Used most to be explicit and my meaning but your wording is more correct.
Le 19 mars 2018 22:46, "Mark Struberg" a écrit :
> heh yea, just keep it going. But keep the idea of probably having
> something tomee independent in the back of your head please!
> It's not that we need to go through inc
heh yea, just keep it going. But keep the idea of probably having something
tomee independent in the back of your head please!
It's not that we need to go through incubator if we want to move things over to
Geronimo later. But it would still be great to avoid duplications if possible.
> Jwt-auth
Totally agree Mark! So not sure where the issue lays if any? I just
don't see a problem with accepting contributions and refactoring if
required in order to get the ball rolling, rather than staring at the
ball until becomes a cube, or waiting for it to be a perfect pyramid ;-)
On 19/03/18 17
Jwt-auth impl doesnt depend on tomee and is reusable so must not be put in
tomee codebase.
Hope it is clearer this time.
Le 19 mars 2018 18:54, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 3:20 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > 2018-03-19 0:07 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament :
> >
> >>
> >>
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 3:20 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> 2018-03-19 0:07 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament :
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 5:38 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 18 mars 2018 21:29, "David Blevins" a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>> > On Mar 18, 2018, at 12:43 PM, Romain Ma
On Monday, 19 March 2018, 11:05:21 CET, Andy Gumbrecht
wrote: > I don't see TomEE as the center of the
world, but somewhere where people
> should be free to work without constantly being told it's not OK to do so.
No, I didn't mean it that way. It's perfectly fine to do things in TomEE o
2018-03-19 14:48 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Gallimore
:
> 1. We haven't. WTP functionality makes up about 50% of the plugin. It could
> be that the other 50% is no use to anyone, although it did have some users
> in the past. I'd like to at least work on it, and I'm ok if that is back in
> the sandbox. I
+1 go for it!
On 19/03/18 13:19, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
Hi
As discussed here:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MP-JWT-progress-tp4683480p4683612.html
I'd like migrate our old SVN sandbox to a git repository.
I've also had someone ping me (not on the mailing list) asking for the
O
1. We haven't. WTP functionality makes up about 50% of the plugin. It could
be that the other 50% is no use to anyone, although it did have some users
in the past. I'd like to at least work on it, and I'm ok if that is back in
the sandbox. If that then moves to WTP, because that's best in the long
+1
Le 19 mars 2018 13:26, "Romain Manni-Bucau" a
écrit :
+1
Side questions:
1. did we already try contributing to wtp?
2. How to expose an update site at asf?
Le 19 mars 2018 13:19, "Jonathan Gallimore"
a écrit :
> Hi
>
> As discussed here:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MP-JWT
+1
Side questions:
1. did we already try contributing to wtp?
2. How to expose an update site at asf?
Le 19 mars 2018 13:19, "Jonathan Gallimore"
a écrit :
> Hi
>
> As discussed here:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MP-JWT-progress-
> tp4683480p4683612.html
>
> I'd like migrate our
Thanks for the reply. I've split that out into a separate thread so it
doesn't hijack this one and will just give people space to object /
discuss, and then I'll move that over.
Jon
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> No nees to ask to move vode over sandbox, great id
Hi
As discussed here:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MP-JWT-progress-tp4683480p4683612.html
I'd like migrate our old SVN sandbox to a git repository.
I've also had someone ping me (not on the mailing list) asking for the
OpenEJB Eclipse Plugin - I'd therefore like to bring it up to da
No nees to ask to move vode over sandbox, great idea Jon.
Le 19 mars 2018 12:10, "Jonathan Gallimore"
a écrit :
> We used to have the concept of a sandbox which allowed folks to play with
> different ideas https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/sandbox/. I it did
> a
> while back (ok, 10 years b
We used to have the concept of a sandbox which allowed folks to play with
different ideas https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/sandbox/. I it did a
while back (ok, 10 years back - has it really been that long...?) for an
Eclipse plugin. I think we need a safe place where experimentation can
happe
What's the other vote ("Geronimo one")?
Jon
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 6:33 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hey David,
>
> How does this vote relates to the geronimo one you launched?
>
> Are they purely concurrent or can they be conditional one for the other?
>
>
> Le 19 mars 2018 01:03, "David B
2018-03-19 11:04 GMT+01:00 Andy Gumbrecht :
> I don't see TomEE as the center of the world, but somewhere where people
> should be free to work without constantly being told it's not OK to do so.
you describe ASF here ;)
However it is also important to not shout in our own foot and this is what
I'm +1 to merge this, and allow the discussion about its ultimate home to
continue.
Jon
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:02 AM, David Blevins
wrote:
> Jean-Louis has put a PR up for discussion for JWT Support in TomEE.
>
> - https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/123
>
> There are 35 commits spanning
I don't see TomEE as the center of the world, but somewhere where people
should be free to work without constantly being told it's not OK to do so.
On 19/03/18 10:45, Mark Struberg wrote:
@Anydy and @David
Let's face it TomEE is mostly an aggregator. A great one, I really love it -
but still.
@Anydy and @David
Let's face it TomEE is mostly an aggregator. A great one, I really love it -
but still.
For example: apart from verifying and excluding all the broken TCKs I had
probably 30 committs for TomEE8 which are really due to upgrades for EE8. Most
of them have been CDI-2.0 adoption
0 - i don't really know enough about it
On 19/03/2018 01:02, David Blevins wrote:
Jean-Louis has put a PR up for discussion for JWT Support in TomEE.
- https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/123
There are 35 commits spanning 27 days of work. It's been reviewed by Andy and
Rudy. One a commit
2018-03-19 9:37 GMT+01:00 Andy Gumbrecht :
> I think that if anyone feels like contributing to TomEE then we should
> allow and encourage that as soon as possible. The politics of where things
> should 'eventually' reside is a huge distraction and just serves to block
> any progress at the moment
I think that if anyone feels like contributing to TomEE then we should
allow and encourage that as soon as possible. The politics of where
things should 'eventually' reside is a huge distraction and just serves
to block any progress at the moment - The enthusiasm dies quickly after
a week of ba
+1.
I'd like to see the code merged and evolve a little within the the TomEE
context. It's relatively easy to discuss/extract reuse later, but I'd
like to see TomEE move forward first.
The same goes for the config PR from Roberto.
Andy.
On 19/03/18 01:02, David Blevins wrote:
The vote for
+1 Andy.
On 19/03/18 01:02, David Blevins wrote:
Jean-Louis has put a PR up for discussion for JWT Support in TomEE.
- https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/123
There are 35 commits spanning 27 days of work. It's been reviewed by Andy and
Rudy. One a committer and one a contributor, which
2018-03-19 0:07 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament :
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 5:38 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Le 18 mars 2018 21:29, "David Blevins" a
>> écrit :
>>
>>
>> > On Mar 18, 2018, at 12:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > 1. code will be at geronimo - whatever happe
26 matches
Mail list logo
