Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 19:41 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 22:23 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
These sources can be found in the specification documents.
That doesn't mean we can just copy them.
Geronimo
should also have the same
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 19:41 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 22:23 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > > These sources can be found in the specification documents.
> > That doesn't mean we can just copy them.
> >
> > > Geronimo
> > > should also have the same files somewhere.
> >
>
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 22:23 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> These sources can be found in the specification documents.
>> That doesn't mean we can just copy them.
>>
>>> Geronimo
>>> should also have the same files somewhere.
>> I believe they use the CDDL ones but I'll check.
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 22:23 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > These sources can be found in the specification documents.
> That doesn't mean we can just copy them.
>
> > Geronimo
> > should also have the same files somewhere.
>
> I believe they use the CDDL ones but I'll check. I'll prepare a patch f
On Nov 9, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 20:16 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 20:16 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
According to the relea
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 20:16 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> >> The candidates binaries are available here:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
> >>
> >> According to the release process, the 6.0.15 ta
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
>>
>> According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is:
>> [X] Broken
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [ ] Stable
>
> I
Didn't someone say earlier that there was a TCK issue?
Best wishes,
Paul
On Nov 9, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
According to the
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
I am undecided abou
Hey,
On Nov 9, 2007 11:09 AM, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > The candidates binaries are available here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
> >
> > According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is:
> > [
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] Stable
I am undecided about how to proceed w
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
and we are re escaping already escaped strings.
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
and we are re escaping already escaped strings.
The spec isn't 100% clea
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>>
>>> Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>
jean-frederic clere wrote:
> and we are re escaping already escaped strings.
>
The spec isn't 100% clear on who is responsible for esca
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
and we are re escaping already escaped strings.
The spec isn't 100% clear on who is responsible for escaping the
values if
required.
... The value can be anything the
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>> and we are re escaping already escaped strings.
>>>
>> The spec isn't 100% clear on who is responsible for escaping the
>> values if
>> required.
>>
>>
>> ... The value can be anything the server chooses to
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'm having problems with the cookie parsing
It is seems there are 2 problems... The version (only TCK will complain)
Haven't looked at this
yes, this is a bug, the version number will never be
jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>> I'm having problems with the cookie parsing
>>
> It is seems there are 2 problems... The version (only TCK will complain)
Haven't looked at this
> and we are re escaping already escaped strings.
The spec isn't 100% clear on who is resp
ignore the invalid cookie header, I was mocking around too much, I'm
still looking into the parsing a bit
Filip
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
the problem is beyond that as well.
for the header
Cookie: name1=value1; Version=1; Path="/testcookies"
The cookie parsing mechanism adds 3 server c
the problem is beyond that as well.
for the header
Cookie: name1=value1; Version=1; Path="/testcookies"
The cookie parsing mechanism adds 3 server cookies, one for each header
value, the end result is still one valid cookie, when the request
creates javax.servlet.http.Cookie object, since the
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> I'm having problems with the cookie parsing
>
It is seems there are 2 problems... The version (only TCK will complain)
and we are re escaping already escaped strings. I will prepare a patch
later today.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
I'm having problems with the cookie parsing
Cookie: $Version="1"; name1="value1"; $Path="/testcookies";
$Domain="localhost"
Specifically
Cookies.java - line 490
if( bytes[valueStart] =='1' && valueEnd == valueStart) {
since the version is one character, then valueEnd should be
valueStart+1,
According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Thumbs up for Linux, win32 and win64!
Regards,
Mladen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[x ] Stable
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
Test Comet NIO API, Cluster and NIO Connector.
Also 6.015 work fine with mod:jk 1.2.25 via AJP.
Peter
Am 05.11.2007 um 15:17 schrieb Rémy Maucherat:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
According to the release process, the 6.0.15 ta
Hey,
On Nov 5, 2007 9:17 AM, Rémy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ X ] Stable
My usual testing, whi
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P
28 matches
Mail list logo