I have to second someone taking over rrdtool. I handed it off to
Chris
a while back, but have still done far more work on it since then than
he has, and I've not seen him touch an rrdtool bz in ages. :(
(And no, I don't want maintainership back.)
I am ready to take it (I already own it in
Compose started at Fri Nov 12 08:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
apcupsd-3.14.8-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.20()(64bit)
balsa-2.4.7-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libnotify.so.1()(64bit)
On 08/27/2010 09:03 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
tanukiwrapper
I will take this one.
--
Miroslav Suchy
Red Hat Satellite Engineering
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I've searched with yum, through bugzilla, and using koji. I can't find it.
Is GNU Parallel not in Fedora?
http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/
I can't find a review request.
nd
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Greetings.
Fedora 14 was a pretty relaxing and stable release. I'm thinking that
Fedora 15 may be much more exciting. ;)
Things I know of so far:
* systemd
* gnome3 / gnome-shell default
* removing a bunch of suid stuff in favor of capabilities
* xfce 4.8 (with any luck).
Things that are
python-nltk ownership is passed from 'salimma' to 'cheeselee'.
Cheers.
Robin 'cheese' Lee
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
* btrfs (Is this ready to be default? :) If so, would that warrant a
change in our lvm by default setup?
I don't think we are quite ready for this yet. I do have btrfs
strategy on my todo list, though. I'm hoping we can start talking at
FUDCon about what we want btrfs to do for us,
On 11/12/2010 11:46 AM, Chris Lumens wrote:
* btrfs (Is this ready to be default? :) If so, would that warrant a
change in our lvm by default setup?
I don't think we are quite ready for this yet. I do have btrfs
strategy on my todo list, though. I'm hoping we can start talking at
FUDCon
We have been spending a lot of time and thought trying to scheme
about how to accelerate btrfs. At this point, it is actually fairly
stable but still missing key things (most notably a fsck that can
fix the file system!).
Last week at plumbers, we did get a large chunk of the btrfs
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:03 PM, clum...@redhat.com wrote:
We have been spending a lot of time and thought trying to scheme
about how to accelerate btrfs. At this point, it is actually fairly
stable but still missing key things (most notably a fsck that can
fix the file system!).
Last week
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:35:54 -0700,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Greetings.
Fedora 14 was a pretty relaxing and stable release. I'm thinking that
Maybe for some people. Having spin stuff break before the alpha and final
releases, was neither dull nor relaxing. The beta was OK for
Agreed, my plan was to take away the option for F15 (I sent the
anaconda patch already right?) and leave it as an optional thing for
at least 2 releases until we even begin to discuss setting it as
default.
Yep, it's been in for quite a while now:
commit
On 11/12/2010 05:03 PM, clum...@redhat.com wrote:
We have been spending a lot of time and thought trying to scheme
about how to accelerate btrfs. At this point, it is actually fairly
stable but still missing key things (most notably a fsck that can
fix the file system!).
Last week at
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 10:09:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I disagree. The evidence you cite does not support this conclusion. We
implemented the policies for three releases. There are significant
problems with one release. This does not justify the conclusion that the
policies should
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
* grub2 (no one is driving for this that I know of, but has some
advantages over our grub1 if someone is willing to run with it, although
it may be a lot of work to get it to where we need it).
I understood grub2 is much worse for serial console
- Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Greetings.
Fedora 14 was a pretty relaxing and stable release. I'm thinking that
Fedora 15 may be much more exciting. ;)
Things I know of so far:
* systemd
* gnome3 / gnome-shell default
* removing a bunch of suid stuff in favor of
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Greetings.
Fedora 14 was a pretty relaxing and stable release. I'm thinking that
Fedora 15 may be much more exciting. ;)
Things I know of so far:
* systemd
* gnome3 / gnome-shell default
* removing a bunch of suid stuff
nodata wrote:
I've searched with yum, through bugzilla, and using koji. I can't find it.
Is GNU Parallel not in Fedora?
http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/
I can't find a review request.
nd
Isn't it part of moreutils?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 20:03 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 10:09:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I disagree. The evidence you cite does not support this conclusion. We
implemented the policies for three releases. There are significant
problems with one release. This
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 14:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Till Maas opensou...@till.name writes:
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 10:09:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I disagree. The evidence you cite does not support this conclusion. We
implemented the policies for three releases. There are
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 14:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
It's absolutely crystal clear to me that we don't have enough tester
manpower to make the current policy workable; it's past time to stop
denying that. I'd suggest narrowing the policy to a small number of
critical packages, for which there
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:19:22 -0800
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 20:03 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 10:09:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I disagree. The evidence you cite does not support this
conclusion. We implemented the
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 14:54 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
Adam why should security updates wait at all ?
Do you fear some packager will flag as security updates that are not ?
Surely we can deal with such maintainer if that happens...
I don't have a hugely strong opinion either way, but the stated
On 2010-11-12 09:02:40 PM, nodata wrote:
On 12/11/10 20:18, Neal Becker wrote:
nodata wrote:
I've searched with yum, through bugzilla, and using koji. I can't find it.
Is GNU Parallel not in Fedora?
http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/
I can't find a review request.
nd
On 11/12/2010 12:09 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
Another criteria I have for making it default is I want grub support,
specifically grub2. So until grub2 is in Fedora and we have btrfs
patches upstream in grub2 I have no intention of making it the default
in Fedora. Thanks,
Grub2 has been in
On 11/12/2010 02:55 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 11/12/2010 12:09 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
Another criteria I have for making it default is I want grub support,
specifically grub2. So until grub2 is in Fedora and we have btrfs
patches upstream in grub2 I have no intention of making it the
On 11/12/2010 03:58 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 11/12/2010 02:55 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 11/12/2010 12:09 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
Another criteria I have for making it default is I want grub support,
specifically grub2. So until grub2 is in Fedora and we have btrfs
patches upstream in
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Tom spot Callaway
tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/12/2010 03:58 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 11/12/2010 02:55 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 11/12/2010 12:09 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
Another criteria I have for making it default is I want grub support,
On 11/12/2010 11:35 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
* grub2 (no one is driving for this that I know of, but has some
advantages over our grub1 if someone is willing to run with it, although
it may be a lot of work to get it to where we need it).
I'll be glad to point people in the right
I'm orphaning 4 Spring-related packages, due do shrinking free time and
inadequate hardware. Spring is a 3D real-time strategy game.
The packages are :
- spring
- spring-installer
- spring-maps-default
- springlobby
Anyone interested ?
Aurélien
--
http://aurelien.bompard.org Jabber
Kevin Fenzi writes:
* gnome3 / gnome-shell default
And what about systems with hardware that does not support accelerated 3D?
* Will NM finally be able to do bridging?
I'd like to know this too.
pgpHpXPxqULIu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 18:07 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Kevin Fenzi writes:
* gnome3 / gnome-shell default
And what about systems with hardware that does not support accelerated 3D?
There'll be a fallback to metacity. (Or, perhaps, you could run Shell on
LLVM...that's just me
On 11/12/2010 02:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Till Maasopensou...@till.name writes:
snip
It's absolutely crystal clear to me that we don't have enough tester
manpower to make the current policy workable; it's past time to stop
denying that. I'd suggest narrowing the policy to a small number of
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
* Can we finally remove hal? (xfce4.8 shouldn't need it anymore with
any luck).
Well, I've been doing this since F13, but not having to deal with it in
n...@minimal installs as well would be nice :) .
* Some kind of packaged wayland to play with, even if
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
* Can we finally remove hal? (xfce4.8 shouldn't need it anymore with
any luck).
Current HEAD of smolt doesn't require it, expecting to release to rawhide
soon.
-Mike
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, 12.11.10 12:09, Josef Bacik (jo...@toxicpanda.com) wrote:
Another criteria I have for making it default is I want grub support,
specifically grub2. So until grub2 is in Fedora and we have btrfs
patches upstream in grub2 I have no intention of making it the default
in Fedora. Thanks,
Hi,
2010/11/13 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Fri, 12.11.10 12:09, Josef Bacik (jo...@toxicpanda.com) wrote:
Another criteria I have for making it default is I want grub support,
specifically grub2. So until grub2 is in Fedora and we have btrfs
patches upstream in grub2 I have
Some folks at LPC suggested we should switch from grub to syslinux
rather than grub2. Meego uses syslinux. I have little clue how both
compare, but maybe it's worth considering syslinux given that we already
use it for the cd booting and maybe we should consolidate our options
and use
Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@cox.net writes:
On 11/12/2010 02:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
It's absolutely crystal clear to me that we don't have enough tester
manpower to make the current policy workable; it's past time to stop
denying that. I'd suggest narrowing the policy to a small number of
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577669
Bug 577669 depends on bug 570097, which changed state.
Bug 570097 Summary: perl-Module-Build is outdated
The lightweight tag 'perl-Text-Hunspell-2.02-1.el6' was created pointing to:
8595b28... Update to 2.02
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
41 matches
Mail list logo
