Dear developers,
Hope you enjoy your friday!
If a such plan is underway, please have in mind to make the freeze of the
CVS to have a stable branch.
Im very thrilled to see this project moving into the module direction. This
way I think we should consider to generalize the concept of modules and
Hi,
Here's a patch for the smsc_cgw module that fixes some bugs, and adds
support for the euro character. The euro character thing is a bit
problematic, as it is represented as ESC + 'e' (i.e. two chars). As I
had to have support for it, I added code to this module to do the
conversion (stuff in
I think idea of having the listening http interface inside bearerbox instead
of running two executables could be usefull too.
Obviously this should be configurable ..
- Original Message -
From: "Nisan Bloch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 08:09 PM 2/21/02 +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
>Oded Arbel wrote:
>
>yep, that brings us to 2 API architectures we should think about:
>
>1) module API to load-on-the-fly smsc modules (smpp, emi2, at2, etc.)
>2) module API to load-on-the-fly sms-services (so that there is no
>need to SIGHUP smsbox f
Well,
according to sema spec's , it only supports Sema2000 protocol, which is
implemented in OIS module, and you use SMPP.
Afaik, your operator has written some propriatory translator for SMPP
protocol, or has made changes to the original smsc.
Kannel SMPP module supports only the standard SMPP fu
All the discussion about the kannel tree branching sounds great guys. When do
you think we should expect to see a new branch/tree created?
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 10:33:33AM -, Ronan Derby wrote:
> Are you connecting to a SEMA SMSC?
Hmm. No idea, to be honest :) I've been just said it supports
SMPP v3.4. But I'll ask.
> If so, I would suggest trying to set the SMPP version to 0x33
> (SMPP v3.3) in smsc_smpp.c and rebuilding
I'm using EMI2 and SMPP if that helps.
Angel.
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En
nombre de Alexei Pashkovsky
Enviado el: viernes 22 de febrero de 2002 5:40
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: concatenation = true
This is VERY smsc module dependant.
---
Hello Bjoern,
Thursday, February 21, 2002, 4:11:24 PM, you wrote:
BB> Can anyone tell me something about the WTLS implementation status,
BB> because we want to migrate our WAP functionallty to WTLS.
3glab partially implemented wtls in kannel but it's very hard
to get more detailed infor
> -Original Message-
> From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> 1) module API to load-on-the-fly smsc modules (smpp, emi2, at2, etc.)
> 2) module API to load-on-the-fly sms-services (so that there is no
> need to SIGHUP smsbox for processing)
will a sms-service loaded with dlopen be
Bjoern Buettner wrote:
>
> I'm so sorry but I have no experience in programming in C, otherwise I would
> do it. Perhaps, I should learn it :-))
definitly :))
> How can we help Kannel to provide this ?
provide us with a good C coder?! :)) -- I think you guys from D2 have
a couple of those sitt
This is VERY smsc module dependant.
- Original Message -
From: "Angel Fradejas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "P. A. Bagyenda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:20 AM
Subject: RE: concatenation = true
> Concatena
Well, in my case I am quite sure that the concatenation works properly. Because
sending other concatenated messages is no problem.
I am also quite sure that my problem is a misformed message, maybe some bytes missing
or something.
Therefore, I would like to have an working example to compare my
Thanks for your answer Stipe,
> You mean patent issues?! Hmmm, what do the others think about this?
Yes, I mean the patent problems!
All what I know is that the patent was valid till 2001
> you can configure using ./configure --with-wtls=openssl, but you can't
> *use* it. We need to addopt 3ui.c
Hi,
try to analize the SMPP packet dump.
Edit gw/smsc_smpp.c, enable debug, and see what it sends, you might send me
if you want me to takea look on it.
Than send message concatenated manually and see the difference.
I had some scripts to manually concatenate messages, might be sharing with
you if
Concatenated messages works for me, using current CVS. Never had a problem
with that.
Angel.
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En
nombre de Stipe Tolj
Enviado el: jueves 21 de febrero de 2002 20:19
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; P. A. Bagyenda
Asunto: Re: concate
"P. A. Bagyenda" wrote:
>
> I'm still trying to figure out what's going wrong with the concatenation
> = true. It doesn't work for text or binary, for the current snapshot.
> I notice two interesting things: in access.log there is dump of each
> message sent out, plus udh header. However I note
Hi,
I'm not sure that that solves the problem. Even with the current
snapshot, any attempt at setting concatenation=true (using SMPP code),
causes the phone to receive junk. And you need this to be able to send
operator logos. Using the snapshot of 16th, with concatenation = true
(SMPP, Comverse
I'm still trying to figure out what's going wrong with the concatenation
= true. It doesn't work for text or binary, for the current snapshot.
I notice two interesting things: in access.log there is dump of each
message sent out, plus udh header. However I note that in each case, the
reported le
Oded Arbel wrote:
>
> I think that would be very nice feature, and I see several things I can
> do with it.
> another revolutionary idea - wouldn't it be nice to load the smsc
> modules as dynamic libraries ? that way we don't need to build smsc
> modules that we're not going to use...
yep, that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> My question is: should I bother? Is there a need/want for this kind of
> thing?
I'm definitly interested in seen this.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Te
Bjoern Buettner wrote:
>
> Is is possible to use openssl for WTLS?
yes, currently it's the only "supported" configure option flag for
--with-wlts. But hey, it's currently ony in the state to compile
cleanly, I'm not aware how far Nick did get when implementing this,
Nick?!
> Are there any restr
Richard Braakman wrote:
> Hmm... if conn_destroy is being called in a context where it is still
> possible that some other process has a lock on the connection, then
> something is wrong. conn_destroy should only be called on connections
> that are definitely not in use anymore.
The connectio
Hi list.
lately (I think since I applied Angel's default-sender patch) I get this
leak reports when I take kannel down :
2002-02-21 16:55:41 [0] DEBUG: Area 0x821c5a8, size 8, max_size 8
2002-02-21 16:55:41 [0] DEBUG: Allocated by octstr_create_from_data_real
at gwlib/octstr.c:179
2002-02-21 16:5
I think that would be very nice feature, and I see several things I can
do with it.
another revolutionary idea - wouldn't it be nice to load the smsc
modules as dynamic libraries ? that way we don't need to build smsc
modules that we're not going to use...
Oded Arbel
m-Wise Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
Can anyone tell me something about the WTLS implementation status,
because we want to migrate our WAP functionallty to WTLS.
I didn't find anything in the list about the last status !
Is is possible to use openssl for WTLS?
Are there any restrictions regarding RSA encryption?
Which type
Hi
I've implemented a sms service type that loads and calls a library
dynamically (using dlopen).
The configuration would look something like:
group = sms-service
keyword = default
name =
"mod"
# name of function called, append ".so" to get filename(Is it ok to
use the name property this wa
yeah i manage to send the sms out already :)
they didn't give me the username, but i managed to send the sms without supplying the
username,
probably that when they gimme only one account for MT and now i have to use different
connection to MO. Then, when i have two accounts, those probl
patch applied, thanks!
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
patch applied, thanks!
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
Hi...
i've encountered this problem while trying to send SMS using EMI (emi2), i don't know
which area i need to discuss with my SMSC provider
here's some of the logs
2002-02-21 18:36:53 [6] DEBUG: clear_sent called
2002-02-21 18:37:06 [2] DEBUG: HTTP: Creating HTTPClient for `192.168.0.102
Andreas Fink wrote:
> Depends on your CPU but unless you got a really slow machine with
> really low memory, yes it should. Can you feed it that fast?
that's the basic problem, the feeding of the beast. If you can
establish streams to the machine that do generate an average incoming
stream of 45
haikannel wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please tell me can I send ringtone and logo to SMSC using SMPP v.3.3 ?
Please take a look in the mailing list archive before asking and
annoying pleople on the list!
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wa
Nope - sorry my mistake
It accepts values as doubles and therefore multiplying them by 1000 to get
the time as milliseconds and converting it to a whole number will do the
trick. Therefore we just need to make sure that
milliseconds = seconds * 1000;
ends up as an int for this to work.
On We
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 08:25:37AM +0100, Andreas Fink wrote:
> To the group: Any objections to declare CVS as "stable 1.2.0" and
> "development 1.3.0".
No objections here.
Should we elect/delegate/co-opt a release manager who will be
responsible for this?
Anyway, please liaise with me or Nick
> -Original Message-
> From: Bernino Lind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> CURRENT branch is a continues function of development,
> meaning a "release"
> of current is never intended. The code to be released is
> first backported
> into STABLE and when all the code has proven super super
Yep - please ignore - no modifications needed - gwthread_sleep will
handle values down to 0.001 (1 millisecond) anyway. Andreas was saying in
an email today that SMPP should work without throttling anyway, however
from our SMSC here, I've seen lots of throttling requests coming back from
the S
Dear Sirs,
Hope you enjoy your day. Here in copenhagen we have a marvellous sunny day
with -1 celtigrade. Very beutifull and nice.
I am very thrilled to see that we are finally making two branches of the
kannel project.
I vote for the tagging at current time and make the two branches, just like
Hi List,
>
> > To the group: Any objections to declare CVS as "stable 1.2.0" and
> > "development 1.3.0".
None. Uoti's patch enabled me to remove my sleep hack.
Aarno
Here are my thoughts
This patch uses similar workings to my original work. The better thing
about AT2 vs. AT is that it has private memory which allows no
modifications outside this file, as well as the other advanages of this
phase2 thing !
Before the patch is applied, we need a clean p
40 matches
Mail list logo
