On 08/28/12 07:18, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
Le 25/08/2012 23:31, Mark Finkle a écrit :
On 08/24/2012 07:02 AM, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
do we have somewhere a documentation/tutorial about how to build a
custom app. against Mozilla source code?
As xulrunner was removed from GNU/Linux distribu
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Em terça-feira, 17 de abril de 2012 12h42min15s UTC-3, Lawrence Mandel
escreveu:
> As I announced on last week's platform call, Telemetry is currently offline
> due to the metrics infrastructure move. The outage includes both the
> Telemetry front-end (dashboard and evolution) and the daily pin
On Sunday, August 26, 2012 6:51:21 PM UTC+1, Anthony Hughes wrote:
> On 12-08-26 06:12 AM, Whiffy wrote:
On Sunday, August 26, 2012 2:12:23 PM UTC+1, Whiffy wrote:
I'm on BST British Summer Time and i posted at 2:12am on Sunday. Firefox
history shows by 19:02 BST in the evening myspace was worki
Fair warning, this is a solicitation request.
I want your Snappy news! Now! Just any news just won't do. Gimme, gimme Snappy
news from the past week. You amazing individuals who contribute Snappy news to
the wondrous and sometimes awe inspiring Snappy etherpad will be rewarded
handsomely with
On 2012-08-27 7:03 PM, Andre Klapper wrote:
* needURLs (used once so far, maybe pretty new?)
Used all the time - it's just removed after the URLs are provided. :)
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/
Andre Klapper schrieb:
* needURLs (used once so far, maybe pretty new?)
We're removed that one from the bug when we paste in URLs from crash
stats, so that's why it's always only on very few or no bugs.
* crashreportid
I wonder why we have that at all, never saw it actually being used - a
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 11:28 -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
> On 2012-08-27 7:03 PM, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > * needURLs (used once so far, maybe pretty new?)
>
> Used all the time - it's just removed after the URLs are provided. :)
Hmm. According to
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?field0-0-0=key
== The Problem ==
Reftests currently assume a window size of 800x1000. This is not
possible on mobile devices, and using this resolution on tegras and
pandas consumes too much memory and results in many timeouts and
random-failures.
Changing the resolution to something like 400x400 is very s
If the exact width/height could be found for each test then these could
be marked in a manifest (theoretically, not speaking to the existing
reftest manifest format per se). Then reftest could be modified to take
a (e.g.) --resoltuion 400x400 argument and the test runner passing over
any test
I've already done this work but we decided to just increase the
resolution for our tegra board:
See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66
which includes an outdated patch that adds a screen(w,h) annotation to
each test and a patch to compute the required size per test.
On Tue, Aug 2
On Tuesday 2012-08-28 12:52 -0400, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
> == The Problem ==
>
> Reftests currently assume a window size of 800x1000. This is not
> possible on mobile devices, and using this resolution on tegras and
> pandas consumes too much memory and results in many timeouts and
> random-fa
On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 1:58:43 PM UTC-4, Benoit Girard wrote:
> I've already done this work but we decided to just increase the
>
> resolution for our tegra board:
>
>
>
> See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66
>
> which includes an outdated patch that adds a screen(w,h)
On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 2:36:16 PM UTC-4, halb...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 1:58:43 PM UTC-4, Benoit Girard wrote:
>
> > I've already done this work but we decided to just increase the
>
> >
>
> > resolution for our tegra board:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > See https:
On Tuesday 2012-08-28 11:17 -0700, L. David Baron wrote:
> On Tuesday 2012-08-28 12:52 -0400, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
> > == The Problem ==
> >
> > Reftests currently assume a window size of 800x1000. This is not
> > possible on mobile devices, and using this resolution on tegras and
> > pandas
On 8/27/2012 6:34 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
W3C is proposing a revised charter for the RDFa Working Group. For
more details, see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2012Aug/0001.html
http://www.w3.org/2012/06/rdfwa-wg-charter.html
Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or
On 8/22/12 11:48 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
Up until now, the focus has been on making Makefile.in's themselves generic
and data-driven [1]. We would use pymake's API to parse, load, and extract
data from Makefile.in's to construct the build
On 8/24/12 8:05 AM, John Hopkins wrote:
Suggestion: identify the ugliest sections of Makefile usage and use
those as a benchmark for evaluating different solutions. ie. how could
it be implemented in SCons, pymake, etc. or even, how could it be
reimplemented in Make in a clean fashion.
I've s
On Tue 28 Aug 2012 08:37:44 AM PDT, Andre Klapper wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 11:28 -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
On 2012-08-27 7:03 PM, Andre Klapper wrote:
* needURLs (used once so far, maybe pretty new?)
Used all the time - it's just removed after the URLs are provided. :)
Hmm. According to
ht
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:17 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
> We don't want to be running our reftests at
> a size smaller than the accepted max size for reftests at W3C.
>
What is the current required size for W3C reftests? I can't find any
documentation of that.
Rob
--
“You have heard that it was
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Alex Keybl wrote:
> Quick ping to platform devs - do you all know of any particularly risky
> changes going in over the next 6 weeks that carry the possibility of
> regression, especially to B2G? Thanks in advance!
>
Display-list-based-invalidation:
https://bugzi
On Wednesday 2012-08-29 17:08 +1200, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:17 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
>
> > We don't want to be running our reftests at
> > a size smaller than the accepted max size for reftests at W3C.
> >
>
> What is the current required size for W3C reftests?
Design patterns solve a problem, but the problem shouldn't have existed in
the first place. Prototypal OO doesn't have the problems that traditional
OO has. Lua is fast, prototypal, has C interop and was used to create World
of Warcraft, the most financially successful game in history. How about
us
23 matches
Mail list logo
