Hi!
Unfortunately, I didn't get very far with the faces tck, but maybe there is
another task that I could deal with in parallel? Maybe I'll find a solution
to the faces tck task in the meantime. What do you think?
Thanks:
Zoltán
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 2:18 AM David Blevins
wrote:
> Hi Zoltán
Hi Zoltán,
> On Jan 18, 2023, at 12:22 PM, Zoltán Tichov wrote:
>
> Ok, but eg. the JsonB TCK is more or less in one jar file and at Jakarta
> TCK is not that case.
> So I think I cannot put the whole Faces TCK in one jar to include as a
> dependency. Or I put the whole faces tck
> in the tomee/
Hi Jean-Louis,
About:
- create jobs for TomEE 9.x maintenance
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4178 and left some
questions to understand better the amount of jobs we finally need for the
9.x branch.
El mié, 18 ene 2023 a las 14:22, Zoltán Tichov ()
escribió:
> Hi David!
Hi David!
Ok, but eg. the JsonB TCK is more or less in one jar file and at Jakarta
TCK is not that case.
So I think I cannot put the whole Faces TCK in one jar to include as a
dependency. Or I put the whole faces tck
in the tomee/tck?
Thanks:
Zoltán
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 8:46 PM David Blevins
Hi Zoltán!
> On Jan 18, 2023, at 11:31 AM, Zoltán Tichov wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I examined the Jakarta Faces TCK and it appears that the setup could be
> done in the same way as tomee-tck is.
> But I don't know if it could merge the two TCK or the faces TCK should be a
> separate project.
> Which d
Hi!
I examined the Jakarta Faces TCK and it appears that the setup could be
done in the same way as tomee-tck is.
But I don't know if it could merge the two TCK or the faces TCK should be a
separate project.
Which direction should I go?
Thanks:
Zoltán
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 12:47 PM Jonathan
I've started wiring up the Concurrency TCK here:
https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/TOMEE-4159_Concurrency_TCK. After
updating the Jakarta EE API to 10, there are some compile issues,
particularly around the concurrency area, so there is some work to do
(which I'm looking at now!).
Cheers
Jon
I saw some commits. Thanks for the setup and the work.
We have a couple of pending PRs ready for the different TCK (BVal, CDI,
JSONB, JSONP, Concurrent).
The challenge with standalone TCK is that if we don't find a way to run
them on the cloud, we'll need to consolidate the results between the 2
p
> On Jan 4, 2023, at 4:00 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> I created JIRAs for all the individual TCKs involved in EE 10. Some of these
> are already setup:
>
> TOMEE-4156 Platform/WebProfile TCK
I have this at least minimally setup here:
- https://github.com/apache/tomee-tck
There’s a `setu
Did you move somewhere with the concurrent TCK Jon?
I'll download the platform TCK and look at what's in there. It does not
look many of the TCK moved to arquillian yet.
Le ven. 6 janv. 2023, 19:48, Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Awesome, thanks - that's all assig
Awesome, thanks - that's all assigned.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 7:23 PM Zoltán Tichov
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It is "eagleegg".
>
> Thanks:
>
> Zoltán
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 8:17 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Can you let me know your JIRA username?
> >
> > Thank
Hi!
It is "eagleegg".
Thanks:
Zoltán
On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 8:17 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can you let me know your JIRA username?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jon
>
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, 19:14 Jonathan Gallimore, <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Yes. I'l
Can you let me know your JIRA username?
Thanks
Jon
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, 19:14 Jonathan Gallimore,
wrote:
> Yes. I'll see if I can assign that to you.
>
> Jon
>
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, 18:15 Zoltán Tichov, wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Can I choose the Jakarta Faces TCK?
>>
>> Thanks:
>> Zoltán
>>
>>
>>
Yes. I'll see if I can assign that to you.
Jon
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, 18:15 Zoltán Tichov, wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Can I choose the Jakarta Faces TCK?
>
> Thanks:
> Zoltán
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 1:06 AM David Blevins
> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 5, 2023, at 11:11 AM, Zoltán Tichov
> > wrote:
> > >
> >
Hi!
Can I choose the Jakarta Faces TCK?
Thanks:
Zoltán
On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 1:06 AM David Blevins
wrote:
> > On Jan 5, 2023, at 11:11 AM, Zoltán Tichov
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Be it as you wrote. What should I do now?
>
> If you want to help learn & setup the new standalone TCKs, that
I was pretty interested in this too. I'll pick one of the JIRA and have a
look.
Jon
On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 2:24 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro
wrote:
> I worked on BVal and CDI and we have work to do for both before we can
> merge the corresponding PRs.
>
> I looked at other candidates and it looks lik
I worked on BVal and CDI and we have work to do for both before we can
merge the corresponding PRs.
I looked at other candidates and it looks like many are still using the old
school approach.
Currently I'm downloading Concurrency TCK because it seems it's Arquillian
based and standalone now.
--
> On Jan 5, 2023, at 11:11 AM, Zoltán Tichov wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Be it as you wrote. What should I do now?
If you want to help learn & setup the new standalone TCKs, that’d be a
fantastic way to contribute. Basically, any of the ones in this list that
isn’t already assigned is up for grabs.
Hi!
Be it as you wrote. What should I do now?
Thanks:
Zoltán
On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 9:41 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro
wrote:
> I think first, we should get the 2 PRs in. From experience, delaying them
> makes it frustrating and painful because you have to rebase all the time.
>
> Then create a new
Quick update
I reverted all the commits to bring back the server to 9.0.0 final (aside
from version change to 10.0.0-SNAPSHOT). But hopefully everything else is
now reverted so we can first work on TCK.
As I'm not sure how we'll proceed with the overall TCK project, I started
looking at CDI
Hey David,
I saw your commits. I'm ok to contribute to TCK first so there is only one
thing updated and we know it's the setup if we get TCK failures.
The changes I made are in a PR for the bigger part. Only the Tomcat update
has been already pushed to main. But I'm happy to revert it. It's usuall
I created JIRAs for all the individual TCKs involved in EE 10. Some of these
are already setup:
TOMEE-4156 Platform/WebProfile TCK
TOMEE-4157 Jakarta Authentication TCK
TOMEE-4158 Jakarta Bean Validation TCK
TOMEE-4159 Jakarta Concurrency TCK
TOMEE-4160 Jakarta Contexts and Depend
I think first, we should get the 2 PRs in. From experience, delaying them
makes it frustrating and painful because you have to rebase all the time.
Then create a new issue assigned to version 10.x (or we can create it for
you because of the new Apache restrictions). So you can create the PR for
MV
Hi!
I could help, but I have a task, which I'm not ready yet ( put jakarta mvc
2.0 and tck in tomee).
What to do with this task?
I also have two pending pull requests, should I synchronize them with the
new main branch?
https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/990
https://github.com/apache/tomee/pul
Hi all,
Looks like the TomEE 9.0.0 final release is in good shape and the vote is
about to pass. Awesome.
I'm already looking forward to TomEE 10.x. To that regard, I created a
branch for 9.x maintenance already. Moved main to 10.0.0-SNAPSHOT. I
upgraded Tomcat already and I'm looking to upgrade
25 matches
Mail list logo
