On 21/12/2011 22:19, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 12/21/2011 11:01 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 21/12/2011 21:57, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>>
>>> In essence no packages will be able to change the version
>>> unless he rewrites the .spec or debian files from scratch thoug
On 22/12/2011 09:17, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 12/21/2011 07:16 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> There hasn't been any activity on this thread for a little while.
>>
>> I don't recall any significant arguments one way or the other for using
>> Nexus or scp
On 22/12/2011 15:49, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/12/22 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Thu Dec 22 15:20:00 2011
>> New Revision: 176
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=176&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Get test working on Windows
>>
>> Modified:
>>tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/
On 22/12/2011 13:48, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> In o.a.t.u.m.Registry with changing
>
> private ModelerSource getModelerSource( String type )
> throws Exception
> {
> if( type==null ) type="MbeansDescriptorsDigesterSource";
> //if( type.indexOf( "" ) < 0 ) {
>
On 23/12/2011 12:58, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2011/12/23 Mark Thomas :
>> On 22/12/2011 13:48, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> In o.a.t.u.m.Registry with changing
>>>
>>> private ModelerSource getModelerSource( String type )
>>>
On 23/12/2011 15:13, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/12/23 Mark Thomas :
>> On 23/12/2011 12:58, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> 2011/12/23 Mark Thomas :
>>>> On 22/12/2011 13:48, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>>>> In o.a.t.u.m.Registry with
On 23/12/2011 16:10, ol...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: olamy
> Date: Fri Dec 23 16:10:56 2011
> New Revision: 1222717
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1222717&view=rev
> Log:
> start adding maven poms and modules structure
One thing that does come to mind is that this is a lot of work be
On 23/12/2011 19:28, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Fri Dec 23 19:28:58 2011
> New Revision: 1222809
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1222809&view=rev
> Log:
> More unused code removal.
> A little refactoring to allow some methods to be removed to simplify
> later refacto
On 23/12/2011 20:53, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/12/23 Mark Thomas :
>> On 23/12/2011 16:10, ol...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: olamy
>>> Date: Fri Dec 23 16:10:56 2011
>>> New Revision: 1222717
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=122
On 23/12/2011 21:22, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/12/23 Mark Thomas :
>> Fair enough. It just looks like a lot of work to me but it will be very
>> useful to be able to compare the two builds side by side.
> As I'm not a windauze user, I will have some issues to t
On 28/12/2011 10:49, Brian Burch wrote:
> So... can I submit a patch for these three changes to build.xml? I am
> sure this will make some of you nervous, but it seems the cleanest
> approach to me.
I have no issues with "tweaking" build.xml if it makes integration
easier with Eclipse, NetBeans, a
On 27/12/2011 21:36, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 1. I think the AuthenticatoBase#cache flag should be honored.
Agreed. Fixed.
> 2. Constants.FORM_PRINCIPAL_NOTE is specific to FormAuthenticator.
> Should it be used here?
Removed.
> 3. Javadoc formatting for the method needs some and .
Done.
Given we see almost as many spam changes as valid ones, is it time for this:
http://wiki.apache.org/general/OurWikiFarm#per_wiki_access_control_-_tighten_your_wiki_just_a_little.2C_benefit_just_a_lot
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
You may have read about a recently announced vulnerability rooted in the
Java hashtable implementation [1]. Since Apache Tomcat uses a hashtable
for storing HTTP request parameters, it is affected by this issue.
As per [1], it appears that Oracle will not be providing a fix for this
vulnerability
On 29/12/2011 07:49, Brian Burch wrote:
> On 29/12/11 15:50, Bill Barker wrote:
>>
>
> Thanks for looking at the two errors for me, Bill. It was hard to see
> your comments because the formatting of your reply appeared mangled when
> I received it. I have snipped out everything except the importan
On 29/12/2011 18:00, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/12/28 Mark Thomas :
>> Given we see almost as many spam changes as valid ones, is it time for this:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/general/OurWikiFarm#per_wiki_access_control_-_tighten_your_wiki_just_a_little.2C_benefit_just_
On 29/12/2011 15:44, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 12/28/11 5:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Tomcat has implemented a work-around for this issue by providing
>> a new option (maxParameterCount) to limit the number of
>> parameters processed for a single req
On 31/12/2011 18:42, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> This commit broke the buildbot and I can reproduce the failures.
Doh. Fixed.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-
On 02/01/2012 12:37, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> FYI, I am able to reproduce the failures in this test.
> Using JDK 6u29 32-bit on WinXP.
I can reproduce it running via Ant as well. Investigating now.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
On 07/01/2012 03:57, Bill Barker wrote:
> Gump Run 1107012012, vmgump.apache.org:vmgump:1107012012
> Gump E-mail Identifier (unique within run) #27.
>
> --
> Apache Gump
> http://gump.apache.org/ [Instance: vmgump]
This is odd.
Here is an extract from the test log [1] (this will disappea
On 07/01/2012 15:49, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/1/7 Mark Thomas :
>> On 07/01/2012 03:57, Bill Barker wrote:
>>> Gump Run 1107012012, vmgump.apache.org:vmgump:1107012012
>>> Gump E-mail Identifier (unique within run) #27.
>>>
>>>
On 10/01/2012 10:43, Rainer Jung wrote:
> I wonder whether we want to improve caching in the WebappLoader. Of
> course most deployments no longer use shared or common to share many
> application classes, but it is still a supported feature and for some
> classes like JDBC it is standard.
I think a
On 13/01/2012 12:06, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 10.01.2012 16:28, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> The below observation seems to be fixed now, after Mark's enhancements
> to Realms and the unit tests.
Most likely, it was moving the destruction of the ContainerBase objects
to ContainerBase.destroy() that fixe
On 13/01/2012 13:41, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
> Have a look here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/res/maven/
+1 and I am planning some enhancements to those scripts so pass-phrases
etc are promoted for rather than having to be in a properties file. I
was planning on doin
On 13/01/2012 20:30, John Simone wrote:
> I've been working on a small project and I want to see what you guys think
> of it. It's a jar file that uses the embedded API and allows you to launch
> a war based webapp into Tomcat with a simple `java -jar tomcat-runner.jar
> myApp.war`. I took inspirat
As of a few minutes ago, the Tomcat 7.0.x bug queue was clear so I am
going to start the release process. I'll run the unit tests and the TCK
on 7.0.x trunk before I tag it so expect a tag towards the end of the
weekend with the vote starting early next week assuming the tests run
cleanly.
Mark
-
On 13/01/2012 22:04, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> I'm looking for a better reason for this change. What was the reasoning
> behind this limitation, as it breaks years of compatibility.
> Workaround is to point docBase to a directory.
The reasoning was that the documentation said one thing (tha
On 14/01/2012 08:24, Brian Burch wrote:
> I realise everyone will be busy on the 7.0.24 release, so don't let this
> distract you - it isn't urgent.
I had to fix a failing unit test so it was no bother.
I've added this to trunk and will port it to 7.0.x once I have taken a
closer look at it. The
On 15/01/2012 06:06, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/1/15 :
>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while
>> building ASF Buildbot.
>> Full details are available at:
>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/2653
>>
>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>>
On 15/01/2012 10:35, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/1/15 Mark Thomas :
>> On 15/01/2012 06:06, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>> 2012/1/15 :
>>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while
>>>> building ASF Buildbot.
>
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.24 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.24/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_24/
The proposed 7.0.24 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ]
On 16/01/2012 00:29, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/1/16 Mark Thomas :
>> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.24 release is now available for voting.
>>
>> It can be obtained from:
>> http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.24/
>> The svn tag is:
>>
It appears there is a problem with the Nexus release process. Prior to
the switch to Nexus, the Maven metedata contained all previous releases
[1]. Post the switch to Nexus, none of the previous releases appear in
the metadata [2].
The switch to Nexus has, therefore, introduced the very bug to the
On 16/01/2012 09:43, Mark Thomas wrote:
> It appears there is a problem with the Nexus release process. Prior to
> the switch to Nexus, the Maven metedata contained all previous releases
> [1]. Post the switch to Nexus, none of the previous releases appear in
> the metadata [2].
>
On 16/01/2012 10:53, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/1/16 Mark Thomas :
>> On 16/01/2012 09:43, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> It appears there is a problem with the Nexus release process. Prior to
>>> the switch to Nexus, the Maven metedata contained all previous releases
On 16/01/2012 11:26, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> How to avoid being asked for passphrase if
> 1. I do not have gpg installed
> 2. Do not want to generate asc files
>
> It seems that buildbot also has problem with this.
>
> Maybe check that "gpg.exec" points to an existing executable.
I'll add an
On 16/01/2012 11:42, sebb wrote:
> On 16 January 2012 09:43, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> It appears there is a problem with the Nexus release process. Prior to
>> the switch to Nexus, the Maven metedata contained all previous releases
>> [1]. Post the switch to Nexus, none of
On 16/01/2012 12:23, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> I think it's here (thanks)
> But you need to close it (tru the ui) in order we can consume
> artifacts from this staged repository.
OK. Closed.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs
On 16/01/2012 13:11, sebb wrote:
> On 16 January 2012 13:02, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 16/01/2012 12:23, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> I think it's here (thanks)
>>> But you need to close it (tru the ui) in order we can consume
>>> artifacts from this staged re
On 16/01/2012 13:19, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 16.01.2012 00:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.24 release is now available for voting.
>>
>> It can be obtained from:
>> http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.24/
>> The svn tag is:
&
On 16/01/2012 19:04, Sylvain Laurent wrote:
>
> On 16 janv. 2012, at 10:44, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>
>> 1) Unit test failure due to missing target directory in src dist
>>
>>
>> I noticed that test/webapp-3.0-virtual-library/target is m
On 15/01/2012 23:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.24 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.24/
> The svn tag is:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCA
On 17/01/2012 01:15, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/1/17 Mark Thomas :
>> On 16/01/2012 19:04, Sylvain Laurent wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16 janv. 2012, at 10:44, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Unit test
The result of the vote was broken. The issues have already been fixed
and I'll be re-tagging shortly.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 17/01/2012 09:11, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 17.01.2012 09:46, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> In that case, I agree with your plan below and will do that shortly.
>
> Sorry Mark, didn't see your response earlier, I hope there was no energy
> wasted by doing duplicate work.
Not at
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.25 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.25/
The Maven staging repo is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-082/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/t
CVE-2011-3375 Apache Tomcat Information disclosure
Severity: Important
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
- Tomcat 7.0.0 to 7.0.21
- Tomcat 6.0.30 to 6.0.33
- Earlier versions are not affected
Description:
For performance reasons, information parsed from a request is ofte
CVE-2012-0022 Apache Tomcat Denial of Service
Severity: Important
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
- Tomcat 7.0.0 to 7.0.22
- Tomcat 6.0.0 to 6.0.33
- Tomcat 5.5.0 to 5.5.34
- Earlier, unsupported versions may also be affected
Description:
Analysis of the recent hash co
On 17/01/2012 12:54, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 17.01.2012 11:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.25 release is now available for voting.
>>
>> It can be obtained from:
>> http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.25/
>> Th
On 17/01/2012 10:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.25 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.25/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositori
On 18/01/2012 12:01, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/1/18 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Wed Jan 18 11:51:53 2012
>> New Revision: 1232843
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1232843&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52480
>> When converting class pat
On 19/01/2012 11:28, Tomcat Mailing List wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I added the feature to sign a war file, sothat the war file containing
> classes can run in a security manager.
> As already explained I can.t put my signed code in a jar in the lib file but
> have to have it under /classes.
>
> Now I.d
Binding PMC votes:
Stable: rjung, markt, kkolinko
Broken: None
Non-binding votes:
Stable: olamy, schultz
The vote therefore passes.
I'll copy the files across, update the website once the mirrors have
sync'd and then announce the release. I'll also release the JARs to
Maven Central via Nex
As per a rather old thread [1] I have moved the contents of [2].
Everything that was there is either in the archives or in Maven Central
so I have not kept any copies.
Note the live web site may take up to 24 hours to reflect the deletion.
Next I'll follow up to switching us to svn pubsub for re
On 20/01/2012 22:02, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Next I'll follow up to switching us to svn pubsub for releases which
> will enable us to do releases in seconds rather than having to wait for
> the changes to sync to the live servers. (We'll still have to wait for
> the mi
Sorry for the spam.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 7.0.25
This release includes numerous bug fixes and several new features
compared to version 7.0.23. The notable new features include:
* Align the Servlet 3.0 implementation with the changes defined in the
first mainten
All,
As per the previous discussion, the process for distributing releases
has changed.
We no longer need to upload releases to people.a.o and then wait for the
changes to sync to the servers handling www.apache.org/dist.
The process is now that changes are committed to an svn repository [1]
and
On 23/01/2012 06:06, Brian Burch wrote:
> I have now finished the second in my set of new unit test classes. This
> one examines the SingleSignOn interactions between the NonLogin and
> Basic Authenticators.
>
> It is consistent with the various changes made to my previously
> submitted test class
On 24/01/2012 11:32, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/1/24 Mark Thomas :
>> All,
>>
>> As per the previous discussion, the process for distributing releases
>> has changed.
>>
>> We no longer need to upload releases to people.a.o and then wait for the
>
I have made some further headway with this and the latest patch is on
people.a.o [1].
Work is still far from complete but the current position is that I have
a simple sample application that runs in Chrome that sends a message to
Tomcat and that message is correctly received.
The most obvious rem
On 25/01/2012 08:11, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 01/24/2012 10:15 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> I have made some further headway with this and the latest patch is on
>> people.a.o [1].
>>
>
> How that relates to Servlet spec 3.1?
TBD :)
Current thinking is that servlet 3.1
On 26/01/2012 09:59, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52535
>
> --- Comment #4 from baleswar...@gmail.com 2012-01-26 09:59:13 UTC ---
>
>
I have just locked out this idiot's BZ account.
Mark
---
On 25/01/2012 13:17, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 02:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 25/01/2012 08:11, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>> On 01/24/2012 10:15 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>> I have made some further headway with this and the latest patch is on
>>
On 26/01/2012 23:15, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Good news. The WebSocket implementation has reached a state where you
> should be able to play with it. Receiving and sending of binary and text
> data via streams/writers and messages is all working as long as you
> don't use continuatio
On 29/01/2012 01:20, Costin Manolache wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> Not complaining - it's great to add this feature, please commit it - but
> I'm wondering
> if a lighter interface wouldn't be better. From looking at the
> impl
On 29/01/2012 22:49, Costin Manolache wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 29/01/2012 01:20, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>> Not complaining - it's great to add
On 29/01/2012 20:53, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/1/29 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Sun Jan 29 19:31:42 2012
>> New Revision: 1237428
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1237428&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Remove deprecated code
>>
>> Modified:
>>tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/startu
I'm starting to look at trunk with Structure 101 and there are quite a
few dependency tangles that it would be good to clear up. Clearing these
up offers several benefits:
- simpler to modularise parts of Tomcat in the future if we want to
- easier to follow code
- better grouping of functionality
On 01/02/2012 13:01, sebb wrote:
> On 1 February 2012 11:56, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> 2012/2/1 sebb :
>>> On 1 February 2012 10:14, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
As the others currently provided tomcat maven artifacts, adding those
in the download section doesn't have (IMHO) sense.
On 01/02/2012 19:32, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/2/1 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Wed Feb 1 18:42:58 2012
>> New Revision: 1239256
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1239256&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Deprecate unused constants
>
> Please check first whether the string values of those cons
On 01/02/2012 19:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 01/02/2012 19:32, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2012/2/1 :
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Wed Feb 1 18:42:58 2012
>>> New Revision: 1239256
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1239256&vie
On 01/02/2012 19:35, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> The trunk Buildbot continues to display test failures since this.
>
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/
>
> The only failing test:
> Test org.apache.catalina.websocket.TestWebSocket FAILED
>
> Is it supposed to succeed, or it is work in
> svn: access to '/repos/dist/!svn/ver/463/release/tomcat' forbidden
>
> 2012/2/1 sebb :
>> On 1 February 2012 13:33, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> 2012/2/1 Mark Thomas :
>>>> On 01/02/2012 13:01, sebb wrote:
>>>>> On 1 February 2012 1
On 01/02/2012 20:51, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
> The vote has passed with the following results.
>
> +1 (binding): Henri Gomez, Jean-Frederic Clere, Peter Roßbach
> +1 (non binding): Russ Tremain, Olivier Lamy
>
> I will close the staged repository (as it artifacts will available in
> Maven Ce
On 01/02/2012 21:09, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/2/1 Mark Thomas :
>> On 01/02/2012 20:51, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> The vote has passed with the following results.
>>>
>>> +1 (binding): Henri Gomez, Jean-Frederic Clere, Peter Roßbach
>
On 01/02/2012 21:26, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/2/1 Mark Thomas :
>> Add the file to people.a.o and I'll pull it in.
>
> /home/olamy/public_html/tomcat/maven-plugin
Not there yet.
>>> I miss you with "ASF web of trust" ? Is there a more generic place (I
On 01/02/2012 21:53, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/2/1 Mark Thomas :
>> On 01/02/2012 21:26, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> 2012/2/1 Mark Thomas :
>>>> Add the file to people.a.o and I'll pull it in.
>>>
>>> /home/olamy/public_html/tomcat/maven-plugin
&g
On 01/02/2012 21:57, Petr Praus wrote:
> Hello,
> we're group of three CS grad students taking a course in advanced
> networking. As a course project, each of us has implemented a basic
> websocket server in Java with functionality roughly equal to the current
> state of Mark's patch. The next stag
On 02/02/2012 11:25, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> cc: dev
>
> 2012/1/23 kitagawa :
>>>
>>> While developing using ubuntu 11.04, tomcat 6.0.33 and java 1.5 I ran
>>> into a problem after setting the character encoding filter for
>>> requests.
>>> When posting a request, the value of any field with o
On 02/02/2012 10:05, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 13:54 -0800, Costin Manolache wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some initial patch for SPDY - using the NPN SSL extension, as required by
>> chrome/firefox.
>>
>> I used github so it's easy to add comments or test:
>>
>> https://github.com/costin
On 02/02/2012 14:14, Costin Manolache wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 02/02/2012 10:05, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>>> Ok, I think your "light protocol" concept to group any "upgraded"
>>> connections is appropria
On 02/02/2012 18:10, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> Nearly all tests at both Gump and Buildbot are currently failing with
>
> null
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> at java.io.File.(File.java:239)
> at org.apache.catalina.startup.Tomcat.initBaseDir(Tomcat.java:609)
> at org.apache.
I've have a patch [1] that uses a much lighter Processor object, while
broadly keeping in line with the previous integration points. It is a
little more invasive therefore I wanted to give folks a chance to look
at it - particularly the integration points before I hit commit. There
is scope to make
On 03/02/2012 01:28, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> Several comments regarding the changes in Tomcat.initBaseDir():
>
> 1. Tomcat#setBaseDir() Javadoc says that if system properties are
> unset the value used is $HOME/tomcat.$PORT.
>
> Though further it says "TODO: better default ? Maybe current dir
On 03/02/2012 12:19, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/2/3 :
>> +@Override
>> +public String getMBeanKeyProperties() {
>> +Container c = this;
>> +StringBuilder keyProperties = new StringBuilder();
>> +int containerCount = 0;
>> +
>> +// Work up container hie
On 03/02/2012 13:35, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Recent commits in trunk changed how Tomcat home and base directories are set
> up
> and how they are accessed by Tomcat components.
>
> Tomcat components no longer need catalina.home and catalina.base
> system properties, but the StandardS
On 07/02/2012 02:23, Jonathan Drake wrote:
> I'm one the three CS grad students working on WebSocket (along with Petr
> Praus).
>
> Just wanted to give an update on our progress, to let you know what we're
> working on:
>
> Adding support for fragmented payloads:
Excellent. That and handling con
On 07/02/2012 06:13, cos...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: costin
> Date: Tue Feb 7 06:13:36 2012
> New Revision: 1241356
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1241356&view=rev
> Log:
> Add the new ssl methods from tomcat-native ( and few poll methods that seemed
> to be missing ).
>
> APR con
On 09/02/2012 02:41, Petr Praus wrote:
> Our initial idea was some form of a streaming API where the reader code
> receiving the message fills a stream that's somehow connected to a client
> code that would be consuming it. Hence the Piped[Input|Output]Stream stuff.
> I also think the individual fr
On 09/02/2012 15:07, Jeremy brown wrote:
> Hi Jonathan and Petr,
>
> I'm an Application Development Graduate Student at Illinois Institute of
> Technology and I'd like to get started contributing to Tomcat. If you have
> any tasks I can help out with please let me know. I'd even be happy to
> star
FYI: I intend to start the 7.0.26 release process once Commons Daemon
1.0.9 is released.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 10/02/2012 16:06, Jeremy Brown wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I think I can work on the website. Is it mostly a css refresh you are
> speaking of?
I suspect it will need more than that. The XLST will almost certainly
need some tweaks too.
> Are there new features that are needed?
I don't think so.
>
On 10/02/2012 21:51, David Blevins wrote:
> I'd like to update this particular question of the wiki to make mention of
> TomEE.
>
>http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Miscellaneous#Q21
>
> Is it possible to get write access or have someone make that update?
It is an open wiki. The process is
On 11/02/2012 22:42, Jeremy Brown wrote:
> Thanks for letting me know Chuck.
>
> Please see the mockup image here.
>
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/jjbosstracker/TomcatMockup.jpg
I like the mockup. It is a step up from what we have already.
I think there is some serious re-organising of the docs re
to the site build that move it in the direction of the
>> 7.0 index page.
>> If a partial patch is enough to get started I'll submit it.
>
> Do you mind sharing what you have started with us? If we can utilize any
> work you have already done that would preferable to doing it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/02/2012 20:11, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 2/9/12 11:04 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 09/02/2012 15:07, Jeremy brown wrote:
>>> Hi Jonathan and Petr,
>>>
>>> I'm an Appli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/02/2012 22:01, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Konstantin,
>
> On 2/13/12 4:32 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2012/2/14 Christopher Schultz :
>>> All,
>>>
>>> There are 15 or so custom rule classes in the Tomcat sources
>>> for handling various
On 14/02/2012 08:29, Costin Manolache wrote:
> Ok, took a bit to get the Apr polling to work and add some minimal tests.
>
> Please take another look - in particular to
> https://github.com/costinm/tomcat/blob/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/AprEndpoint.java
>
> The spdy implementation seem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14/02/2012 16:21, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 2/13/12 5:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 13/02/2012 20:11, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>>
>>> IIRC, Pid did a bunch of work toward that end
501 - 600 of 9371 matches
Mail list logo
