Re: How to extend ZooKeeper data structure without breaking the backward compatibility

I thought we added the version to the file header for exactly this case. Allowing the server to differentiate in case we need to upgrade the on-disk format. Option 3 seems the best to me -- "one time conversions" typically have bad corner cases. You'll also want to think through the upgrade implic

Re: Review Request 47354: ZOOKEEPER-1045 : Quorum mutual authentication using SASL mechanism

e artifact generation someone should verify that downstreams (hbase?) are still able to compile/test successfully when pulling in this release artifact. - Patrick Hunt On May 13, 2016, 7:22 p.m., Rakesh R wrote: > > --- > This i

Re: Review Request 47354: ZOOKEEPER-1045 : Quorum mutual authentication using SASL mechanism

patch seems to revert it? Or perhaps this patch is not against the most recent version of 3.4 branch? Rakesh - can you check the recent commits to 3.4 branch and ensure that this patch isn't reverting them? I suspect something went awry or was missed while updating this patch along t

Re: IbmX509 KeyManager and TrustManager algorithm not supported

Makes sense to me. However I'd recommend that you make it configurable. Make the default getDefaultAlgo, but allow it to be overridden by the user via configuration at the ZK level. Print a debug level message with the value used for debuggability. Patrick On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 7:24 AM, saurabh

Re: IbmX509 KeyManager and TrustManager algorithm not supported

. > Can I open a Jira for this ? > > Earlier I created a jira (ZOOKEEPER-2428) for this not sure why it was > removed. > > Thanks, > Saurabh > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > Makes sense to me. However I'd recommend t

Re: IbmX509 KeyManager and TrustManager algorithm not supported

gh the process on how to contribute and will submit the > patch as per Patrick's recommendation. > > > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > There was a discussion about that recently, looks like an INFRA issue, > see > > http://markmail.

Re: FYI - JIRA attach file permission / workflow

I believe this is part of INFRA JIRA spam abatement. We can live with it or try to change it (probably just a config issue in JIRA). I'm fine leaving it where it is if others are ok with that. Patrick On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > Thanks for the hint, Michael. > > -

Re: How to extend ZooKeeper data structure without breaking the backward compatibility

onfidential information from > HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is > listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way > (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, > or dissemination) by persons othe

Re: Review Request 47354: ZOOKEEPER-1045 : Quorum mutual authentication using SASL mechanism

No need to address at this point, but we should figure out what to do long term... - Patrick Hunt On May 20, 2016, 3:10 a.m., Rakesh R wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:

Re: Error while starting embedded zookeeper

Try using netstat to check the networking status? That will usually indicate which process has already bound the port. Patrick On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Bikramjeet Singh < singh.bikramje...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > I was building airavata and had run zookeeper before running airavata

Re: sharing a post on ZAB architecture

Linking from the cwiki would be great. If you send your cwiki id to me/flavio one of us will give you edit privs. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/Index there is an existing articles page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/ZooKeeperArticles Regards, Patric

Re: sharing a post on ZAB architecture

gt; On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > Linking from the cwiki would be great. If you send your cwiki id to > > me/flavio one of us will give you edit privs. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/Index > > there is an existing a

Re: Zookeeper 3.4.8 is bundled with old version of Netty:jar

There is a jira for this already. Someone want to drive this one? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2399 Patrick On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Michael Han wrote: > FYI branch 3.4 was recently patched with Netty 3.10 to address some of the > security concerns as described in ZOO

Re: Unable to contribute on JIRA

I've added Martin as a contributor, give it another try. Patrick On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Marshall McMullen < marshall.mcmul...@gmail.com> wrote: > That makes sense. I would appreciate if a committer can change Martin's > role to be contributer. Otherwise we'll reach out to the Infra team

Re: Official Docker Image

I'm no expert but Tim Crowder has written a blog post about zk/docker in the past and commented here in the list: http://markmail.org/message/7lczngv643jk6fcs have you been able to address? Or perhaps docker/zk has moved fwd in some way that helps? Patrick On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Елисей З

Re: Zookeeper 3.4.8 is bundled with old version of Netty:jar

Pallavi do you have any insight into this? Michael? Are we ok with 3.x netty or is there some security related fix we are missing that would require 3.4 to upgrade to 4.x? Patrick On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés wrote: > On 7 June 2016 at 18:48, Patrick Hunt wr

Re: svn commit: r1747408 - in /zookeeper/trunk: CHANGES.txt src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/QuorumCnxManager.java

Raul, what's the status on this? Seems like trunk was committed but not 3.5? We don't want to lose track. Patrick On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 8:43 AM, wrote: > Author: rgs > Date: Wed Jun 8 15:43:15 2016 > New Revision: 1747408 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1747408&view=rev > Log: > ZOO

Re: Review Request 47354: ZOOKEEPER-1045 : Quorum mutual authentication using SASL mechanism

QuorumPeer.java (line 402) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/47354/#comment203068> the comment here is not super helpful - perhaps we could indicate why 20 vs some other number? - Patrick Hunt On June 5, 2016, 7:56 a.m., Rakesh R wrote: > > --

Re: Review Request 47354: ZOOKEEPER-1045 : Quorum mutual authentication using SASL mechanism

and eliminate as many as possible (hopefully all). - Patrick Hunt On June 5, 2016, 7:56 a.m., Rakesh R wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply,

Re: Review Request 47354: ZOOKEEPER-1045 : Quorum mutual authentication using SASL mechanism

ay not be wise to expose all of this. a different class but see ZOOKEEPER-2405 for some background. pull out something useful but not sensitive - e.g. a pricipal name or somesuch. src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/util/SecurityUtils.java (line 218) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/47354/#comment2

Re: ZooKeeper 3.5.2-alpha Release Coordination

s still under active code > review that we want for 3.5.2. I'll keep those in. > > --Chris Nauroth > > > > > On 5/12/16, 2:44 PM, "Patrick Hunt" wrote: > > >Hi Chris. +1 on that. I believe it's imperative that we get 3.5.2-alpha > >out &

Re: Review Request 47354: ZOOKEEPER-1045 : Quorum mutual authentication using SASL mechanism

> On June 16, 2016, 12:01 a.m., Patrick Hunt wrote: > > src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/quorum/LearnerHandler.java, line > > 172 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/47354/diff/6/?file=1406658#file1406658line172> > > > > should we say "

Re: ZooKeeper 3.5.2-alpha Release Coordination

uding ZK-1045 in 3.5.2, right? > > -Flavio > > > On 21 Jun 2016, at 17:43, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > > Can we set a deadline/date for the release? It's fine to have blockers > > while we're still in alpha. We should cut a release for folks that want > t

Re: Review Request 49112: ZOOKEEPER-1898

could also have a subclass that understands keeper exceptions? - Patrick Hunt On June 22, 2016, 10:27 p.m., Abraham Fine wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, vi

Re: Review Request 49112: ZOOKEEPER-1898

> On June 22, 2016, 10:52 p.m., Patrick Hunt wrote: > > src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/ZooKeeperMain.java, line 626 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/49112/diff/1/?file=1427805#file1427805line626> > > > > See my comment on the exception class. Should we

Re: Official Docker Image

ks, > > Elisey > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:11 PM Елисей Занько > > wrote: > > > >> Patrick, > >> > >>Thank you for pointing to this! > >>Yes, I've addressed this. There is a section called "... via > >>

Re: Official Docker Image

at 10:33 AM, Flavio Junqueira < fpjunque...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > My interpretation is that it is official from a Docker perspective, not > from a Apache ZooKeeper perspective. I wonder if we can make the official > docker image also official apache zk image. > > -Flavio

Re: Article about configuration management with Etcd, Consul and ZooKeeper

Hey, we're only 10 years old, but I guess in code years that might be grandpa. ;-) I thought this was a good article, however it lacked focus on reliability/availability/correctness/etc... vs ease of use/features. When I talk to people about ZK vs another option it almost always comes back to "we

Re: Official Docker Image

f there was confusion. Patrick > Regards, > Elisey > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:46 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > So I have it backward then? In that case what would we need to > contribute? > > I do see tomcat and httpd there, but from what I can tell the "offi

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 0

+1. sig/xsum are valid, RAT ran clean and no other discrepancies noticed. I ran it through a number of manual tests (including starting a 23 server ensemble) - no issues found. Patrick On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > This is a release candidate for 3.5.2-alpha. The full

Re: ZooKeeper 3.5.2-alpha Release Coordination

5 PM, "Chris Nauroth" wrote: > > >I'd like to propose a deadline of 12 noon Thursday, 6/23 PST. If anyone > >needs a later deadline, please let me know. > > > >--Chris Nauroth > > > > > > > > > >On 6/21/16, 10:08 AM, &qu

Re: unexpected server response ZRUNTIMEINCONSISTENCY

What version(s) are you seeing this against? (I put similar request in to the jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2455) Is there a small test case that reproduces this issue that you can provide? Logs? (if so please add them to the jira) Patrick On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 7:33 AM,

Re: Review Request 49112: ZOOKEEPER-1898

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49112/#review139890 --- Ship it! lgtm. - Patrick Hunt On June 23, 2016, 10:17 p.m

Re: ZooKeeper 3.5.2-alpha Release Coordination

for getting the release candidate out. > > > >Thank you for volunteering to be the release manager for the 3.5.3 > >release, Pat. > > > >-Flavio > > > > > >> On 25 Jun 2016, at 00:16, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> > >> Kudos on getting t

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 0

erver. > Maybe it would be useful to hide the dependency in future release but > it is not a showstopper for my projects. > > > > 2016-06-28 19:52 GMT+02:00 Abraham Fine : > > +1 tested SSL support, everything appears to be working as expected. > > > > On Fri, Ju

Re: ZK-2458 and ZK-2459

Thanks Flavio. I reviewed/committed both of them. Patrick On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > I have submitted two patches to fix the license issues I found. Id' > appreciate if someone could have a look at them and possibly check them in > if LG. > > Thanks, > -Flavio

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 0

Following Operations are verified > > create node (ALL API, All node types) > > delete node > > set data > > get data > > setAcl > > getAcl > > multi operation > > Few Four letter word commands > > 3) Veri

Re: ZRUNTIMEINCONSISTENCY

Folks are trying to get more details on the jira. I posted a comment there with more details: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2455?focusedCommentId=15356509&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15356509 Patrick On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 6:46

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 0

possible. I don't know > if I have time today in order to submit a patch > > Enrico > > Il Gio 30 Giu 2016 06:19 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > > > I've committed 2458 and 2459 to 3.5 and trunk branches if you want to cut > > another RC. These two patches addre

Re: Backporting ZOOKEEPER-2120 (SSL support) to 3.4.8

I'd like to recommend that we consider a special 3.4 branch for this. (sorry I'm late to the party but I was on vacation till today, just back). We could create a 3.4+ssl branch, or something like that, and give special permissions for non-committers to commit to the branch. People that are intere

Re: Post 3.4 GA (was Re: Backporting ZOOKEEPER-2120 (SSL support) to 3.4.8)

Hi Andrew. We've hashed through this a few times in the last couple months, not sure if you're following on the list. Summary: Primary gates are captured on the jira, the dashboard gives a good overview https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12327688 Blocker issues in p

Re: Script to spin up ZK cluster

Consider posting links to stuff like this from https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/UsefulTools Patrick On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Jeremy Duvall wrote: > I have a similar script that works for AWS if anyone's interested? I need > to clean it up a bit before posting on GH.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 1

+1 - sig/xsum are valid, rat ran clean, tested with a couple different ensemble sizes and cli and everything looked fine to me. Patrick On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:45 AM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > This is a release candidate for 3.5.2-alpha. The full release notes are > available at: > > https://iss

Re: Backporting ZOOKEEPER-2120 (SSL support) to 3.4.8

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > > > That's a great idea, I'm +1. > > > > -Flavio > > > > > On 11 Jul 2016, at 21:13, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > > > > I'd like to recommend that we consider a special 3.4 branch for

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.9 release discussion

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan wrote: > > >ZK-1045 is a major change and I suggest we give time for folks to try > it out before cutting a release candidate. Ideally, we check it in and give > a few weeks until we cut a release candidate. > > Agreed, will try to push ZK-

Re: Status: Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 1

Thanks for pointing this out Chris, I'll update the site. FYI committers can view the official list here: https://whimsy3.apache.org/roster/committee/zookeeper Patrick On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > I had miscounted the vote from Raúl as non-binding, based on this page

Re: Status: Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 1

Site is updated. Patrick On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Thanks for pointing this out Chris, I'll update the site. > > FYI committers can view the official list here: > https://whimsy3.apache.org/roster/committee/zookeeper > > Patrick > > On

Re: DSN 2011 paper link broken on cwiki

Thanks Michael, I updated the link. Patrick On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Michael Han wrote: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/Zab+vs.+Paxos > > The DSN 2011 paper at end of the page > is now 404. This should be the same paper: > htt

Re: Official Docker Image

out? >> If it looks good could someone please leave a short comment on behalf >> of the committers team in the PR >> <https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/1765>? >> >> Thanks, >> Elisey >> >> On Fri, Ju

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.5.2-alpha

Kudos all, thanks Chris! Patrick On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > Thanks everyone for the push to get 3.5.2-alpha out, and specially to Chris > for being the release manager. > > -Flavio > >> On 21 Jul 2016, at 13:08, Chris Nauroth wrote: >> >> The Apache ZooKeeper te

Re: Official Docker Image

rary will be merged > until having any proof of upstream awareness and acceptance. > > Do I understand it right that you guys are OK with the image as long as > it uses the official distribution and you don't have any suggestions about > it right now, neither want to collab

Re: CHANGES.txt inconsistency

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > While working on the 3.5.2-alpha release, I noticed that CHANGES.txt in > trunk is not completely synchronized with the 3.5 release line. In > branch-3.5, we have sections for releases 3.5.0, 3.5.1 and 3.5.2 (added by > me), each indicating

Re: Flaky unit tests

Thanks for taking this up Michael, much appreciated! If folks are looking for ways to participate in the community helping to address these issues is a great way to do so, it's also a great way to learn the project! Patrick On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Michael Han wrote: > Hi, > > I've noti

Re: PreCommitBuild - Adding comment to Jira

I'd recommend you start by opening an INFRA jira against Jenkins. The INFRA folks are usually pretty quick to address. Patrick On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > I've only logged on to the jenkins console, I've never tried to access the > machine itself. > > -Flavio > >

Re: PreCommitBuild - Adding comment to Jira

: > Thanks Michael for reporting the infra issue. Lets us watch the progress. > > Rakesh > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:25 AM, Michael Han wrote: > > > Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12327. > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Patrick Hu

Re: PreCommitBuild - Adding comment to Jira

Note that there is a similar, but different, issue now affecting trunk builds. Seems to have started a few days ago, on July23. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12335 Patrick On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > FYI - I'm working through some of the sug

ZooKeeper Jenkins builds are broken (environmental)

Hi folks - just a heads up that the Jenkins environment has changed and as a result our builds are failing. We're working with INFRA team to resolve this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12327 Patrick

Re: ZooKeeper Jenkins builds are broken (environmental)

bot to JIRA, so I closed the > INFRA-12327 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12327> as fixed. > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > Hi folks - just a heads up that the Jenkins environment has changed and > as > > a result our

Re: Flaky unit tests

/#showFailuresLink are those two tests captured already, or do we need to create new jiras for these? (would you mind, thanks!) Patrick On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Thanks for taking this up Michael, much appreciated! If folks are looking > for ways to participate in the com

Re: ZooKeeper Jenkins builds are broken (environmental)

t; > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/ZooKeeper_branch35_openjdk7/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/ReconfigRecoveryTest/testCurrentServersAreObserversInNextConfig/ > > > > > > > I've just seen it in the 35 openjdk build. >

Re: myid documentation

I believe that the myid is used as part of the server id, in order to get a unique value for quorum formation. iirc it's the top 8 bits of the server id. Hence the reason why we mention that in the docs. afaik we never "enforced" this at the code level. On the plus side it would be a good idea, on

Re: Proposal: Drop all project specific labels.

Hi Gavin. afaik we had those labels in order to run our "hadoop qa bot" process. Looks like four jobs currently have that label: https://builds.apache.org/label/Zookeeper/ as long as we can continue to run the "hadoop qa bot" on any other (non H* nodes) I believe we don't have any other reason to

Re: Proposal: Drop all project specific labels.

Sure thing, sounds reasonable to me. Thanks Gavin. Patrick On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Gav wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> Hi Gavin. afaik we had those labels in order to run our "hadoop qa bot" >> process. L

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Chris Nauroth joins the Apache ZooKeeper PMC

Kudos Chris! Patrick On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > In recognition of all his contributions to the project, the Apache > ZooKeeper PMC has invited Chris Nauroth to join the PMC and he has > accepted. I'd like to take the opportunity to thank Chris for his > contribut

Fwd: Jenkins Ant Matrix - and consolidating of versions.

FYI in case you notice any weirdness: -- Forwarded message -- From: Patrick Hunt Date: Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 5:25 PM Subject: Re: Jenkins Ant Matrix - and consolidating of versions. To: gmcdon...@apache.org Cc: builds , "infrastruct...@apache.org Infrastructure" <

Re: http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.5.2-alpha/ showing old document

Thanks for catching this Mohammad, it looks like this commit changed the source on 3.5 branch but the generated docs were not re-generated: + ZOOKEEPER-2402: Document client side properties (Arshad Mohammad via fpj) svn commit: r1745280 - in /zookeeper/branches/branch-3.5: CHANGES.txt src/docs/s

Fwd: [PLANNED OUTAGE] - Jenkins upgrade at builds.a.o

FYI, jenkins upgrade is coming: -- Forwarded message -- From: Gav Date: Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:39 PM Subject: [PLANNED OUTAGE] - Jenkins upgrade at builds.a.o Hi All, Jenkins - at builds.apache.org is going to be upgraded. Currently on version 1.6.42.2 and upgrading to 2.7.2 LTS

Re: http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.5.2-alpha/ showing old document

> in the > > next release > > >> 2. Can we generate and update the documentation site > > http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.5.2-alpha/, because mostly people > > refer this website for document reference. > > >> > > >> -Arshad

Seems Reddit is using ZK.

Unfortunate incident, some ops issues while migrating ZK/infra led to site outage. Sheds some light on how Reddit uses ZK though: "We use a system called Zookeeper to keep track of most of our servers and their health." https://www.reddit.com/r/announcements/comments/4y0m56/why_reddit_was_down_on

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.9 release discussion

t; > (3) I'd love to include ZK-2355 also. It looks like the fix is good, > I've > > added few comments. Perhaps, will wait to see feedback from others. > > > > Kindly requesting everyone to look at your issues marked for 3.4.9 > a

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.9 release discussion

--Chris Nauroth > > On 8/16/16, 2:52 PM, "Patrick Hunt" wrote: > > Rakesh pointed out that the current "how to release" docs no longer are > correct for branch-3.4 as in branch-3.5 and later we updated the > release > notes creation proc

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.9 release discussion

then add >> our current 3.4.9 release notes, isn't it? >> >> >> Thanks, >> Rakesh >> >> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan > > wrote: >> >>> Thanks Patrick and Chris for quickly resolving this. I will continue

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 0

+1 sig/xsum are correct. RAT ran clean. I was able to start/use a number of different size ensembles with the code. Looks good to me. Patrick On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan wrote: > This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.4.9. It fixes 21 issues, including > issues that

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 0

Rakesh - part of running step 1 of the "building" (ant test package tar) is that you should end up with (notice this is in the build directory): phunt@phunt-MBP13:~/dev/zookeeper-br34[branch-3.4]$ ls build/zookeeper-3.4.9/src/c/ ChangeLog NOTICE.txt c-doc.Doxyfile configure.ac missing

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 0

it has > created the tarball perfectly with all these missing files. > > Rakesh > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > Rakesh - part of running step 1 of the "building" (ant test package tar) > is > > that you should end up with (

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 2

+1 xsum/sig are valid. RAT ran clean. I was able to compile the code and successfully put a few ensemble sizes through their paces. fwiw I also did a "diff" btw 3.4.8 release artifact and this rc. There were a number of changed files, obviously. However I did not notice any missing files, as we've

Re: Procedure for adding a new feature

The "how to contribute" page is also a good resource for new folks interested in participating: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToContribute Patrick On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Camille Fournier wrote: > We are generally open to new features if they seem useful to

Re: ZOOKEEPER-2169

Hi Jordan. This looks like a great new feature, but I'm afraid I'm focused on other things atm. I don't have much time after work/home currently, as such I've been focused on other priorities; 1) supporting existing users/issues in 3.4, and 2) trying to get 3.5 branch to production ready. There are

Re: switching to git?

I really love it when the new guy shows up and immediately requests tool changes. ;-) afaik given we have a git mirror already, moving to git from an infra perspective is pretty straightforward. Definitely some impact in some other areas (like cutting a release) but we should be able to chase thos

Re: ZOOKEEPER-2169

I'm the slacker that proposed us doing this in the first place and I'm > THRILLED that you have done it Jordan, thank you so much. > Pat, I can review and merge, unless you are concerned with interference on > other issues. LMK. > > C > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:42 A

[ANNOUNCE] New ZooKeeper committer: Michael Han

The Apache ZooKeeper PMC recently extended committer karma to Michael and he has accepted. Michael has made some great contributions and we are looking forward to even more :) Congratulations and welcome aboard, Michael! Patrick

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.10 release discussion

Perhaps you can make the changes directly on the wiki page as a duplicate line item under the original in a different color? It's hard for me to really follow, esp as it's not a 1:1 replacement iiuc. Could you try editing the wiki directly to start with, leave the original line and add the new line

Re: ZooKeeper cwiki - Updated ZooKeeper and SASL auth 1045 work

t; Following are few blogs/sites which has a reference to the ZK SASL > page:- > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-38%3A+ > >> ZooKeeper+Authentication > >> http://blog.intelligencecomputing.io/security/12409/repost-z > >> ookeep

Re: Newbie

Send it to me directly and I'll update the role settings in jira. I couldn't find this name/email in jira currently. Patrick On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Michael Han wrote: > Vineet, > > What is the full name and email address associated with your JIRA account? > We need that information t

Re: Newbie

he ticket to me > > > > UserName:vinegh > > Full Name: Vineet Ghatge > > Email: vgh4us...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> Send it to me directly and I'll update the role settings in jira. I > &g

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache ZooKeeper Committer: Mohammad Arshad

Kudos Arshad! Patrick On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan wrote: > Congratulations, Arshad! > > Rakesh > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Michael Han wrote: > > > Congratulations and welcome aboard, Arshad! > > > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 5:34 AM, Edward Ribeiro < > edward.

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.10 release discussion

hing -> modified step 1* > > Thanks, > Rakesh > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > Perhaps you can make the changes directly on the wiki page as a duplicate > > line item under the original in a different color? It's hard for me to

Re: Paper

Very interesting results and real world insights. Thanks for creating/sharing. One thing I noticed is that you mentioned considering SSDs, had you also considered using ram disks? I've seen some scenarios where that has been very successful. Patrick On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Bobby Evans

Re: Paper

Regards, Patrick > - Bobby > > > On Thursday, January 26, 2017, 10:36:01 AM CST, Patrick Hunt < > ph...@apache.org> wrote: > Very interesting results and real world insights. Thanks for > creating/sharing. > > One thing I noticed is that you mentioned considering SSDs

ZooKeeper DOS exploit published

Hi folks. The following exploit was recently published on the web and has come to our attention, it details a ZooKeeper DOS attack against certain four letter words (4lw), possible when the client port is exposed to untrusted actors: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:_CNGIz10PR

Re: ZooKeeper Build failure - Unsupported major.minor version 52.0

Rakesh can you login to jenkins? Patrick On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created an https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13526 jira to > understand more about the failure. From the discussion it looks like, Ant > (latest) link was changed a

Re: ZooKeeper Build failure - Unsupported major.minor version 52.0

o you want to give this a try? Now's the best time to learn. ;-) Patrick On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:49 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan wrote: > Yes, logged in. But didn't see the drop down options. > > Rakesh > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > >

Re: ZooKeeper Build failure - Unsupported major.minor version 52.0

the page. But getting access denied exception. > Could you please give permission to the user "rakeshr". Anyway, Gavin has > reconfigured it for now and triggered build. > > "rakeshr is missing the Job/ExtendedRead permission" > > Thanks, > Rakesh &g

Re: Apache ZooKeeper 3.5.3-beta Release Plan

Thanks for driving this Michael. What you are suggesting sounds reasonable to me. I've been swamped of late - any chance you (Michael) would be able/willing to take on the RM responsibilities for 3.5.3? I can help shepherd you through the process. Regards, Patrick On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:42 PM

Re: Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.10 candidate 0

-1 - I'm seeing this test fail consistently on my Mac (the other tests all seem to be passing on the java side) Lots of the "server not up" messages followed by: 2017-03-08 08:54:58,507 [myid:] - INFO [Thread-1:FourLetterWordMain@62] - connecting to 127.0.0.1 11224 2017-03-08 08:54:58,508 [myid:

Re: Snapshot build please?

I honestly don't remember. My recommendation would be to look at what other projects are doing in this regard (iirc some publish nightly? that might be a good idea...) and try to copy their policies/process. Check the wiki and see if we ever documented anything around this, whether we have or not I

Re: Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.10 candidate 0

uorumKerberosAuthTest/testValidCredentials/> > > > > > > A brief look up indicates commit b26eaf3492a43821f648d8a8f87d8a > c3488f1cef > > <https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/commit/b26eaf3492a43821 > > f648d8a8f87d8ac3488f1cef> > > might be the culpri

Re: 3.5.3: alpha or beta?

I don't remember ever agreeing that 3.5 is in beta. If people feel comfortable with that transition I think we should formalize it. See my comment here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=159368

Re: Disabling snapshots in ZooKeeper

I don't believe it's a matter of disabling the feature, it never existed. IIRC, synchronizing followers may include sending them the snapshot, which is streamed from the disk in the "on disk" form. Patrick On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:28 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan wrote: > Hi Aishwarya, > > >Is t

Re: [VOTE] Make 3.5.3 the first beta release.

+1. Patrick On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Abraham Fine wrote: > +1 non binding > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017, at 13:00, Edward Ribeiro wrote: > > +1 non binding > > > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan > > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > Rakesh > > > > > > On Thu,

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >