[VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 (RC2)

I propose the following RC to be released for the Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 release. The commit id is d0ddf8fdff75b4229543f7ebfd5eb001f685382d which is corresponds to the tag v0.7.0-rc2: *https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zeppelin.git;a=commit;h=d0ddf8fdff75b4229543f7ebfd5eb001f685382d

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1931: [ZEPPELIN-1894] Capture stdin/stdout on interpreter pr...

Github user Tagar commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1931 Thanks a lot @Leemoonsoo . ps. PR title misspelled ZEPPELIN-1894 -> ZEPPELIN-1984 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1931: [ZEPPELIN-1894] Capture stdin/stdout on interpreter pr...

Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1931 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1721: [ZEPPELIN-969] order by note name in job menu

Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1721 Merge into master and branch-0.7 if there are no more COMMENTS! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1912: [HOTFIX][ZEPPELIN-1980] - Test and update CI fo...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1912 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1915: ZEPPELIN-1985 Remove user from pig tutorial not...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1915 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1924: [Pyspark] checking nhooks count.

Github user astroshim commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1924 Thank you @felixcheung and @Leemoonsoo for reviewing this. Let me check the CI. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 (RC1)

I think including https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1985, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1980 worth to be included in 0.7.0 release for the sake of user convenience. I am canceling this vote and will come back soon with rc2 vote. Thank you everyone who voted! On Sun,

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1915: ZEPPELIN-1985 Remove user from pig tutorial note

Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1915 @zjffdu Thanks! LGTM again :) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 (RC1)

Thanks. I'd incline to agree having latest matplotlib broken with python (python interpreter) seems like a big inconvenience. Is there a workaround? Let's discuss a bit in the JIRA and bring this back to the vote thread. Also we should really try to mark JIRA too to be included in RC builds,

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1915: ZEPPELIN-1985 Remove user from pig tutorial note

Github user zjffdu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1915 Thanks @AhyoungRyu for noticing that. I have added the missing part. BTW, --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1915: ZEPPELIN-1985 Remove user from pig tutorial note

Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1915 wait wait, seems the below part was removed by mistake in #1830. There is no part to download `bank.csv` from S3. ``` %sh wget

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1922: [ZEPPELIN-1991] Can't get the PARAGRAPH_APPEND_OUTPUT ...

Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1922 Merging into master and branch-0.7 if there are no comments on this. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1915: ZEPPELIN-1985 Remove user from pig tutorial note

Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1915 Sorry for my late response. LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1918: Remove multple artifactId - hadoop-common

Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1918 Merging this if no more discussion. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 (RC1)

Hi Alex & Mina, Sorry for didn't fill the fix version (maybe my misunderstanding, usually I use fix version for when it is fixed and target version as when it will be fixed). It is fine for me to without this ticket in 0.7, I would cancel my -1. Alexander Bezzubov

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 (RC1)

I also think ZEPPELIN-1980 should be included in 0.7.0 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1980 The reason being, built-in matplotlib integration is a major new feature that is slated to be included in 0.7.0, but without this PR, it will be broken for users with matplotlib 2.0.0,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 (RC1)

Hi Jeff, thank you for the notice, it is a good catch! But the issue that you mention does not have FixFor version assigned - if you want it to part of the release and even conside it as important enough to block the relese vote, could you please update that? This would simplify drastically the

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1930: [ZEPPELIN-1886] implementation z.getZeppelinJob...

paragraph. 2. Record the noteid and paragraph id of the paragraph you have run. 3. You can use the following code: for example ``` %spark z.getJobStatus("noteID", "paragraphId").name() z.getJobStatus("2C8D89Y9N", "20170121-042805_15601883

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1930: [ZEPPELIN-1886] implementation z.getZeppelinJob...

Github user cloverhearts closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1930 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1909: [ZEPPELIN-1978] Let Zeppelin server start if authoriza...

Github user khalidhuseynov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1909 @felixcheung that's good point. basically it was targeting change of authorization file format, however it's possible that someone may corrupt file on purpose. Although in that case user

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1909: [ZEPPELIN-1978] Let Zeppelin server start if au...

Github user khalidhuseynov closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1909 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1921: [ZEPPELIN-1984] Zeppelin Server doesn't catch all exce...

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1921 Change LGTM. Recently there were some fixes for CI. @Tagar Could you rebase this PR and see if CI build goes green? And i implemented propagating actual cause to front-end at

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1931: [ZEPPELIN-1894] Capture stdin/stdout on interpr...

GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1931 [ZEPPELIN-1894] Capture stdin/stdout on interpreter process creation and propagate to front-end when error ### What is this PR for? This PR captures stdin/stdout on interpreter process

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 (RC1)

+1 On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Hyung Sung Shim wrote: > +1 > 2017년 1월 21일 (토) 오전 4:55, Jeff Zhang 님이 작성: > >> -1, Can we include ZEPPELIN-1985 >> ? This issue cause >> only user1 can see the pig

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 (RC1)

+1 2017년 1월 21일 (토) 오전 4:55, Jeff Zhang 님이 작성: > -1, Can we include ZEPPELIN-1985 > ? This issue cause > only user1 can see the pig tutorial note which is a very bad user > experience. > > > > Prabhjyot Singh

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1913: [ZEPPELIN-1979] fix 'File size limit Exceeded' when im...

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1913 LGTM and merge to master and branch-0.7 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1927: [ZEPPELIN-1994] bugfix of streaming output.

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1927 Great fix. LGTM. Merge to master and branch-0.7 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1927: [ZEPPELIN-1994] bugfix of streaming output.

Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1927 I tested #1833 upon this patch and #1922, it's perfectly working now. Appreciate for fixing this! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1582: [ZEPPELIN-1604] Add Neo4j interpreter and Netwo...

Github user conker84 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1582 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1582: [ZEPPELIN-1604] Add Neo4j interpreter and Netwo...

GitHub user conker84 reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1582 [ZEPPELIN-1604] Add Neo4j interpreter and Network visualization ### What is this PR for? This contribution would to introduce Neo4j Cypher intepreter and the new network visualization;

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1924: [Pyspark] checking nhooks count.

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1924 @astroshim following test failure might related. Could you check? ``` Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 19.978 sec <<< FAILURE! - in

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1908: [ZEPPELIN-1976] Text-Output too large, causing crash

Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1908 Merge to master when no more discussions --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

Re: Unstable travis CI recently

Hi, I fixed some CI issues today. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1583 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1857 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1986 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1749 Now, making CI green on PR wouldn't be too difficult.

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1930: [ZEPPELIN-1886] implementation z.getZeppelinJob...

paragraph. 2. Record the noteid and paragraph id of the paragraph you have run. 3. You can use the following code: for example ``` z.getZeppelinJobStatus("notid", "paragraphid").getStatus() z.getZeppelinJobStatus("2C8D89Y9N", "201

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1721: [ZEPPELIN-969] order by note name in job menu

Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1721 CI Green --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1928: ZEPPELIN-598 ] Dynamic loading for Interpreter and API

Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1928 LOG FILE Limit 4MB Over --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1929: [ZEPPELIN-1997] Added derbylog in .gitignore

GitHub user cloverhearts opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1929 [ZEPPELIN-1997] Added derbylog in .gitignore ### What is this PR for? Added derbylog in .gitignore Sometime created derby.log in bin directory. We should stop tracking derbylog

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-1997) exclude source tracking for derby.log

CloverHearts created ZEPPELIN-1997: -- Summary: exclude source tracking for derby.log Key: ZEPPELIN-1997 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1997 Project: Zeppelin Issue Type:

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1928: ZEPPELIN-598 ] Dynamic loading for Interpreter ...

Github user cloverhearts closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1928 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1928: ZEPPELIN-598 ] Dynamic loading for Interpreter ...

GitHub user cloverhearts reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1928 ZEPPELIN-598 ] Dynamic loading for Interpreter and API ### What is this PR for? Use of external libraries that are included in the Roadmap, The interpreter needs related to

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1721: [ZEPPELIN-969] order by note name in job menu

Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1721 @AhyoungRyu 

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1582: [ZEPPELIN-1604] Add Neo4j interpreter and Netwo...

GitHub user conker84 reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1582 [ZEPPELIN-1604] Add Neo4j interpreter and Network visualization ### What is this PR for? This contribution would to introduce Neo4j Cypher intepreter and the new network visualization;

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1582: [ZEPPELIN-1604] Add Neo4j interpreter and Netwo...

Github user conker84 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1582 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1582: [ZEPPELIN-1604] Add Neo4j interpreter and Netwo...

GitHub user conker84 reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1582 [ZEPPELIN-1604] Add Neo4j interpreter and Network visualization ### What is this PR for? This contribution would to introduce Neo4j Cypher intepreter and the new network visualization;

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1582: [ZEPPELIN-1604] Add Neo4j interpreter and Netwo...

Github user conker84 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1582 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1922: [ZEPPELIN-1991] Can't get the PARAGRAPH_APPEND_OUTPUT ...

Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1922 This patch fixes the issue that I reported in [this comment in #1833 ](https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1833#issuecomment-270078954). Looks good. LGTM --- If your project is set up

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 (RC1)

-1, Can we include ZEPPELIN-1985 ? This issue cause only user1 can see the pig tutorial note which is a very bad user experience. Prabhjyot Singh 于2017年1月21日周六 下午7:25写道： > +1 > > On Jan 21, 2017 4:52 PM, "Jun

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #908: ZEPPELIN-598 ] Dynamic loading for Interpreter a...

Github user cloverhearts closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/908 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1864: [ZEPPELIN-1921] missing close in closeAndRemoveInterpr...

Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1864 @jongyoul TEST PASS could you please review for this pr? :) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1928: ZEPPELIN-598 ] Dynamic loading for Interpreter ...

GitHub user cloverhearts opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1928 ZEPPELIN-598 ] Dynamic loading for Interpreter and API ### What is this PR for? Use of external libraries that are included in the Roadmap, The interpreter needs related to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 (RC1)

+1 On Jan 21, 2017 4:52 PM, "Jun Kim" wrote: > +1 > 2017년 1월 21일 (토) 오후 8:21, CloverHearts 님이 작성: > >> +1 >> >> >> >> The Zeppelin 0.7 release includes some amazing features. >> >> In particular, a major bug fix for the remote interpreter. >> >> I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 (RC1)

+1 2017년 1월 21일 (토) 오후 8:21, CloverHearts 님이 작성: > +1 > > > > The Zeppelin 0.7 release includes some amazing features. > > In particular, a major bug fix for the remote interpreter. > > I am actively in favor of this release. > > > > > > *출발**: *Mina Lee

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 (RC1)

+1 The Zeppelin 0.7 release includes some amazing features. In particular, a major bug fix for the remote interpreter. I am actively in favor of this release. 출발: Mina Lee 회신 대상: 날짜: 2017년 1월 21일 토요일 오전 3:17 받는 사람:

[VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 (RC1)

Hi folks, I propose the following RC to be released for the Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 release. The commit id is bcbe0855175f55eddd10b918303806eb5e5db091 which is corresponds to the tag v0.7.0-rc1:

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-1996) Scheduled execution of JDBC alias interpeters (like %hive) fails

Vadim Lositski created ZEPPELIN-1996: Summary: Scheduled execution of JDBC alias interpeters (like %hive) fails Key: ZEPPELIN-1996 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1996

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-1995) Scheduled execution of JDBC Interpreter fails with Kerberos-enabled Hive

Vadim Lositski created ZEPPELIN-1995: Summary: Scheduled execution of JDBC Interpreter fails with Kerberos-enabled Hive Key: ZEPPELIN-1995 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1995

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1927: [ZEPPELIN-1994] bugfix of streaming output.

GitHub user astroshim opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1927 [ZEPPELIN-1994] bugfix of streaming output. ### What is this PR for? If you run the following code, then streaming output doesn't work properly from the second run. ```

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1922: [ZEPPELIN-1991] Can't get the PARAGRAPH_APPEND_OUTPUT ...

Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1922 Thanks for the patch! Tested and works well as you described. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[jira] [Created] (ZEPPELIN-1994) Streaming output problem from the second run on PySpark.

Shim HyungSung created ZEPPELIN-1994: Summary: Streaming output problem from the second run on PySpark. Key: ZEPPELIN-1994 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1994 Project:

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1922: [ZEPPELIN-1991] Can't get the PARAGRAPH_APPEND_...

GitHub user astroshim reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1922 [ZEPPELIN-1991] Can't get the PARAGRAPH_APPEND_OUTPUT from the Interpreter. ### What is this PR for? This PR fixes the problem of streaming events(PARAGRAPH_APPEND_OUTPUT). It's

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1922: [ZEPPELIN-1991] Can't get the PARAGRAPH_APPEND_...

Github user astroshim closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1922 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1864: [ZEPPELIN-1921] missing close in closeAndRemove...

Github user cloverhearts closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1864 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1864: [ZEPPELIN-1921] missing close in closeAndRemove...

GitHub user cloverhearts reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1864 [ZEPPELIN-1921] missing close in closeAndRemoveInterpreterGroup method ### What is this PR for? The problem is that some code in the closeAndRemoveInterpreterGroup method of

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #1926: [BUILD] Remove docker build from release script

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1926 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #1926: [BUILD] Remove docker build from release script

Github user minahlee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1926 Merge it to start 0.7.0 release --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled