On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 09:40:12PM -0400, Ben Kelly wrote:
> On Jul 19, 2017 8:57 PM, "Mike Hommey" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 08:48:45PM -0400, Ben Kelly wrote:
> > On Jul 19, 2017 6:20 PM, "Mike Hommey" wrote:
> >
> > > What would be the rationale behind this choice?
> >
> > Smaller me
On Jul 19, 2017 8:57 PM, "Mike Hommey" wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 08:48:45PM -0400, Ben Kelly wrote:
> On Jul 19, 2017 6:20 PM, "Mike Hommey" wrote:
>
> > What would be the rationale behind this choice?
>
> Smaller memory footprint, which, you'll admit, when you're on a machine
> with (less
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 08:48:45PM -0400, Ben Kelly wrote:
> On Jul 19, 2017 6:20 PM, "Mike Hommey" wrote:
>
> > What would be the rationale behind this choice?
>
> Smaller memory footprint, which, you'll admit, when you're on a machine
> with (less than) 2GB RAM, makes a difference.
>
>
> I t
On Jul 19, 2017 6:20 PM, "Mike Hommey" wrote:
> What would be the rationale behind this choice?
Smaller memory footprint, which, you'll admit, when you're on a machine
with (less than) 2GB RAM, makes a difference.
I thought we had data that showed OOM (small) due to VM fragmentation still
outw
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:02 PM, R Kent James wrote:
> On 7/19/2017 4:06 PM, David Keeler wrote:
>
>> [dev-apps-thunderbird and dev-apps-seamonkey cc'd, but please discuss on
>> dev-platform]
>>
> ...
>
>> Given all this, the question is do we still need this second API? Does
>> Thunderbird or Se
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 05:02:23PM -0700, R Kent James wrote:
On 7/19/2017 4:06 PM, David Keeler wrote:
[dev-apps-thunderbird and dev-apps-seamonkey cc'd, but please discuss on
dev-platform]
...
Given all this, the question is do we still need this second API? Does
Thunderbird or SeaMonkey use
On 7/19/2017 4:06 PM, David Keeler wrote:
[dev-apps-thunderbird and dev-apps-seamonkey cc'd, but please discuss on
dev-platform]
...
Given all this, the question is do we still need this second API? Does
Thunderbird or SeaMonkey use it for any reason, or can we simplify the
code-base, reduce bu
[dev-apps-thunderbird and dev-apps-seamonkey cc'd, but please discuss on
dev-platform]
Hello Everyone,
You may or may not be surprised to learn that Gecko contains two
different ways to verify that an add-on has been signed. The primary
method is nsIX509CertDB.openSignedAppFileAsync. This is what
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 12:01:04AM +0200, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > What's the plan for eligible people that still want to keep 32-bit
> > Firefox? Are they going to have to stop auto upgrades, which would get
> > them automatically
>On 2017-07-14 1:31 AM, Jim Blandy wrote:
>> Many people seem to be asking, essentially: What will happen to old bugs?
>> I'm trying to follow the discussion, and I'm not clear on this myself.
>>
>> For example, "Splinter will be turned off." For commenting and reviewing,
>> okay, understood. What
>On 7/13/17 9:04 PM, Mark Côté wrote:
>> It is also what newer systems
>> do today (e.g. GitHub and the full Phabricator suite)
>
>I should note that with GitHub what this means is that you get discussion
>on the PR that should have gone in the issue, with the result that people
>following the issu
The data platform and tools teams are working on our core Telemetry system,
the data pipeline, providing core datasets and maintaining some central
data viewing tools.
To make new work more visible, we provide quarterly updates.
What’s new in the last few months?
A lot of work in the last months
On 2017-07-19 10:18 AM, Mike Hoye wrote:
On 2017-07-19 3:58 AM, Chris Peterson wrote:
On 2017-07-19 12:01 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
What's the plan for eligible people that still want to keep 32-bit
Firefox?
Outside of our QA team (or others orgs, I guess?) do we have a set of
use cases that w
On 2017-07-19 3:58 AM, Chris Peterson wrote:
On 2017-07-19 12:01 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
What's the plan for eligible people that still want to keep 32-bit
Firefox?
Outside of our QA team (or others orgs, I guess?) do we have a set of
use cases that would motivate people to flip that switch?
On 2017-07-19 12:01 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
What's the plan for eligible people that still want to keep 32-bit
Firefox? Are they going to have to stop auto upgrades, which would get
them automatically on 64-bits and upgrade manually? This is especially
going to be a problem for users with less th
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:38:56PM -0700, Chris Peterson wrote:
> We are on track to make 64-bit Firefox the default build for Win64 OS,
> bringing improved ASLR and fewer OOM crashes to the 70% of Windows Firefox
> users running Win64.
>
> PLANS:
>
> * In Firefox 55 (August 8), the Windows stub
16 matches
Mail list logo