FYI ZOOKEEPER-3517[1][2].
We still have one invocation of the checkstyle plugin per module.
The strategy is that we turn on the strict one at project level while
the simple one at contrib module level as an override. This is an invert
from what we previously did.
Best,
tison.
[1] https://issues
Il dom 18 ago 2019, 03:26 Zili Chen ha scritto:
> Of course I volunteer to do.
>
Great
>
> To clarify the process, we want to merge checkstyle-strict.xml into
> checkstyle.xml and thus turn on rules in current checkstyle-strict.xml
> on project level, while also removing configurations in plugi
Of course I volunteer to do.
To clarify the process, we want to merge checkstyle-strict.xml into
checkstyle.xml and thus turn on rules in current checkstyle-strict.xml
on project level, while also removing configurations in plugins field
of pom.xml in submodules. Is this process expected?
Best,
t
We have merged this useful work.
Now we have to merge the two checkstyle files/plugin executions into only
one.
We have one project wide configuration (all projects, contrib...) that
check for '@author' and the new one that is a full checkstyle run.
Tison, do you want to complete the work?
Than
Hi,
A quick update on this thread.
ZOOKEEPER-3475 a.k.a GH-1049[1] has been sent for review.
It contains commits enabling checkstyle configuration on
zookeeper-server module per package, as described above.
Best,
tison.
[1] https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1049
Enrico Olivelli 于2019年
Il giorno ven 9 ago 2019 alle ore 16:45 Zili Chen ha
scritto:
> Hi Enrico,
>
> It happens my original schedule on this weekend canceled so that
> I can make progress on this thread the next two days.
>
> From my side I would prefer multiple self-contained commits(see
> below) when sending pull re
Hi Enrico,
It happens my original schedule on this weekend canceled so that
I can make progress on this thread the next two days.
>From my side I would prefer multiple self-contained commits(see
below) when sending pull requests. It would helps reviews and we
can always squash and merge them.
Fo
It is better that we preserve variable names, method names, class names
because we could fall into bad troubles in case of cherry picks.
We can comment out the rules that would force us to break such kind of
'compatibility'
Fangmin and Micheal, you are the maintainers of two major forks,
do you p
hi tison, that sounds good to me, thanks
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 6:40 PM Zili Chen wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> After thinking about it, I think enable checkstyle configuration
> is only about formatting. And I would make sure that there is no
> refactor. And forked repo maintainers can rebase their
Hi Michael,
After thinking about it, I think enable checkstyle configuration
is only about formatting. And I would make sure that there is no
refactor. And forked repo maintainers can rebase their work on the
new master just by manually applying patches. If the forked repo
has been quite diverged
@Michael
FYI, it is possible by properly setting and updating suppressing rules.
Best,
tison.
Michael Han 于2019年8月8日周四 上午9:12写道：
> I think a good approach is doing this incrementally. Doing this all at once
> over entire server code base will make life much harder for those who
> maintain the
I think a good approach is doing this incrementally. Doing this all at once
over entire server code base will make life much harder for those who
maintain their own ZooKeeper forks and has internal patches, and the change
itself will be impossible to review (even though most changes are
mechanical,
>I see some javadoc related issues in your gist,
>didn't we disable that rule ? JavadocType
The failures reported are "Missing javadoc", and
what we disabled is "Empty javadoc". Fair enough to
disable "Missing javadoc" for now and filed into
ZOOKEEPER-3469 since a empty javadoc is also a
placehold
Il giorno mar 6 ago 2019 alle ore 03:51 Zili Chen ha
scritto:
> Hi Enrico,
>
> Thanks for your participant!
>
> Running after turn on checkstyle on zookeeper-server
> it reports about 9000 checkstyle failures(see failures.txt[1])
> among 596 files(see files.txt[1]). Most of them
> are related to
Hi Enrico,
Thanks for your participant!
Running after turn on checkstyle on zookeeper-server
it reports about 9000 checkstyle failures(see failures.txt[1])
among 596 files(see files.txt[1]). Most of them
are related to whitespace and import.
I think I can handle it with one or two whole days but
Il giorno lun 5 ago 2019 alle ore 14:03 Zili Chen ha
scritto:
> Hi zookeepers,
>
> Recently I've sent a pr[1] on enable checkstyle configuration on
> zookeeper-promethus-metrics, Enrico(committer) and Dinesh（contributor)
> kindly reviewed it but we still need another look from committer as
> proc
Hi zookeepers,
Recently I've sent a pr[1] on enable checkstyle configuration on
zookeeper-promethus-metrics, Enrico(committer) and Dinesh（contributor)
kindly reviewed it but we still need another look from committer as
process required. Someone of you has spare time to have a look?
Besides, as ZO
17 matches
Mail list logo
