RE: [PATCH] smsc-id in /status.xml

2002-04-18 Thread Oded Arbel
Me like -- Oded Arbel m-Wise Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (972)-67-340014 (972)-9-9581711 (ext: 116) ::.. There's a fine line between courage and foolishness. Toobad it's not a fence. > -Original Message- > From: Angel Fradejas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:5

RE: [PATCH] smsc-id in /status.xml

2002-04-18 Thread Stefan Cars
Me like alot --- Stefan Cars Development Manager Globalwire Communications Mob: +46 (0)708 44 36 00 On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Oded Arbel wrote: > Me like > > -- > Oded Arbel > m-Wise Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (972)-67-340014 > (972)-9-9581711 (ext: 116) > > ::.. > There's a fine line betw

smsc_at2.c at+cmms=2

2002-04-18 Thread Andrea Viscovich
Inside the code there is a call to at+cmms=2 if(list_len(privdata->outgoing_queue) > 1) at2_send_modem_command(privdata, "AT+CMMS=2", 0, 0); On all wavecom this generates an error response. Looking to at manual (wavecom) there is no mention to this. Does anybody know anything about it? Andrea Visc

RE: Reporting the number of message parts sent for long messages.

2002-04-18 Thread Oded Arbel
Hi Stipe. I didn't like the fact that you removed the reporting from the 'error' section in smsbox_req_handle - correct me if I'm wrong, but this way, if a split message is sent to multiple receivers, and some of them fail, the calling application can't tell how many messages were sent to the re

RE: smsc_at2.c at+cmms=2

2002-04-18 Thread Oded Arbel
I don't know what is +CMMS (IIRC it isn't mentioned on the wavecom manual), what its suposed to do or why Bruno put it in, but latest CVS has a configuration for that (in modems.conf) that is disabled by default for most modem types (only enabled for nokia phone in the sample modems.conf). -- O

Re: Reporting the number of message parts sent for long messages.

2002-04-18 Thread Stipe Tolj
Oded Arbel wrote: > > I didn't like the fact that you removed the reporting from the 'error' > section in smsbox_req_handle - correct me if I'm wrong, but this way, if > a split message is sent to multiple receivers, and some of them fail, > the calling application can't tell how many messages we

RE: Reporting the number of message parts sent for long messages.

2002-04-18 Thread Angel Fradejas
Like Oded, our applications don't send SM to multiple receivers, but adding that information seems the right thing to do. My vote is +1 Angel Fradejas Mediafusión España, S.A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.mediafusion.es Tel. +34 91 252 32 00 Fax +34 91 572 27 08 -Mensaje original- De: [EMAI

RE: smsc_at2.c at+cmms=2

2002-04-18 Thread Alex Judd
+CMMS is "More messages to send" and is used by the Siemens, however not by most other devices. Have a look at http://gatling.ikk.sztaki.hu/~kissg/gsm/at+c.html and reports from Siemens vs. Falcon there too. Alex On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Oded Arbel wrote: > > I don't know what is +CMMS (IIRC

User manual for Wavecom 1200 series?

2002-04-18 Thread Jacob Vennervald Madsen
Hi List Does anybody have a Wavecom 1200 series they can send me? I lost my own. Best regards, Jacob Vennervald > -Original Message- > From: Angel Fradejas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 18. april 2002 13:47 > To: Stipe Tolj; Oded Arbel > Cc: Kannel-devel (E-mail) > Subject: RE: Rep

RE: smsc_at2.c at+cmms=2

2002-04-18 Thread Bruno David Simões Rodrigues
On Thu, 2002-04-18 at 12:57, Alex Judd wrote: > +CMMS is "More messages to send" and is used by the Siemens, however not > by most other devices. Uhm. I've set it disabled by default because altough it works with nokia 6210, it ain't working with Siemens M20...

EMI2 stop-and-wait bug again

2002-04-18 Thread GAksenov
Hello! bug in emi2 still exist :( then stop-and-wait in use and acknolegement message (/R/51/) lost. (does not received in some time). kannel wait forever and does not send any message to smsc (until restart). is it possible to fix it? Thanks a lot. with best wishes German Aksenov phone: (095)

PAM authentifcation in sendsms_post and sendota

2002-04-18 Thread Stipe Tolj
Hi there, I see that smsbox_sendsms_post() and smsbox_sendota_post() are both calling directly authorise_username() for username and password authentification, while the others (i.e. smsbox_req_sendsms()) are calling authorise_user() and hence give the PAM module a chance to grap for the authenti

[Fwd: Daily patch: gateway]

2002-04-18 Thread Bruno David Simões Rodrigues
Hei, what happened to changelog ?!?!?! -Forwarded Message- > From: kannel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Daily patch: gateway > Date: 18 Apr 2002 06:30:03 +0100 > > File gateway/ChangeLog changed from revision 1.1781 to 1.1786 > File gateway/gw/bb_smscconn.c cha

Re: smsc_at2.c at+cmms=2

2002-04-18 Thread Andrea Viscovich
Thanks Alex and Oded. >but latest CVS >has a configuration for that (in modems.conf) that is disabled by >default for most modem types I just dowloaded latest tar.gz (snapshot). There is exactly the same code: void at2_send_messages(PrivAT2data *privdata) { Msg *msg; do { if(

Bug in gw/numhash.c

2002-04-18 Thread Paul Keogh
This module has a bug that causes a crash. Replace if (octstr_str_compare(type, "text/plain") != 0) { octstr_destroy(type); octstr_destroy(reply_body); error(0, "Strange content type <%s> for numhash, operatiomn fails", octstr_get_cstr(type)); r

Re: [Fwd: Daily patch: gateway]

2002-04-18 Thread David Holland
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 03:29:42PM +0100, Bruno David Simões Rodrigues wrote: > Hei, what happened to changelog ?!?!?! Good question. I noticed the big diff, but the new Changelog looked intact, so I didn't go further. Maybe the whitespace got reformatted or something? Stipe, I think you were th

Snapshots aren't being built (Was: Re: smsc_at2.c at+cmms=2)

2002-04-18 Thread Bruno Rodrigues
- Original Message - From: "Andrea Viscovich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Alex Judd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Oded Arbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 3:51 PM Subject: Re: smsc_at2.c at+cmms=2 > Thanks Alex and Oded. > > >but latest CVS > >has a

Re: Snapshots aren't being built (Was: Re: smsc_at2.c at+cmms=2)

2002-04-18 Thread Andrea Viscovich
>Subject: Snapshots aren't being built (Was: Re: smsc_at2.c at+cmms=2) Hi Bruno, can you tell me why this happens? Still I tought snapshot were built at 4.00 every morning. Is there any reason as someone stopeed it? Cheers Andrea

Re: [Fwd: Daily patch: gateway]

2002-04-18 Thread Bruno Rodrigues
Can't we split changelog to some kind of old changelog.1.1.0, changelog.1.1.1 to prevent it from beeing so large ? - Original Message - From: "David Holland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 3:56 PM Subject: Re: [Fwd: Daily patch: gateway] > On

Re: Snapshots aren't being built (Was: Re: smsc_at2.c at+cmms=2)

2002-04-18 Thread Bruno Rodrigues
something must gone wrong... snapshot-timestamp says Apr 09, snapshot doesn't have my patch and I've commited it on Apr 10 I don't have shell access, therefor I don't know what happens. - Original Message - From: "Andrea Viscovich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Bruno Rodrigues" <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [Fwd: Daily patch: gateway]

2002-04-18 Thread Stipe Tolj
David Holland wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 03:29:42PM +0100, Bruno David Simões Rodrigues wrote: > > Hei, what happened to changelog ?!?!?! my fault, sorry. Cygwin's DOS/UNIX line endings got messed up in WinCVS, so that's why there way a big diff, actually containing the same. Stipe [EM

Re: [Fwd: Daily patch: gateway]

2002-04-18 Thread Stipe Tolj
Bruno Rodrigues schrieb: > > Can't we split changelog to some kind of > old changelog.1.1.0, changelog.1.1.1 > to prevent it from beeing so large ? Good idea. Do you intend to branch it off or are we going to cut it off any continue in the HEAD branch?! Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug in gw/numhash.c

2002-04-18 Thread Stipe Tolj
Paul Keogh wrote: > > This module has a bug that causes a crash. > > Replace > > if (octstr_str_compare(type, "text/plain") != 0) { > octstr_destroy(type); > octstr_destroy(reply_body); > error(0, "Strange content type <%s> for numhash, operatiomn fails", >

Re: [Fwd: Daily patch: gateway]

2002-04-18 Thread Bruno Rodrigues
- Original Message - From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "David Holland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 4:30 PM Subject: Re: [Fwd: Daily patch: gateway] > David Holland wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 03:29:42PM +0100, Bruno Davi

Re: [Fwd: Daily patch: gateway]

2002-04-18 Thread Bruno Rodrigues
- Original Message - From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Bruno Rodrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 4:31 PM Subject: Re: [Fwd: Daily patch: gateway] > Bruno Rodrigues schrieb: > > > > Can't we split changelog to some kind of > > o

Re: [Fwd: Daily patch: gateway]

2002-04-18 Thread Stipe Tolj
> I was thinking in just splitting it, but I don't know where to. > > doc/old/changelog.*.*.* ? maybe at the gateway 1.1.6 release making log, this would be 1.1748 ?? Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248

WAP Push over SMS

2002-04-18 Thread Anarchy
hi guys... need some info desperately... how do u translate the PAP/SI data into an 8-bit SMS? i'm writing a program (in java, if possible) to form a push message from some input parameters, w/o going thru test_ppg... more specifically, i need to know which attribute maps to which byte in the me

RE: [Fwd: Daily patch: gateway]

2002-04-18 Thread Angel Fradejas
I think it's good to keep old changelogs, as they are valuable to see how things are going, and even they are useful if something breaks suddenly. Probably changelog tells you the one to blame ;-) doc/changelog.*.*.* seems a good place. Angel Fradejas Mediafusión España, S.A. [EMAIL PROT

Problems with Portuguese

2002-04-18 Thread Juvinski
Hi, I'm testing the versions 1.1.5 and 1.1.6 (WAP), and there are some pages with the characters like ã, ç, õ and some others. And the mobile device freeze the wapbox result in a segment fault. Someone know how I can resolv this problem. Thank's Vinicius Juvinski

Coreaccess Log Parser

2002-04-18 Thread Cipher Strength
Hi All, Is there any Coreaccess Log parser. If some body had make it, can share it with me. Currently i am using GREP unix command to parse log file or by inserting the Log file in DATABASE. Also if i want to make a pull service but not use any keyword neither default service any soloution?

Unicode Kannel - almost there

2002-04-18 Thread Jari Juslin
Hi, fellow developers. After weeks of hard negotiations, we have finally got our copy of Unicode Kannel. However, we have not got rights to release it to public yet, because some people representing Kannel Foundation have also expressed their interest of some parts of Kannel to the lawyers of the

Re: Coreaccess Log Parser

2002-04-18 Thread Bruno Rodrigues
I have a set of perl scripts to split and convert from access.log to CLF and process it through webalizer As I fix some last minor issues, I'll commit them to contrib directory - Original Message - From: "Cipher Strength" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April

Re: Problems with Portuguese

2002-04-18 Thread Bruno Rodrigues
Uh ? I'm serving wap pages with accented chars perfectly. Do you have the encoding in wml ? I'm using -1 and -15, even if I still can't set the EUR sign :( (BTW: my CMG Wap gw doesn't understand iso-8859-15) Which mobile is it ? - Original Message - From: "Juvinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Problems with Portuguese

2002-04-18 Thread Bruno Rodrigues
That's what I meant. The page doesn't have an encoding, so it defaults to UTF8, and bruno@server:~$ GET -H 'Accept: text/vnd.wap.wml' 'wap.copel.com' | xmllint - -:9: error: Input is not proper UTF-8, indicate encoding ! Andamento serviços ^ -:9: error