Hi Stipe,
yup, and the cvs head version works like a absolute charm! Thanks allot...
On 11/23/05, Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deon van der Merwe wrote:
Hi Stipe,
On 11/23/05, Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yep, that's CVS HEAD branch then.
I used all the radius code
Deon van der Merwe wrote:
Hi Stipe,
yup, and the cvs head version works like a absolute charm! Thanks allot...
so the problem has been resolved via CVS HEAD version, right?
Just to confirm this.
Stipe
mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme-group.de
Hi Stipe,
On 11/25/05, Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deon van der Merwe wrote:
Hi Stipe,
yup, and the cvs head version works like a absolute charm! Thanks allot...
so the problem has been resolved via CVS HEAD version, right?
Just to confirm this.
Correct. Running on a clean
Hi Deon,
Deon van der Merwe wrote:
Hi Stipe,
Yes- you are correct in your assumptions of my broken explanation of
the setup. with parent is that there is a native RADIUS server.
I will do a build using the cvs versions of the radius code and test it again.
This is how our setup also looks
Deon van der Merwe wrote:
Hi Stipe,
Yes- you are correct in your assumptions of my broken explanation of
the setup. with parent is that there is a native RADIUS server.
I will do a build using the cvs versions of the radius code and test it again.
This is how our setup also looks (as you
Hi Stipe,
On 11/23/05, Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Deon,
Deon van der Merwe wrote:
Hi Stipe,
Yes- you are correct in your assumptions of my broken explanation of
the setup. with parent is that there is a native RADIUS server.
I will do a build using the cvs versions of
Deon van der Merwe wrote:
Hi Stipe,
On 11/23/05, Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Deon,
Deon van der Merwe wrote:
Hi Stipe,
Yes- you are correct in your assumptions of my broken explanation of
the setup. with parent is that there is a native RADIUS server.
I will do a build
Deon van der Merwe wrote:
Hi Stipe,
On 11/23/05, Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yup- this is what is going on. Only the accounting messages are being
sent to my kannel server. The problem is that I do not see the
requests being forwarded to the native server.
??? aha.. will have a
Hi Stipe,
On 11/23/05, Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yep, that's CVS HEAD branch then.
I used all the radius code from that checkout on the standard 1.4.0
code. Is this correct?
drop 1.4.0 completely, CVS HEAD includes numerious fixed and is also mainly
release candidate for
Deon van der Merwe wrote:
Hi Stipe,
On 11/23/05, Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yep, that's CVS HEAD branch then.
I used all the radius code from that checkout on the standard 1.4.0
code. Is this correct?
drop 1.4.0 completely, CVS HEAD includes numerious fixed and is also mainly
Hi Stipe,
Yes- you are correct in your assumptions of my broken explanation of
the setup. with parent is that there is a native RADIUS server.
I will do a build using the cvs versions of the radius code and test it again.
This is how our setup also looks (as you have it):
APN --acct pdu--
Hi Stipe,
Here is a request that I received. I did not see any requests sent to
the native RADIUS server. I do not see any responses going back to
the APN. After these requests the wapbox also stops to precess the
accounting requests:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# netstat -an | grep :1813
Active
Hi,
(first attempt was sent from wrong account, so I am not sure if it was
delivered...)
We are running kannel 1.4.0 on FC4. Subscribers are accessing the
system over GPRS. Recently we have the need to add the subscribers
MSISDN into the HTTP headers. For this we then use the
13 matches
Mail list logo
