On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 16:29 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Matt Domsch wrote:
Yes, your system, on new install, or if you delete
/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and the HWADDR lines from
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-*, will then use the new names.
specifically,
On 12/01/2010 01:50 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 16:29 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
OK. Perhaps the wiki should be updated to state the feature works more
generically (SMBIOS 2.6+) and not for just Dell/HP systems?
+1
And also, I'd love to see fewer attacks on Dell
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 14:04 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 12/01/2010 01:50 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 16:29 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
OK. Perhaps the wiki should be updated to state the feature works more
generically (SMBIOS 2.6+) and not for just Dell/HP
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com writes:
[...]
The packages which depends on mpfr should be rebuild against the new
versio. The list is:
It would be much better to either do the rebuilds yourself or arrange a
tag for the new soname and ask the packagers of the below packages to
rebuild
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Hello,
I tried rebuild RPM on F-14. New RPM doesn't find all provides as it should.
Example:
RPM 4.9.alpha
rpm -qp --provides
Hello,
libglade-java - kasal - failed build
libgnome-java - kasal - failed build
libgtk-java - kasal - failed build
these packages, together with cairo-java, glib-java, libgconf-java,
and libvte-java are part of java-gnome project.
The versions we distribute were considered obsolete by the
Compose started at Wed Dec 1 08:15:05 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0(VER_1)(64bit)
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 08:21:32AM +0100, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
Hi all,
I'm orphaning awstats, a web log file analyzer.
If anyone's interested...
I will take it.
Petr
--
Petr Lautrbach, Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/30/2010 07:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 18:03 +0100, Ivana Varekova wrote:
Hello,
mpfr-3.0.0 is now build to rawhide branch and soname is bumped to 4.0.0
there.
MPFR 3.0.0 is binary incompatible with previous versions and also is not
completely API compatible.
I have my laptop with php-cli and php-pear installed, and I was to do
an upgrade and found that yum wanted to install httpd package to my
surprise.
Looking in detail, I found that php-pear needed php-devel, which needs
php, which needs httpd.
-- Ejecutando prueba de transacción
--- Paquete
Hi.
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:33:33 + (UTC), Ben Boeckel wrote:
Why? FreeBSD (and other BSDs, I'm sure) have been naming network
interfaces based on the manufacturer, at least, for a while now (I
personally started with 7.x and am unsure of when that was new). I was
always curious why eth*
Summary of changes:
d4d47c9... Initial push of CGI (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
php-pear most likely depends on php-devel as a courtesy, based on the fact that
PECL requires php-devel in order to build some/most/all (?) of its modules.
Meaning, when someone says:
# pecl install foo
Foo requires php-devel to build properly, and install the module. Without
php-devel as
On 12/01/2010 07:55 AM, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 01:33:33 + (UTC), Ben Boeckel wrote:
Why? FreeBSD (and other BSDs, I'm sure) have been naming network
interfaces based on the manufacturer, at least, for a while now (I
personally started with 7.x and am unsure of
commit 23c3507914dcf95ff2948d7af3eb0cc02ea2a2e5
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Dec 1 15:10:24 2010 +0100
Obsoleted -test sub-package, which would be needed also in perl-core
perl-CGI.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff
Summary of changes:
23c3507... Obsoleted -test sub-package, which would be needed also in (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Summary of changes:
23c3507... Obsoleted -test sub-package, which would be needed also in (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
exiv2-0.21 was released recently, and includes a soname bump. I plan on
importing this into rawhide next week sometime, if all goes well.
Here's a scratch build for testing,
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2636872
I've done a few test builds of the items below, and the only
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:29:32PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Interesting work, Matt. I'm surprised the Unix purists who would fight
you to death to keep sendmail on desktops would allow you to change the
almighty eth* naming scheme.
Because it's not so almighty. In BSD-land,
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:31:59 +0100,
Dodji Seketeli do...@redhat.com wrote:
Indeed. But just curious, how do one arranges a tag? Is this
documented somewhere? Or you just have to file a ticket?
Le 01/12/2010 14:25, BJ Dierkes a écrit :
php-pear most likely depends on php-devel as a courtesy, based on the fact
that PECL requires php-devel in order to build some/most/all (?) of its
modules. Meaning, when someone says:
# pecl install foo
Foo requires php-devel to build
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 18:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
This meeting will have newly elected Fesco Members as well as outgoing
Hi,
I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.15.3. There are some
API changes (see below) and 1 soname bump of libpoppler.so.9 to
libpoppler.so.11.
You can test it against your package with this scratch-build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2552287
I'll ask release
On 12/1/10 2:57 AM, Stepan Kasal wrote:
Hello,
libglade-java - kasal - failed build
libgnome-java - kasal - failed build
libgtk-java - kasal - failed build
these packages, together with cairo-java, glib-java, libgconf-java,
and libvte-java are part of java-gnome project.
The versions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624308
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-CGI-Simple: CRLF injection vulnerability via a crafted URL
[fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658973
Summary: perl-CGI-Simple: CRLF
Summary of changes:
4f50925... update to 0.07001 (*)
8574e29... update to 0.07002 (*)
4b56868... provides perl(DBIx::Class::Schema::Loader::Utils) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658970
--- Comment #1 from Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com 2010-12-01 13:04:05
EST ---
This issue affects the version of the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658970
Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Jesse Keating wrote:
I
don't really understand why a simple rebuild failed for these packages,
likely some movement in the buildroot contents. But I need somebody
with more knowledge of the code base to attempt the build and translate
the error.
I took the libgtk-java F14 SRPM and rebuilt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658976
Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 11/30/2010 05:24 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:22:54PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:18:10PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Many desktops have dual-NICs. I'm typing from an SMBIOS 2.6 ASUS desktop
motherboard with dual-NICs.
Handle 0x002D,
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 09:13 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:31:59 +0100,
Dodji Seketeli do...@redhat.com wrote:
Indeed. But just curious, how do one arranges a tag? Is this
documented somewhere? Or you just have to file a ticket?
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 11:38:05AM -0500, Steven Parrish wrote:
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor topic.
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Huh? so the first device (handle 2D) will be called 'em0' and the second
device (handle 3D) will be also called 'em0'?
2D and 3D reference one NIC.
I only had one NIC in my e-mail to avoid it being lengthy. ;)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 01:18:09PM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 11/30/2010 05:24 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:22:54PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:18:10PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Many desktops have dual-NICs. I'm typing from an
On 11/30/2010 05:50 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
mailto:kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I am sorry but somebody does not did his job? It is not the
job of
anyone to test packages
commit add61beb29a082cd1f530f117be5ca5082c84a6a
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Dec 1 18:30:17 2010 +0100
apply upstream fix for RHBZ #658453
...ug-that-is-probably-a-bug-in-List-MoreUti.patch | 35
perl-Moose.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658453
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01
12:39:57 EST ---
perl-Moose-1.12-2.fc14 has been
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:11:52PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:13:30PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
Good day,
Am Dienstag, den 30.11.2010, 13:04 -0600 schrieb Matt Domsch:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 08:48:05PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/29/2010 08:27
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:23 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
That being said, F14 went out with a broken mdadm *purely* because of
this policy.
Evidently my update was approved somewhere along the way, but because of
the volume of bodhi spam I get, I missed it.
...so what you're saying is that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658453
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 12/1/10 10:16 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
I
don't really understand why a simple rebuild failed for these packages,
likely some movement in the buildroot contents. But I need somebody
with more knowledge of the code base to attempt the build and translate
the
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:23 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
So, for anyone that cares, I will posit a maxim that you can't create a
policy that creates an unbreakable roadblock without also creating
either A) a job who's responsibility it is to clear said roadblocks in a
reasonable period of time
commit 8134c999dfc664467a88704d496c0b3052f9965c
Author: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Dec 1 13:49:55 2010 -0500
patch for randomizing boundary (bz 658973)
perl-CGI-Simple-boundary-fix.patch | 54
perl-CGI-Simple.spec |
commit 0ff51c089bc94036a6cb71237c0ac8e5c39c0662
Author: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Dec 1 13:50:12 2010 -0500
patch for randomizing boundary (bz 658973)
perl-CGI-Simple-boundary-fix.patch | 54
perl-CGI-Simple.spec |
commit 0bffce3a1cd6625625c48ba932d586e10fd1517e
Author: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Dec 1 13:50:30 2010 -0500
patch for randomizing boundary (bz 658973)
perl-CGI-Simple-boundary-fix.patch | 54
perl-CGI-Simple.spec |
commit 3ba5b4a83e8c0e3778caced0dcb32ba0cedc2e67
Author: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Dec 1 13:51:09 2010 -0500
patch for randomizing boundary (bz 658973)
perl-CGI-Simple-boundary-fix.patch | 54
perl-CGI-Simple.spec |
On 12/01/2010 05:10 PM, Marek Kasik wrote:
You can test it against your package with this scratch-build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2552287
It should be http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2636922
Marek
___
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-12-01)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 18:30:18 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-12-01/fesco.2010-12-01-18.30.log.html
Meeting summary
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 21:12 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
You can get an exception to the policy with majority approval from FESCo.
That exception process is a joke! It takes too long to get approval from 2
people, one in a medium-sized group and the other in a very
On 12/01/2010 01:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:23 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
That being said, F14 went out with a broken mdadm *purely* because of
this policy.
Evidently my update was approved somewhere along the way, but because of
the volume of bodhi spam I get,
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTML-Tree:
c339cc18ec68e9c677480d2e714b20d1 HTML-Tree-4.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 63c6f60390315d56c086d7548ae3ae839cb53fcc
Author: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Dec 1 16:34:56 2010 -0500
update to 4.1
.gitignore |1 +
perl-HTML-Tree.spec | 11 ++-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:41:20AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:23 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
That being said, F14 went out with a broken mdadm *purely* because of
this policy.
Evidently my update was approved somewhere along the way, but because of
the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540356
Bug 540356 depends on bug 657965, which changed state.
Bug 657965 Summary: RFE: Please update HTML::Tree to version 4.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657965
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 12/01/2010 04:40 PM, Luke Macken wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:41:20AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:23 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
That being said, F14 went out with a broken mdadm *purely* because of
this policy.
Evidently my update was approved somewhere
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 04:49:07PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
On 12/01/2010 04:40 PM, Luke Macken wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:41:20AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:23 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
That being said, F14 went out with a broken mdadm *purely*
On 12/01/2010 04:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:22 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
If the ticket can be allowed to languish that long, then I don't feel in
the least bit guilty that I didn't drop my other Red Hat
responsibilities on the floor when the ticket was finally
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652158
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2010-12-01 16:54:48 EST ---
mrtg-2.16.4-2.fc14 has been
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:54 -0500, Luke Macken wrote:
Yep, that happens. There are also people that add +0 comments to
updates saying Untested. There is an obvious need for more
fine-grained karma types.
I've sent out notes to the test list to ask people not to do either of
those things in
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:55 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
The comparison is 100% fair because it points out the fundamental
problem with the current policy: if you don't have a paid staff of
testers to make sure testing is done in a timely fashion, then you have
absolutely no business gating
On 12/01/2010 03:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I don't really see any reason why *everyone* who's a packager shouldn't
also have signed up to be a proven tester by now. I'd like to ask if
anyone has a perception that it's a hard process to get involved in, or
if they got the impression that
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:53 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 12/01/2010 03:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I don't really see any reason why *everyone* who's a packager shouldn't
also have signed up to be a proven tester by now. I'd like to ask if
anyone has a perception that it's a hard
On 12/01/2010 04:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:53 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 12/01/2010 03:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I don't really see any reason why *everyone* who's a packager shouldn't
also have signed up to be a proven tester by now. I'd like to ask
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:15 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
fedora-easy-karma makes it very, very easy. Have you tried it? You just
run it, at a console, and it detects all the packages you have installed
from updates-testing, gives you the description of each, and asks you to
provide
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 02:17:32PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
The concept of having a policy requiring updates to be tested before
they're issued is really no different. I think one point where we've
fallen over is that it wasn't sufficiently well discussed / communicated
in advance that
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:53 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I don't really see any reason why *everyone* who's a packager shouldn't
also have signed up to be a proven tester by now. I'd like to ask if
anyone has a perception that it's a hard process to get involved in, or
if they got the
Hello.
...following the Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers as Paul
Howarth told me (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658725)
i realized that Chris Weyl seems to be unresponsive:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 14:17 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
[...] I think we need to be
careful of the mindset that says 'we can't enforce any standards in
Fedora because it's a volunteer project so we must just accept what
people are willing to give us'.
Even though packaging in Fedora is a
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:59 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
I'm not sure I'd want to go quite that far unless the sign-up process
can wave the proven testers instructions in your face quite prominently.
They're short and easy to read and understand, but you can't infer them
from first
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 03:59:02PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:53 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I don't really see any reason why *everyone* who's a packager shouldn't
also have signed up to be a proven tester by now. I'd like to ask if
anyone has a
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 20:21 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:59 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
I'm not sure I'd want to go quite that far unless the sign-up process
can wave the proven testers instructions in your face quite prominently.
They're short and easy to read
On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 12:43:09 pm Jesse Keating wrote:
On 12/1/10 10:16 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
I
don't really understand why a simple rebuild failed for these packages,
likely some movement in the buildroot contents. But I need somebody
with more
On 12/01/2010 07:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 09:13 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:31:59 +0100,
Dodji Seketelido...@redhat.com wrote:
Indeed. But just curious, how do one arranges a tag? Is this
documented somewhere? Or you just have to
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 20:29 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
libgnome-java failed to build
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2638084
I took a look out of curiosity, and this appears to be an intermittent
problem that occurs when two instances of install(1) try to write to the
same
Hi,
since i upgraded from f13 to f14, i have problems with the radeon
driver.
It looks like a kernel problem, because fedora 14 and the xorg driver
has no problem, i can work with it. Also my own compiled kernel, based
on f13 latest kernel, works with f14.
Now i read about UMS and KMS and i want
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 12:03:42AM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 20:29 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
/usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'doc/examples/runExample.sh'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656317
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658298
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CGI:
51d62c74b83e5b6a8b6f88b4e9334387 CGI.pm-3.50.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: No error reporting when config is a directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658945
Summary: No error reporting when config is a directory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658973
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01
14:08:50 EST ---
perl-CGI-Simple-1.112-2.fc13 has
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658973
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-01
14:09:03 EST ---
perl-CGI-Simple-1.112-2.el5 has
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658976
--- Comment #1 from Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com 2010-12-01 14:09:45
EST ---
This issue affects the versions of the perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658976
--- Comment #2 from Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com 2010-12-01 14:16:58
EST ---
CVE Request:
[1]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658970
--- Comment #3 from Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com 2010-12-01 14:20:45
EST ---
CVE Request:
[1]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658970
--- Comment #4 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-12-01
14:25:47 EST ---
Jan, seems to make sense to wait. I'll
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658970
--- Comment #5 from Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com 2010-12-01 14:34:48
EST ---
Sure, will keep an eye on the issue and post
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-App-cpanminus-1.1004 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659045
Summary: perl-App-cpanminus-1.1004 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-0.12 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659047
Summary: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-0.12 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Config-General-2.50 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659046
Summary: perl-Config-General-2.50 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-ORLite-1.46 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659048
Summary: perl-ORLite-1.46 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl-0.15 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659049
Summary: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl-0.15 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Text-CSV_XS-0.79 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659051
Summary: perl-Text-CSV_XS-0.79 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-pip-1.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659050
Summary: perl-pip-1.19 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654773
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-TreeBuilder:
b1190367133fbf2807c488c2704588c4 XML-TreeBuilder-4.0.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 1ccaacfd6806dbe9c3624c5434a8d52af7ace028
Author: Jeff Fearn jfe...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Dec 2 14:10:05 2010 +1000
update to latest upstream
.gitignore |1 +
XML-TreeBuilder-NoExpand.patch | 267
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
