On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 06:51:33PM +0200, Fernando Primo wrote:
> I try to probe kannel 1.0.3 to send SMS mainly, but i don´t sure about
> the kind of GSM modem that i have to use. In the user manual, i have
> read that you used three GSM modem: WAVECOM, SIEMEMS and Ericsson. Are
> there any speci
>
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: GSM modem
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 06:51:33PM +0200, Fernando Primo wrote:
> > I try to probe kannel 1.0.3 to send SMS mainly, but i don´t sure about
> > the kind of GSM modem that i have to use. In the user manual, i
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 08:26:47PM +0100, Fernando Primo wrote:
> Finaly I bought the GSM modem and I have got to send/recive menssage, but
> now I have a little problem, and I don´t know if you will be able to solve
> it. When I send special character, like "ñ, ú, ó, á, é, í, ü" , I don´t get
>
In my company we use Wavecom modems (specificly WM02B model), and its
working perfectly for our needs (very high loads for both sending and
receiving). it does not have a builtin power supply, but use an external
adapter, but in addition to the external power adapter it comes with a
connector and
The Siemens Cellular Engine's MC ## work fine - but really they are just
normal phones. Their serial port is a bit faster - it is a bit easier to
mount in a 1U rack box with all the extra bits - but you are limited by
the air speed anyway.
The only real reason to use those is that they are much
--From: Saurabh Bhardwaj
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002
1:33 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: GSM Modem
HiLet me first thank all who provided me with their
valuable insights (Andreas Fink, Oded Arbel, Jörg, Dave Wilson, Dw.). After a
br
Title: Message
HiLet me first thank all who provided me with their
valuable insights (Andreas Fink, Oded Arbel, Jörg, Dave Wilson, Dw.). After a
brief research, I decided on following alternatives ( I have
to finally zero on one of them)Wavecom WM02Siemens M20
TerminalSiemens TC35 TerminalNo
Hi. This actually works, thank you !
(The sender now gets a 'message delivered' instead of
'problem with receiving device' message).
They (kannel and the modem) sure do talk a lot, though.
But, I'm curious: This workaround, is it generally needed
because of a problem with falcom, or is it tempo
On 3 October 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi. This actually works, thank you !
If you are talking about my patches I sent the list, then
a] This work around is for all modems. It uses modem memory for reception
of SMSs and uses direct SMS sending to send SMSs. It tends to be more
reliable
Matt, I would like you to patch the at
code and let at2 code from Andreas Fink.
By the way maybe someone won't agree with this,
but having an at3 is not so good.
Anybody using at currently has any comments?
Andrea
Why is it that bad to have at3 ?
Current AT module is buggy but it works, AT2 is worse cause sometimes my
Siemens M20T just stop receiving any messages under it.
I think adding AT3 till we get the perfect one is a good idea.
I am willing to test the new At module which saves messages into a sim ca
Ok then Matt,
at3 seems the best solution.
Andrea
- Original Message -
From: "Alexei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confirmation back to SMSC?
> Why is it that bad t
On 3 October 2001, Alexei wrote:
> Why is it that bad to have at3 ?
> Current AT module is buggy but it works, AT2 is worse cause sometimes my
> Siemens M20T just stop receiving any messages under it.
> I think adding AT3 till we get the perfect one is a good idea.
> I am willing to test the new
it's working fine... I have no idea where it could come
fom.
Eric Guivarch
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Matt Flax
Envoye : mercredi 3 octobre 2001 14:47
A : Alexei
Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: gsm-modem -AT+ CNMI / no confi
14 matches
Mail list logo
