Message Body (6 of 6) APPEAL TO MOZILLA FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS
1) Violation of Anti-Trust Laws:
The Module Owner’s discretionary decision, when taken into context with the
comments of other Mozilla Peers employed by other Browsers and/or competing
Certificate Authorities, are intended
Message Body (5 of 6) APPEAL TO MOZILLA FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS
1) Erroneous Legal Conclusions:
The Module Owner’s discretionary decision was guided by an erroneous legal
conclusion, when he determined that the legal ownership structure of the
Applicants was insufficient to allow them to
Message Body (4 of 6) APPEAL TO MOZILLA FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS
1) Discriminatory Practices;
The Module Owner conducted his decision making process, and allowed the
distrust discussion to proceed, in a manner contrary to the Mozilla Foundation
commitment to an “Internet that includes all
Message Body (3 of 6) APPEAL TO MOZILLA FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS
1) Abuse of Discretionary Power:
The Module Owner’s failure to consider relevant factors that should have been
given significant, or equal weight, and deliberate mischaracterizations of
facts intended to inflate the
Message Body (2 of 6) APPEAL TO MOZILLA FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS
2) Procedural Fairness/Bias:
The Module Owner’s decision making activities, and the supporting actions of
other Mozilla staff, were not procedurally fair, transparent, absent of bias,
nor made in good-faith.
a) The
Message Body (1 of 6) APPEAL TO MOZILLA FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Mozilla Foundation Board of Directors
Attention: Mitchell Baker, Executive Chairwoman
Mozilla Corporation
Attention: Chris Beard, CEO
Attention: Denelle Dixon-Thayer, General Counsel
July 16, 2019
Mozilla CA Certificate
A formal appeal has been filed with the Mozilla Foundation Board of Directors.
In the spirit of transparency, we will be posting the contents of the Appeal to
this forum in six (6) separate messages.
Benjamin Gabriel
Benjamin Gabriel | General Counsel & SVP Legal
Tel: +971 2 417 1417 |
Benjamin Gabriel | General Counsel & SVP Legal
Tel: +971 2 417 1417 | Mob: +971 55 260 7410
benjamin.gabr...@darkmatter.ae
The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only for the
person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged
Benjamin Gabriel | General Counsel & SVP Legal
Tel: +971 2 417 1417 | Mob: +971 55 260 7410
benjamin.gabr...@darkmatter.ae
The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only for the
person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged
Part 1 of 2:
Dear Ryan,
A fair and transparent public discussion requires full disclosure of each
participant's motivations and ultimate agenda. Whether in CABForum, or
Mozilla-dev-security-policy, I represent the viewpoints of my employer
DarkMatter and passionately believe in our
Part 2 of 2
On Wednesday, March 6, 2019 7:51 PM, Ryan Sleevi wrote:>
>DarkMatter response to the serial number issue has demonstrated
>that DarkMatter did not do the expected due diligence to investigate
>and understand the issue.
Your statement as Google's representative is quite
Dear Ryan,
A fair and transparent public discussion requires full disclosure of each
participant's motivations and ultimate agenda. Whether in CABForum, or
Mozilla-dev-security-policy, I represent the viewpoints of my employer
DarkMatter and passionately believe in our unflagging efforts to
Dear Selena,
On Wednesday, 6 March 2019 02:58:19 UTC+4, Selena Deckelmann wrote:
>
> I think what you've quoted are accurate statements. That is, recent articles
> raised questions that I, and others, felt were important to bring to this
> public forum to discuss.
>
While we welcome and are
Message Body (2 of 2)
[... continued ..]
Dear Wayne
Furthermore, it is unfortunate that Mozilla have chosen to reference
categorically misleading articles (and which continue to be recycled on
slow-news days, on an annual basis since 2016) to support the allegation of
“credible evidence”,
Message body (1 of 2)
Mozilla CA Certificate Policy Module Owner
Dear Wayne,
I am writing to provide an official response to the public discussion that you
have initiated, on mozilla.dev.security.policy, in accordance with Article 7,1
of the Mozilla Root Store Policy, on the inclusion of
15 matches
Mail list logo
