[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12916060#action_12916060
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-3679:
I've committed this to a new branch at
I've added a callback-api sample in the getting-started folder derived from
the callback-api-basic integration test. Feel free to check it out and let
me know what should be done next (declaration in parent poms, readmes, wiki
page?).
I'll be looking for an itest that uses sca scopes. Let me know
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Florian MOGA moga@gmail.com wrote:
One detail that I've noticed is that we're having a lack for naming
consistency for the samples (e.g. contribution-helloworld /
helloworld-webapp). IMHO using a consistent naming (like
helloworld-contribution /
samples/store-secure doesn't work properly
--
Key: TUSCANY-3695
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3695
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Samples
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 9:26 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Florian MOGA moga@gmail.com wrote:
One detail that I've noticed is that we're having a lack for naming
consistency for the samples (e.g. contribution-helloworld /
helloworld-webapp).
JSONP binding doesn't work with arrays
--
Key: TUSCANY-3696
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3696
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-M5, Java-SCA-1.6,
Hi
I just raised TUSCANY-3696 [1] as I realize that it's not clear how
bindings should deal with arrays. It seems that the databinding layer
is set up at the moment to transform the contents of an array
parameter and leave the array in place for binding code to deal with.
To put it another way
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Florian MOGA moga@gmail.com wrote:
@Ant: What kind of sample are you thinking of in order to show the
sca-contribution.xml file? Can you give me an example (maybe an itest)?
There are a couple of issues we need to decide on, one is how to run
the getting
I personally like the shell and the shell idea very much and I agree it
would be the way to go (no Maven/Ant discrimination). The major problem in
using the shell is that it implies a decent amount of knowledge with terms
like domain, node, contribution which (we all know) aren't very well defined
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:02 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Florian MOGA moga@gmail.com wrote:
@Ant: What kind of sample are you thinking of in order to show the
sca-contribution.xml file? Can you give me an example (maybe an itest)?
There are
I've seen Simon started fixing things on the json databinding and I would
like to update the jsonp sample as well to also use arrays and BigDecimal.
Are we keeping the current format for the scdl or switch to the wire
declaration? I can't estimate how much such a change would take but if it
needs
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Florian MOGA moga@gmail.com wrote:
I personally like the shell and the shell idea very much and I agree it
would be the way to go (no Maven/Ant discrimination). The major problem in
using the shell is that it implies a decent amount of knowledge with terms
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Florian MOGA moga@gmail.com wrote:
I personally like the shell and the shell idea very much and I agree it
would be the way to go (no Maven/Ant discrimination). The major problem in
using the shell is that it implies a decent amount of knowledge with terms
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Florian MOGA moga@gmail.com wrote:
I've seen Simon started fixing things on the json databinding and I would
like to update the jsonp sample as well to also use arrays and BigDecimal.
Are we keeping the current format for the scdl or switch to the wire
I think the current state is that although the binding.http has the
start of some support for this the tuscany-binding-jsonp-runtime still
works and will take prcidence if that jar is included. So for the time
being i think it should all be fine just using binding.jsonp and
binding-jsonp-runtime
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Florian MOGA moga@gmail.com wrote:
I personally like the shell and the shell idea very much and I agree it
would be the way to go (no Maven/Ant discrimination). The major problem
Simon, like you mentioned, the original thinking must simply be that
in most cases, the right thing to do is transform the contents of one
array into the contents of the resulting array.
I just wanted to chime in and ask if it might be worth trying to use
the transformer weight mechanism to make
Shell scripting is an interesting idea and certainly something that
could be added. However, to me, it sounds more like a power user
convenience.
Here's another approach. Why not simply imagine a directory structure
that lays out the various parts of the problem, e..g
domain1
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Scott Kurz scottk...@gmail.com wrote:
Simon, like you mentioned, the original thinking must simply be that
in most cases, the right thing to do is transform the contents of one
array into the contents of the resulting array.
I just wanted to chime in and ask
Hi Simon,
I'm currently studying things for a major enhancement on the comet binding
and helping out with the samples when finding time. It's fine if you
estimate completing fixes on the json databinding this or the next week. Let
me know when you're done and I'll proceed with improving the
Simon Nash wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Simon Laws
simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
I thought we already included the Ibiblio mirror in the top level pom?
Is it just that because the download.java.net works (but very slowly)
that it's choosing that one but not
From what I understand node.xml would be the final configuration that you
would export from the shell after adding/installing all the
contributributions (please correct me if i'm wrong). Wouldn't this bring a
bit more overhead as it adds a new syntax, etc. Does it bring more things
other than a
Hi,
Can you explain why we need to add these extra configuration parameters?
Thanks,
Raymond
Raymond Feng
rf...@apache.org
Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book:
Ok well I've published a snapshot of our maven-bundle-plugin that
allows us to generate some more meta-data for the binary distro. The
snapshot is not synched yet to the Nexus repo so I haven't committed
the distro poms that allow you to build for yourself. I've posted the
resulting zip to my
snip...
Being able to export the full application with all the dependencies included
sounds like a must-have to me.
I would add that being able to start up from a full configuration
without the need to run separate commands seems similarly important.
Simon
--
Apache Tuscany committer:
Hi,
What's the difference between feature and extension?
Thanks,
Raymond
Raymond Feng
rf...@apache.org
Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com
How about we start to making progress on the Beta release again...
Things are looking ok I believe from an otest point of view.
We've had discussion about the samples and that looks to be shaping up.
We've also had disscussion about the distro structure and there are
lots of ideas. I think we
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Raymond Feng enjoyj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
What's the difference between feature and extension?
Thanks,
Raymond
In the bundle plugin config you mean?
In reality in the code nothing at the moment. I had looked on features
as being a somewhat arbitrary but
samples/osgi-supplychain ant script builds incorrect jar files
--
Key: TUSCANY-3697
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3697
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12916273#action_12916273
]
Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-3680:
-
A number of build.xml files in the samples
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote:
I tried the brute force approach today. Without any changes to the
repository definitions in the poms I ran the top-level build and killed it
when it hit a hung download. I rebuilt the failing module until the
download
31 matches
Mail list logo
