Hi Sewmini
In your case since you have sent 5 requests to the both of the resources
these will be successful due to your API level throttling tier being 5.
After that requests will be terminated.
Please find the below documentation that will be a help to you
https://docs.wso2.com/display/AM180/Ke
Hi All
Considering the above changes and the bug fixes that will be incorporated
in the latest pack, there should be a new qa cycle on the latest pack.
While considering the amount of test cases we have as well as the available
qa resources (#2) it will take around one week to complete the test cy
:
> Hi,
>
> We'll give a new setup tomorrow morning. Meanwhile please cover the breath
> in other areas that have not changed.
>
> thanks,
> dimuthu
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Chathurika De Silva <
> chathuri...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi A
gt; delete from development environment is it ?
>>
>>
>> Thank You,
>> Sewmini
>>
>> Sewmini Jayaweera
>> *Software Engineer - QA Team*
>> Mobile: +94 (0) 773 381 250
>> sewm...@wso2.com
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Chathurika De
Hi
Yes let's go ahead as planned.
Thank You
Erandi
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Dimuthu Leelarathne
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could we still go ahead release beta on the 18th while you do the
> documentation?
>
> thanks,
> dimuthu
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:
Hi
Currently in App Factory, the fork repository as well as the main
repository is affected by the auto build/deploy configuration. Is this the
functional requirement?
Thank You
Erandi
--
*Chathurika Erandi*
Software Engineer,
WSO2 Inc.
*E-mail:* chathuri...@wso2.com
*Mobile: *+94714 328 612
*
eed to have different configuration for fork. Thanks
> for reporting. Please create a jira. We will decide when to fix this.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Danushka Fernando
> Software Engineer
> WSO2 inc. http://wso2.com/
> Mobile : +94716332729
>
> On Wed, Mar 11,
Hi
There a reported jira [1] which is similar to your exception. Maybe the
related fix will be a help to you
[1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/APPFAC-2717
Thank You
Erandi
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Fathima Dilhasha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to create an application in the private clo
Hi
As an addition to what pavithra mentioned, an example for a use case,
Disabling chunked encdoing from gateway can be considered. Here we have to
associate a custom sequence and this can be done by following [1]
We can write a simple sequence as follows
http://ws.apache.org/ns/synapse";
name="
Hi All
Since we are going to start the release testing is it ok to use the packs
in the location
https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/scratch/chunk13-release/29-09-2014/ because
it's the most recent for APIM
Thank You
Erandi
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Evanthika Amarasiri
wrote:
> Hi Ratha,
>
t; On 17 October 2014 12:04, Chathurika De Silva
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> Since we are going to start the release testing is it ok to use the packs
>> in the location
>> https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/scratch/chunk13-release/29-09-2014/
>> because it's the
Hi All
While testing it's observed that work-flow scenarios are not working out of
the box for API Manager 1.8.0 and BPS 3.2.0.
In order to get it working had to apply patch 0009 to BPS [1]
This was an offline advice i have got and there's no indication anywhere in
documentation or wherever that
ate as of
> 30.07.2014
>
> *QA Personal* : Chalitha Waldeniyage and Chathurika De Silva
>
> *Environment details*:
>
> Operating System : Linux
> Java Version/Java VM :jdk1.7.0 (Oracle)
> Packs : APIM 1.7.1
> DBMS: mysql and oracle
> Browser : Firefox 29.0 and Chrome 3
, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Chathurika De Silva
wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I am going to conduct a testing round in Windows to verify
> APIMANAGER-2559. Will circle back to you once i am done.
>
> Thank You
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Chalitha Waldeniyage
> wro
for basic API Manager scenarios.
Thank You
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Chathurika De Silva
wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I conducted a test on windows environment to verify APIMANAGER-2559
>
> This is issue is fixed for super tenant but not for other tenants due to
> APIMANAGER
get
> the above mentioned issues fixed,we cannot proceed with migration testing
> in API Manager 1.7.1 further.
>
> Thank you
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Chathurika De Silva
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> As of today (01.08.2014) the migration
9, Uvindra Dias Jayasinha wrote:
>
>> Seems the stack trace is different from what was originally reported for
>> this ticket, can we have a closer look at this? Please ping me when you get
>> back to your seat. Thanks
>>
>>
>> On 11 August 2014 12:30, Chathurik
the jira (these instructions are added to the
> readme.txt).
>
> [1] https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/scratch/chunk13-release/17-08-2014/
> Thanks,
> Chamila.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Chathurika De Silva > wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> As pe
gt; synapse-config/default/api folder.
> Thanks,
> Chamila.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Nuwan Dias wrote:
>
>> We should be able to write a simple script or java client to do this
>> right?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> NuwanD.
>>
>>
>> On
Congratulations Akila
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Sewwandi Perera wrote:
> Congratulations Akila...!!!
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Dumidu Handakumbura
> wrote:
>
>> Congrats Akila.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Dunith Dhanushka wrote:
>>
>>> Congrats Akila!
>>>
>>
Hi All
The migration cannot be tested in the 04/09/2014 due to the following
issue, since none of the migrated APIs can be retrieved. Testing is
currently blocking.
https://wso2.org/jira/browse/APIMANAGER-2799
Thank You
Erandi
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Chathurika De Silva
wrote
.0_to_1.7.1" to modify the database.
> it creates the related column "SUBS_CREATE_STATE" (which is mentioned in
> the error log). Did you use that one? I think this might be the problem.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Chathurika De Silva > wrote:
>
>&g
be found in the svn location[1] but is missing in the pack
>
> [1]
> https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/carbon/platform/branches/turing/products/apimgt/1.7.1/modules/distribution/resources/migration-1.7.0_to_1.7.1/
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Chathurika De Silva > wrote:
Hi All
I connected the pack released on 04/09 to the MSSQL database i used with a
previous 1.7.1 pack and the following error occurred.
https://wso2.org/jira/browse/APIMANAGER-2802
Please provide directives in proceeding.
Thank You
Erandi
--
*Chathurika Erandi*
Software Engineer,
WSO2 Inc.
*
Congratulations Harshan
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Sewwandi Perera wrote:
> Congratulations Harshan...!!! :)
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Inosh Perera wrote:
>
>> Congrats Harshan!!! :)
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Niranjan Karunanandham <
>> niran...@wso2.com> wrot
Congratulations Sewwandi!!
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Kalpa Welivitigoda
wrote:
> Congratulations Sewwandi !
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Thanuja Jayasinghe
> wrote:
>
>> Congratz...!!!
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Dunith Dhanushka
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Congrats Sewwandhi!
Hi All
I have implemented a secure proxy service and a client that talks to that
service. In the client i have referenced rampart module as below
ConfigurationContext ctx =
ConfigurationContextFactory.createConfigurationContextFromFileSystem("/home/erandi/axis2-1.6.2/repository",
null);
When run
Hi All
I tried to use the following MAVEN_OPTS value which is in the documentation
*MAVEN_OPTS="-Xms768m -Xmx3072m -XX:MaxPermSize=1200m"*
but it resulted in an error saying *Xms768m not found*
When i used the following command worked
*MAVEN_OPTS="-Xms1024m -Xmx4096m -XX:MaxPermSize=1024m"*
EN_OPTS string in WSO2 docs directly. This is because of character (")
> where it should be (") precisely. Please ack if this is what troubled you.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Chathurika De Silva > wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
&
t; On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Chathurika De Silva
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Gayan
>>
>> You are correct, that is the problem. Shouldn't it be specified in the
>> documentation? Not to copy paste?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 4:51 P
Following errors occurred when starting the BRS 2.0.0 with the below db2
configuration
WSO2_CARBON_DB
The datasource used for registry and user
manager
jdbc/WSO2CarbonDB
jdbc:db2:/
Hi All
We tried to set up the cluster for above mentioned BRS version using ELB
2.1.1. We encountered the following blocker which we reported under LB-147
Due the above issue, we are moving to ELB 2.1.0 for our further testing
process until the issue is fixed.
Best Regards
--
*Chathurika Erand
rds,
> Sandapa
>
>
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Chathurika De Silva > wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> We tried to set up the cluster for above mentioned BRS version using ELB
>> 2.1.1. We encountered the following blocker which we reported under LB-147
&
Hi
Test cases added and related samples can be found attached with the
following issue
https://wso2.org/jira/browse/BRS-88
Best Regards
Erandi
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Waruna Jayaweera wrote:
> Hi,
> We need to test Decision table samples too. Please add that to the doc.
>
>
> On Mon,
Hi All
Please find the BRS Load test results in the following given location
https://docs.google.com/a/wso2.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnpVKBDCKX9ldERGSzFZaUxJMWFKVlVObEh0akJYRnc&usp=sharing
Best Regards
--
*Chathurika Erandi*
Software Engineer,
WSO2 Inc.
*E-mail:* chathuri...@wso2.com
*Mobile
Hi ESB Team
Addition to dilshani' and nuwan's feedback, from user's perspective, when
debug points are set and if the artifact is not changed, the need for him
to resend debug point information is an additional task. Ideally it's
better to give the same feel to a developer who is using this tool a
>>
>>>> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Isabelle Mauny
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 - Can we fix this in 5.0.0 …
>>>>> __
>>>>>
>>>>> Isabelle Mauny
&g
Hi Suho
In a multi tenancy environment, with the increment of tenants how does the
supervisor slots behave? As in do they increment with the number of
tenants?
Best Regards
Erandi
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Manorama Perera wrote:
> Yes, this is because ML uses carbon.analytics 1.0.3-S
Hi
For BPS 3.5.0 following sections will be tested. Please note that this will
be a non release oriented test.
1. BPEL
2. BPMN
3. BPMN Explorer (new feature in 3.5.0)
4. Human Tasks
5. Human Task Explorer (new feature in 3.5.0)
6. Migration from 3.2.0 to 3.5.0
7. Performance
8. Provided patches
Hi
I am trying to use the $subject through jmeter. I am getting response code
201 which is the success code for deployment [1].
In the BPS logs i am observing the following
TID: [-1234] [] [2015-10-05 06:21:15,781] INFO
{org.wso2.carbon.user.core.ldap.ReadWriteLDAPUserStoreManager} - LDAP
conn
m/> <http://suhothayan.blogspot.com/>*
>> *twitter: https://twitter.com/firzhan007
>> <https://twitter.com/firzhan007> | linked-in:
>> **https://www.linkedin.com/in/firzhan
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/firzhan>*
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 a
Hi All
We have configured a SchedulerTask for the BPS cluster (2 workers and
manager fronted by nginx). The task runs every day 5.10 pm and deletes
FAILED instances. The cluster was up and running in the weekend but was
idle. Following error was observed.
TID: [-1] [] [2015-10-09 18:49:23,157] E
t;*
> *twitter: https://twitter.com/firzhan007
> <https://twitter.com/firzhan007> | linked-in:
> **https://www.linkedin.com/in/firzhan
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/firzhan>*
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Chathurika De Silva <
> chathuri...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
ayan.blogspot.com/>*
> *twitter: https://twitter.com/firzhan007
> <https://twitter.com/firzhan007> | linked-in:
> **https://www.linkedin.com/in/firzhan
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/firzhan>*
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Chathurika De Silva <
>
Hi
While running the $subject on a manager, 2 worker cluster, noticed a
dis-ambiguity reported in [1]
Can you please provide an explanation on this? Your help is greatly
appreciated.
[1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/BPS-912
Thank You
Erandi
--
*Chathurika Erandi*
Software Engineer,
WSO2 Inc.
the cleanup?
Please find the test parameters in [1]
[1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/BPS-912
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Chathurika De Silva
wrote:
> Hi
>
> While running the $subject on a manager, 2 worker cluster, noticed a
> dis-ambiguity reported in [1]
>
> Can you
Hi
As per our understanding the starting point of EMM which is device
enrolment happens in two ways
1. User addition
2. Through QA code
But both seem to be not working in the M7 pack. Please find the reported
jiras below. Is there a chance to get a new pack?
[1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/EMM
Hi
In EMM for permissions the following structure is there
-Device Management
-Device Management Admin
User 1 -> Device Management (parent level permission)
User 2 -> Device Management Admin (Child level permission only)
What are the contexts that above users can be used? Help regardi
Hi
As of today EOD we have total number of 13 blockers [1] raised and these
have affected the following scenarios
1. Unable to use MSSQL, Oracle, Mysql or PostgresSQL
2. Unable to change default username and role
3. Unable to self enrol device
4. Unable to apply policies for QR enrolled devices s
6:36 PM, Chathurika De Silva
wrote:
> Hi
>
> As of today EOD we have total number of 13 blockers [1] raised and these
> have affected the following scenarios
>
> 1. Unable to use MSSQL, Oracle, Mysql or PostgresSQL
> 2. Unable to change default username and role
> 3. Una
Hi
The clustering guide in [1] is not currently available. Can you please
provide us documentation on this as this is currently blocking our testing
process.
Please find the jira reported on this [2]
[1] https://docs.wso2.com/display/CLUSTER44x/Clustering+WSO2+Products
[2] https://wso2.org/jira/
SO2 (pvt.) Ltd.
> Colombo, Sri Lanka
> (+94) 773131798
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Chathurika De Silva <
> chathuri...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> The clustering guide in [1] is not currently available. Can you please
>> provide us documentat
Hi All
Currently in the above pack, the following main scenarios cannot be executed
1. Change the default H2 database
2. Applying policies
3. Secondary user store association for Oracle, MSSQL
4. Device not being able to be enrolled for a tenant user
5. Email as a username cannot be used
6. Etc..
SAP.
>
> Cheers,
> Prabath
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Chathurika De Silva > wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Any update on this please, as we need to go for deployment soon.
>>
>> Thank You
>> Erandi
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:06 AM
Hi
Since the Alpha is released, the QA people MUST setup the cluster now. Is
there any way we can get the deployment details and get them documented?
This is currently BLOCKING our testing cycle on Alpha.
Thank You
Erandi
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Chathurika De Silva
wrote:
> Hi
>
Congratzz!!!1
Kaushi!
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Chalitha Waldeniyage
wrote:
> Congratulations !!! Kaushi
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Chankami Maddumage
> wrote:
>
>> Congrats Kawshy :)
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 a
Hi Hasitha
Do we have any differences in BPMN related functionality that affects
migration from 350 to 351?
Couldn't find a reference in the documentation
Thank You
Erandi
--
*Chathurika Erandi*
Software Engineer,
WSO2 Inc.
*E-mail:* chathuri...@wso2.com
*Mobile: *+94714 328 612
*Blog*: chath
Hi
In [1] there are two session management methods as "Transport" and "Soap".
The document does not provide comprehensive details on their usage. Can you
please explain their usage with a user scenario?
Thank You
Erandi
--
*Chathurika Erandi*
Software Engineer,
WSO2 Inc.
*E-mail:* chathuri...@
Adding the doc link [1]
[1] https://docs.wso2.com/display/ESB4100/Load-balance+Group
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Chathurika De Silva
wrote:
> Hi
>
> In [1] there are two session management methods as "Transport" and "Soap".
> The document does not provid
Feb 3, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Chathurika De Silva > wrote:
>
>> Adding the doc link [1]
>>
>> [1] https://docs.wso2.com/display/ESB4100/Load-balance+Group
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Chathurika De Silva <
>> chathuri...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>
>
Hi Nisrin
I couldn't find related documentation on $subject in either [1] or [2]. Is
there any reason why it's not added? For reference i have recorded a doc
jira [3] as well
[1] https://docs.wso2.com/display/ESB4100/Adding+a+New+Endpoint+Template
[2] https://docs.wso2.com/display/ESB490/Adding+a
Hi Nisrin
According to the above mail ESB 4.10.0 will be ESB 5.0.0 with immediate
effect. Can we change the documentation space to reflect it as well?
Thank You
Erandi
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Kasun Indrasiri wrote:
> Also, to clarify that there won't be any major changes related to
>
Hi Madhawa
This blog might be a help as well [1]
[1] https://dzone.com/articles/how-build-wso2-carbon-420
Regards
Erandi
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Tharindu Edirisinghe
wrote:
> Hi Madhawa,
>
> Can you try to build with some maven 3.0.x version ? According to [1]
> that's the recommenda
Hi
Currently the version 500 is not there in the jira. Could you please update
it?
Thank You
Erandi
--
*Chathurika Erandi*
Software Engineer,
WSO2 Inc.
*E-mail:* chathuri...@wso2.com
*Mobile: *+94714 328 612
*Blog*: chathurikaerandi.blogspot.com
___
Hi
With regarding to the $subject what is the default action on a incoming
request?
If i further explain, say i configure ip address 1 as allowed. Then the
incoming requests from this particular ip address will be allowed.
Currently, if i invoke from another ip address (ip addres 2) then those
re
Raised [1] with the concern as well
[1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/ESBJAVA-4455
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Chathurika De Silva
wrote:
> Hi
>
> With regarding to the $subject what is the default action on a incoming
> request?
>
> If i further explain, say i configu
Hi
As per the offline chat with Asela the documentation that is pointed by [1]
is Oauth 1.0 [2] . There seems to be no sample for Oauth 2.0 related
scenario. Can we get it included in the documentation?
[1] https://docs.wso2.com/display/ESB500/OAuth+Mediator
[2]
https://docs.wso2.com/display/IS51
Hi ESB team
The $subject, the documentation gives
http://ws.apache.org/ns/synapse/transform/feature/dom as the example. Is
there any predefined feature list that can be used here?
Thank You
Erandi
--
*Chathurika Erandi*
Software Engineer,
WSO2 Inc.
*E-mail:* chathuri...@wso2.com
*Mobile: *+947
Hi
Currently the data mapper compares (compare operator) String values for >
(greater than), < (less than). The native javascript too does the same
which is the underlining engine of data mapper.
Since we are providing data mapper to the user to enhance conversion and
mapping, rather than a graph
If I understood your suggestion in a different manner.
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Chathurika De Silva > wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Currently the data mapper compares (compare operator) String values for >
>> (greater than), < (less than). The native javas
Hi
Currently in data mapper, the multiplication of -2 * 0 results in -0.
Ideally in basic mathematics the value zero should not have any - or +
marking on it. I have reported [1] regarding this and according to jira's
comments if this is to be fixed the -0 should be converted to string and
then ag
Hi ESB Team
Currently the constant operator provides just a setting of value and
mapping to an output. In the present mapping configuration the constant is
not defined as a constant, rather the defined value is assigned directly to
the relevant output.
If there is a mechanism to define a global c
ks,
> Viraj.
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Chathurika De Silva > wrote:
>
>> Hi ESB Team
>>
>> Currently the constant operator provides just a setting of value and
>> mapping to an output. In the present mapping configuration the constant is
>> n
Hi
A similar issue exists for un-deploying a CAPP and the issue is reported as
[1]. Would it be possible for us to get this fixed?
[1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/DEVTOOLESB-642
Thank You
Erandi
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Pubudu Priyashan wrote:
> Awesome. Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Pubudu
t Dev Studio calls admin services with additional '/' and it
> will be removed with the fix.
>
> [1] - https://wso2.org/jira/browse/DEVTOOLESB-637
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Chathurika De Silva > wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> A simila
Hi
It was observed that the operators which manipulates values using both the
configuration and the inputs always takes the configured value as the
preceded one when both ways are present. According to the discussion in [1]
the user has to keep the default values in the configuration as it is to
m
ut and operator description in the configure dialog about it.
>
> [1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/DEVTOOLESB-655
>
> Thanks,
> Nuwan
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Chathurika De Silva > wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> It was observed that the operators which manip
Hi
While trying to get a fine grained access control implemented for apis
using WSO2 Identity server, I came across [1] which provides a high level
guide to get it done, then going forward I referred [2] which discusses
$subject.
In [1] it mentions using WSO2 IS set up as the key manager for WSO2
Hi
In order to achieve the $subject to implement solution 15 in [1] I have
done the below steps
1. Add WSO2 IS as an Identity provider in WSO2 APPM (added as a federation
hub identity provider)
2. Followed from step 1 to 3 in [2]
It would be much appreciated if the above mentioned steps can be ve
ent the first part of configuration? or is it
> not working kind of situation?
>
> Thanks,
> Kavitha
>
> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Chathurika De Silva
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> In order to achieve the $subject to implement solution 15 in [1] I have
&
Hi
I am trying to creating an api using the rest interfaces to have access
control for selected roles. In Publisher UI i can set "Restricted to Roles"
as Access Control mechanism. Referred [1] to find the relevant parameter to
set the above through the REST APIs but couldn't find the reference. An
Roles": [], "visibleTenants": [],
>>
>> [1]https://docs.wso2.com/display/AM210/apidocs/publisher/#!/
>> operations#APICollection#apisPost
>>
>> Thanks,
>> sanjeewa.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Chathurika De Silva <
>> cha
Hi
There is a need to create/update an api with a custom sequence associated
through the REST APIs. In [1] the sample payload has a field called
sequences which is taking an array as the argument. But from the document
it's not clear how to proceed with it (whether we need to first upload the
sequ
MediationPost
>
> Thanks,
> Praminda
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Chathurika De Silva > wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> There is a need to create/update an api with a custom sequence associated
>> through the REST APIs. In [1] the sample payload has a field ca
; creation time, otherwise, you will have to create the API first and upload
> the sequence through the API mentioned by Praminda.
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Chathurika De Silva > wrote:
>
>> Hi Praminda
>>
>> Thank you. I will try this. Since the payload in [1]
quot;tiers": ["Unlimited"],
"visibility": "PUBLIC",
"endpointConfig": "{\"production_endpoints\":{\"url\":\"
http://localhost:8080//sample-data-backend/rservice/taskservice/\",\"config\":null},\"
86 matches
Mail list logo
