Re: Potential release vote for 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

Skip my previous question. Regards. Gurkan On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 8:57 AM Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > AFAIK, (please correct me if I am wrong), ASF is not a member of the > Jakarta EE working group and is not able to get certified. How will TomEE > get certified? > Because of this, T

Re: Potential release vote for 8.0.7 and 9.0.0-M7

AFAIK, (please correct me if I am wrong), ASF is not a member of the Jakarta EE working group and is not able to get certified. How will TomEE get certified? Because of this, Tomcat is not able to be listed in certification pages of Servlet specification. Regards. Gurkan On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 4:

Re: Fixing TomEE 7.1.x Build

Cool, thank you! On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 6:56 PM Daniel Cunha wrote: > Hi Gurkan, > > You right! My fault from my last two Pull Request. > I'll work to it not happenings again. > > Em sex, 22 de mar de 2019 às 12:52, Gurkan Erdogdu > escreveu: > > > Hi >

Re: Fixing TomEE 7.1.x Build

Hi As a general idea: I advise to attach a JIRA issue for each commit. Otherwise, the community are not able to follow the commits and their exact reasons. Regards. Gurkan On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 5:41 PM Daniel Cunha wrote: > Thanks for review it and merge Jon. > > Em sex, 22 de mar de 2019 às 1

Re: Remove TomEE Web Access Module from Repository

r what does it offer? > And can you elaborate on why it's not usable? Is it broken? > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 8:09 PM Gurkan Erdogdu > wrote: > > > Hi folks, > &

Remove TomEE Web Access Module from Repository

Hi folks, Can we remove the TomEE web access project (tomee/tomee-web-access) from the repository? I think this module is not usable. Any Idea? Regards. Gurkan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.0 MILESTONE 2

+1 Thank you! On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 12:26 PM chongma wrote: > +1 i will grab a copy and test it locally with my projects later and let > you > know if there are any difficulties > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html >

Re: Another 8.0.0 milestone release

+1 Gurkan On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:17 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > Sounds good to me. > > Le mer. 23 janv. 2019 à 04:23, César Hernández Mendoza < > cesargu...@gmail.com> > a écrit : > > > I have never done a TomEE release but I'm willing to learn during > 8.0.0-M

Re: JakartaEE TCK

rying to find areas to help. What do you > think? > > > El vie., 18 ene. 2019 a las 2:41, Gurkan Erdogdu () > escribió: > > > Hi Cesar > > > > My environment is macOS > > > > Before updating, I received the following error when I run the follow

Re: Jakarta EE TCKs and compatibility logo

+1 Gurkan On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 3:47 AM David Blevins wrote: > This would be a +1 from me. > > Adding some additional context that this doesn't just affect use of the > compatible logo, but ability to be listed with all the other certified > servers on the jakarta.ee website. > > > -David > >

Re: JakartaEE TCK

Hi Cesar My environment is macOS Before updating, I received the following error when I run the following command from tomee-tck and also got some dev/tomee-tck/./target/lib is not directory errors etc. ./runtests --web tomee-plume com.sun.ts.tests.ejb30.bb.localaccess.statelessclient [INFO] --

Re: JakartaEE TCK

I have also executed some other tests and successfully PASSED, Woww, amazing, working with open source, free TCK :) Regards. Gurkan- On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 1:52 AM Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > I have now successfully executed the try.sh and see the PASSED lines :) I > dont know whether it i

Re: JakartaEE TCK

nejbLib}" builder.append("openejb-lite*.jar") builder.directory = "${javaeetckHome}/lib" builder.append("javatest.jar") On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:32 PM Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hi Jon > Yeah I am with master but still receive the

Re: JakartaEE TCK

ith master? > > Thanks > > Jon > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 6:30 AM Gurkan Erdogdu > wrote: > > > I received the following error when I run the following command from > > tomee-tck, any idea? > > > > ./runtests --web tomee-plume &

Re: JakartaEE TCK

gt; appreciated. > > > >>>>>>>>> Jon > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 3:29 PM Jonathan Gallimore < > > > >>>>>>>>> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>

Re: JakartaEE TCK

I have successfully created the javaeetck-8.0_16-Jan-2019.zip. My enviornment : macOS Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_161-b12) Now, run some TCK tests :) Regards. Gurkan On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 6:29 PM Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Currently working on

Re: Jakarta EE TCK

Hello David This is really great news! I did it once for Java EE 6 TCK and would be happy to do it again for Apache TomEE. I'm sure it will be a very challenging and enjoyable process :) How can I access the current TCK runner of TomEE? Regards. Gurkan On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 12:28 AM David Blevin

Re: Adding Java EE Security 1.0 Spec to geronimo-specs

Roberto, is it ok for you? On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 11:22 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > If Roberto agrees +1 > > Le ven. 11 janv. 2019 20:29, Gurkan Erdogdu a écrit > : > > > Hi folks > > Regarding TomEE, we need to add Java EE Security, JSR-375 spec to > > g

Re: Java EE Security API for EE 8

I have added geronimo-specs-security_1.0 to geronimo-specs and let geronimo-dev about the issue. After receiving some response, I can commit the code. On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 9:50 PM Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Ok then I created subtask, > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2453 und

Adding Java EE Security 1.0 Spec to geronimo-specs

Hi folks Regarding TomEE, we need to add Java EE Security, JSR-375 spec to geronimo-specs and needs a release. I have committer access to geronimo-specs and added to code (implemented by Roberto Cortez in tomee-security) into my local. Can I commit to code to the geronimo-specs? Any objection? Rega

Re: Java EE Security API for EE 8

> I have commit permissions so if you need help help or something. Lemme > know. > > > Le ven. 11 janv. 2019 à 07:12, Gurkan Erdogdu a > écrit : > > > Hello Roberto > > We probably need to move javax.security.enterprise.* package to geronimo > > specs projec

Re: Java EE Security API for EE 8

geronimo-specs. Regards. Gurkan On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 8:32 PM Roberto Cortez wrote: > Hi, > > I’ve merged the current state of the code. > > In the meanwhile, I’ll write some documentation to help to understand the > implementation. > > Cheers, > Roberto > >

Re: How can I contribute?

Hi Richard He can start with adding comments to Java source files. There are documents here, http://tomee.apache.org/dev/ which reflects Java files under tomee source code. He can open an issue under https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2450 as subtask (example : https://issues.apache.org/ji

Re: Java EE Security API for EE 8

Hello Roberto, Thank you for initiating this integration. Can you prepare a small documentation (and also send to here) which helps contributors to understand the internals about your current commit. Regards. Gurkan On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 6:14 PM Roberto Cortez wrote: > Hi folks, > > I think I’

Re: Javadoc is online / How deployment works

already opened for me, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2451 I am not able to assign this to me, because I have no authorization. Regards Gurkan On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:04 AM David Blevins wrote: > > On Jan 6, 2019, at 1:23 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > > > > Thank

Re: [DISCUSS] Regarding TomEE and OpenEJB related system properties

Thanks all. Hope clear all conflicts. Jon, can you now merge the PR? Regards. Gurkan On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 5:21 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote: > Yes I agree and take it as you describe so it's all good. It's definitely a > step forward > > Le lun. 7 janv. 2019 à 12:21, Gur

Re: [DISCUSS] Regarding TomEE and OpenEJB related system properties

ties to configure TomEE. I'd > rather take the opportunity to yank some system properties when possible. > > > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 7:28 AM Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:

Re: Javadoc is online / How deployment works

Thank you David. One question, do we need to comment on the interface or concrete class? For example, Assembler interface in org.apache.openejb.spi package? I think commenting on the interface is better and then for extra comments in concrete class. Regards. Gurkan On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 10:59 PM

Re: [DISCUSS] Regarding TomEE and OpenEJB related system properties

Thank you Jon! On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 5:35 PM Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the explanation, I appreciate it. As long as there's no > objections I'll merge the PR in. > > Jon > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 6:28 AM Gurka

Re: [DISCUSS] Regarding TomEE and OpenEJB related system properties

ability to override config with > system properties, however, is useful and also widely used so we'll need to > keep it. > > Jon > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 9:53 AM Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > > > For me, using services-jar.xml approach is not so visible to users.

Re: TomEE logo poll

+1 On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 2:51 PM Daniel Cunha wrote: > +1 > > Em qua, 2 de jan de 2019 às 08:40, Ivan Junckes Filho < > ivanjunc...@gmail.com> > escreveu: > > > Would be nice to get some +1 or -1 from some committers here :) > > > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 9:31 PM Bruno Baptista > wrote: > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Regarding TomEE and OpenEJB related system properties

ot more regarding substitution and config on several places > > that MP Config doesn’t support. > > > > > On 2 Jan 2019, at 09:55, Bruno Baptista wrote: > > > > > > Sounds like a good plan. :) > > > > > > Bruno Baptista > > > https://tw

Re: [DISCUSS] Regarding TomEE and OpenEJB related system properties

tation of the different > >> properties and that we need to improve it. > >> > >> Doing the inventory and using the proposed syntax looks ok to me but I > >> also think we should go even further. > >> > >> How about to migrate all the properties t

Re: [DISCUSS] Regarding TomEE and OpenEJB related system properties

d > system properties. > > Hope it helps > Jean-Louis > > > > > > > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 8:21 AM Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > > &g

[DISCUSS] Regarding TomEE and OpenEJB related system properties

Hello There are lots of known and unknown system properties in the current code base. I would like to introduce TomEESystemProperties and OpenEJBSystemProperties classes to hold these system property constants and provide clear comment what it does. For example: class TomEESystemProperties{ pu

Re: [TOMEE-2435] New Pull Request

if (!match((String) modules, file)) { > +i.remove(); > +} > +} > > I don't think anyone else has expressed an opinion one way or another, so > I'd leave your for-loop as it is. > > Jon > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 2

Re: [TOMEE-2435] New Pull Request

in the removeIf. > > Jon > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 10:21 AM Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yep, I'll take a look. Thanks for the PR. > > > > Jon > > > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 9:10 AM Gurkan Erdogdu &g

[TOMEE-2435] New Pull Request

Hi I have created a PR (https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/332) for (TOMEE-2435) Simplify the Code in org.apache.openejb.OpenEjbContainer$Provider If anybody can check and merge, it is appreciated :) Regards. Gurkan

Re: How Can I Help?

. Are there any instructions for how to do this? > > Thanks, > Jeff > > > On Dec 29, 2018, at 2:13 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > > > > Hi Jeff > > Welcome! You can start to look at > > http://tomee.apache.org/community/index.html > > To familiar with the TomEE sou

Re: How Can I Help?

Hi Jeff Welcome! You can start to look at http://tomee.apache.org/community/index.html To familiar with the TomEE source code, I think your first step is to get the source code and try to produce your own release. Check http://tomee.apache.org/community/sources.html Regards. Gurkan On Sat, Dec 29,

Re: ORB Dependencies and Java 11

Hi David I have created JIRA issue to track this : https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE/issues/TOMEE-2324 Could you please check? Regards. Gurkan On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 1:38 AM David Blevins wrote: > Gurkan, you have any references on the imports? Could be a good place for > contributi

Re: CMP/JPA mapping not accounting for in persistence.xml

For the ORB case, there are places where ORB class is imported (openejb-core and openejb-client). For java 11, this will probably not compile and needs to have some 3th party Jar. For CMP case, as you have already experienced, the codebase is very complicated and it is really old technology and has

Re: CMP/JPA mapping not accounting for in persistence.xml

Great job John. In the mean time, What do you think to trim old parts of TomEE which includes - Removing ORB support - Removing CMP/BMP support - Some other non-common or deprecated parts? If we want to have a maintainable TomEE codebase, instead of adding more features, we need to have

Re: New Java EE Schemas for Java EE Deployment Descriptors

CKs. Regards. Gurkan On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 2:33 AM David Blevins wrote: > > On Dec 2, 2018, at 2:59 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > I am working on the Java EE schema update to support Java EE 7 and Java > EE8 > > schemas which are specified in &g

New Java EE Schemas for Java EE Deployment Descriptors

Hi folks, I am working on the Java EE schema update to support Java EE 7 and Java EE8 schemas which are specified in https://www.oracle.com/webfolder/technetwork/jsc/xml/ns/javaee/index.html Seems that two modules openejb-jee and openejb-jee-accessor modules are mostly updated by manually after ge

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 7.1.0

+1 Gurkan On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 6:24 AM Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Here is the first roll of TomEE 7.1.0. Please can you take a look and > vote? Everyone, > committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. > > Staging repo: > https://reposito

Re: [VOTE] Allow an MicroProfile-focused TomEE 7.1 release

> > we can focus entirely in TomEE 8. +1 Gurkan On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 1:43 PM Roberto Cortez wrote: > I think the idea was to release something quick with MP work on a stable > version. The earliest conversations about this are from March / April and > TomEE 8 was not ready back then. > > Rig

Re: [DISCUSS] Goal - release this week and very frequently thereafter

Thanks for your input David. What about release new TomEE version at every first week of each month? Also, this action must not be specific to MP features but also covers overall TomEE features (bug, security vulnerabilities, component and dependency update etc.). In the mean time, (IMO) in our re

Re: MP Summary in TomEE

<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2209> > TOMEE-2210 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2210> > TOMEE-2221 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2221> > > Hope it helps! > > Cheers, > Roberto > > > On 9 Aug 2018, at 21:

Re: MP Summary in TomEE

ything related under the parent task work? > > > On 9 Aug 2018, at 17:36, David Blevins wrote: > > > >> On Aug 9, 2018, at 4:28 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > >> > >> Can you also please open JIRA issue (main issue and we > >> can create sub-tasks unde

Re: [VOTE] Allow an MicroProfile-focused TomEE 7.1 release

hu, Aug 9, 2018 at 3:04 PM, Alex The Rocker wrote: > Hello Gurkan, > > Sorry I do not understand you point: I replied to the list (using > dev@tomee.apache.org) and not just to you. > What is your point? > > Kind regards, > Alexandre > Le jeu. 9 août 2018 à 13:56, Gurka

Re: [VOTE] Allow an MicroProfile-focused TomEE 7.1 release

> > Non-binding: > > -1 : if there's a lack of resource i'd prefer to see first TomEE > compatibility with Java 11 LTS addressed as soon as possible (hoping a > fix for at least https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2200...). > > Indeed, Java 11 LTS is supposed to be soon available (25/09 acc

Re: MP Summary in TomEE

> > In TomEE 8: > > I have completed MP 1.2 Support (since last week). This adds Config, Fault > Tolerance, JWT, Health Check and Metrics. I did open a PR for it: > https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/141 tomee/pull/141> > > I have been working in the MP 1.3 Support.

Re: [VOTE] Allow an MicroProfile-focused TomEE 7.1 release

+1 to start MP work on TomEE 8 master and then back port to the 7.1. On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:33 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > +1 > > Still don't see why a vote is needed. Let's move on and work on TomEE now > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouism

Re: Microprofile JWT impl Enum injection

> > I updated this so we don't have special code to convert enum, but rather > we use xbean-reflect's conversion capabilities which handles enum and much > more. > Thank you David. On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 8:00 AM, David Blevins wrote: > I updated this so we don't have special code to convert enu

Re: MP Summary in TomEE

oProfile PR to TomEE 8 only, go right > ahead, those who want to see a TomEE 7.1 will have to back port it if > they're serious about a TomEE 7.1 > ++1, exactly. MP2 must be started in TomEE 8 and if want to see at TomEE 7.1, any volunteer can back port to it. Regards. Gurkan On Thu,

Re: MP Summary in TomEE

thread? Or any other comment before the vote process? Regards. Gurkan On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:40 AM, David Blevins wrote: > > On Aug 8, 2018, at 1:58 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > > > >> > >> Going straight on 8.x is easier and gives at > >> least the same fe

Re: MP Summary in TomEE

août 2018 22:45, Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> > a écrit : > > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 9:32 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu > > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > Can you please summarize the current state of MP in TomEE versions? I >

Re: MP Summary in TomEE

our mojo > which is good for end users cause doing an pp distro is easily broken as > delivery if you dont use the full stack and respect the spec). > > Roberto was hacking in that area I think but not sure anyone else was doing > anything. > > Le mer. 8 août 2018 22:32, Gurk

MP Summary in TomEE

Hi all, Can you please summarize the current state of MP in TomEE versions? I really lost and confused that different people is working on some (different) part of MP stuff. I really lost on all of these patches and different branches. Also, before adding anything to the codebase, can we first cre

Re: TomEE 8 Jsonb Provider

Hello Mark Instead of using this thread, can you please create a new VOTE thread on this (versioning for the TomEE 8 release) ? Regards. Gurkan On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 3:33 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Folks, probably it's easier to push hard for a first TomEE8 release? > Things like the JsonbProvi

Re: TomEE 7.1 with MP

cause the 8.0 branch has not been formally released :) Regards. Gurkan On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 6:32 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Le dim. 29 juil. 2018 à 17:30, Gurkan Erdogdu a > écrit : > > > At a minimum, if some users (move from 7.0.x to 8.0.x) are successfully > > used

Re: TomEE 7.1 with MP

; | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- > ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le

Re: TomEE 7.1 with MP

Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- > ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le dim.

Re: TomEE 7.1 with MP

process. Regards. Gurkan On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > +1, even a 8.0.0, no need of milestones > > Le dim. 29 juil. 2018 14:27, Gurkan Erdogdu a écrit > : > > > Hi team > > Sorry about this question (even discussed before lots of time) but w

Re: TomEE 7.1 with MP

Hi team Sorry about this question (even discussed before lots of time) but what is the meaning of creating 7.1 branch? Just MP with JDK 8? If that's the only reason why not publish TomEE 8 with a milestone like TomEE 8.0_M1 or something similar including MP? Possible to release TomEE 8.0.M1 using G

Re: TomEE 7.1 with MP

> > Because the Geronimo MP is not fully implements the MP specification > Sorry I mean Geronimo MP *fully implements* the MP specification On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 9:13 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hi Romain > Great news! > I don't see any benefits to replicate the same e

Re: TomEE 7.1 with MP

Hi Romain Great news! I don't see any benefits to replicate the same efforts in two different locations. Because the Geronimo MP is not fully implements the MP specification and attracted more contributors, we should help them instead of implementing the same stuff in here. (I know that there are t

Re: Closing JIRA Issues

nte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > Have you done a first round on the JIRAs? > > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:07 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu > wrote: > > > Hi team, > > Could yo

Closing JIRA Issues

Hi team, Could you please go over the current JIRA issues and update them according to the latest status? (i.e Change their state as Close, Not Fix, or Update the Fix for version). Regards. Gurkan

Re: Docker and TomEE, what's our status? (was [RELEASE] TomEE 7.0.5)

Hi +1 For Romain advice Regards. Gurkan On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:41 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > quick - really overdue - follow up on docker thanks to Otavio mail (mainly > small 3 points): > > 1. We have an apache account on docker https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/, I > wonder

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 7.0.5 (round 2)

Hello team What is the latest state about this vote? (I am lost because some other comments also exists in the vote mail chain). My advice is not pollute the VOTE mail with other stuff instead starting another email thread. Regards. Gurkan On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:36 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 7.0.5 (round 2)

Hi Jon Thanks for initiating this. I opened a bug in Tomcat regarding java:/ namespace and it will be corrected in 8.5.33 and upper versions. If we distribute the TomEE with 8.5.32, it will be a problem for users who uses lookups with openejb. So, for this release we can stick to 8.5.31. WDYT? Rega

Re: Help appreciated - Test failure: org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.context.passivating.dependency.resource.persistence.DataSourcePassivationDependencyTest

I have opened a bug in Tomcat, https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62527 On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hi Jon > As you said validation error in Tomcat side. Is it possible to change > lookup from openejb:/ to java:/ ? > Regards. > Gurkan >

Re: Help appreciated - Test failure: org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.context.passivating.dependency.resource.persistence.DataSourcePassivationDependencyTest

Hi Jon As you said validation error in Tomcat side. Is it possible to change lookup from openejb:/ to java:/ ? Regards. Gurkan On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:38 AM, Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Corresponding Tomcat change is here: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mb

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

ven for arquillian module to run all-adapters > profile. > > Id rather fix tests than excluding them and introduce potential regressions > easily. > > On mac main issue is network interface selection. Should be easy to fix, > no? > > Le jeu. 5 juil. 2018 10:26, Gurkan E

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

on as well. I'll get as close to your setup as > I can. > > Jon > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yes, I will run it on MacOS and post the results here. > > > > Jon > > > &

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

t; Jpn > > On Thu, 5 Jul 2018, 06:27 Gurkan Erdogdu, wrote: > > > Hello Mark > > Here is the JIRA issue, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2199 > > Regards. > > Gurkan > > > > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:25 PM, Mark Struberg > > > wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

2:02:57 PM org.apache.openejb.util.LogStreamAsync run > >> INFO: Created Ejb(deployment-id=ABean, ejb-name=ABean, container=Default > >> Stateless Container) > >> Jul 04, 2018 2:02:57 PM org.apache.openejb.util.LogStreamAsync run > >> INFO: Started Ejb(deployment-id=ABean, ejb-name=ABean, container=Default > >> Stateless Container) > >> Jul 04, 2018 2:02:57 PM org.apache.openejb.util.LogStreamAsync run > >> INFO: Deployed Application(path=/Users/jgallimore/dev/tomee/ > >> container/openejb-core/target/BeanValidationCustomProviderTest) > >> Jul 04, 2018 2:02:57 PM org.apache.openejb.util.LogStreamAsync run > >> INFO: Undeploying app: /Users/jgallimore/dev/tomee/ > >> container/openejb-core/target/BeanValidationCustomProviderTest > >> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.969 > sec > >> - in org.apache.openejb.bval.BeanValidationCustomProviderTest > >> > >> Results : > >> > >> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 > >> > >> [INFO] > >> [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.17:test (test-testng) @ openejb-core > >> --- > >> [INFO] > >> > >> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > >> [INFO] > >> > >> [INFO] Total time: 22.927 s > >> [INFO] Finished at: 2018-07-04T14:02:58+01:00 > >> [INFO] > >> > >> > >> The build on my server is still on-going, but I can confirm that test > has > >> run, and passed there too. > >> > >> Jon > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Here is the test case result part: > >>> > >>> >>>> classname="org.apache.openejb.bval.BeanValidationCustomProviderTest" > >>>> time="0.245"> > >>>> >>>> type="org.apache.openejb.OpenEJBException">

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

Here is the test case result part: classname="org.apache.openejb.bval.BeanValidationCustomProviderTest" > time="0.245"> > type="org.apache.openejb.OpenEJBException">

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

Thank you. What is your build server, OS and JVM details? On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'll do an explicit build against that tag on my build server now and > confirm. > > Jon > > On Wed, Jul 4, 201

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

Tried to execute mvn clean install from the root location but failed : (Environment macOSX, java version "1.8.0_161") Results : Tests in error: BeanValidationCustomProviderTest.valid » OpenEJB Unable to read OpenEJB config... Tests run: 3926, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 2 What is your bu

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

Thanks Jon. Can you also provide the github source tag URL instead of providing the source as zip? Regards. Gurkan On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Here is the initial roll of TomEE 7.0.5. Please can you take a look and

Release Guidelines

Hello team, Do we have a any well-written guidelines for release procedures? If not, we need to have one which enables the new committers to become release managers? Mark, Romain, Jon: Could you able to provide the some insight on this? Any help appreciated. Regards. Gurkan

Re: Latest Status Release TomEE 7.0.5

Hi Jon Great, thank you :) Ready to test it... Gurkan On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am doing it _right now_. :-) > > Jon > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu > wrote: > > > Hello a

Latest Status Release TomEE 7.0.5

Hello all, What is the latest status about this release? We postpone the release regularly. What needs to be done to release? More than happy to help. Regards. Gurkan

Re: [DISCUSS] Extract examples into own git repo

Hi Mark ++1 for this. Examples must not be a test suite, and it is a great idea to separate them from the main source code. It must be independently build and execute from main TomEE codebase. Best Gurkan On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi folks! > > While trying to relea

TomEE Test Class Wiriting Rules and Documentation

Hi all Currently for the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2150 case, I have just replicated the one of the test class to test issue scenario. Romain said that there are some test rules (we can add this kind of test but please don't use EJBContainer, rather an > application composer test

JIRA Issues

All, I am now looking over TOMEE jira issues to fix them ASAP. Could you help on this? Some of the issues have creation date very old. Any comment on the issues are well appreciated? Thanks. Gurkan

Re: starting with the 7.0.5 release steps.

No, full Web Profile Java EE TCK On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hmm, bval and cdi tck right? This is almost nothing of ee tck coverage > sadly. > > Le jeu. 21 juin 2018 08:22, Gurkan Erdogdu a écrit : > > > Aha 3 h is ok, assumed 13 h :) Actua

Re: starting with the 7.0.5 release steps.

tomee flavors > and not only one as in the default build). > > However 3h of tck is due to a highly parallel execution (kudo David) and > will not be that few without the full infra. So if you want to check some > coverage it easily takes that much or more yes. > > Le jeu. 21 juin

Re: starting with the 7.0.5 release steps.

Romain, do you mean that each release running with TCK takes 13h? On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Le mer. 20 juin 2018 à 07:59, Mark Struberg a > écrit : > > > A build should work out of the box and not require 2 weeks of first > fixing > > sporadically broken unit

Re: starting with the 7.0.5 release steps.

++1 I am a big supporter of easy build of the full system with couple of commands. What can we do to ease the build? On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 8:59 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > A build should work out of the box and not require 2 weeks of first fixing > sporadically broken unit tests. > > And a rele

Re: [VOTE] Merge Pull Request 123 - MicroProfile JWT support

Hi David+1 to merge in TomEE. Regards.Gurkan On Monday, March 19, 2018, 3:02:20 AM GMT+3, David Blevins wrote: Jean-Louis has put a PR up for discussion for JWT Support in TomEE.  - https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/123 There are 35 commits spanning 27 days of work.  It's been rev

Re: TomEE MicroProfile Dist with Config

Hi allYep, as mentionned no issue to have a new distro ;).Right decision, TomEE is the best reasonable place to have MP profile. We also need to have only MP profile of TomEE (TomEE Micro with only have MP nothing else). CheersGurkan On Tuesday, March 6, 2018, 12:32:03 AM GMT+3, Romain

Re: TomEE and MicroProfile

, 2018, 11:38:02 AM GMT+3, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2018-02-22 9:35 GMT+01:00 Gurkan Erdogdu : > >>>After all the same (active!) people are involved in most of those > projects anyway. When you have lots of similar projects, it is not easy to > create and maintain the

Re: TomEE and MicroProfile

is no real confusion since the overlaps are very small once you checked out the projects IMHO. Le 22 févr. 2018 07:43, "Gurkan Erdogdu" a écrit : Hi allSeveral months ago I advised to create another profile under TomEE (or create another TLP project) instead of duplicating the wo

Re: TomEE and MicroProfile

Hi allSeveral months ago I advised to create another profile under TomEE (or create another TLP project) instead of duplicating the work in Meecrowave project but Romain and Mark rejected. Now, come to the same point :) There are lots of separate projects (or subprojects, or modules) in Apache

Re: [Discuss] Review-than-commit 3 month trial

.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> 2017-07-05 7:28 GMT+02:00 Gurkan Erdogdu : > Hi MarkThis is only for fixing the appeared (very important) problem in > the community. So, I don't see what will happen to the p

Re: [Discuss] Review-than-commit 3 month trial

Hi MarkThis is only for fixing the appeared (very important) problem in the community. So, I don't see what will happen to the project in 3 months period with RTC process? So, at least 3 months, every commit will be approved by the community via consensus. After that, we can safely return back t

  1   2   >