; simplify.
WILL
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
In 1.x we have:
directive.set.null.allowed = false
I think that we should flip that to true and perhaps even remove the
option in 2.0.
Does anyone out there rely on not being able to change variables to null
It would be helpful if you could tell us which ones.
2009/3/17 杨冬 yangdong19841...@hotmail.com:
Hi,
I love the user guide to Velocity, it is fabulous. But I found that runtime
results to certain program lists which involves escaping are not correct. I'm
currently using Velocity 1.6.1, and
While i was hoping that 2.0 final would be the next Tools release, it
hasn't worked out that way. But a number of bugs have been fixed and
features improved since 2.0-beta3, and it's time to release another
beta.
Please test this build. I'll call for a vote by the end of the week.
Ok, a new test build with this morning's VelocityViewTag fixes is up.
Same location, same plan. :)
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
While i was hoping that 2.0 final would be the next Tools release, it
hasn't worked out that way. But a number of bugs have
that'd be my fault. fix coming promptly.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Okay, because I'm such a sweetheart I found the broken spots:
Index: src/test/org/apache/velocity/test/ScopeTestCase.java
Hmm. That would be a part of Antonio's patch for VELTOOLS-116 that i
didn't take (it was unnecessary). Apparently he kept building
tiles-velocity against his own local version after i resolved that
issue. :(
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Apologies
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Thu, 5/14/09, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: tiles-velocity problem
To: Velocity Developers List dev@velocity.apache.org
Cc: d...@tiles.apache.org
Date
for the record, here's the +1 from me
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, there were no complaints about the test build, so i'm moving on to a vote.
The test build is still available here:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-beta4
ping
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
for the record, here's the +1 from me
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, there were no complaints about the test build, so i'm moving on to a
vote.
The test build is still
The vote has passed. I'll try to get the website updated and announce
as soon as possible.
+1
Nathan Bubna
Claude Brisson
Will Glass-Husain
+0
Christopher Schultz
Thanks, Will!
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Will Glass-Husain
wglasshus...@gmail.com wrote:
+1.
Ran ant test under JDK 1.5
The Velocity developers are pleased to another beta release of
VelocityTools 2.0 available for download.
Downloads are available here:
http://velocity.apache.org/download.cgi
This should be useable as a drop in replacement for Tools 1.4 or Tools
2.0-beta3, with a few minor exceptions. The 2.x
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Byron Fosterby...@base2.cc wrote:
On Jul 13, 2009, at 11:44 , tl56 wrote:
Hello
I am new to velocity so please excuse me if this is a foolish question,
but
I have a foreach loop and I'd like to display the data within an excel
sheet(exporting data to
Either is fine with me, and help with the maven build is always appreciated. :)
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Antonio
Petrelliantonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I noticed that the tests do not run with Maven, because the classes
end with ...Tests and not ...Test.
There are two
That's great to hear!
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Christopher
Schultzch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
All,
Some time ago, I posted an idea to the list to improve the performance
of Velocity in Struts2
(http://www.nabble.com/Named-macro-parameters-td19459070.html).
After almost a
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:58 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
I noticed that Velocity 2.0 is still at snapshot level, it seems a lot of
time to me :-)
yes, it is a long time. :( but we have had 4 beta releases, not just snapshots.
So I would like to ask: What's
that is really cool. any idea how they got that set up? do you have
this for Tiles?
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Just another thing.
I would like to help, but it's difficult to do it since the patch mechanism
of Subversion is not
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/14 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
I think that the Maven move is easy, knowing what needs to be done. Since
the Ant build files are pretty big, I did not go too deep reading them. What
do they do?
I
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/15 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
What is jdoc BTW?
Google can tell, but it is ultimately unimportant, IMO.
Just curious, I really cannot find anything related to Java, only one
link related
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/15 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
Separate from the example apps? Or just from the main artifact(s).
From the main artifact, because it involves a specific web application
to be deployed. It could
Great! Wish i could join you, but can't do it this year...
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Will Glass-Husain
wglasshus...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there--
I'm going to do a couple days work on Velocity in early November at
the Apache Hackathon. Anyone have some favorite bugs they want to
...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/17 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, overlapping jars? What are you referring to?
We distribute three jars: velocity-tools-generic,
velocity-tools-view, and velocity-tools
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/15 Antonio Petrelli antonio.petre...@gmail.com:
There is only *one* test that I am not able to execute, since it needs a
container, i.e. it is an integration test and it needs, essentially, a
web
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/19 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
Ok, you've got me fairly convinced that everything can be done.
That's great. The next challenge is, i suppose, figuring out how to
transition things over smoothly
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
Nathan,
Resurrecting this because I'm ready to commit.
On 10/29/2009 3:04 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
Nathan
Ok, it seems to me that VELOCITY-731 set back performance enough for
people that we should not wait for 1.7 to have an official release
with the new directive.if.tostring.nullcheck config switch
available. So, here's a 1.6.3 test build. Please try it out and
report problems ASAP. :)
all of you even if
it doesn't work out, but i'm rather hoping it does happen. :)
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, it seems to me that VELOCITY-731 set back performance enough for
people that we should not wait for 1.7 to have an official release
Argh. a) sorry, too late. b) no one ever confirmed my fix for
VELOCITY-718, so i never merged it into the 1.6.x branch c) while
waiting for confirmation, i forgot about 718, so i didn't even
remember it when i asked for 748 to be filed. d) i'm apparently doing
too much if i can't even keep
First, some personal news: my work has taken some dramatic shifts
toward the client side in the last year. This makes it
nigh-impossible to use work time for Velocity development. So, i
have lacked time to finish VelocityTools 2 (among other things), and i
don't foresee much change in this
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Claude Brisson cla...@renegat.net wrote:
Tools 2.0 has been languishing in beta due to unfinished docs. No
one has stepped up to help and really the docs aren't that bad, so i'm
done with that. Expect a CFV for Tools 2.0 final soon. Object
quickly if you
at 1:07 PM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
First, some personal news: my work has taken some dramatic shifts
toward the client side in the last year. This makes it
nigh-impossible to use work time for Velocity development. So, i
have lacked time to finish VelocityTools 2 (among other
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Claude Brisson cla...@renegat.net wrote:
That is still more work in total for both me and any would be adopters
and will reduce their accesibility and thus may inhibit development of
them by anyone else. But whatever, these are not all that important
of tools,
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/4/8 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
I'd vote for a src/sandbox directory without any dedicated task, each
tool in its own subdirectory with a small README file. Interested users
can copy the source files
Ok, it's long overdue for us to put out a Tools 2.0 final release.
Here's the test build.
Please test it. I'll hopefully call for a vote by the end of the week.
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0/
Here's the list of changes since 2.0-beta4
- Added beta-quality UiDependencyTool
+1 for the beta from me
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@apache.org wrote:
Well, still no update from Will on VELOCITY-717, but since it seems an
uncommon issue and this is only a beta, i'm going to proceed with the
vote:
The build is still available here:
http
i'll do it. that part is quick.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Claude Brisson cla...@renegat.net wrote:
Ok, then tell me if you want me to put a new test build online or if
you're on the way to do it...
Claude
On mar., 2010-04-13 at 08:04 -0700, Nathan Bubna wrote:
If you want
Ok, i've updated the test build to revision 933536. It is still at:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0/ant pu
and i still hope to call for a vote this weekend-ish. :)
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
i'll do it. that part is quick
either 3
PMC +1s, a -1 or 2 weeks happen. If the vote passes, I'll push this
to the mirrors, change the web site and get Henning to deploy it.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, i've updated the test build to revision 933536. It is still at:
http
+1
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, everyone seems happy with the build at this point, so it's time to vote:
The build is still available here:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0/
Please vote regarding your support for releasing
(
java.lang.StringBuffer)]
Those look suspicious to me. Did fix for VELOCITY-753 break something or are
those messages normal?
Nathan Bubna-3 wrote:
The build is still available here:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine/1.7-beta1/
Please vote regarding your support for releasing
If we manage a 1.6.4 release, it will be in there. It is fixed in all
branches: 1.6.x, 1.7(trunk) and 2.0 (exp). It is fixed in the
upcoming 1.7-beta1 release. Please feel free to jump in and help
with things, especially testing release builds. That's how things
like this get caught before a
Use Ant. The Maven build is only casually supported.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 9:28 AM, 校长 sdh5...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi devs,
I got source code from
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/velocity/engine/branches/1.6.x and compile
it , then I got following error. Anyone can help me ? Thank you.
: The following error occurred
while executing this line:
/disk/home/work/v1.6.x/build/testcases.xml:81: taskdef A class needed by
class org.apache.velocity.anakia.AnakiaTask cannot be found:
org/jdom/JDOMException
Total time: 49 seconds
2010/4/21 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com
Use Ant
, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
What versions of Ant and the JDK are you using?
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 9:42 AM, 校长 sdh5...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Nathan,
sorry, i got another test task faild.
Thank you.
Leon
test-anakia:
[echo] Running Anakia tests...
BUILD
:) We'll get that sandbox going. Just be patient...
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/4/21 校长 sdh5...@gmail.com:
I think JDOM does not add in test lib path.
How many times should I say to support Maven? Oh well..
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:04 AM, 校长 sdh5...@gmail.com wrote:
Ohh...I think velocity devs shuold select ONE build tool for peoject.
Mutiple build tools will cause many problem on test task. Ant Maven are
very good, But focus on one tool.
agreed
When guys see pom.xml in project root
Can't you use a ReferenceInsertionEventHandler? We have ready-made
ones for escaping output.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Ivan Ristic ivan.ris...@gmail.com wrote:
[Note: I am sending this email for the second time because,
apparently, the first email did not make it to the list. Apologies
No worries. I wasn't ignoring you, so much as trying to keep
attention on the open vote threads.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/4/21 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
:) We'll get that sandbox going. Just be patient...
Ok thanks! I
.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Ivan Ristic ivan.ris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't you use a ReferenceInsertionEventHandler? We have ready-made
ones for escaping output.
No, I don't think I can, because I need to use
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Rachid rachi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ivan,
Good to hear that there is more development on Reducing XSS in Velocity. I
did some research on it and made a tool which scans Velocity Templates and
check if every output ($v1, etc) is encoded. If not, the tool gives
Ok, we have three small, relatively uncommon but serious bug fixes
since 1.6.3 was released. Rather than wait for a final 1.7 release,
it seems prudent to also do 1 1.6.4 release (assuming we can get the
votes :). Here's the test build:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine/1.6.4/
I
The Velocity developers are please to announce the availability of
Velocity Engine 1.7-beta1.
Downloads can be found here:
http://velocity.apache.org/download.cgi
A great deal of work has been done since the 1.6 branch. Here's a taste:
- Your macros can now be called with bodies when you
today, i'll close
the vote anyway. Can't drag this out forever...
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@apache.org wrote:
Ok, i fixed the problem with the missing showcase war. Nothing else
has changed. I'll call for a new vote in a few days. Please test it
now, rather than
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.com wrote:
On 05/03/2010 04:45 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
And the moral of the story is that VTL is that getting creative with
macro args is only for the brave... simplicity is a good goal.
(more response inline)
On Mon, May 3
...
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, we have three small, relatively uncommon but serious bug fixes
since 1.6.3 was released. Rather than wait for a final 1.7 release,
it seems prudent to also do 1 1.6.4 release (assuming we can get the
votes :). Here's
+1 from me
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@apache.org wrote:
Ok, there were no complaints about the 2nd test build. Let's try the
vote again...
The build is still available here:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0/
Please vote regarding your support
+1 from me
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, it seems worth doing one last bugfix release for 1.6 while i still
have a little steam here. The release candidate is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine/1.6.4/
[ ] +1 Let's do
just noticed that fix for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-760 should be included in
this release (and 1.7 also) since it's a critical bug for those who use the
DataSourceResourceLoader.
Sorry :)
Nathan Bubna wrote:
Ok, it seems worth doing one last bugfix release for 1.6 while
Apologies for the delay..
The vote has passed:
+1
Antonio Petrelli
Nathan Bubna
Will Glass-Husain
Claude Brisson
Christoph Reck
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:26 AM, apa...@recks.org wrote:
+1, works for me! I will continue to use and test it.
Thanks,
Christoph
On 2010-05-03 18:17, Nathan
Apologies for the delay...
The vote has passed:
+1
Nathan Bubna
Malcolm Edgar
Jarkko Viinamaki
Claude Brisson
Will Glass-Husain
Ilkka Priha
+0
Daniel Rall
Christoph Reck
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Will Glass-Husain
wglasshus...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for the release.
On Tue, May 4, 2010
-report.html
Apache Velocity 1.6.4 can be downloaded here:
http://velocity.apache.org/download.cgi
Documentation for Engine1.6.4 can be found here:
http://velocity.apache.org/engine/releases/velocity-1.6.4/
For the Apache Velocity Team,
Nathan Bubna
The Apache Velocity project is pleased to announce the release of
VelocityTools 2.0.
Downloads are available here:
http://velocity.apache.org/download.cgi
This should be useable as a drop in replacement for Tools 2.0-beta4 or
Tools 1.4, with a few minor exceptions. The 2.x series of
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Claude Brisson cla...@renegat.net wrote:
Yes, go ahead. Your mail only lacks [VOTE] and a mention of the voting
period, which is *usually* 72h.
give or take 72hrs... :)
Claude
On mar., 2010-06-08 at 21:04 +0200, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
Hi all,
I would
Oh, and technically, we already voted in favor of making a sandbox for
this purpose, so i don't think another vote is needed. I say just go
for it. We can discuss and vote later about moving it to the various
trunks and branches of the projects.
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Nathan Bubna nbu
responses inline...
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:49 AM, nodje nodje...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've successfully upgraded to Tools 2.0 and Velocity 1.6.4.
upgrading from what?
I'm getting confusing logs though, I wish someone could help me understand
them.
First of all, I'm using Velocity in a
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I am proposing that we change our release process so that we can
leverage the Apache instance of Sonatype Nexus Professional.
Not all of us are familiar with this. Could you explain the benefits?
And
Ok, +1
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/9 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
Not all of us are familiar with this. Could you explain the benefits?
The benefit is that staging Maven artifacts is no more a problem,
since Nexus (professional
Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/5/19 Nathan Bubna nbu...@apache.org:
The Apache Velocity Team announces the availability of the of Apache
Velocity Engine 1.6.4. This is only a bugfix release and contains no
new features. We recommend all 1.6.x users upgrade to this release
They were both for works-in-progress and crazy ideas that never really
found a home. Neither has had clear definition in my recent memory.
They should probably be combined and cleaned-up. Some things are
obsolete now (localdirective, everything in whiteboard directories for
geir and daveb, and
Oops, didn't realize i'd missed those. Sorry, i was trying to get a
lot of releases done amidst little time to do them.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/22 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
That reply probably didn't need to go to user
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:25 AM, nodje nodje...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I'm getting confusing logs though, I wish someone could help me
understand them.
First of all, I'm using Velocity in a web environnement as a replacement
to JSPs.
yes, but how. are you using VelocityViewServlet? can you
, as it is truly, totally obsolete (daveb's stuff,
henning's jdk15 stuff, and some of geir's stuff).
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/22 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
They were both for works-in-progress and crazy ideas that never really
found
They started out life as components of Velocity. A few years back
we broke Velocity into Engine, Anakia and Texen. However, for
backwards compatibility reasons, the embedded Anaki and Texen were
simply deprecated in Engine 1.x, not removed. In Engine 2.x, they
were removed. All users are
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/velocity/engine/branches/2.0_Exp
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/23 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
They started out life as components of Velocity. A few years back
we broke Velocity into Engine
I think the Logkit stuff can go. That's pretty unpopular at this point.
I, however, am opposed to a switch to pure commons-logging or SLF4j,
even in Velocity 2.0. I do not think static logging is appropriate
for Velocity. A bridge to a static logger system is fine, but direct
use is not.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the Logkit stuff can go. That's pretty unpopular at this point.
I, however, am opposed to a switch to pure commons-logging or SLF4j,
even in Velocity 2.0. I do not think static logging is appropriate
for Velocity
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/29 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
...
Velocity is not a development framework. It is an
oft-embedded component.
Sorry? I thought it was a template engine...
yes, a template engine is (or should
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok you convinced me, but I have one last point to debate.
2010/6/29 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
With Maven I can create
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/30 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
So, if i wanted to use the servlet log, i would have to download and
use both a velocity-engine jar and a velocity-engine-servlet jar?
Yes. Or declare a dependency
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/30 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/30 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
So, if i wanted to use the servlet log, i
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/1 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/30 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Antonio
2010/7/1 Marinó A. Jónsson mari...@centrum.is:
Just noticed you're going ahead with the change from velocity-log-{lib} to
velocity-engine-{lib} - I believe, seeing as the uberjar will be packaged
for ant users, that the original naming of velocity-log-{lib} actually makes
more sense to us
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
I changed the subject for clarity.
2010/7/1 Marinó A. Jónsson mari...@centrum.is:
Just noticed you're going ahead with the change from velocity-log-{lib} to
velocity-engine-{lib} - I believe, seeing as the
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I would like to inform you that Maven reorganization of Velocity
Engine has finished. You can see the result here:
http://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/velocity/sandbox/maven-reorg/engine/trunk/
great!
+1
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I noticed that there is no velocity directory in the builds
directory of people.apache.org.
Do you mind if I ask the INFRA team about creating it?
In this directory there will be put official test
i think that's a better plan than the current situation. :)
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I noticed that, under the tools trunk, there are two files:
WebappUberspector.java.velocity-1.x
WebappUberspector.java.velocity-2.x
I would
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2010-08-02, apa...@recks.org wrote:
even though I would love to have the established character escaping
with a backslash used in many programming languages, velocity is not
up to it yet (the tendency is not to make it
That certainly sounds like a bug. Would you open a JIRA issue?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS
i'm planning/hoping to spend a day or two next week fixing bugs and
maybe putting out an Engine 1.7 final. This looks like something that
i should do that day. :)
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/8 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
* The Excalibur dependency has not been removed.
but it should be
Yes, I forgot to tell it :-D
Other things that I forgot:
- 1 -
The test organization is strange
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/8/31 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
- 1 -
The test organization is strange: the .java test files are considered
resources, parsed just to substitute two variables in one file, and
then compiled
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/8/31 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
But at this point, you'll have my support in a
vote for moving this into the Engine 2.0, Tools 2.1, etc, with one
condition: documentation. With the proliferation
Well, since no one else seems to have an opinion, we can either a)
assume they have no objections and procede or b) call for a vote to
get attention and decide by lazy consensus (at least one +1 and no -1)
personally, i'm ok with either next step. :)
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Nathan Bubna
, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/9/8 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
Well, since no one else seems to have an opinion, we can either a)
assume they have no objections and procede or b) call for a vote to
get attention and decide by lazy consensus (at least one +1
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/9/8 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
No, we're not definitely not mavenizing the Engine trunk, only the 2.x
branch (which can probably lose the exp moniker by now). Also, we
should not mavenize the Tools
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/9/8 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/9/8 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
No, we're not definitely not mavenizing
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/9/8 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
2) Merge sandboxed Engine project(s) into the 2.x branch of Engine
3) Copy trunks of current projects into maintenance branches (e.g.
2.0.x branch for Tools)
4) Merge
ant -p is needed because targets are always custom. Maven goals are
standardized, so users are expected to know the basics :
http://maven.apache.org/guides/getting-started/maven-in-five-minutes.html
mvn install is usually where i begin.
maven has dependency management at the core. getting
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/9/9 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/9/8 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com:
2) Merge sandboxed Engine project(s
+1 (with minor correction)
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
All Velocity projects, with the exclusion of DBF, have been mavenized.
You can see the result of this process in the Subversion sandbox:
i have no love for gump. +1
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that Gump is failing. Since Gump is a bit outdated, why
don't we move to Hudson instead? Apache runs an instance of it:
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/
Antonio
No. Usually, after i run the 'ant parser' task, the only file i need
to tweak is the JJTParserState class, to re-add a need import
statement. And those three classes you mentioned are not generated
by 'ant parser'. Perhaps they were once, long ago, but they've been
hand-edited for a long time.
301 - 400 of 1185 matches
Mail list logo
