This is issue f) in Konstantin's comments in TOMCAT-NEXT.txt
This issue only applies if a custom URL scheme is required. I think we
should park this issue until that question is answered.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub
Keiichi Fujino wrote:
>> /**
>> + * Check for old versions of applications using parallel
>deployment that are
>> + * now unused (have no active sessions) and undeploy any that
>are found.
>> + */
>> +if (context != null) {
>> +Manager man
On 09/09/2012 20:01, Mark Thomas wrote:
> This is issue d) in Konstantin's comments in TOMCAT-NEXT.txt
>
> Konstantin is right to point out the inefficiencies in JarScanner. There
> is no need to scan WEB-INF/lib and WEB-INF/classes as the class path
> from the WebappClassLoa
On 10/09/2012 15:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/09/2012 20:01, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> This is issue d) in Konstantin's comments in TOMCAT-NEXT.txt
>>
>> Konstantin is right to point out the inefficiencies in JarScanner. There
>> is no need to scan WEB-INF/lib and W
On 10/09/2012 17:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 10/09/2012 15:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 09/09/2012 20:01, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> This is issue d) in Konstantin's comments in TOMCAT-NEXT.txt
>>>
>>> Konstantin is right to point out the inefficiencies in Jar
On 09/09/2012 19:23, Mark Thomas wrote:
> This thread is for tracking the remaining TODO items.
>
> An initial brain dump of to do items:
>
> 1. Run Tomcat 7 TCKs
>a) To check they pass (minus the API tests which will fail)
JSP TCK passes minus the API test which is expect
On 12/09/2012 22:51, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/9/12 :
>> +public static final String Package = "org.apache.catalina.webresoucres";
>
> There is a typo in the above constant value.
Thanks. I'll fix that.
Mark
-
To u
On 14/09/2012 16:40, Christian Kahlo wrote:
> Are there any plans to make things more abstract,
No.
> i.e. the possibility to inject a
>
> ByteChannel (or NioChannel / SecureNioChannel) into the EndPoint
>
> implementation or is it a design goal to use SSLContext + SSLEngine
> directly in NioEn
On 09/09/2012 19:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
> This is issue a) in Konstantin's comments in TOMCAT-NEXT.txt
>
> My expectation is that the need for refactoring in some form or another
> is clear. Currently Tomcat has the following features:
> - aliases
> - resource JAR
On 06/09/2012 16:02, schu...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: schultz
> Date: Thu Sep 6 15:02:42 2012
> New Revision: 1381633
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1381633&view=rev
> Log:
> Added multi-op modes to JMXProxyServlet.
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/manager/
On 09/09/2012 19:23, Mark Thomas wrote:
> This thread is for tracking the remaining TODO items.
>
> An initial brain dump of to do items:
>
> 1. Run Tomcat 7 TCKs
>a) To check they pass (minus the API tests which will fail)
JSP TCK passes.
Servlet TCK not yet tested.
>
On 14/09/2012 19:12, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/09/2012 19:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> This is issue a) in Konstantin's comments in TOMCAT-NEXT.txt
>>
>> My expectation is that the need for refactoring in some form or another
>> is clear. Currently Tomcat has the
On 09/09/2012 19:50, Mark Thomas wrote:
> This is part of issue b) in Konstantin's comments in TOMCAT-NEXT.txt
>
> Konstantin has accurately summed up the issues with basing the API on
> DirContext as:
> - Unnecessary objects, e.g. NamingException instead of null.
On 18/09/2012 14:55, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/09/2012 19:23, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> This thread is for tracking the remaining TODO items.
>>
>> An initial brain dump of to do items:
>>
>> 1. Run Tomcat 7 TCKs
>>a) To check they pass (minus the AP
On 09/09/2012 19:51, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/09/2012 19:44, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> This is part of issue b) in Konstantin's comments in TOMCAT-NEXT.txt
>>
>> The current DirContext implementation supports caching in most but not
>> all circumstances. It would be
Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>2012/9/20 Mark Thomas :
>> A simple JMeter test requesting the same static file over and over
>again
>> shows that the original DirContext implementation is around 5 times
>> faster than the new Resources implementation.
>>
>> I t
On 23/09/2012 12:04, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On 23.09.2012 11:43, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Sun Sep 23 09:43:43 2012
>> New Revision: 1388991
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1388991&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Use CharBuffer rather than StringBuilder to build
All,
You will have a seen a handful of changes over the last few days related
to performance and garbage generation. I wanted to provide a little
background.
As part of testing the new Resources implementation I have been running
the follow ab test:
ab -c 4 -k -n 100 http://localhost:8080/te
On 23/09/2012 15:10, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 23.09.2012 14:56, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2012/9/23 :
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Sun Sep 23 11:37:48 2012
>>> New Revision: 1389023
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1389023&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Review from rjung
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>
On 23/09/2012 20:03, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/9/23 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Sun Sep 23 15:20:38 2012
>> New Revision: 1389076
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1389076&view=rev
>> Log:
>> ConcurrentLinkedQueue is currently the biggest contributor to garbage in the
>> load tes
Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>2012/9/24 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Sun Sep 23 21:09:22 2012
>> New Revision: 1389145
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1389145&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Some more low(ish) hanging fruit from the allocation hit list. This
>accounts for ~8% due to the way Thread s
On 24/09/2012 13:19, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 12:35 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> ab -c 4 -k -n 100 http://localhost:8080/test-1k.txt
>
> The concurrency of the test is very low, there will be only 4 threads
> used with that test, which means decent sync
On 24/09/2012 16:04, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/09/2012 13:19, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 12:35 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> ab -c 4 -k -n 100 http://localhost:8080/test-1k.txt
>>
>> The concurrency of the test is very low, there will be on
On 25/09/2012 13:19, Elgs Chen wrote:
> Dear Tomcat Developers,
>
> I have a question regarding the behavior of the
> WebClassLoader.loadClass(String name, boolean resolve) in the
> org.apache.catalina.loader package.
>
> I have the following assumptions, please correct me if any is wrong:
> 1,
On 25/09/2012 16:04, Elgs Chen wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for your fast answer. That helped me to narrow down the scope of this
> problem. I understand line 262 is to initialize and create the common, shared
> and catalina class loaders. But I'm still struggling how the
> WebappClassLoader.lo
On 25/09/2012 15:14, Fastupload wrote:
> Konstantin, to whom maybe concern,
>
> What's the right org that I can apply a commuter account of apache open
> source project?
You don't. You should read this [1]. Patches (in diff -u format) should
be attached to Bugzilla issues.
Mark
[1] http://ww
On 19/09/2012 20:46, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/09/2012 19:50, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> This is part of issue b) in Konstantin's comments in TOMCAT-NEXT.txt
>>
>> Konstantin has accurately summed up the issues with basing the API on
>> DirContext as:
&g
On 27/09/2012 10:09, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> I am sure that DirContext is not the right API to define resources.
>
> At best is could be a [deprecated] view/proxy to the actual implementation.
>
> The only benefit I see in using this API by someone is that the API
> itself is defined in javax
Costin Manolache wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 27/09/2012 10:09, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> > I am sure that DirContext is not the right API to define resources.
>> >
>> > At best is could be a [deprecated] vie
In the two+ years since Taglibs moved to the Tomcat project there have
been a few short bursts of activity totalling just over 200 commits but
no releases. There has also been no progress towards a migration to
svnpubsub for the taglibs part of the web site.
Given the lack of progress I would prop
On 01/10/2012 07:48, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/10/1 Konstantin Kolinko :
>> 2012/10/1 Olivier Lamy :
>>> Hi Folks,
>>> I wonder what is the plan for CMS or svnpubsub for the web site ?
>>
>> The plan is to use svnpubsub.
> Ok.
>>
>> The whole site is already in svn, except for subprojects that rel
On 20/09/2012 17:45, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Jim,
>
> On 7/25/12 7:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 24, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> On 24/07/2012 14:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>> Any interest in seeing a 5.5.36 relea
On 01/10/2012 10:36, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/10/1 Mark Thomas :
>> On 01/10/2012 07:48, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> 2012/10/1 Konstantin Kolinko :
>>>> 2012/10/1 Olivier Lamy :
>>>>> Hi Folks,
>>>>> I wonder what is the plan for CMS
On 01/10/2012 09:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/09/2012 17:45, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Jim,
>>
>> On 7/25/12 7:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 24, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 24/07/2012 14:40, Jim Ja
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.31 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.31/
The Maven staging repo is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-073/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/r
On 01/10/2012 23:51, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/10/2 Mark Thomas :
>> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.31 release is now available for voting.
>>
>> It can be obtained from:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.31/
>> Th
On 01/10/2012 22:07, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.31 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.31/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/co
On 15/09/2012 23:02, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 06/09/2012 16:02, schu...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: schultz
>> Date: Thu Sep 6 15:02:42 2012
>> New Revision: 1381633
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1381633&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Added
On 08/09/2012 14:37, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/09/2012 11:52, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2012/9/6 :
>>> Author: schultz
>>> Date: Thu Sep 6 15:08:58 2012
>>> New Revision: 1381635
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2012 17:30, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 10/2/12 12:16 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Mark,
>>
>> On 10/2/12 5:16 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 15/09/2012 23:02, Mark Thomas w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2012 17:41, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Yes, the code will become convoluted if we support more varieties
> of operations but I figured that get/set or set/get (or invoke
> replacing get or set in any of those) were by far to be the most
> li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2012 21:37, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Konstantin,
>
> On 10/2/12 3:58 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2012/10/2 Christopher Schultz :
>>> Konstantin,
>>>
>>> On 10/2/12 2:32 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Running current trunk + Nio
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.32 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.32/
The Maven staging repo is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-087/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/r
On 03/10/2012 10:24, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.32 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.32/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/co
On 01/10/2012 10:52, Mark Thomas wrote:
> OK. All the proposed patches are applied and 5.5.x is ready to tag and
> roll the release. Jim?
Jim is unlikely to be able to do this in the next few weeks so I propose
to attempt this myself as 5.5.x is now end-of-life and we need to get
the
On 05/10/2012 12:55, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Fri Oct 5 11:55:20 2012
> New Revision: 1394461
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1394461&view=rev
> Log:
> CTR: Version updates
I assume no-one will object to these but it will take me a little while
to figure out what
On 05/10/2012 13:12, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/10/5 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Fri Oct 5 12:08:20 2012
>> New Revision: 1394473
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1394473&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Update changelog
>>
>> Modified:
>> tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/container/webapps/docs/chang
The proposed Apache Tomcat 5.5.36 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-5/v5.5.36/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc5.5.x/tags/TOMCAT_5_5_36/
The proposed 5.5.36 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not re
Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>2012/10/5 Christopher Schultz :
>> RFCs 2616, 2068, and 1945 all agree that method name is
>case-sensitive:
>> http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec5.html#sec5.1.1
>>
>
>OK. Agreed.
>
>Looking at Servlet spec 2.5, SRV.3.1.1 says "The HTTP method is POST".
>
On 06/10/2012 21:33, Rainer Jung wrote:
> - Minor things:
>
> - STATUS.txt in svn, but not in src tar and zip
> (I guess that's expected)
Yep.
> - Some javadoc warnings (but no regression from 5.5.35),
> TC 5.5 was never 100% clean for javadoc (details see below)
Fixed in case ther
On 05/10/2012 14:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 5.5.36 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-5/v5.5.36/
> The svn tag is:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc5.5.x/
+1 (binding): markt, rjung, yoavs, olamy, kfujino
+1 (non-binding): schultz
No other votes were cast.
The vote therefore passes. I'll start the release process.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.o
Ping.
One more PMC +1 is required for this release.
Mark
On 05/10/2012 14:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 5.5.36 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-5/v5.5.36/
> The svn
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 7.0.32.
Apache Tomcat is an open source software implementation of the Java
Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies.
This release contains a small number of bug fixes and improvements
compared to version 7.0.30. The no
On 09/10/2012 13:58, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/10/5 Mark Thomas :
>> The proposed Apache Tomcat 5.5.36 release is now available for voting.
>>
>> It can be obtained from:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-5/v5.5.36/
>> The svn tag is:
&
+1 (binding): markt, rjung, kkolinko
No other votes were cast.
The vote therefore passes. I'll start the release process.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev
On 09/09/2012 20:13, Mark Thomas wrote:
> This is issue e) in Konstantin's comments in TOMCAT-NEXT.txt
> I think this boils down to "Is there a requirement for a scheme that
> provides unified URLs?" While it does hide the details of where stuff is
> from an applicati
I believe from the various threads on the Resources implementation for
Tomcat 8 there is agreement that:
- DirContext is not the right basis for the Resources API
- Refactoring is required to simplify the multiple 'add-ons' and to
provide a sound basis for overlays (which may slip to Servlet 3.2
Christopher Schultz wrote:
>All,
>
>On 10/9/12 6:07 PM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53986
>>
>> --- Comment #4 from Christopher Schultz
> ---
>> (In reply to comment #3)
>>> Possible cause: r1381417
>>
>> Reverting that patch resolves the iss
The Apache Tomcat Team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 5.5.36.
Apache Tomcat 5.5.36 is primarily a bug-fix release.
As per the previous end of life announcement [1] this will almost
certainly be the final Apache Tomcat 5.5.x release. Users of the 5.5.x
series are strongly en
It has been just over 10 months since the last 6.0.x release. The change
log is looking pretty lengthy. I think we need a release.
Jean-Frederic? Someone else?
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For
On 12/10/2012 01:21, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Fri Oct 12 00:21:23 2012
> New Revision: 1397390
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1397390&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix Eclipse Javadoc warning
This commit is primarily to test buildbot as it now has Java 7 available
and withou
On 12/10/2012 08:54, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/10/12 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Thu Oct 11 20:29:01 2012
>> New Revision: 1397291
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1397291&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fill in some of the HTTP upgrade Javadoc
>>
>> Modified:
>> tomcat/trunk/java/javax/
On 12/10/2012 13:24, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Please use quoting, particularly when you have a few short comments on a
very large e-mail. Without quoting, your comments were more effort to find.
>> Added: tomcat/trunk/java/javax/net/websocket/HandshakeRequest.java
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/
On 12/10/2012 09:01, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/10/12 Mark Thomas :
>> On 12/10/2012 01:21, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Fri Oct 12 00:21:23 2012
>>> New Revision: 1397390
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc
On 13/10/2012 12:45, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> http://ci.apache.org/projects/tomcat/tomcat8/logs/1397390/TEST-org.apache.catalina.util.TestServerInfo.NIO.txt
>
> Architecture: amd64
> JVM Version:1.7.0_07-b10
> JVM Vendor: Oracle Corporation
>
> JDK 7u7. Nothing exotic there...
>
>
On 13/10/2012 22:43, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Sat Oct 13 21:43:36 2012
> New Revision: 1397953
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1397953&view=rev
> Log:
> Run the UCDetector and remove unused code
> Some follow-up remains.
Drat. This clean-up was too aggressive. I n
On 14/10/2012 00:05, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/10/14 Mark Thomas :
>> On 13/10/2012 22:43, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Sat Oct 13 21:43:36 2012
>>> New Revision: 1397953
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewv
On 13/10/2012 23:57, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/10/2012 22:43, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Sat Oct 13 21:43:36 2012
>> New Revision: 1397953
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1397953&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Run the UC
On 15/10/2012 10:21, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51698
>
> zhanqili changed:
This idiot ^ has had their BZ account locked for messing about with
this bug. I have restored the original values.
Mark
>
>What|Removed
On 09/10/2012 22:27, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I believe from the various threads on the Resources implementation for
> Tomcat 8 there is agreement that:
>
> - DirContext is not the right basis for the Resources API
> - Refactoring is required to simplify the multiple 'add-ons&#
On 17/10/2012 13:57, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/9/23 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Sun Sep 23 10:36:58 2012
>> New Revision: 1389005
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1389005&view=rev
>> Log:
>> More GC reduction in the AccessLog. Integer.toString(response.getStatus())
>> was respon
On 17/10/2012 15:07, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 1. Are and able to inject individual files?
Not yet, but that should be relatively simple to implement.
> 2. I am -1 on removal of VirtualWebappLoader.
>
> The feature of injecting additional classpath entries into
> WebappClassLoader.super.add
Costin Manolache wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Most browsers are switching from SPDY/2 to 3, I'm working on updating
>the
>tomcat implementation as well.
>I'm not sure if anyone has tried out or uses the SPDY support - or if
>there
>is still interest in supporting it (
>or doubts about keeping it ) - please let
On 17/10/2012 18:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Costin Manolache wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Most browsers are switching from SPDY/2 to 3, I'm working on
>> updating the tomcat implementation as well. I'm not sure if anyone
>> has tried out or uses the SPDY
Mridul Vishal wrote:
>Hi,
>I am a newcomer in the tomcat developers community.
Welcome.
> I tried to find out
>the places where i can contribute something to the development
>activities. However, not sure where to startI have few specific
>queries. Hope you are the right person to answer it .
On 19/10/2012 07:28, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Ok 4 +1: so I will process with release today.
Great.
FYI. I have updated the ASF Jira instance to use this release. It has
only been a few hours but all looks OK so far. Sorry I didn't have time
to do this earlier in the release vote.
Mark
---
On 23/10/2012 01:01, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/10/17 Mark Thomas :
>> On 17/10/2012 15:07, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>
>>> 1. Are and able to inject individual files?
>>
>> Not yet, but that should be relatively simple to implement.
>>
>&g
On 24/10/2012 00:13, build...@apache.org wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while
> building ASF Buildbot.
> Full details are available at:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/3484
>
> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>
> Buildslave for t
On 24/10/2012 09:35, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/10/2012 00:13, build...@apache.org wrote:
>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while
>> building ASF Buildbot.
>> Full details are available at:
>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk
On 26/10/2012 19:35, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/10/26 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Fri Oct 26 18:13:51 2012
>> New Revision: 1402601
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1402601&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Add test case for BZ 54044
>>
>> Added:
>> tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/val
On 26/10/2012 19:37, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 26/10/2012 19:35, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2012/10/26 :
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Fri Oct 26 18:13:51 2012
>>> New Revision: 1402601
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=14
David Blevins wrote:
>Seems there was a measurable decrease in large app deploy time between
>Tomcat 7.0.28 and 7.0.29. I haven't yet had time to dig in with a
>profiler. Hoping someone might go "oh, that's when we changed X" and
>have a tip or two.
No need for a profiler. The changelog for 7.
On 01/11/2012 00:03, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/11/1 :
>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-7-trunk while
>> building ASF Buildbot.
>> Full details are available at:
>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-7-trunk/builds/890
>>
>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
dav/default servlet - but I don't see what use
> case is optimized by not allowing overwrites.
It looks like I didn't include an equivalent of rebind() in the new
resources implementation. That was an oversight rather than an
intentional decision. I'll fix that next.
Mark
>
On 01/11/2012 18:25, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 05:21, Costin Manolache wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>> I synced from HEAD - and noticed that DefaultServlet.PUT now fails with
>>
Douglas Beachy wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Quick question: is there an estimate on when Tomcat 7.0.33 is scheduled
>for
>release? Our application runs on Tomcat and we will need Tomcat 7.0.33
>for
>Bugfix 54022 (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54022,
>already fixed) before we can ship
Thanks,
> Doug
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 11:49 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: Estimate on Tomcat 7.0.33 release date?
>
> Douglas Beachy wrote:
>
>>
On 04/11/2012 19:35, Mayur Patil wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Greetings !!
>
> I want to ask if I am going to develop a module of Tomcat ,
>
> how would I come to know lifetime/duration the module in which
>
> it can be developed !! Plz guide !!
>
> Thank you !!
>
Please do not cross-post.
Please
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
CVE-2012-2733 Apache Tomcat Denial of Service
Severity: Important
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
- - Tomcat 7.0.0 to 7.0.27
- - Tomcat 6.0.0 to 6.0.35
Description:
The checks that limited the permitted size of request hea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
CVE-2012-3439 Apache Tomcat DIGEST authentication weaknesses
Severity: Moderate
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
- - Tomcat 7.0.0 to 7.0.29
- - Tomcat 6.0.0 to 6.0.35
- - Tomcat 5.5.0 to 5.5.35
- - Earlier, unsupported versi
On 06/11/2012 16:15, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/11/6 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Tue Nov 6 14:52:00 2012
>> New Revision: 1406156
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1406156&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix where possible and silence where not possible some deprecation warnings
>>
>> Modifie
On 09/11/2012 16:03, Sean Winterberger wrote:
> We are attempting to implement ping/pong functionality but have run into a
> wall with the Tomcat Websocket implementation. Unless we are missing
> something, there seems to be no way of modifying the opcode on a frame
> prior to sending it without u
On 09/11/2012 17:14, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/11/2012 16:03, Sean Winterberger wrote:
>> We are attempting to implement ping/pong functionality but have run into a
>> wall with the Tomcat Websocket implementation. Unless we are missing
>> something, there seems to be no
On 10/11/2012 09:31, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/11/9 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Fri Nov 9 19:33:44 2012
>> New Revision: 1407596
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1407596&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54096
>> env-entry can use any typ
I plan to run the TCKs tomorrow (strictly later today) but either way
once I have got some sleep. If they and the unit tests pass, I'll tag
7.0.33 shortly afterwards.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.o
On 12/11/2012 05:25, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/11/12 :
>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while
>> building ASF Buildbot.
>> Full details are available at:
>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/3550
>>
>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>
On 13/11/2012 11:31, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12/11/2012 05:25, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2012/11/12 :
>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while
>>> building ASF Buildbot.
>>> Full details are available at:
>>> http
On 13/11/2012 00:57, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/11/12 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Sun Nov 11 23:35:41 2012
>> New Revision: 1408152
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1408152&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54123
>> There are two things goi
On 13/11/2012 01:08, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/11/12 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Sun Nov 11 23:32:43 2012
>> New Revision: 1408150
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1408150&view=rev
>> Log:
>> both timeout and complete, as with all container callbacks must be invoked
>> with the
901 - 1000 of 9355 matches
Mail list logo
