--- Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Wade Chandler
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 4:57 PM
> > To: Tomcat Developers List
> > Subject: Re: never say never..
On 2/25/06, Wade Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought about not even writing this. Then I thought
> about not even submitting it. Don't take it
> personally how ever it hits anyone. I think it's
> fair.
>
> I think it runs both ways. I think most of the Tomcat
> developers are really
> -Original Message-
> From: Wade Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 4:57 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: never say never...
>
> --- "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
--- "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Glen Mazza wrote:
> > Haroon Rafique wrote:
> >
> >> On Tuesday at 12:54pm, JB=>Jay Burgess
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> JB> The following comments are not intended to be
> a personal attack on
> >> JB> anyone. However, I can't st
Glen Mazza wrote:
Haroon Rafique wrote:
On Tuesday at 12:54pm, JB=>Jay Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JB> The following comments are not intended to be a personal attack on
JB> anyone. However, I can't stand by and watch George speak my mind
for JB> me, word for word, and not chime in an
Haroon Rafique wrote:
On Tuesday at 12:54pm, JB=>Jay Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JB> The following comments are not intended to be a personal attack on
JB> anyone. However, I can't stand by and watch George speak my mind for
JB> me, word for word, and not chime in and say "I agree!".
On Tuesday at 12:54pm, JB=>Jay Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JB> The following comments are not intended to be a personal attack on
JB> anyone. However, I can't stand by and watch George speak my mind for
JB> me, word for word, and not chime in and say "I agree!". Plus, I think
JB> if you
At the risk of getting meta on everyone, I have to point out that
something(?) similar seemed to happen to the CVS development several years
back. I tuned out for a few years, and it seems like the entire (active)
development group turned over.
Maybe there is some sort of Anti-Pattern lurking in
2006/2/21, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > No. Bill gave a wrong answer. He ignored in the fact that
> java.io.tmpdirand
> > javax.servlet.context.tempdir are equivalent in implementation in
> Tomcat,
> > and that to be compliant, Tomcat has to make java.io.tmpdir writable.
>
>
> File.c
> No. Bill gave a wrong answer. He ignored in the fact that java.io.tmpdirand
> javax.servlet.context.tempdir are equivalent in implementation in Tomcat,
> and that to be compliant, Tomcat has to make java.io.tmpdir writable.
File.createTempFile spec says that if a dir is not specified, the file
ginal Message-
> From: George Sexton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:37 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
> Subject: RE: never say never...
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMA
h respect.
Jay
| Jay Burgess [Vertical Technology Group]
| http://www.vtgroup.com/
-Original Message-
From: George Sexton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 1:12 PM
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Subject: RE: never say never...
> -Original Messa
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin van den Bemt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 11:24 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: never say never...
>
> You are pretty bad in taking examples.
The example I took was specifical
I applaud to your willing to contribute, but if you wish to
do that, and eventually become a member of the elite, you must
follow some rules, and the first one, like in any company is to
respect your colleagues.
Respect is a two way street. When someone like Bill Barker creates a logic
puzzle
> -Original Message-
> From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 4:48 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: never say never...
> > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38352
> >
>
> From y
> -Original Message-
> From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 4:48 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: never say never...
> > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38352
> >
>
> From y
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38716
Yet another perfect example. This time its a WONTFIX, instead of
INVALID, there is some progress to be observed :-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additiona
On 2/21/06, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually, I've got two other submissions that are not in critical portions
> > of the code:
> >
> > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38352
> >
>
> From your bz report:
>
> > ...
> > I think to be compliant with the spec, thi
George Sexton wrote:
This assumes that committers are an practically unlimited
resource, and they
Of course we have, because we actually own the Intellectual Property.
You are forgetting that we have PMC (Project Management Committee),
that is responsible to deal with all administrative stu
> -Original Message-
> From: Preston L. Bannister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 6:22 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: never say never...
>
> A disclaimer here - I used to have committer status (and might still).
>
>
A disclaimer here - I used to have committer status (and might still).
On 2/20/06, George Sexton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As far as how to structurally fix the tomcat group, my only feeble
> suggestion would be to permit "TOMCAT USERS" to recall or fire committers.
> Perhaps then some of the
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 5:33 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: never say never...
>
> On the subject of fairness, is it fair that someone who is too lazy to
> read the sp
George Sexton wrote:
> Don't misunderstand me. I'm certainly not saying a committer shouldn't say
> "This is non-compliant and will not be addresed" or "We comply with the
> spec, and we will not be expanding the application to meet your specific
> need". These are legitimate responses.
Agreed.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 4:02 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: never say never...
>
> I agree that closing bug reports without an explanation is rarely, if
> ever helpful
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 4:02 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: never say never...
>
> George Sexton wrote:
> Whilst I agree with the general thrust of the arguments made s
George Sexton wrote:
Whilst I agree with the general thrust of the arguments made so far in
this thread I do take serious issue with one of your statements.
> Just as a little example, several months ago I submitted a patch. One
> committer commented that he would -1 it for the "com.sun" imports.
> -Original Message-
> From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 1:52 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: never say never...
>
> nor the political aspects of open source projects and how they work,
This is
I really try to avoid these threads cause I'm not interested in debates
nor the political aspects of open source projects and how they work,
but the user brings up a good point, with a probable solution, and I
don't see how a non committer response like the one below is even justified.
I'm not in
RESOLVED | INVALID
George Sexton
MH Software, Inc.
http://www.mhsoftware.com/
Voice: 303 438 9585
> -Original Message-
> From: Reinhard Moosauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 11:09 AM
> To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: never say never...
>
>
+1
=)
Reinhard Moosauer wrote:
Hi List,
please somebody explain:
every few days, a strange procedure can be seen on this list.
Somebody asks for improvement, suggests a fix or simply wants to discuss a new
feature.
Few minutes later, there is an answer from somebody, which tells us to ignor
30 matches
Mail list logo
