Re: GCC bug 634757 F14 rebuild status

On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 12:03:42AM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 20:29 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'doc/examples/runExample.sh' > '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libgnome-java-2.12.7-2.fc14.1.i386/usr/share/doc/libgnome-java-2.12.7/examples/runExamp

fedora 14 thinkpad T60 radeon cause xorg server crash

Hi, since i upgraded from f13 to f14, i have problems with the radeon driver. It looks like a kernel problem, because fedora 14 and the xorg driver has no problem, i can work with it. Also my own compiled kernel, based on f13 latest kernel, works with f14. Now i read about UMS and KMS and i want

Re: GCC bug 634757 F14 rebuild status

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 20:29 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > libgnome-java failed to build > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2638084 I took a look out of curiosity, and this appears to be an intermittent problem that occurs when two instances of install(1) try to write to the same

Re: mpfr soname bump in rawhide

On 12/01/2010 07:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 09:13 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:31:59 +0100, >>Dodji Seketeli wrote: >>> >>> Indeed. But just curious, how do one "arranges a tag"? Is this >>> documented somewhere? Or you just have to fil

Re: GCC bug 634757 F14 rebuild status

On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 12:43:09 pm Jesse Keating wrote: > On 12/1/10 10:16 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > Jesse Keating wrote: > >> I > >> don't really understand why a simple rebuild failed for these packages, > >> likely some movement in the buildroot contents. But I need somebody >

Re: Proven tester signup process

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 20:21 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:59 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I'm not sure I'd want to go quite that far unless the sign-up process > > can wave the proven testers instructions in your face quite prominently. > > They're short and easy to r

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 03:59:02PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:53 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > > I don't really see any reason why *everyone* who's a packager shouldn't > > > also have signed up to be a proven tester by now. I'd like to ask if > > > anyone has a

Proven tester signup process

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:59 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > I'm not sure I'd want to go quite that far unless the sign-up process > can wave the proven testers instructions in your face quite prominently. > They're short and easy to read and understand, but you can't infer them > from first princip

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 14:17 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > [...] I think we need to be > careful of the mindset that says 'we can't enforce any standards in > Fedora because it's a volunteer project so we must just accept what > people are willing to give us'. > > Even though packaging in Fedora

Unresponsive maintainer cweyl alias Chris Weyl (fast track)

Hello. ...following the Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers as Paul Howarth told me (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658725) i realized that Chris Weyl seems to be unresponsive: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?resolution=---&emailtype1=exact&query_format=advanced&ema

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:53 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > I don't really see any reason why *everyone* who's a packager shouldn't > > also have signed up to be a proven tester by now. I'd like to ask if > > anyone has a perception that it's a hard process to get involved in, or > > if they got

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 02:17:32PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > The concept of having a policy requiring updates to be tested before > they're issued is really no different. I think one point where we've > fallen over is that it wasn't sufficiently well discussed / communicated > in advance t

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:15 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > > fedora-easy-karma makes it very, very easy. Have you tried it? You just > > run it, at a console, and it detects all the packages you have installed > > from updates-testing, gives you the description of each, and asks you to > > pr

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On 12/01/2010 04:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:53 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: >> On 12/01/2010 03:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> I don't really see any reason why *everyone* who's a packager shouldn't >>> also have signed up to be a proven tester by now. I'd like

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:53 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On 12/01/2010 03:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I don't really see any reason why *everyone* who's a packager shouldn't > > also have signed up to be a proven tester by now. I'd like to ask if > > anyone has a perception that it's a

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On 12/01/2010 03:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > I don't really see any reason why *everyone* who's a packager shouldn't > also have signed up to be a proven tester by now. I'd like to ask if > anyone has a perception that it's a hard process to get involved in, or > if they got the impression that

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:55 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > The comparison is 100% fair because it points out the fundamental > problem with the current policy: if you don't have a paid staff of > testers to make sure testing is done in a timely fashion, then you have > absolutely no business gating

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:54 -0500, Luke Macken wrote: > Yep, that happens. There are also people that add +0 comments to > updates saying "Untested". There is an obvious need for more > fine-grained karma types. I've sent out notes to the test list to ask people not to do either of those things

[Bug 652158] Use of :locked is deprecated

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652158 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-01 16:54:48 EST --- mrtg-2.16.4-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stabl

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On 12/01/2010 04:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:22 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > >> If the ticket can be allowed to languish that long, then I don't feel in >> the least bit guilty that I didn't drop my other Red Hat >> responsibilities on the floor when the ticket was fin

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 04:49:07PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > On 12/01/2010 04:40 PM, Luke Macken wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:41:20AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:23 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > >> > >>> That being said, F14 went out with a broken mdadm *p

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On 12/01/2010 04:40 PM, Luke Macken wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:41:20AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:23 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: >> >>> That being said, F14 went out with a broken mdadm *purely* because of >>> this policy. >> >>> Evidently my update was approv

[Bug 657965] RFE: Please update HTML::Tree to version 4.1

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657965 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 540356] & and & are treated as & during rendering

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540356 Bug 540356 depends on bug 657965, which changed state. Bug 657965 Summary: RFE: Please update HTML::Tree to version 4.1 https://

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:41:20AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:23 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > > > That being said, F14 went out with a broken mdadm *purely* because of > > this policy. > > > Evidently my update was approved somewhere along the way, but because of > >

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:22 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > If the ticket can be allowed to languish that long, then I don't feel in > the least bit guilty that I didn't drop my other Red Hat > responsibilities on the floor when the ticket was finally approved. By > the time it was approved, I had a

[perl-HTML-Tree] update to 4.1

commit 63c6f60390315d56c086d7548ae3ae839cb53fcc Author: Tom "spot" Callaway Date: Wed Dec 1 16:34:56 2010 -0500 update to 4.1 .gitignore |1 + perl-HTML-Tree.spec | 11 ++- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- diff --gi

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:36:18PM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2010-11-29, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > Proven testers do get copies of these emails (dozens of them) and its > > also summarised in the updates-testing report for all to see.

File HTML-Tree-4.1.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by spot

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTML-Tree: c339cc18ec68e9c677480d2e714b20d1 HTML-Tree-4.1.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On 12/01/2010 01:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:23 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > >> That being said, F14 went out with a broken mdadm *purely* because of >> this policy. > >> Evidently my update was approved somewhere along the way, but because of >> the volume of bodhi s

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 21:12 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > You can get an exception to the policy with majority approval from FESCo. > > That "exception process" is a joke! It takes too long to get approval from 2 > people, one in a medium-sized group and the other in a v

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

Adam Williamson wrote: > You can get an exception to the policy with majority approval from FESCo. That "exception process" is a joke! It takes too long to get approval from 2 people, one in a medium-sized group and the other in a very large group, and so the process is that you need to get 5 vo

Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2010-12-01)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-12-01) === Meeting started by nirik at 18:30:18 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-12-01/fesco.2010-12-01-18.30.log.html Meeting summary -

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On 12/01/2010 05:10 PM, Marek Kasik wrote: > You can test it against your package with this scratch-build: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2552287 It should be http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2636922 Marek ___ dev

[perl-CGI-Simple/f14/master] patch for randomizing boundary (bz 658973)

commit 3ba5b4a83e8c0e3778caced0dcb32ba0cedc2e67 Author: Tom "spot" Callaway Date: Wed Dec 1 13:51:09 2010 -0500 patch for randomizing boundary (bz 658973) perl-CGI-Simple-boundary-fix.patch | 54 perl-CGI-Simple.spec |9 +- 2 fi

[perl-CGI-Simple/f13/master] patch for randomizing boundary (bz 658973)

commit 0bffce3a1cd6625625c48ba932d586e10fd1517e Author: Tom "spot" Callaway Date: Wed Dec 1 13:50:30 2010 -0500 patch for randomizing boundary (bz 658973) perl-CGI-Simple-boundary-fix.patch | 54 perl-CGI-Simple.spec | 19 ++--

[perl-CGI-Simple/el6/master] patch for randomizing boundary (bz 658973)

commit 0ff51c089bc94036a6cb71237c0ac8e5c39c0662 Author: Tom "spot" Callaway Date: Wed Dec 1 13:50:12 2010 -0500 patch for randomizing boundary (bz 658973) perl-CGI-Simple-boundary-fix.patch | 54 perl-CGI-Simple.spec |9 +- 2 fi

[perl-CGI-Simple/el5/master] patch for randomizing boundary (bz 658973)

commit 8134c999dfc664467a88704d496c0b3052f9965c Author: Tom "spot" Callaway Date: Wed Dec 1 13:49:55 2010 -0500 patch for randomizing boundary (bz 658973) perl-CGI-Simple-boundary-fix.patch | 54 perl-CGI-Simple.spec | 52

[perl-CGI-Simple] patch for randomizing boundary (bz 658973)

commit 786d7c3cf9655dcfd08cc09f1602b7b5ab93468b Author: Tom "spot" Callaway Date: Wed Dec 1 13:49:31 2010 -0500 patch for randomizing boundary (bz 658973) perl-CGI-Simple-boundary-fix.patch | 54 perl-CGI-Simple.spec |9 +- 2 fi

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:23 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > So, for anyone that cares, I will posit a maxim that you can't create a > policy that creates an unbreakable roadblock without also creating > either A) a job who's responsibility it is to clear said roadblocks in a > reasonable period of ti

Re: GCC bug 634757 F14 rebuild status

On 12/1/10 10:16 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: >> I >> don't really understand why a simple rebuild failed for these packages, >> likely some movement in the buildroot contents. But I need somebody >> with more knowledge of the code base to attempt the build and translate >

[Bug 658453] "use JSON::RPC::Common::TypeConstraints" in perl script leads to error (fix inside)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658453 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added ---

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:23 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > That being said, F14 went out with a broken mdadm *purely* because of > this policy. > Evidently my update was approved somewhere along the way, but because of > the volume of bodhi spam I get, I missed it. ...so what you're saying is that

Re: biosdevname hitting rawhide

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:11:52PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:13:30PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote: > > Good day, > > > > Am Dienstag, den 30.11.2010, 13:04 -0600 schrieb Matt Domsch: > > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 08:48:05PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > > On 11/29/

[Bug 658453] "use JSON::RPC::Common::TypeConstraints" in perl script leads to error (fix inside)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658453 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-01 12:39:57 EST --- perl-Moose-1.12-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for

[perl-Moose/f14/master] apply upstream fix for RHBZ #658453

commit add61beb29a082cd1f530f117be5ca5082c84a6a Author: Iain Arnell Date: Wed Dec 1 18:30:17 2010 +0100 apply upstream fix for RHBZ #658453 ...ug-that-is-probably-a-bug-in-List-MoreUti.patch | 35 perl-Moose.spec|7 +++- 2 fil

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On 11/30/2010 05:50 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Kevin Kofler > wrote: > > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > I am sorry but "somebody does not did his job"? It is not the > "job" of > > anyone to test packages for you.

Re: biosdevname hitting rawhide

On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 01:18:09PM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 11/30/2010 05:24 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:22:54PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:18:10PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > >>> Many desktops have dual-NICs. I'm typin

Re: biosdevname hitting rawhide

Przemek Klosowski wrote: > Huh? so the first device (handle 2D) will be called 'em0' and the second > device (handle 3D) will be also called 'em0'? 2D and 3D reference one NIC. I only had one NIC in my e-mail to avoid it being lengthy. ;) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https:

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-12-01)

On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 11:38:05AM -0500, Steven Parrish wrote: > > > > If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to > > this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco, > > e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during > > the open flo

Re: mpfr soname bump in rawhide

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 09:13 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:31:59 +0100, > Dodji Seketeli wrote: > > > > Indeed. But just curious, how do one "arranges a tag"? Is this > > documented somewhere? Or you just have to file a ticket? > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Pack

Re: biosdevname hitting rawhide

On 11/30/2010 05:24 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:22:54PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:18:10PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >>> Many desktops have dual-NICs. I'm typing from an SMBIOS 2.6 ASUS desktop >>> motherboard with dual-NICs. >>> >>> Han

[Bug 658976] perl-CGI: CRLF injection vulnerability via a crafted URL

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658976 Jan Lieskovsky changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 658976] perl-CGI: CRLF injection vulnerability via a crafted URL

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658976 Jan Lieskovsky changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: GCC bug 634757 F14 rebuild status

Jesse Keating wrote: > I > don't really understand why a simple rebuild failed for these packages, > likely some movement in the buildroot contents. But I need somebody > with more knowledge of the code base to attempt the build and translate > the error. I took the libgtk-java F14 SRPM and rebui

[Bug 658970] perl-CGI-Simple: CRLF injection vulnerability via a crafted URL

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658970 Jan Lieskovsky changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 658970] perl-CGI-Simple: CRLF injection vulnerability via a crafted URL

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658970 --- Comment #1 from Jan Lieskovsky 2010-12-01 13:04:05 EST --- This issue affects the version of the perl-CGI-Simple package, a

[perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader/f14/master] (3 commits) ...provides perl(DBIx::Class::Schema::Loader::Utils)

Summary of changes: 4f50925... update to 0.07001 (*) 8574e29... update to 0.07002 (*) 4b56868... provides perl(DBIx::Class::Schema::Loader::Utils) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/

[Bug 658973] New: perl-CGI-Simple: CRLF injection vulnerability via a crafted URL [fedora-all]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-CGI-Simple: CRLF injection vulnerability via a crafted URL [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658973 Summary: perl-CGI-Simple: CRLF

[Bug 624308] Package pre-dates the discovery of fire.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624308 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 624308] Package pre-dates the discovery of fire.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624308 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-12-01 13:03:29 EST --- perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.07002-2.fc14 has been subm

[Bug 658970] perl-CGI-Simple: CRLF injection vulnerability via a crafted URL

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658970 Jan Lieskovsky changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: GCC bug 634757 F14 rebuild status

On 12/1/10 2:57 AM, Stepan Kasal wrote: > Hello, > >> libglade-java - kasal - failed build >> libgnome-java - kasal - failed build >> libgtk-java - kasal - failed build > > these packages, together with cairo-java, glib-java, libgconf-java, > and libvte-java are part of java-gnome project. > > T

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.15.3. There are some API changes (see below) and 1 soname bump of libpoppler.so.9 to libpoppler.so.11. You can test it against your package with this scratch-build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2552287 I'll ask release engi

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-12-01)

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting tomorrow at 18:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on > irc.freenode.net. > > This meeting will have newly elected Fesco Members as well as outgoing ones. > > = Fol

Re: biosdevname hitting rawhide

On 12/01/2010 10:13 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Because it's not so almighty. In BSD-land, including Solaris, the devices > are named after the driver, so you get /dev/sis0 and /dev/bge1 and > /dev/e1000g0 and whatnot. > That BSD scheme suffers the same pitfalls as the current fedora scheme

Re: php-pear dependencies install httpd

Le 01/12/2010 14:25, BJ Dierkes a écrit : > php-pear most likely depends on php-devel as a courtesy, based on the fact > that PECL requires php-devel in order to build some/most/all (?) of its > modules. Meaning, when someone says: > > # pecl install foo > > > Foo requires php-devel to build

Re: mpfr soname bump in rawhide

On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:31:59 +0100, Dodji Seketeli wrote: > > Indeed. But just curious, how do one "arranges a tag"? Is this > documented somewhere? Or you just have to file a ticket? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UpdatingPackageHowTo#Requesting_special_dist_tags -- dev

Re: biosdevname hitting rawhide

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:29:32PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Interesting work, Matt. I'm surprised the Unix purists who would fight > you to death to keep sendmail on desktops would allow you to change the > almighty eth* naming scheme. Because it's not so almighty. In BSD-land, includ

exiv2 soname bump

exiv2-0.21 was released recently, and includes a soname bump. I plan on importing this into rawhide next week sometime, if all goes well. Here's a scratch build for testing, http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2636872 I've done a few test builds of the items below, and the only on

[perl-CGI/f13/master] Obsoleted -test sub-package, which would be needed also in perl-core

Summary of changes: 23c3507... Obsoleted -test sub-package, which would be needed also in (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedorapro

[perl-CGI/f14/master] Obsoleted -test sub-package, which would be needed also in perl-core

Summary of changes: 23c3507... Obsoleted -test sub-package, which would be needed also in (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedorapro

[perl-CGI] Obsoleted -test sub-package, which would be needed also in perl-core

commit 23c3507914dcf95ff2948d7af3eb0cc02ea2a2e5 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Dec 1 15:10:24 2010 +0100 Obsoleted -test sub-package, which would be needed also in perl-core perl-CGI.spec |7 +-- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-CGI.spec

Re: biosdevname hitting rawhide

On 12/01/2010 07:55 AM, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > Hi. > > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:33:33 + (UTC), Ben Boeckel wrote: > >> Why? FreeBSD (and other BSDs, I'm sure) have been naming network >> interfaces based on the manufacturer, at least, for a while now (I >> personally started with 7.x and am uns

Re: php-pear dependencies install httpd

php-pear most likely depends on php-devel as a courtesy, based on the fact that PECL requires php-devel in order to build some/most/all (?) of its modules. Meaning, when someone says: # pecl install foo Foo requires php-devel to build properly, and install the module. Without php-devel as a

[perl-CGI/f13/master] Initial push of CGI

Summary of changes: d4d47c9... Initial push of CGI (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: biosdevname hitting rawhide

Hi. On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:33:33 + (UTC), Ben Boeckel wrote: > Why? FreeBSD (and other BSDs, I'm sure) have been naming network > interfaces based on the manufacturer, at least, for a while now (I > personally started with 7.x and am unsure of when that was new). I was > always curious why eth

php-pear dependencies install httpd

I have my laptop with php-cli and php-pear installed, and I was to do an upgrade and found that yum wanted to install httpd package to my surprise. Looking in detail, I found that php-pear needed php-devel, which needs php, which needs httpd. --> Ejecutando prueba de transacción ---> Paquete php-

Re: mpfr soname bump in rawhide

On 11/30/2010 07:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 18:03 +0100, Ivana Varekova wrote: >> Hello, >> >> mpfr-3.0.0 is now build to rawhide branch and soname is bumped to 4.0.0 >> there. >> MPFR 3.0.0 is binary incompatible with previous versions and also is not >> completely API c

[perl-CGI] Initial push of CGI

commit d4d47c9a85a267906f451b5e80fb7104cb3899e1 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Dec 1 12:43:17 2010 +0100 Initial push of CGI .gitignore|1 + perl-CGI.spec | 72 + sources |1 + 3 files changed, 74 insertions(

Re: Orphaning awstats

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 08:21:32AM +0100, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm orphaning awstats, a web log file analyzer. > If anyone's interested... > I will take it. Petr -- Petr Lautrbach, Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.

rawhide report: 20101201 changes

Compose started at Wed Dec 1 08:15:05 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit) beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0(VER_1)(64bit) bognor-regis-0.6.11-1

Re: GCC bug 634757 F14 rebuild status

Hello, > libglade-java - kasal - failed build > libgnome-java - kasal - failed build > libgtk-java - kasal - failed build these packages, together with cairo-java, glib-java, libgconf-java, and libvte-java are part of java-gnome project. The versions we distribute were considered obsolete by the

Re: Looking for testers: RPM 4.9 alpha

On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote: >> On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: >>> Hello, >>> I tried rebuild RPM on F-14. New RPM doesn't find all provides as it should. >>> Example: >>> RPM 4.9.alpha >>> rpm -qp --provides perl-CGI-3.50

Re: mpfr soname bump in rawhide

Adam Williamson writes: [...] >> The packages which depends on mpfr should be rebuild against the new >> versio. The list is: > > It would be much better to either do the rebuilds yourself or arrange a > tag for the new soname and ask the packagers of the below packages to > rebuild them in the

Re: biosdevname hitting rawhide

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 14:04 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 12/01/2010 01:50 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 16:29 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > >> > >> OK. Perhaps the wiki should be updated to state the feature works more > >> generically (SMBIOS 2.6+) and not for just D

Re: biosdevname hitting rawhide

On 12/01/2010 01:50 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 16:29 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> >> OK. Perhaps the wiki should be updated to state the feature works more >> generically (SMBIOS 2.6+) and not for just Dell/HP systems? > +1 > > And also, I'd love to see fewer attacks on

Re: biosdevname hitting rawhide

On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 16:29 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Matt Domsch wrote: > >> > Yes, your system, on new install, or if you delete > >> > /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and the HWADDR lines from > >> > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-*, will then use the new names. > >