ZooKeeper-trunk-solaris - Build # 1290 - Still Failing

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-solaris/1290/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 436290 lines...] [junit] 2016-08-30 08:21:28,01

ZooKeeper_branch35_jdk7 - Build # 643 - Failure

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch35_jdk7/643/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 432669 lines...] [junit] 2016-08-30 09:03:21,413

ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk8 - Build # 727 - Still Failing

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk8/727/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 499903 lines...] [junit] 2016-08-30 12:01:01,684 [m

Re: switching to git?

> On 30 Aug 2016, at 07:42, Benjamin Reed wrote: > > i'm curious, can we get the qa > bot to trigger off a pull request? Yes, we can. See this Kafka build queue: https://builds.apache.org/job/kafka-trunk-git-pr-jdk7/ -Flavio > > On M

Re: ZOOKEEPER-2169

> On 29 Aug 2016, at 19:51, Jordan Zimmerman wrote: > >> On the server side, we already have a mechanism to expire sessions, do we a >> separate scheme to expire TTL nodes or can we use the same mechanism? Does >> it make sense to consider a TTL node as a degenerate case of a session in >> wh

Re: ZOOKEEPER-2169

Yes, you need a session to create the TTL node. I believe discussion about needing a session to create the node is beyond the scope of this issue and should be addressed by a new Jira issue. It doesn’t affect the utility of TTL nodes that you must first have a ZK session. Users who no longer wan

ApacheCon Seville CFP closes September 9th

It's traditional. We wait for the last minute to get our talk proposals in for conferences. Well, the last minute has arrived. The CFP for ApacheCon Seville closes on September 9th, which is less than 2 weeks away. It's time to get your talks in, so that we can make this the best ApacheCon yet. I

Re: switching to git?

i like kafka's contributor work flow! https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Contributing+Code+Changes i'd like to head toward that. of course there are other options as well, but as pat points out the first phase is moving to git. On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Flavio Junqueira wro

Re: ZOOKEEPER-2169

As I understand TTL nodes, you want to have them when you don't want to have sessions. I find it odd that you still need to create a session when you choose to use TTL nodes to avoid sessions. It is correct that you can create session/create TTL/close session in this order, but again, if you're

Re: ZOOKEEPER-2169

> As I understand TTL nodes, you want to have them when you don't want to have > sessions That’s not the only use case. For example, here at Elasticsearch we have a need for a semi-persistent node. It’s a node that lasts for about an hour. Whether or not there is a session is irrelevant. I ende

ZooKeeper_branch35_solaris - Build # 229 - Still Failing

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch35_solaris/229/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 468814 lines...] [junit] 2016-08-30 17:31:00,

Re: ZOOKEEPER-2169

Isn't a TTL node and a session somewhat orthogonal issues? Can we create TTL nodes today within a session? Or would there need to be a thick client implementation that manages them by scheduled tasks that delete said node? On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > As I understa

Status: Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 2

Hi All, With inclusion of my own +1 (non-binding), the current tally on the [VOTE] for release 3.4.9 candidate 2 is: 1 +1 (binding) 2 +1 (non-binding) If required, I will extend the voting to one more week September 7th 2016, 23:59 UTC+0. I'd request everyone to cast your vote on 3.4.9-RC2 and

Re: ZOOKEEPER-2169

Yes, I'm conflating session and TTL nodes because etcd has TTL nodes to avoid having ephemerals which depend on some notion of lease or session... At least that's my understanding of their design choice. You're pointing out a use case in which you don't care whether you have to create sessions

Re: ZOOKEEPER-2169

As Jordan described, he has implemented it in Curator. I haven't had a look at the implementation, but perhaps he can point you to code and doc. -Flavio > On 30 Aug 2016, at 18:29, Irfan Hamid wrote: > > Isn't a TTL node and a session somewhat orthogonal issues? Can we create > TTL nodes tod

Re: ZOOKEEPER-2169

Oops - I realized I didn’t put this in Curator. It’s in the Elasticsearch Cloud code (proprietary - sorry). -Jordan > On Aug 30, 2016, at 1:36 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > > As Jordan described, he has implemented it in Curator. I haven't had a look > at the implementation, but perhaps he ca

ZooKeeper-trunk-openjdk7 - Build # 1147 - Failure

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-openjdk7/1147/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 459099 lines...] [junit] java.net.ConnectExcep

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-2014) Only admin should be allowed to reconfig a cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Han updated ZOOKEEPER-2014: --- Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-2014.patch Fixed C client unit tests, added more documentation regar

Failed: ZOOKEEPER-2014 PreCommit Build #3376

Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2014 Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/3376/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2014) Only admin should be allowed to reconfig a cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15450116#comment-15450116 ] Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-2014: -- -1 overall. Here are the results of test

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-2014) Only admin should be allowed to reconfig a cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Han updated ZOOKEEPER-2014: --- Attachment: (was: ZOOKEEPER-2014.patch) > Only admin should be allowed to reconfig a c

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-2014) Only admin should be allowed to reconfig a cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Han updated ZOOKEEPER-2014: --- Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-2014.patch > Only admin should be allowed to reconfig a cluster > --

ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk8 - Build # 686 - Failure

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk8/686/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 225641 lines...] [junit] 2016-08-30 23:03:27,031

Failed: ZOOKEEPER-2014 PreCommit Build #3377

Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2014 Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/3377/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2014) Only admin should be allowed to reconfig a cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15450446#comment-15450446 ] Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-2014: -- -1 overall. Here are the results of test

Review Request 51546: ZOOKEEPER-2014: Only admin should be allowed to reconfig a cluster

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51546/ --- Review request for zookeeper, fpj, Patrick Hunt, Raul Gutierrez Segales, and Ale

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2014) Only admin should be allowed to reconfig a cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15450515#comment-15450515 ] Michael Han commented on ZOOKEEPER-2014: For reviewers: https://reviews.apache

Issue with NettyServerCnxn.java

Hello there, We have been extensively testing Netty connection versus NIIO and there are some issues that show up I wanted to get community response on. In the process of testing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2509  fix we identified that sendResponse() method may try to do some o

Re: switching to git?

+1 Rakesh On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: > i'm starting to get back into zk development :) i'm a bit distressed that > we are still using svn and patches managed by jiras. i've gotten extremely > spoiled by gerritt and phabricator over the years! > > as a first step to m

Re: Issues with release notes in 3.4.9 RC2 (was: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 2)

IIUC, the summary of this discussion is that no one (yet) sees the issues flagged as blockers for the 3.4.9 release. No one yet has decided to vote -1. (If anybody has concerns, I'm happy to create another release candidate.) This [VOTE] is still open, so kindly do review the RC and vote. Thanks,