on OS/X 10.7 Lion.
Does the JVM there supports the -d32 now?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 07/29/2011 11:41 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Does the JVM there supports the -d32 now?
Yes, Apple JVM support both 32 and 64bits (-d32 / -d64) :
xmac:~ henri$ java -d64 -version
java version 1.6.0_26
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03-384-10M3425)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server
Hi,
Native 1.1.22 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.21 it just fix typos in docs and the packaging script.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.22/source
Win32/Win64 binaries
On 07/27/2011 06:53 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/07/2011 16:48, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 07/26/2011 07:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
1. Should tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk be RTC or CTR?
CTR
2. With tomcat/trunk becoming the basis for Tomcat 8, I would like to
see earlier and more frequent alpha/beta
On 07/27/2011 02:04 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 07/27/2011 11:20 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Win32/Win64 binaries will be available at:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.21/binaries/
Think we should stop shipping anything that is not voted for.
You should have
On 07/28/2011 10:10 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/07/2011 10:20, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
Native 1.1.21 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.21 and earlier versions it fixes some bugs.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
http
On 07/28/2011 01:22 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 28/07/2011 10:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 28/07/2011 10:04, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 07/28/2011 10:10 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/07/2011 10:20, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
Native 1.1.21 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.21
On 07/28/2011 11:24 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 28.07.2011 21:23, Henri Gomez wrote:
So here's the vote.
It will be closed in about 72 hours
(or sooner if enough votes are encountered)
There is no configure available into jni/native this time ?
I mention that because buildconf require APR
Hi,
Native 1.1.21 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.21 and earlier versions it fixes some bugs.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.21/source
(Will be visible after the server
On 07/27/2011 02:04 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 07/27/2011 11:20 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Win32/Win64 binaries will be available at:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.21/binaries/
Think we should stop shipping anything that is not voted for.
You should have
On 07/27/2011 07:07 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/07/2011 17:31, Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi guys,
We're stuck with Tomcat 6.0.32 with this bug
(https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189).
Did there is any date for 6.0.33 release ?
Any committer can roll a release. Last time I
On 07/26/2011 07:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The Servlet EG is starting to discuss changes to the Servlet API for
3.1. It would be useful if the option existed to implement some of these
changes in Tomcat trunk. The benefits of this are:
- we can see how feasible the API changes are to implement
-
Hi,
I plan to tag
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/native/tags/TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_21/
tomorrow.
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 07/25/2011 11:21 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
nope, let's go for release.
BTW, what's the main changes ?
Just bug fixes. I will update the changelog now.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 07/20/2011 11:11 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 20.07.2011 17:28, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Wed Jul 20 15:28:05 2011
New Revision: 1148815
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1148815view=rev
Log:
Improve fix for PR50394 Requires native 1.1.21
Does it require it
On 07/21/2011 01:34 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/7/19jfcl...@apache.org:
Author: jfclere
Date: Tue Jul 19 08:06:46 2011
New Revision: 1148216
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1148216view=rev
Log:
Fix for PR49595
Modified:
On 07/21/2011 03:55 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Why is this change needed? Look around current line 139, which already
handles that case. All the options are set there and the code before
your change mimics the code in httpd. I tested it recently and thought
it's correct for all protocol settings.
On 06/22/2011 08:44 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/06/2011 17:43, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 06/22/2011 03:56 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 22 13:56:05 2011
New Revision: 1138468
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1138468view=rev
Log:
Vote
Modified:
tomcat
On 06/22/2011 03:56 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 22 13:56:05 2011
New Revision: 1138468
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1138468view=rev
Log:
Vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
On 03/09/2011 11:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 09/03/2011 22:36, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Mar 9 22:36:55 2011
New Revision: 1080040
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1080040view=rev
Log:
Fix Async with APR and TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT
Who ever it was that reported async
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.32 stable.
Apache Tomcat 6.0.32 is primarily a security and bug fix release. All
users of older versions of the Tomcat 6.0 family should upgrade to 6.0.32.
Note that is version has 4 zip binaries: a generic one
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.32/
According to the release process, the 6.0.32 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_32 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 01/27/2011 10:30 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/1/25 jean-frederic clerejfcl...@gmail.com:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.31/
According to the release process, the 6.0.31 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_31 is:
[x]
On 01/23/2011 09:41 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
The only bug remaining that impact the JSTL libraries is #46052 (locale
performance on 1.6). Henri suggested releasing in its current form which sounds
reasonable. Should we release this as 1.2.0? Is this a good version number -
should we use
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.31/
According to the release process, the 6.0.31 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_31 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Hi,
Due the regression in NIO we need a release, I plan to tag on Monday
afternoon my time, comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 01/20/2011 05:09 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The memory leak in the Tomcat 7 NIO connector [1] got back-ported to
6.0.x and included in 6.0.30. [2]
I have proposed the fix for 6.0.x. Given the severity I think we need to
approve the backport and start a 6.0.31 release asap.
+1
Cheers
On 01/17/2011 03:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd like to look over the remaining STATUS of 5.5 in hopes of
getting a 5.5.32 out soon... I'll RM.
Comments?
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
According to the results 6.0.30 is going to be released as STABLE.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.30 stable. This release includes bug-fixes over Apache
Tomcat 6.0.29.
Note that is version has 4 zip binaries: a generic one and three
bundled with Tomcat native binaries for different CPU architectures.
Apache
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.30/
According to the release process, the 6.0.30 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_30 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.30 on Monday, please complain if you disagree.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 01/04/2011 07:04 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/1/4 jean-frederic clerejfcl...@gmail.com:
On 01/04/2011 11:44 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
It has been a while since 6.0.29 and there have been a few requests for
this on the users list. Jean-Frederic, do you have any plans for 6.0.30
at this
Hi,
I plan to tag TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_21 to release it later, is that OK?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 01/04/2011 11:44 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
It has been a while since 6.0.29 and there have been a few requests for
this on the users list. Jean-Frederic, do you have any plans for 6.0.30
at this point?
Next week :D
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 12/01/2010 07:46 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Rainer,
On 11/1/2010 10:56 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 01.11.2010 15:32, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mladen,
On 11/1/2010 7:43 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of
Apache Tomcat Connectors
On 11/24/2010 07:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.5 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.5/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_5/
As with
On 11/30/2010 09:55 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 30/11/2010 08:17, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Something looks broken (that is not new I think).
Yes, but it is your test environment ;)
Yes I had a build.properties with
junit.home=${user.home}/java/junit3.8.1 probably for a older version of TC
On 11/18/2010 01:45 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 18:06 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 17 18:06:20 2010
New Revision: 1036150
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1036150view=rev
Log:
Add recent performance improvements to changelog
Ok.
Hi,
We will have a meetup during the ApacheConNA2010 on Thursday 4th at
20h00. Meetups are free to attend and a opportunity to have short
presentation and discussion about the new Tomcat 7 and the latest
improvement done in the code.
See http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/TomcatAtApacheConNA2010 and
On 09/13/2010 11:51 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
I just spotted that in a couple of places 6.0.29 reports itself as
6.0.0.29. Looking at the tag, it appears
version.patch=29
was used rather than
version.build=29
It isn't a major issue as in most places the version property is used
(which
On 08/24/2010 09:02 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Aug 24 07:02:44 2010
New Revision: 988409
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=988409view=rev
Log:
Make 1.4.x mandatory at build time as well
The 1.3.x apr_pool_pre_cleanup_register doesn't work?
Cheers
On 08/24/2010 10:48 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:23 +0200, Mladen Turk wrote:
This is for trunk (tcnative 1.2.x)
Branch 1.1.x will have apr-1.3.x dependency with those
functions backported after found stable.
Pool pre cleanup is easily backportable and is
already part
On 08/24/2010 03:33 PM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Aug 24 13:33:18 2010
New Revision: 988537
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=988537view=rev
Log:
Allow using vedor APR that have lower then required version but required API
Modified:
On 08/24/2010 04:07 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 08/24/2010 03:33 PM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Aug 24 13:33:18 2010
New Revision: 988537
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=988537view=rev
Log:
Allow using vedor APR that have lower then required version
On 08/24/2010 04:30 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 08/24/2010 04:07 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 08/24/2010 03:33 PM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Aug 24 13:33:18 2010
New Revision: 988537
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=988537view=rev
Log:
Allow using vedor APR
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.29 stable. This release includes bug-fixes over Apache
Tomcat 6.0.28.
Apache Tomcat 6.0 includes new features over Apache Tomcat 5.5,
including support for the new Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 specifications, a
refactored
On 07/19/2010 06:33 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.29/
According to the release process, the 6.0.29 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_29 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
We
On 07/19/2010 07:16 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 18/07/2010 23:50, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 18.07.2010 02:02, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 18/07/2010 00:57, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sat Jul 17 23:57:23 2010
New Revision: 965150
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=965150view=rev
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.29/
According to the release process, the 6.0.29 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_29 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 07/15/2010 11:10 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Folks,
It looks like we have a regression in the cookie handling. Invalidating
the session and then requesting a new session results in a mal-formed
header (in trunk) and I have seen similar reports from one of our
support customers on 6.0.28.
I
On 07/16/2010 01:15 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 16.07.2010 12:30, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 16/07/2010 08:20, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 07/15/2010 11:10 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Folks,
It looks like we have a regression in the cookie handling. Invalidating
the session and then requesting a new
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.28 stable. This release includes bug-fixes over Apache
Tomcat 6.0.26.
Apache Tomcat 6.0 includes new features over Apache Tomcat 5.5,
including support for the new Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 specifications, a
refactored
On 07/09/2010 05:20 PM, Marc Guillemot wrote:
Hi Jean-Frédéric,
why does http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-6/ always say:
Current stable version is 6.0.26
Should be OK soon.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe,
On 06/14/2010 06:19 PM, Peter Roßbach wrote:
Hi Jean-Frederic,
only the last 6.0.26 release has a wrong normal juli.jar. Can you
correct this? Please, made a check after
tomcat 6.0.27 maven publish.
I think it should be ok in 6.0.28.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 07/01/2010 06:11 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The builds for Tomcat 5.5.30 are ready for testing and approval.
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
According to the release process, the 5.5.30 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_5_5_30
On 07/02/2010 03:08 PM, Marc Guillemot wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
...
Exact details are forbidden, but I'm sure there'll be some information
as soon as someone had time to dig into it.
this was exactly what I feared. This is an additional argument for an
open source test suite.
I think
On 07/01/2010 09:28 AM, Marc Guillemot wrote:
Hi Mark,
nice to see some activity on this thread.
If you were following the dev list you would have seen that
Jean-Frederic has already vetoed the change Peter made on the basis
that it breaks the TCK. That suggests that Peter's analysis of
On 06/30/2010 05:20 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/6/29 jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.com:
Due to bugs (49445 and 49424) and as I was not able to finish the
release process quickly (because of working remotely) and as releases
are cheap we would like to abandon 6.0.27 and propose
On 06/27/2010 01:02 PM, p...@apache.org wrote:
Author: pero
Date: Sun Jun 27 11:02:10 2010
New Revision: 958362
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=958362view=rev
Log:
Start JioEndpoint timeout thread, to handle timeout a AsyncListener.
Added:
Due to bugs (49445 and 49424) and as I was not able to finish the
release process quickly (because of working remotely) and as releases
are cheap we would like to abandon 6.0.27 and propose the vote for 6.0.28
The candidates binaries are available here:
On 06/16/2010 07:44 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:14 PM, jean-frederic clere
jfcl...@gmail.comwrote:
On 06/16/2010 07:08 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 06/16/2010 12:34 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Hi,
There are some methods in SSLContext to create and use a new BIO
On 06/17/2010 04:30 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:56 AM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.com
mailto:jfcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/16/2010 07:44 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:14 PM, jean-frederic clere
jfcl...@gmail.com
On 06/16/2010 07:08 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 06/16/2010 12:34 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Hi,
There are some methods in SSLContext to create and use a new BIO. Are
there
any examples/tests for this ? I can't find how to attach the BIO to a
socket, it seems SSL_set_bio is never called,
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.27/
According to the release process, the 6.0.27 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_27 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 06/13/2010 11:09 AM, Peter Roßbach wrote:
Hi Jenn-Frederic,
at the 6.0.26 Release we have deployed a wrong juli.jar at the maven repo:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository/org/apache/tomcat/juli/6.0.26/juli-6.0.26.jar
This jar is the commons-logging/log4j juli package.
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.27 on Monday (European morning) and start the release
process.
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 06/04/2010 09:57 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Hi!
When can we make 6.0.27?
There were a couple of important fixes since 6.0.26, like BZ 48903
(classloader deadlock).
I think it is about time to make 6.0.27.
+1 I will start to prepare the stuff. Tag on Monday, packaging , votes
and
Hi,
What about putting back the original tomcat logo? (The 10th one is there
since 2009-10-23).
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 05/24/2010 12:38 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
The next Tomcat 7.0.0 release candiate is ready for testing. 7.0.0-RC3
can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.0-RC3/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_0_RC3/
On 05/25/2010 01:04 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/05/2010 23:38, Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
The next Tomcat 7.0.0 release candiate is ready for testing. 7.0.0-RC3
can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.0-RC3/
The svn tag is:
On 05/21/2010 04:41 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
We found a few issues in RC2 so I'm going to create RC3. Before I do,
are there any other issues in RC2 that need fixing? If no-one speaks up
I'll roll RC3 over the weekend.
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 05/19/2010 12:09 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 05/19/2010 11:40 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 17/05/2010 20:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
The 7.0.0-RC2 tag is
[ ] Broken - do not release
[X] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Alpha based on 7.0.0-RC2
[ ] Beta - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Beta
On 05/20/2010 11:10 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 20/05/2010 07:55, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The TC tests are crashing the JVM with and without my patch. Should I
commit the patch anyway?
The TCK tests?
No: in the TC tests: ant tests.
The problem is located in AprLifecycleListener
On 05/19/2010 11:40 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 17/05/2010 20:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
The 7.0.0-RC2 tag is
[ ] Broken - do not release
[X] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Alpha based on 7.0.0-RC2
[ ] Beta - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Beta based on 7.0.0-RC2
[ ] Stable - go ahead and
On 05/19/2010 02:25 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] +1 Move them.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 05/18/2010 03:07 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 17/05/2010 22:31, Yoav Shapira wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
I have drafted an announcement of the upcoming TC7 release for our first
blog post. It can be previewed here:
On 05/17/2010 07:25 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
I've just completed testing of trunk.
Unit tests - pass
Servlet 3.0 TCK
- BIO with security manager - pass
- NIO with security manager - pass (expected failures due to bug 49284)
- APR/native with security manager - pass
I am still working
On 05/17/2010 04:41 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
I have drafted an announcement of the upcoming TC7 release for our first
blog post. It can be previewed here:
http://blogs.apache.org/preview/tomcat/?previewEntry=apache_tomcat_7_released
Suggestions for improvements welcome.
Note the links
On 05/02/2010 10:52 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
On 05/02/2010 04:02 AM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
-// endpoint.processSocket(this.socket,
SocketStatus.STOP);
+try {
+asyncDispatch(SocketStatus.STOP); // What to do
with return code ?
On 04/14/2010 07:22 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/04/2010 11:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
The 7.0.0-RC1 tag is
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
[X] Beta - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Beta based on 7.0.0-RC1
[ ] Stable - go ahead and
On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
After the experience of the recent 6.0.x releases, I wanted to try an
alternative approach and use explicit release candidates for 7.0.x. I'm
expecting to tweak the release process as we go.
The first Tomcat 7 release candiate is ready for
301 - 400 of 730 matches
Mail list logo
