On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:22 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Greg aptge...@gmail.com wrote:
will BTRFS be default in F17? going by a story posted on Phoronix there's
likely to be
To all whom it may concern:
I updated fcoe-utils 1.0.22 in Rawhide yesterday. This version
includes the default interfaces naming scheme change in fipvlan
tool, removing the old '-fcoe' suffix.
The old behavior could be restored by using the new -f/--suffix
options.
-P
pgpaEENYbnH1Q.pgp
Hi,
since we finally got our Ruby 1.9.3 feature page [1] approved, we are starting
rebuild for Ruby 1.9.3. Everyone who owns a package that depends on Ruby or
Rubygems should rebuild it in the special Koji target f17-ruby. This target
will be merged into rawhide just before the branching, which
Hi all,
Ruby 1.9.3 that will be going into Fedora 17 has a different license:
Ruby 1.8.x had RUBY and GPLv2
Ruby 1.9.x has RUBY and BSD
Cheers,
Slavek Kabrda.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 24/01/2012 5:11 PM, Frederic Muller wrote:
Hi!
Some may remember I was struggling with my old (but faithful) T60 and
rawhide because of poor performance and increased heat. I have
therefore upgraded my hardware (more CPUs, more RAM) and have hit a
lot of new annoying to critical bugs with
On 01/24/2012 06:16 PM, Greg wrote:
On 24/01/2012 5:11 PM, Frederic Muller wrote:
Hi!
Some may remember I was struggling with my old (but faithful) T60 and
rawhide because of poor performance and increased heat. I have
therefore upgraded my hardware (more CPUs, more RAM) and have hit a
lot of
On 24/01/12 06:11, Frederic Muller wrote:
Hi!
Some may remember I was struggling with my old (but faithful) T60 and
rawhide because of poor performance and increased heat.
Besides, hw upgrades.
Clean dust, more powerful fan\heatsink, thermal paste
Raise laptop slightly on edges to clear desk,
On 01/24/2012 06:46 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
In the case of F16 post to: users list
it could be a simple icon\theme missing.
For tesing\Rawhide post to: test list
In either case say what you have done\tried,
relevant logs.
Are you in a position to run a seriel console.
Yes there is a com port
On 24/01/12 11:03, Frederic Muller wrote:
I am also running updates-testing, but my question was really about what
would be more effective/beneficial for the project: F16 or rawhide bug
filling? It seems it doesn't matter?
Testing is always appreciated,
but in many cases it depends on what
Having looked at the way releasing packages and versions in linux has
been moving in a number of distributions it is interesting that there
are several that now have a rolling-release model.
Three of these are:
Debian CUT:
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/03/debian-cut-a-new-rolling-release/
Am 24.01.2012 12:23, schrieb mike cloaked:
Having looked at the way releasing packages and versions in linux has
been moving in a number of distributions it is interesting that there
are several that now have a rolling-release model.
Fedora would appear to be out of line in not taking on
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784243
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Statistics-Basic-1.6607 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784253
Summary: perl-Statistics-Basic-1.6607 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Text-CSV_XS-0.86 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784254
Summary: perl-Text-CSV_XS-0.86 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C-0.28 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784255
Summary: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C-0.28 is
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perlbrew-0.40 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784256
Summary: perlbrew-0.40 is available
Product: Fedora
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:23 AM, mike cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote:
Having looked at the way releasing packages and versions in linux has
been moving in a number of distributions it is interesting that there
are several that now have a rolling-release model.
Three of these are:
- Original Message -
On 18/01/12 14:47, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Well, if I understand it correctly, the Python packaging guidelines
say, that the Python 2 modules should be named python-* and Python
3 modules python3-*, so I would go with that (although I agree that
it is a
2012/1/24 Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com:
How is rawhide not a rolling release? Or perhaps better asked, what
about rawhide makes it
unsuitable for use as a rolling Fedora release?
This has been discussed several times on this list: Technically,
rawhide is a rolling release, sure. But rawhide
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:23:14AM +, mike cloaked wrote:
Fedora would appear to be out of line in not taking on board the
potential user base for a rolling release version. For servers there
would be huge advantages in management of systems.
I doubt your claims here.
Fedora already has
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Fedora would appear to be out of line in not taking on board the
potential user base for a rolling release version. For servers there
would be huge advantages in management of systems.
Can you list what advantages there
On 24/01/12 12:22, Thomas Moschny wrote:
2012/1/24 Josh Boyerjwbo...@gmail.com:
How is rawhide not a rolling release? Or perhaps better asked, what
about rawhide makes it
unsuitable for use as a rolling Fedora release?
This has been discussed several times on this list: Technically,
rawhide
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-AnyEvent-XMPP:
8eae8394fc24aae01f651423c2a5 AnyEvent-XMPP-0.52.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 2af8ddcf3b463c269b52e750c55c0786458e63c8
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jan 24 13:31:12 2012 +0100
0.52 bump and some cleanup
.gitignore |1 +
perl-AnyEvent-XMPP.spec | 96 ++
sources |
On 24/01/12 12:30, mike cloaked wrote:
The number of problems that have been reported to the lists for yum
upgrades seems very large. Although for any rolling release there
have been occasions where unforeseen problems have arisen the day to
day updates have been largely routine and trouble
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784243
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784255
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/01/12 12:22, Thomas Moschny wrote:
2012/1/24 Josh Boyerjwbo...@gmail.com:
How is rawhide not a rolling release? Or perhaps better asked, what
about rawhide makes it
unsuitable for use as a rolling Fedora
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/01/12 12:30, mike cloaked wrote:
The number of problems that have been reported to the lists for yum
upgrades seems very large. Although for any rolling release there
have been occasions where unforeseen problems
On 24/01/12 12:24, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:23:14AM +, mike cloaked wrote:
Fedora would appear to be out of line in not taking on board the
potential user base for a rolling release version. For servers there
would be huge advantages in management of systems.
On 01/24/2012 07:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:23:14AM +, mike cloaked wrote:
Fedora would appear to be out of line in not taking on board the
potential user base for a rolling release version. For servers there
would be huge advantages in management of
On 24/01/12 12:41, mike cloaked wrote:
This was meant as a discussion in the desirability or otherwise of the
concept of rolling release.Of course manpower is required to make it
happen.
Desirability and manpower can't be seperated in some situations.
This being one. page to the sig\wiki
On 01/24/2012 07:13 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
How is rawhide not a rolling release? Or perhaps better asked, what
about rawhide makes it
unsuitable for use as a rolling Fedora release?
Actually it is totally unsuitable for a stable rolling release.
A rolling release, as most mean it these
On 01/24/2012 01:24 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:23:14AM +, mike cloaked wrote:
Fedora would appear to be out of line in not taking on board the
potential user base for a rolling release version. For servers there
would be huge advantages in management of
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:23:14AM +, mike cloaked wrote:
Fedora would appear to be out of line in not taking on board the
potential user base for a rolling release version. For servers there
would be huge
On 01/23/2012 09:39 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
systemd 37 didn't have a problem booting. I suppose the
large number of errors slows udev start down so much that it hits some
kind of timeout in 38 that isn't in 37, maybe?
v38 introduced the journal and removed the old systemd-kmsg-syslogd
2012/1/24 Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com:
On 01/24/2012 07:13 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
How is rawhide not a rolling release? Or perhaps better asked, what
about rawhide makes it
unsuitable for use as a rolling Fedora release?
Actually it is totally unsuitable for a stable rolling
On 01/24/2012 01:44 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
I've been doing this a while,
F16 yum --releasever=17 update --bugfixes --exclude=fedora-release*
How can the --bugfixes possibly work when there are no updates
metadata in Rawhide?
Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 01/24/2012 02:13 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
Fedora suffers an additional problem it seems - not only are there
large changes as part of many releases, but lately some of them
immediately stop being supported until the 'next big release' - which
makes fedora far less reliable and desirable
Am 24.01.2012 13:18, schrieb Bohuslav Kabrda:
Hi,
I think that you should follow the two guidelines that I mentioned in one of my
previous mails: [1], [2].
Therefore, you should use something like:
Provides: django-debug-toolbar = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: django-debug-toolbar 0.9.3-1
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 07:13:03AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
Is there any support at all within the development community for a
rolling release version of Fedora (and possibly ulitimately Redhat)?
Is there a possibility that not moving to rolling release could
ultimately damage Fedora in
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-List-MoreUtils:
8a33c84028cc2ff3e92c92434b326c0f List-MoreUtils-0.33.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Text-CSV_XS:
4f21293f85fea370ab121606dd0f17d9 Text-CSV_XS-0.86.tgz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 24/01/12 14:05, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 01/24/2012 01:44 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
I've been doing this a while,
F16 yum --releasever=17 update --bugfixes --exclude=fedora-release*
How can the --bugfixes possibly work when there are no updates
metadata in Rawhide?
Michal
We'll it doesn't
commit e04b4535159e5f99565e5092b562be4e8e00cfd5
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jan 24 15:31:18 2012 +0100
update to 0.86
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Text-CSV_XS.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
On 01/24/2012 09:08 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 01/24/2012 02:13 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
Fedora suffers an additional problem it seems - not only are there
large changes as part of many releases, but lately some of them
immediately stop being supported until the 'next big release' -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784254
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 24/01/12 14:31, Frank Murphy wrote:
How can the --bugfixes possibly work when there are no updates
metadata in Rawhide?
Michal
We'll it doesn't throw an error.
So no idea.
Apologies forget paste link:
http://fpaste.org/IvtS/
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
--
devel mailing list
So called red-hat perl is popular again on Perl porters. I guess if
you have any proposals about Perl packaging, now it's the best time to
say so.
The main problem is that 'yum install perl' doesn't install whole Perl
tarball.
Original Message
Subject: (WTF?) ExtUtils::MakeMaker
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for
perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C:
6ea7012db4f047460881cfd3fa377f95 WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C-0.28.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 024d1acbb1e2ac4a252ed7aaf37ce2ddd02305b5
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jan 24 15:44:03 2012 +0100
0.28 bump and some cleanup
.gitignore |1 +
perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C.spec | 36 +-
sources
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:23 AM, mike cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.comwrote:
Having looked at the way releasing packages and versions in linux has
been moving in a number of distributions it is interesting that there
are several that now have a rolling-release model.
Three of these are:
On 01/24/2012 08:09 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 01/24/2012 09:08 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 01/24/2012 02:13 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
Fedora suffers an additional problem it seems - not only are there
large changes as part of many releases, but lately some of them
immediately stop
I have used Fedora, Ubuntu, and Arch. I believe the ideal is a
combination of the three
1) A pure rolling release like Arch, upgrades packages when they are
stable without regard to external impacts. The early adoption of
Python 3 in Arch broke many packages and took awhile to fix.
2) Ubuntu
On 01/24/2012 08:21 PM, Mark Bidewell wrote:
Recommended Cycles for major upgrades for each group:
1) User - As soon as possible.
2) System - 6 months.
3) Core - 12-18 months.
Problem is that, it is often the case that 1) requires updates in 2) and
sometimes even 3)
Rahul
--
devel
Hi,
My name is Rudy Sicard. I submitted a review request 781624 (one week
ago but freshly updated) and I am seeking a sponsor.
I work for a company named MLstate (.mlstate.com).
We have created a language to simplify web development, named Opa
(opalang.org) which is available with an
Hi,
WHO MAY BE AFFECTED: people, who installed ladvd voluntarily. It is not
installed by default.
WHAT IS LADVD: it is a small daemon, using low-level ethernet mechanisms to
learn how switches are connected. It implements CDP protocol, LLDP protocol
and few others. By default it sends
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/24/2012 08:21 PM, Mark Bidewell wrote:
Recommended Cycles for major upgrades for each group:
1) User - As soon as possible.
2) System - 6 months.
3) Core - 12-18 months.
Problem is that, it is often the case
On 01/24/2012 08:54 PM, Mark Bidewell wrote:
1) I don't think that many changes in the user section would rely
heavily on new libraries. (Firefox 9 and Libreoffice both run fine on
Ubuntu 10.04 LTS which is almost 2 years old).
Only if they bundle libraries.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
On 01/24/2012 03:39 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 01/24/2012 09:08 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 01/24/2012 02:13 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
Fedora suffers an additional problem it seems - not only are there
large changes as part of many releases, but lately some of them
immediately stop
Am 24.01.2012 15:48, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 01/24/2012 08:09 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 01/24/2012 09:08 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 01/24/2012 02:13 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
Fedora suffers an additional problem it seems - not only are there
large changes as part of many
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:53:32 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 24.01.2012 15:48, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 01/24/2012 08:09 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 01/24/2012 09:08 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 01/24/2012 02:13 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
Fedora suffers an
On 01/24/2012 04:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.01.2012 15:48, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
You are ridding on thin ice here. systemd gets many many updates.
Claiming that it doesnt receive proper attention is very much
unsubstantiated. I think you should go back on this claim.
where are they
Am 24.01.2012 17:07, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
this is BAD because the version in F15 was a really EARLY state
services for F16 like cups rely on systemd-features that do NOT
exist in F15 - so you have no chance converting sysv to systemd
in an easy way on your F15 installation
I disagree
YAWN!
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Am 24.01.2012 17:07, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
this is BAD because the version in F15 was a really EARLY state
services for F16 like cups rely on systemd-features that do NOT
exist in F15 - so you have no
On 24/01/12 16:21, Johannes Lips wrote:
YAWN!
Please don't, I've got Narcolepsy.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 01/24/2012 03:45 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
So called red-hat perl is popular again on Perl porters. I guess if
you have any proposals about Perl packaging, now it's the best time to
say so.
The main problem is that 'yum install perl' doesn't install whole Perl
tarball.
It should not. It
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse:
a9a66f74aeba7c45730430dbf9b37cfd DateTime-Format-DateParse-0.05.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit db3d15fef2c3453e346ec538a3e0d01dde6880e5
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jan 24 17:37:15 2012 +0100
0.05 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse.spec | 43 ++-
sources
On 01/24/2012 05:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
when i see that services which was not converted to systemd
needs features which were not available with the systemd
of F15 this is a clear sign that systemd was NOT ready for
a GA release
That missing feature is PathExistsGlob=, isn't it?
So the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784245
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Am 24.01.2012 17:37, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
On 01/24/2012 05:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
when i see that services which was not converted to systemd
needs features which were not available with the systemd
of F15 this is a clear sign that systemd was NOT ready for
a GA release
That
On 01/24/2012 06:15 PM, Dave Cross wrote:
On 01/24/2012 04:28 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/24/2012 03:45 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
So called red-hat perl is popular again on Perl porters. I guess if
you have any proposals about Perl packaging, now it's the best time to
say so.
The main
Le Mar 24 janvier 2012 16:03, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
On 01/24/2012 08:21 PM, Mark Bidewell wrote:
Recommended Cycles for major upgrades for each group:
1) User - As soon as possible.
2) System - 6 months.
3) Core - 12-18 months.
Problem is that, it is often the case that 1) requires
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 04:20:16PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
WHAT TO EXPECT: nothing should break because of ifAlias. But if something
goes wrong, let me wrong, I will flip default switch to off in our unit
file.
How does this affect lldpad and why do we have both it and ladvd?
--
devel
On 01/24/2012 06:23 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
Having looked at the way releasing packages and versions in linux has
been moving in a number of distributions it is interesting that there
are several that now have a rolling-release model.
I have some systems that were upgraded across multiple
The lightweight tag 'perl-List-MoreUtils-0.33-1.fc17' was created pointing to:
4ed7cee... Update to 0.33
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 02:09:37PM -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 04:20:16PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
WHAT TO EXPECT: nothing should break because of ifAlias. But if something
goes wrong, let me wrong, I will flip default switch to off in our unit
file.
How
On 01/24/2012 05:36 AM, Frederic Muller wrote:
On 01/24/2012 06:16 PM, Greg wrote:
On 24/01/2012 5:11 PM, Frederic Muller wrote:
Hi!
Some may remember I was struggling with my old (but faithful) T60 and
rawhide because of poor performance and increased heat. I have
therefore upgraded my
mike cloaked wrote:
Is there any support at all within the development community for a
rolling release version of Fedora (and possibly ulitimately Redhat)?
No. We've had this discussion many times. It just doesn't work.
There are changes like KDE 4 or GNOME 3 which can't just be pushed as an
On 01/24/2012 02:59 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
But a fully rolling release just cannot work (and this is also why all those
just use Rawhide if you want the latest, usable Rawhide etc. suggestions
are fundamentally flawed). Yes, there are distros doing this, but they all
have one thing in
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
mike cloaked wrote:
Is there any support at all within the development community for a
rolling release version of Fedora (and possibly ulitimately Redhat)?
No. We've had this discussion many times. It just doesn't
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
Moving any large change has challenges - whether periodic or rolling.
In that sense, they are no different - both can be a PITA.
However, in a rolling model you have the advantage of it being the
-only- change you
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:13 AM, mike cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote:
So how did Arch Linux cope with that particular set of changes? I
suppose Arch Linux collapsed never to recover? I think not!
It would behoove the argument you are making if you could write up the
summary of how Arch
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 8:52 PM, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
A question please? Two related ones actually.
What are you going to name your rolling Linux release? And when can we
expect to see it?
:-) notice this.
Of course the decision about a name would be a really huge discussion!
On 24/01/12 20:52, David wrote:
A question please? Two related ones actually.
What are you going to name your rolling Linux release? And when can we
expect to see it?
:-) notice this.
Rooling rooling rooling Rawhde
):)(
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
--
devel mailing list
Genes MailLists wrote:
Moving any large change has challenges - whether periodic or rolling.
In that sense, they are no different - both can be a PITA.
However, in a rolling model you have the advantage of it being the
-only- change you need to do .. which is far less an issue than
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/01/12 20:52, David wrote:
A question please? Two related ones actually.
What are you going to name your rolling Linux release? And when can we
expect to see it?
:-) notice this.
Rooling rooling rooling
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/24/2012 02:06 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 24/01/12 20:52, David wrote:
A question please? Two related ones actually.
What are you going to name your rolling Linux release? And when can we
expect to see it?
On 24/01/12 21:08, Kevin Kofler wrote:
I don't think it makes sense for an individual to drive this forward without
any sort of consensus.
Kevin Kofler
I disagree, in a manner.
Not necessarily drive forward.
But at least have a presentaion ready.
With some facts, some analysis,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/01/12 21:08, Kevin Kofler wrote:
I don't think it makes sense for an individual to drive this forward
without
any sort of consensus.
Kevin Kofler
I disagree, in a manner.
Not necessarily drive
mike cloaked wrote:
So how did Arch Linux cope with that particular set of changes? I
suppose Arch Linux collapsed never to recover? I think not!
There are 2 ways rolling release distros handle this kind of transition:
a) They just push it. That leaves you with e.g. your desktop being
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 07:13:03AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
Or perhaps better asked, what
about rawhide makes it
unsuitable for use as a rolling Fedora release?
The rpm packages in Rawhide are not signed.
Regards
Till
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/52
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/52/0001-Trac-Ticket-52-FQDN-set-to-nsslapd-listenhost.patch
Fix description: Added a code to check netaddr is duplicated or
not. When the address is IPv4-mapped-IPv6, cut the IPv4 part
out of the address and
Hi,
Kicad doesn't build with gcc-4.7 and I don't understand anything with c++.
Can somebody help me?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3730441
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-December/160723.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131
Regards,
mike cloaked wrote:
That way once installed there is no need to maintain and test updates
specifically for the current release. As an overall workload would
this actually be any more effort than the constant stream of testing
for the two current releases - as an overall picture?
Of course
mike cloaked wrote:
Arch has an extensive wiki and a lot of very helpful forums including
a valuable announce forum
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Main_Page
https://bbs.archlinux.org/
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewforum.php?id=24
If you like what Arch is doing so much, why don't you
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Alain Portal alain.por...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
Kicad doesn't build with gcc-4.7 and I don't understand anything with c++.
Can somebody help me?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3730441
Outage: Server reboots for systems - 2012-01-27 04:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2012-01-27 04:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 2 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2012-01-27
Alain Portal wrote:
Kicad doesn't build with gcc-4.7 and I don't understand anything with c++.
Can somebody help me?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3730441
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-December/160723.html
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
