Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

On 07/26/2013 01:47 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: [1] "Onsen", in Berlin-Friedrichshain (recommended) Hmmm I must try it. Hard to find real Japanese in this city. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: rpmconf and new feature to configure application

Dne Čt 25. července 2013 11:38:28, Colin Walters napsal(a): > On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 14:42 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > So I put in rpmconf this code (little bit simplified here): > > if [ -x /usr/share/rpmconf/$PACKAGE ]; then > > > > /usr/share/rpmconf/$PACK

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 05:09:54PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> On 25 July 2013 16:59, Billy Crook wrote: >> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> >> Given the amount of time that he spent on the mailing-lis

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Rakesh Pandit

So I think it's time to release his packages to people who have time now. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Rakesh Pandit

HI On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Christopher Meng wrote: > Hi, > > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984776 > > Rakesh Pandit aka rpandit at redhat.com, hasn't replied any of unhide > emails I've sent to him since Jul 1st. > He has left Red Hat (although his Fedora work

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Rakesh Pandit

Once upon a time, Christopher Meng said: > Rakesh Pandit aka rpandit at redhat.com, hasn't replied any of unhide > emails I've sent to him since Jul 1st. I'll go one better: I reported a buffer overflow in up-imapproxy, with a patch supplied, on 2008-11-05, and he still hasn't patched it. https:

Non-responsive maintainer: Rakesh Pandit

Hi, Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984776 Rakesh Pandit aka rpandit at redhat.com, hasn't replied any of unhide emails I've sent to him since Jul 1st. In Mar 2012, unhide author asked if he could push an update for this package[1], and after a year, it still remains like w

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 18:48 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > On Jul 25, 2013, at 6:42 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Lennart Poettering > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> "He" didn't depart from the meeting. He was at d

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Jul 25, 2013, at 6:42 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Lennart Poettering >> wrote: >>> >>> "He" didn't depart from the meeting. He was at dinner with friends and >>> only had a peek every now and then on his

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

On Jul 25, 2013, at 6:42 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Lennart Poettering > wrote: >> >> "He" didn't depart from the meeting. He was at dinner with friends and >> only had a peek every now and then on his phone while having some >> delicious Japanese food [1] which t

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Dan Mashal >> >> >> Your attitude is atrocious. Go start your own distro. You already >> ruined ours with systemd and PulseAudio. Stop acting like you own >> everything. We have boards, comittees, an

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

Hi On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Dan Mashal > > Your attitude is atrocious. Go start your own distro. You already > ruined ours with systemd and PulseAudio. Stop acting like you own > everything. We have boards, comittees, and plenty of intelligent > people to decide things. > Please don't a

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 25.07.13 17:59, Billy Crook (billycr...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> After some reasonable dialog on the issue FESCo meeting, it was clear >> he wasn't going to immediately get exactly what he wanted without any >> challenge. So he de

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 05:09:54PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> On 25 July 2013 16:59, Billy Crook wrote: >> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> >> Given the amount of time that he spent on the mailing-lis

Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 07:25:32PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > Right now, we have a unified system which we pretty much guarantee cannot be > > targeted at all. It's moving too fast at every level. > Honestly this is the only thing that holds together Fedora at all. The 6 > month release c

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

On Thu, 25.07.13 17:59, Billy Crook (billycr...@gmail.com) wrote: > After some reasonable dialog on the issue FESCo meeting, it was clear > he wasn't going to immediately get exactly what he wanted without any > challenge. So he departed the meeting. In his absence, FESCo decided > to compromise

Re: Multirelease effort: Moving to Python 3

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:49:41AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > ━━━ > > /me goes to the upstream thread to ask Nick what distutils/setuptools/etc > do when they rewrite shebang lines. > > Hmm, patching setuptoo

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 05:09:54PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 25 July 2013 16:59, Billy Crook wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > >> Given the amount of time that he spent on the mailing-list fighting for > >> those features, then it looks like a wast

Re: Following MPI packaging guidelines

Hi! On Jul 24, 2013 9:04 AM, "Antonio Trande" wrote: > I'm editing .spec file of MUMPS package to conform it to the MPI > packaging guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MPI). I > have a modest experience in this particular case so I need some > suggestions. > > This is initial .spe

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 17:09 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 25 July 2013 16:59, Billy Crook wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > >> Given the amount of time that he spent on the mailing-list fighting for > >> those features, then it looks like a waste of ti

Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 16:22 -0600, Eric Smith wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 16:04 -0600, Eric Smith wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Reindl Harald > >> wrote: > >> > if that would be the case i would not run Apache 2.4, an

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

On 25 July 2013 16:59, Billy Crook wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> Given the amount of time that he spent on the mailing-list fighting for >> those features, then it looks like a waste of time, that work has been done. > > Unfeatures technically. He wanted to

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Given the amount of time that he spent on the mailing-list fighting for those > features, then it looks like a waste of time, that work has been done. Unfeatures technically. He wanted to remove features from the Default spin. Subtracti

Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > i really do not justify my decisions inside support cycles > because *you* quote out of context and sound like "booh nobody > is running Fedora in production" And I didn't say that nobody is running Fedora in production. -- devel mailing li

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support

On 25 Jul 2013 19:55, "Daniel J Walsh" wrote: > The only provisos/additions I could suggest on the above then is to make it clear in the release notes that server and client should be matching for any additional fcontext rules to eliminate any server/client relabel discrepancies. In addition r

Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 04:22:59PM -0600, Eric Smith wrote: > And what are you going to do for security updates on Fedora 17? Live > without? Backport and rebuild everything yourself? Update to Fedora 18 or 19 in the next five days. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ -- dev

Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 16:04 -0600, Eric Smith wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Reindl Harald >> wrote: >> > if that would be the case i would not run Apache 2.4, and Zend Opcache >> > in production on Fdora 17 >> >> I wouldn't

[perl-AnyEvent-DBus] Perl 5.18 rebuild

commit 61d761c9e7c32f524f80374fa4a6bf0fe30ed3d8 Author: Petr Písař Date: Fri Jul 26 00:22:52 2013 +0200 Perl 5.18 rebuild perl-AnyEvent-DBus.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-AnyEvent-DBus.spec b/perl-AnyEvent-DBus.spec index 1c245c2

Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 16:04 -0600, Eric Smith wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Reindl Harald > wrote: > > if that would be the case i would not run Apache 2.4, and Zend Opcache > > in production on Fdora 17 > > I wouldn't run *anything* in production on Fedora 17. That's what the > dow

Re: Rawhide tree now includes install images

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 03:37:34PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Hopefully fixed for tomorrow. Nice, thanks to you and Dennis. Lars -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > if that would be the case i would not run Apache 2.4, and Zend Opcache > in production on Fdora 17 I wouldn't run *anything* in production on Fedora 17. That's what the downstream "enterprise" distributions are for. -- devel mailing list d

Re: Proposal: ReadOnlyDirectories /etc and /usr for network-services

Am 25.07.2013 20:51, schrieb drago01: >> *you* can *not* fix anything in packages > > Sure I can done that countless times in the past or IOW no idea what > that is supposed to mean. it means webinterfaces nobody outside our company will ever be possible to touch or see controlling httpd, dbmai

Re: Proposal: ReadOnlyDirectories /etc and /usr for network-services

Am 25.07.2013 21:26, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> if you are able to marry pure-ftpd, samba and 250 cms-installations >> predictable >> on a machine running also *self developed* managment-software for a complete >> infrastructure on 20 Fedo

Re: Proposal: ReadOnlyDirectories /etc and /usr for network-services

Am 25.07.2013 21:06, schrieb drago01: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > >>> There might still be bugs in them (and/or in the selinux-policy package). >>> Being more specific would be way more productive. Like "my app tries >>> to do X but fails with the following message

Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

Am 25.07.2013 20:53, schrieb drago01: >> i saw a lot of (successful) competitors come and go in the >> past 10 years in case of our business and if we would have >> followed them bldindly we would have gone down the same way > > There is a difference between "follow blindly" and bury your head i

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 04:36:20PM -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: > - Original Message - > > On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 17:36 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Thu, 25.07.13 14:39, Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > > > Partially accepted Changes > > > > * No Default Se

Re: Rawhide tree now includes install images

And as is typical, I asked Dennis to look at it, and he found the problem right away. ;) Hopefully fixed for tomorrow. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Rawhide tree now includes install images

On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:12:42 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 21:57 +0200, Lars Seipel wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:41:22AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > After consulting with various teams, release engineering has > > > re-enabled rawhide composes to create install

Re: Rawhide tree now includes install images

On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 21:57 +0200, Lars Seipel wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:41:22AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > After consulting with various teams, release engineering has re-enabled > > rawhide composes to create install images again. > > Hmm, it was disabled again? Nothing there in the

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

- Original Message - > On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 17:36 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Thu, 25.07.13 14:39, Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > Partially accepted Changes > > > * No Default Sendmail - > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSendmail - >

Orphaned: emacs-vm emacs-bbdb

Hi folks, I've just orphaned the emacs-vm and emacs-bbdb packages. Hopefully the other maintainer (goeran) of these packages will take ownership. Cheers, Jonathan. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Orphaned: emacs-vm emacs-bbdb

> I've just orphaned the emacs-vm and emacs-bbdb packages. Hopefully the > other maintainer (goeran) of these packages will take ownership. Yes, I just did it. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

File ExtUtils-PkgConfig-1.14.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by spot

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ExtUtils-PkgConfig: 80003c7a6a214e7712fbd9f9d9abe93a ExtUtils-PkgConfig-1.14.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorapro

Re: Rawhide tree now includes install images

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:41:22AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > After consulting with various teams, release engineering has re-enabled > rawhide composes to create install images again. Hmm, it was disabled again? Nothing there in the last few rawhide composes (0718 was the last one with install i

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 47449 - deadlock after adding and deleting entries

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47449 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47449/0001-Ticket-47449-deadlock-after-adding-and-deleting-entr.patch -- Mark Reynolds Red Hat, Inc mreyno...@redhat.com -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproje

Re: Proposal: ReadOnlyDirectories /etc and /usr for network-services

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > if you are able to marry pure-ftpd, samba and 250 cms-installations > predictable > on a machine running also *self developed* managment-software for a complete > infrastructure on 20 Fedora servers with SElinux go ahead :-) > > been there d

Re: Proposal: ReadOnlyDirectories /etc and /usr for network-services

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> There might still be bugs in them (and/or in the selinux-policy package). >> Being more specific would be way more productive. Like "my app tries >> to do X but fails with the following message" > > my app does not exist outside the own inf

Re: Co-maintainer wanted for ReviewBoard packages

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:19:10AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I've approved you for ReviewBoard. Would you please apply for > python-djblets as well? They're virtually always updated together > (since a lot of the presentation-layer stuff for ReviewBoard is > provided by Djblets). Also, I fo

Re: Proposal: ReadOnlyDirectories /etc and /usr for network-services

Hi On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > So, yeah, if somebody wants to work on getting "ReadOnlyDirectories=/etc > /usr" into the packaging guidelines as proposed default for all system > services, I'd certainly support that, but since I have enough of > discussing and d

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 17:36 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 25.07.13 14:39, Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > Partially accepted Changes > > * No Default Sendmail - > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSendmail - > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/piper

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/25/2013 10:57 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 25 Jul 2013 14:36, "Daniel P. Berrange" > wrote: >>> Updated testing section on >>> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LabeledNFS >> >> Feature looks good to me no

Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 25.07.2013 20:29, schrieb drago01: >>> I am fine with splitting out the actual enduser apps out, but that's >>> nothing that can happen before we actually have a sane concept of >>> apps. But for the rest we should work on creating one

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 14:39 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > Greeting! > This is a summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes by FESCo for week 30 > (2013-07-24 meeting). Thanks Jaro! Could you folks please review the Visible Cloud Change as a priority at the next meeting? If that's accepted it will re

Re: Proposal: ReadOnlyDirectories /etc and /usr for network-services

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 25.07.2013 20:31, schrieb drago01: >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Reindl Harald >> wrote: >>> Am 25.07.2013 17:57, schrieb drago01: > in theory yes > > practically a exploit is not that easy like fire > a bundle

Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

Am 25.07.2013 20:29, schrieb drago01: >> I am fine with splitting out the actual enduser apps out, but that's >> nothing that can happen before we actually have a sane concept of >> apps. But for the rest we should work on creating one strong unified >> platform rather than a conglomerate of puzz

Re: Proposal: ReadOnlyDirectories /etc and /usr for network-services

Am 25.07.2013 20:31, schrieb drago01: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 25.07.2013 17:57, schrieb drago01: in theory yes practically a exploit is not that easy like fire a bundle of commands as root like a script > So we're talking about l

Re: Fedora as an crowd founded project an additional funding source to our sponsor

On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 10:07 +0200, Brendan Jones wrote: > On 07/25/2013 12:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 16:50 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > >> On 07/24/2013 04:40 PM, inode0 wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:07 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" > >>> wrote: > >

Re: Proposal: ReadOnlyDirectories /etc and /usr for network-services

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 25.07.2013 17:57, schrieb drago01: >>> in theory yes >>> >>> practically a exploit is not that easy like fire >>> a bundle of commands as root like a script >>> So we're talking about limited circumstances where the attacker

Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 22.07.13 11:22, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:40:14PM +0200, drago01 wrote: >> > > Whenever I go to a tech meetup or talk to someone from a new startup >> > > company, their deve

Re: Proposal: ReadOnlyDirectories /etc and /usr for network-services

Am 25.07.2013 19:48, schrieb Lennart Poettering: > On Mon, 22.07.13 00:02, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote: >> has anybody considered to put the following as default in systemd-units of >> network services? cross-posting to users-list intented because i think it >> is a good idea to

Re: Multirelease effort: Moving to Python 3

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:49:41AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > ━━━ > > . Which means patching in a bunch of packages. For os_install_post > modification you're talking about a check that fails the build if >

Re: Proposal: ReadOnlyDirectories /etc and /usr for network-services

On Mon, 22.07.13 00:02, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote: > Hi > > has anybody considered to put the following as default in systemd-units of > network services? cross-posting to users-list intented because i think it > is a good idea to bring it to a broader userbase! > > ReadOnlyD

Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

On Mon, 22.07.13 11:22, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:40:14PM +0200, drago01 wrote: > > > Whenever I go to a tech meetup or talk to someone from a new startup > > > company, their developers are inevitably using a different (usually > > > proprietary

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Web Assets

On 07/23/2013 12:56 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 17:07, Robert Marcano a écrit : Fonts has licenses, some of them require the license to be shown or the copyright displayed, some fonts has the copyright added to th

Re: Proposal: ReadOnlyDirectories /etc and /usr for network-services

Am 25.07.2013 17:57, schrieb drago01: >> in theory yes >> >> practically a exploit is not that easy like fire >> a bundle of commands as root like a script >> >>> So we're talking about limited circumstances where >>> the attacker can modify files and not execute code, or where the >>> attacker i

Re: Backslash swallowed by %configure on koji rawhide build

On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:03:57 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 07/25/2013 10:52 AM, Jamie Nguyen wrote: > > Today, the %configure macro swallowed a backslash linking the next line, [...] > Looks like breakage caused by the recent libtool-related hardening > hackery in redhat-rpm-config > (https://

[Bug 988458] New: "Smartmatch is experimental" warnings

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988458 Bug ID: 988458 Summary: "Smartmatch is experimental" warnings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Perl6-Junction Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: p...@cit

Re: Proposal: ReadOnlyDirectories /etc and /usr for network-services

On Monday, July 22, 2013, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 22.07.2013 18:37, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:53:36PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > has

Re: Backslash swallowed by %configure on koji rawhide build

On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:50:40 +0100 Jamie Nguyen wrote: > On 25/07/13 09:03, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > On 07/25/2013 10:52 AM, Jamie Nguyen wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> The spec in question: > >> http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/strongswan.spec > >> > >> The lines in question: > >> %configure --di

Re: rpmconf and new feature to configure application

On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 14:42 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > So I put in rpmconf this code (little bit simplified here): > if [ -x /usr/share/rpmconf/$PACKAGE ]; then > /usr/share/rpmconf/$PACKAGE > fi Have you looked at Debconf? In a past life I wrote the Debcon

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

On Thu, 25.07.13 14:39, Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) wrote: > Partially accepted Changes > * No Default Sendmail - > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSendmail - > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185328.html > > Sendmail will be removed from @core

Re: rpmconf and new feature to configure application

On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 17:28 +0200, Thomas Moschny wrote: > In my opinion, the best solution would be to automatically keep a copy > of the original configuration file (maybe RPM could do that - always > wondered why it doesn't, or one could use a tool like etckeeper). You might be interested to kn

Re: rpmconf and new feature to configure application

In my opinion, the best solution would be to automatically keep a copy of the original configuration file (maybe RPM could do that - always wondered why it doesn't, or one could use a tool like etckeeper). For files in /etc that have to be changed, I usually make a backup copy, enabling me to do a

Re: Following MPI packaging guidelines

> Hi all. > > I'm editing .spec file of MUMPS package to conform it to the MPI > packaging guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MPI). I > have a modest experience in this particular case so I need some > suggestions. > > This is initial .spec file of MUMPS: > http://pkgs.fedoraprojec

Re: f18 koji all failed

It is my fault because I forgot to manually expire everything in the buildroot once my last build was done. -Elio - Original Message - From: "Adam Williamson" To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:51:34 PM Subject: Re: f18 koji all failed On

Re: Fedora as an crowd founded project an additional funding source to our sponsor

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:04 AM, drago01 wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Brendan Jones > wrote: >> On 07/25/2013 12:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 16:50 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: On 07/24/2013 04:40 PM, inode0 wrote: > > On Wed

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support

On 25 Jul 2013 14:36, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: > > Updated testing section on > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LabeledNFS > > Feature looks good to me now. > A few bits that come to immediate mind: Are the labels applied following the semanage fcontext rules from server or clien

Re: Co-maintainer wanted for ReviewBoard packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/25/2013 08:53 AM, Suresh Shinde wrote: > My FAS ID is sureshinde, I have applied to group and willing to > start with my first package. > > On Thursday 25 July 2013 06:08 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On > 07/25/2013 08:32 AM, Suresh Shinde wrote

Re: Co-maintainer wanted for ReviewBoard packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/25/2013 10:08 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 08:27:31AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> My schedule has been a little erratic lately and will continue to >> be so in the near future as I will be disappearing on paternity

Re: Co-maintainer wanted for ReviewBoard packages

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 08:27:31AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > My schedule has been a little erratic lately and will continue to be > so in the near future as I will be disappearing on paternity leave in > late August or early September. I'm looking for some help maintaining > the ReviewBoard

Re: rpmconf and new feature to configure application

On 07/25/2013 03:48 PM, Christopher Meng wrote: I have a package which needs upgrade script sometimes... Question, will this tool backup the conf if some unexpected things happen? If users find that things are not good as expected, how to revert? No, I did not target neither backup nor revert

Re: rpmconf and new feature to configure application

Great. I have a package which needs upgrade script sometimes... Question, will this tool backup the conf if some unexpected things happen? If users find that things are not good as expected, how to revert? Thanks. -- *Yours sincerely,* *Christopher Meng* Always playing in Fedora Project h

[perl-Apache-Session-Wrapper] Perl 5.18 rebuild

commit e6e5779f8ad28c97e1622a542758d448b11de21f Author: Petr Písař Date: Thu Jul 25 15:40:20 2013 +0200 Perl 5.18 rebuild perl-Apache-Session-Wrapper.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Apache-Session-Wrapper.spec b/perl-Apache-Session

[perl-DBD-AnyData] Perl 5.18 rebuild

commit c89269765f07710c3af8692e7a19b16bce145eb9 Author: Petr Písař Date: Thu Jul 25 15:39:48 2013 +0200 Perl 5.18 rebuild perl-DBD-AnyData.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-DBD-AnyData.spec b/perl-DBD-AnyData.spec index e13bc0a..0180

[perl-CPAN-Uploader] Perl 5.18 rebuild

commit bcdeb5fe3ace7bdcaea18e474e5f9305a895970d Author: Petr Písař Date: Thu Jul 25 15:39:12 2013 +0200 Perl 5.18 rebuild perl-CPAN-Uploader.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-CPAN-Uploader.spec b/perl-CPAN-Uploader.spec index f9144ed

[perl-Directory-Queue] Perl 5.18 rebuild

commit 45955255b62f0c6e8695c675c2e78c67abd0f381 Author: Petr Písař Date: Thu Jul 25 15:39:13 2013 +0200 Perl 5.18 rebuild perl-Directory-Queue.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Directory-Queue.spec b/perl-Directory-Queue.spec index 8

[perl-GraphViz] Perl 5.18 rebuild

commit 353ef2af982e0650699df90e70e9815511c561ca Author: Petr Písař Date: Thu Jul 25 15:37:48 2013 +0200 Perl 5.18 rebuild perl-GraphViz.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-GraphViz.spec b/perl-GraphViz.spec index 6ef9c40..407fd4d 10064

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 08:48:24AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/25/2013 07:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > I think this feature needs to cover some app integration testing. For > > example, one of the core use cases for NFS/SELinux

[perl-Config-Validator] Perl 5.18 rebuild

commit 10f121e555de89102d49e5cf0f5ed5841199fef3 Author: Petr Písař Date: Thu Jul 25 15:30:30 2013 +0200 Perl 5.18 rebuild perl-Config-Validator.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Config-Validator.spec b/perl-Config-Validator.spec inde

[perl-Net-DBus] Perl 5.18 rebuild

commit 1e069b0862fdd6af4b5ad14d8e669cdd00e8d063 Author: Petr Písař Date: Thu Jul 25 15:30:30 2013 +0200 Perl 5.18 rebuild perl-Net-DBus.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Net-DBus.spec b/perl-Net-DBus.spec index 92ef281..9ab86a4 10064

[perl-AnyEvent-XMPP] Perl 5.18 rebuild

commit dd43f5a030f57b9d911347e3a42d8f9c39557e32 Author: Petr Písař Date: Thu Jul 25 15:30:30 2013 +0200 Perl 5.18 rebuild perl-AnyEvent-XMPP.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-AnyEvent-XMPP.spec b/perl-AnyEvent-XMPP.spec index 0351dd3

[perl-Nmap-Parser] Perl 5.18 rebuild

commit ef31f7c43539f5d6e4dd4b57885186b8d8621587 Author: Petr Písař Date: Thu Jul 25 15:30:30 2013 +0200 Perl 5.18 rebuild perl-Nmap-Parser.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Nmap-Parser.spec b/perl-Nmap-Parser.spec index 6b52317..8818

[perl-OpenFrame] Perl 5.18 rebuild

commit 8895105505868b0d9691f8f575207b8767db84a5 Author: Petr Písař Date: Thu Jul 25 15:30:30 2013 +0200 Perl 5.18 rebuild perl-OpenFrame.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-OpenFrame.spec b/perl-OpenFrame.spec index bf0239b..865e720 10

[perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd] Perl 5.18 rebuild

commit 529546b29205ed5fe432c923c0eb9184e9232098 Author: Petr Písař Date: Thu Jul 25 15:30:30 2013 +0200 Perl 5.18 rebuild perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd.spec b/perl-Authen-Simple-Pass

Re: Following MPI packaging guidelines

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/24/2013 06:56 PM, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote: > On 24/07/13 05:04 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: >> This phrase in MPI guidelines is little clear for me: >> >> "Software that supports MPI MUST be packaged also in serial mode >> [i.e. no MPI], if it i

Re: Co-maintainer wanted for ReviewBoard packages

My FAS ID is sureshinde, I have applied to group and willing to start with my first package. On Thursday 25 July 2013 06:08 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/25/2013 08:32 AM, Suresh Shinde wrote: Yes. I am interested. On Thursday 25 July 2013

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/25/2013 07:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > I think this feature needs to cover some app integration testing. For > example, one of the core use cases for NFS/SELinux support is to enable > sVirt to work for KVM guests with storage on NFS. So

rpmconf and new feature to configure application

Hi, I just built into rawhide new rpmconf(8) which has new feature - to configure application. Background: After each "yum upgrade/install" you should resolve .rpmnew/.rpmsave files. Rpmconf(8) will help you with that. But it will not help you with initial configuration. Especially with insta

Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

Greeting! This is a summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes by FESCo for week 30 (2013-07-24 meeting). = System Wide Changes = * Unversioned Docdirs - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs discussed on https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185633.html * A

Re: Co-maintainer wanted for ReviewBoard packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/25/2013 08:32 AM, Suresh Shinde wrote: > > Yes. I am interested. > > On Thursday 25 July 2013 05:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: My > schedule has been a little erratic lately and will continue to be > so in the near future as I will be disapp

  1   2   >