[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3662) Tavel sample GUI money amount fomats are inconsistent

Tavel sample GUI money amount fomats are inconsistent - Key: TUSCANY-3662 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3662 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3661) Travel Sample still use float for money amounts in some places

Travel Sample still use float for money amounts in some places -- Key: TUSCANY-3661 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3661 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-3642) Tuscany does not evaluate mutually exclusive intents correctly where one intent is Qualifiable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brent Daniel resolved TUSCANY-3642. --- Resolution: Fixed > Tuscany does not evaluate mutually exclusive intents correctly where on

Re: tutorial - using binding.rest with non-jaxrs service?

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:10 PM, ant elder wrote: > Mmm, it looks like its a problem with the json data binding not being > able to convert an int response value into a json string. > It looks like we might be missing two things in the JSON databinding : - A SimpleType transformer (e.g SimpleTy

Re: tutorial - using binding.rest with non-jaxrs service?

Mmm, it looks like its a problem with the json data binding not being able to convert an int response value into a json string. ...ant On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Florian MOGA wrote: > Thanks Ant. Line 45 is self-explanatory. That's what I was referring to as > in the previous version of

Re: Apache Retreat in Hursley agenda

Luciano Resende wrote: On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Simon Laws wrote: On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Florian MOGA wrote: Here's another one JIRA cleanup and structure Tuscany whitepaper (documentation) On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Florian MOGA wrote: Hi, Having a chat with Ant,

Re: Apache Retreat in Hursley agenda

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Simon Laws wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Florian MOGA wrote: >> Here's another one >> >> JIRA cleanup and structure >> Tuscany whitepaper (documentation) >> >> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Florian MOGA wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> Having a chat with An

Re: tutorial - using binding.rest with non-jaxrs service?

Thanks Ant. Line 45 is self-explanatory. That's what I was referring to as in the previous version of the binding only the instance variables were initialized with the objects coming from the framework. This wouldn't have brought any differences from the target contract. Didn't expect for changes i

Re: tutorial - using binding.rest with non-jaxrs service?

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:51 PM, ant elder wrote: >> >> If you really want to have all this is in just a single binding then >> why not call it binding.http? Merging this function into binding.rest >> makes no sense at all. REST is not RP

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-3606) POL_4007 Problems with mutually exclusive intent checking

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brent Daniel resolved TUSCANY-3606. --- Assignee: Brent Daniel Resolution: Fixed > POL_4007 Problems with mutually exclusive

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-3652) Callbacks need to be set on service invocation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brent Daniel resolved TUSCANY-3652. --- Resolution: Fixed > Callbacks need to be set on service invocation > --

Re: tutorial - using binding.rest with non-jaxrs service?

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Florian MOGA wrote: > Hi Simon, > Thanks for pointing where can I find more info. I've taken a look at > the DatabindingRuntimeWireProcessor and the only thing I'm trying to clarify > is how tuscany finds out that a String array is actually hiding behind the > Obj

Re: tutorial - using binding.rest with non-jaxrs service?

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Florian MOGA wrote: > Hi Ant, > It seems I've missed Simon's commit and didn't update jsonp binding sources > at the time I was checking them out... That was the problem I wanted to > bring up. I've checked up the new getJSONRequestStringArray() method and > I've s

Re: tutorial - using binding.rest with non-jaxrs service?

Hi Simon, Thanks for pointing where can I find more info. I've taken a look at the DatabindingRuntimeWireProcessor and the only thing I'm trying to clarify is how tuscany finds out that a String array is actually hiding behind the Object[] argument when invoking the wire and decides to use JSON (e

Re: tutorial - using binding.rest with non-jaxrs service?

Hi Florian On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Florian MOGA wrote: > Hi Ant, > It seems I've missed Simon's commit and didn't update jsonp binding sources > at the time I was checking them out... That was the problem I wanted to > bring up. I've checked up the new getJSONRequestStringArray() method

Re: tutorial - using binding.rest with non-jaxrs service?

Hi Ant, It seems I've missed Simon's commit and didn't update jsonp binding sources at the time I was checking them out... That was the problem I wanted to bring up. I've checked up the new getJSONRequestStringArray() method and I've spotted that the typesIndex is never incrementing... Can't estim

Re: Binding Comet location

Hi Luciano, I'm afraid it's been a little misunderstanding as I totally agree with moving the code to trunk/contrib and I was just detailing why I did the copy of poms from trunk to contrib. It's just that the same build problem was affecting the other modules and samples in contrib/ so that solve

Re: Apache Retreat in Hursley agenda

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Florian MOGA wrote: > Here's another one > > JIRA cleanup and structure > Tuscany whitepaper (documentation) > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Florian MOGA wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Having a chat with Ant, we figured out it will be good having some topics >> set for