rzo1 edited a comment on pull request #816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/816#issuecomment-1042134139
@cesarhernandezgt lgtm.
~~GitHub actions are failing due to TOMEE-3842. I will provide a related fix
for it soon.~~
I pushed a fix for TOMEE-3842 - so GitHub
Hello all,
Good news!! The arm64v8 images should be live shortly. The commit was
accepted into official images a few minutes ago. This also included a Java 17
JDK for TomEE 8.0. If that all looks good, I will get 17 ready for TomEE 9.0
later this week.
Thank you,
Rod.
On 2/16/22, 10:10
rzo1 commented on pull request #816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/816#issuecomment-1042134139
@cesarhernandezgt lgtm.
GitHub actions are failing due to TOMEE-3842. I will provide a related fix
for it soon.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
cesarhernandezgt closed pull request #815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/815
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
cesarhernandezgt commented on pull request #815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/815#issuecomment-1042090656
Thank you @rzo1 for the review. I discovered that this server.xml's are
part of the boom generation. So I'll close this PR in favor of
FYI,
I added arm64v8 to the official images today. As I understand, there is not
much we need to change just add the architecture to the list.
We will see what happens.
Rod.
On 2/16/22, 10:10 AM, "Cesar Hernandez" wrote:
Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an
+1 on the proposal to support arm64 for 8,9 with support for java 8, 11,
and 17.
El mar, 25 ene 2022 a las 8:47, Jonathan Gallimore (<
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> That sounds like a good proposal to me, and I'm happy to help test.
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 5:28 PM
> On Feb 16, 2022, at 9:28 AM, Zowalla, Richard
> wrote:
>
> The list archive does not contain any useful information regarding sxc.
Note the list archive frustratingly searches only the last month's worth of
mail by default. Try this link:
-
jeanouii opened a new pull request #814:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/814
Initial work to move packages when applicable
Upgrade dependencies already jakarta compatible
Start shading others until we can have ready to use deps
--
This is an automated message from the
Yup, but group ids differ, so I think, that the SXC repo (from
codehaus) on GitHub does not yield the actual code.
From the 2013 commit by Romain, I can see an adjustment of the group id
from com.envoisolutions.sxc to org.metatype.sxc
The list archive does not contain any useful information
Codehaus repo is https://github.com/codehaus/sxc
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 3:21 PM Zowalla, Richard <
richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote:
> From a quick scan of our deps, it looks like we are using
>
>
From a quick scan of our deps, it looks like we are using
org.metatype.sxc artifacts (last release 2013):
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.metatype.sxc
I wasn't able to find an actual repository, which contains the related
code (and not the artifacts from the codehouse repo...)
Gruß
We do have some code to generate JAXB accessors. From what I recall, the
first time JAXB sees classes, it will bytecode generate the accessors. This
is fine for further invocations, but when you read descriptors only once or
a few times, it's not worth generating them at runtime. We use SXC to
Hello,
The PR was approved earlier today. I will work on getting them moved to the
official images.
Thanks,
Rod.
On 2/16/22, 5:02 AM, "Jean-Louis Monteiro" wrote:
Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL email. Use
CAUTION before clicking on links, opening
Why do we need SXC?
Am Mi., 16. Feb. 2022 um 14:49 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>:
> Hi,
>
> I'm still doing some upgrades with the view to have some jakarta compliant
> builds for TomEE 9.x.
>
> I did some Geronimo upgrades to Jakarta like Geronimo Transaction
Hi,
I'm still doing some upgrades with the view to have some jakarta compliant
builds for TomEE 9.x.
I did some Geronimo upgrades to Jakarta like Geronimo Transaction (would
need a release). I'm now looking at SXC which is a layer on top of JAXB. It
hasn't been released for 13 years and
Should be ok
Le mer. 16 févr. 2022 à 09:21, Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> could anyone merge it?
> I would also like to see Java17 images.
>
> Best Regards,
> Thomas
>
> Am Do., 27. Jan. 2022 um 21:22 Uhr schrieb Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) <
>
Hi,
could anyone merge it?
I would also like to see Java17 images.
Best Regards,
Thomas
Am Do., 27. Jan. 2022 um 21:22 Uhr schrieb Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) <
jenki...@nationwide.com>:
> Hello,
>
> I have created the PR for the OpenJDK.
>
> https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/pull/59
>
> I
18 matches
Mail list logo
