* ticket #1182 F21/F22 System Wide Change: Python 3 as the Default
Implementation -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3_as_Default (nirik,
18:10:29)
* AGREED: Feature is approved, provided that the contingency plan is
updated with permitting a mixed environment of
On 10/24/2013 07:01 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
Errr...
I just hope if a packager is also its upstream, we can sponsor him
quickly as well.
Why should we? I don't see why this should be of any relevance.
Somebody being involved into upstream only is an indication for somebody
being familiar
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:01:18 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
Errr...
I just hope if a packager is also its upstream, we can sponsor him
quickly as well.
Well, people are different, and it may not always happen quickly, if the
package suffers from issues and/or the Fedora specific stuff
python3-cairo is a separate package, it contains the latest upstream
release 1.10.0
but it looks like the License is wrong in the .spec (License: MPLv1.1 or
LGPLv2)
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/python3-cairo/sources/spec/
from upstream homepage
pycairo is licensed under the GNU Lesser
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:49:35PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
So that's why I ask if it makes sense to have an fsck for GPT disks.
Sounds sensible. The fsck would just check the checksums of primary
secondary tables, and if an error in either (but not both) is
detected it would restore from
Quoting Jiri Vanek (2013-10-21 18:45:46)
Hi all!
With
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.3.0.fc20
beeing stable,
would like to make this more visible:
The jdk in Fedora, being inspired in Debian, now supports headless version.
During the life of
On 23.10.2013 23:25, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 07:22:16PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
In cases where a package ships a service.tmpfiles file which
manages i.e. the /var/run/service directory, what is the best way
|to make sure that the directory exists after installing
commit 22dc39acb1f3d4125618bcb967ff7d090e06af49
Author: Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk
Date: Thu Oct 24 11:39:54 2013 +0200
Attempt at saner SPEC file formatting
I'm doing this semi-automatically across all packages I maintain, since some
are several years old and since then
Hi,
On 10/13/2013 11:36 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
Hi maintainers,
On 01/05/2012 08:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
(d) Move the whole thing (back) to RPM Fusion (where it originally was, before
we started needing xine-lib for Amarok and Phonon, which both no longer
use it). It would go
- Original Message -
Quoting Jiri Vanek (2013-10-21 18:45:46)
Hi all!
With
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.3.0.fc20
beeing stable,
would like to make this more visible:
The jdk in Fedora, being inspired in Debian, now supports
See an example of mindi-busybox, packager from HP still can't get
sponsored after 5 years.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
It has had fedora-review flag set to '?', which means somebody
is working on it.
I've cleaned up the tickets and their dependencies.
Several
Compose started at Thu Oct 24 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server = 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Path-FindDev:
a11511306156719502d3f4a6e1be4a27 Path-FindDev-0.4.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 13:17:53 +0200,
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Several have not been displayed in the review queue, none has been displayed
on the needsponsor list, and Bruno uses three different submitter email
addresses in bugzilla.
Me Bruno? I should be just using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/24/2013 02:45 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
* ticket #1182 F21/F22 System Wide Change: Python 3 as the
Default Implementation -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3_as_Default
(nirik, 18:10:29) * AGREED: Feature is approved,
Also, will this change be ackported into the Java packages of RHEL_5 and RHEL-6?
Our products use only one spec file, we'll have to add lots of %if osversion
in our spec files (and we have 300+ of them).
- Original Message -
From: Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com
To: Jiri
Quoting Fernando Nasser (2013-10-24 16:06:27)
Also, will this change be ackported into the Java packages of RHEL_5 and
RHEL-6?
Doesn't matter. Fedora != RHEL
Our products use only one spec file, we'll have to add lots of %if osversion
in our spec files (and we have 300+ of them).
Well then
On 10/24/2013 01:33 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:49:35PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
So that's why I ask if it makes sense to have an fsck for GPT disks.
Sounds sensible. The fsck would just check the checksums of primary
secondary tables, and if an error in
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 08:11:08 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Several have not been displayed in the review queue, none has been displayed
on the needsponsor list, and Bruno uses three different submitter email
addresses in bugzilla.
Me Bruno?
No, another Bruno, previously referred to as
plplot has an OCaml interface, but I see:
plplot-ocaml.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/ocaml/stublibs/dllplplot_stubs.so ['/usr/lib64/ocaml',
'/builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.9.9/fedora/src']
plplot-ocaml.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
#445: upgradepath is failing rawhide builds due to no rawhide-pending
-+
Reporter: tflink | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Hot issues
Component: tests | Keywords:
Blocked By: |
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:49:35PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
The bottom line question is, would it be useful to have an fsck_gpt
run by systemd at either startup or shutdown time?
I have a system that corrupts the backup GPT on every reboot: the CRC32
in the backup GPT is always 0. I run
#445: upgradepath is failing rawhide builds due to not being higher version than
other releases
+-
Reporter: tflink | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Hot issues
Component: tests |
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:59 PM, John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote:
On 10/24/2013 01:33 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:49:35PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
So that's why I ask if it makes sense to have an fsck for GPT disks.
Sounds sensible. The fsck would just
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022678
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016186
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
Today at Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip Fedora 20 Beta release
by one week due to unresolved blocker bugs, see the blocker tracking app [1].
More details in meeting minutes [2].
As a result, ALL MAJOR MILESTONES, and their dependent tasks, will be
pushed out by one week [3]. The new
On Oct 24, 2013, at 2:33 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:49:35PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
So that's why I ask if it makes sense to have an fsck for GPT disks.
Sounds sensible. The fsck would just check the checksums of primary
secondary
On Oct 24, 2013, at 8:59 AM, John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote:
Such a tool also should diagnose both overlap and unclaimed space,
and provide some means for repair of these conditions.
For example in the case of minor overlap: repair might be minimum wins,
maximum wins, or arbitrary
On Oct 24, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Jeffrey Bastian jbast...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:49:35PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
The bottom line question is, would it be useful to have an fsck_gpt
run by systemd at either startup or shutdown time?
I have a system that corrupts the
On Oct 24, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
Please let's not mix the two concepts of tools quoted above.
If the proposal is to run something by default on every bootup, it
must be overwhelmingly safe, not apply heuristics that may break the
system even more.
Right.
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
550
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
65
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
26
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
550
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
65
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
41
Hey folks! Just wanted to make sure everyone knows that Wayland Test Day
tomorrow has been CANCELLED - the devs don't think it would be valuable
at this point in time, they say they already have a list of stuff that
needs working on and adding more to the pile would not be of much value.
Today is
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 10:44 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:35:31 +0100,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
that you can do successfully complete a graphical DVD default package
install with 512MB of RAM, or a text network default package install. I
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 10:46 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
For F21, I plan to orphan the following X video drivers:
xorg-x11-drv-apm
xorg-x11-drv-cirrus
xorg-x11-drv-geode
xorg-x11-drv-glint
xorg-x11-drv-i128
xorg-x11-drv-i740
xorg-x11-drv-mach64
xorg-x11-drv-mga
xorg-x11-drv-neomagic
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 07:49 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
We just started to support ARM, I don't think we want to drop it.
I guess those three products are currently most important and
other products like Embedded should go into Spins category. At
least for now.
Yes, we're probably
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 04:03 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/07/2013 03:49 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 15:09:24 -0500
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:11:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I now see ... the version
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 13:15 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 13:09:23 +0200, I wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017695
Visited http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/mc and noticed several tickets at
the bottom are private, too.
This is a step into a wrong
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:29:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I really think whatever the New Way Of Doing Things turns out to be, it
needs to include a minimal network install image much like the current
netinst.iso, built for all primary arches, as a primary deliverable.
Whether that's
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 16:31 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
You don't really need to use mock either. Just use 'rpmbuild -ba'
directly or 'fedpkg local' which is a wrapper.
You don't need to, but there are a few reasons it's superior:
1) Your local environment is almost certainly dirty in
On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 16:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
There's only a few times a scratch build isn't practical: if you're
doing a set of chained builds, you can't use scratch builds, as you
can't have one scratch build build against another scratch build. In
this case I use mock: copy the
On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 11:51 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 10/12/2013 09:55 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 07:50:45PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
cx18-firmware -- Firmware for Conexant cx23418-based video capture
devices
libcrystalhd -- Broadcom Crystal HD device interface
On Sun, 2013-10-13 at 20:21 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
... and how do I find out? I checked over all recent messages on
devel-announce, but it doesn't seem to be mentioned.
Also, automatic obsoleting of builds is a bit of a mixed blessing. On
the one hand it's useful to obsolete an
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 17:35 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
Needing a calendar server for the company, I've ended up packaging the
groupware server SOGo [1], which is a neat MS Exchange alternative. SRPM
of sogo plus deps are here:
FWIW, OwnCloud works great as a CalDAV server (doesn't
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 07:49 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
We just started to support ARM, I don't think we want to drop it.
I guess those three products are currently most important and
other products like
On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 08:55 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Matthew Miller wrote:
Back in May, the systemd package was changed to enable journal persistancy
by default, by creating /var/log/journal.
that dir should be owned by systemd:
repoquery --whatprovides /var/log/journal
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 08:55:00AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Is that folder getting deleted for you somehow?
Um yes. We made this decision in F19. Never mind. :)
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ mat...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Le 25/10/2013 01:53, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 17:35 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
Needing a calendar server for the company, I've ended up packaging the
groupware server SOGo [1], which is a neat MS Exchange alternative. SRPM
of sogo plus deps are here:
FWIW, OwnCloud
On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 14:01 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi folks, and welcome to the Fedora 20 Beta blocker bug news...
can't find any criteria currently that covers application icons (though do
mention it if such a thing exists)...
At issue here are gtk3
On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 16:22 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
to step up and do so? Or we add another state sponsors could query for
this?
I think this would very much be the best option. For instance, a couple
of us have been reviewing the gooey-karma package (like easy-karma, but
with a GUI!):
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 04:12 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
something. And the tarball they ship is a working copy in an outdated format
(outdated SVN version). (IMHO, shipping SVN working copies rather than
exports as tarballs is broken in the first place.)
Very much agree with this; if I was
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 18:08 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The intended usage of test list has always been a problem. Once in a
while, somebody points that out, but there's nobody (no leadership) to
work on a change actively. Is it only for Test releases or also for
Rawhide? Its description
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 17:34 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 10/21/2013 05:25 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
So, discussing Test Updates for stable dist releases belongs onto which
list?
According to some in the QA community ( at least in the past ) any GA
release test topic ( like
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 07:01 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/21/2013 07:48 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:07:25 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
As a first step, I suggest clearing up the intended usage of devel list.
There's too much traffic on that list. 792 messages
On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 19:56 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
It is up to each WG to determine their product requirements. That
includes which architectures and target users they are trying to
produce a product for.
We've done a lot of work over the last few cycles to really bump ARM up
to
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 19:56 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
It is up to each WG to determine their product requirements. That
includes which architectures and target users they are trying to
produce a product for.
We've
commit 9c5a690a2166bb027da8456d34194c1da0b6f4be
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 24 08:55:40 2013 +0200
F18 has tar in /bin
perl-DepGen-Perl-Tests.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DepGen-Perl-Tests.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022894
Bug ID: 1022894
Summary: perl-Path-FindDev-0.4.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Path-FindDev
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
commit a9f17f26f7753fe2e0650974cf167cacf3de60ba
Author: Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk
Date: Thu Oct 24 11:39:54 2013 +0200
Attempt at saner SPEC file formatting
I'm doing this semi-automatically across all packages I maintain, since some
are several years old and since then
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Capture-Tiny:
7c6f63671802d004c0df5dbcba93e5b4 Capture-Tiny-0.23.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit a98c0e912a33508d1727e8c8ce1532fb81328679
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 24 18:56:19 2013 +0900
0.23 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Capture-Tiny.spec | 10 +++---
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021378
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-POE-Test-Loops:
1ee83db755eaf74dac7575b9563cd429 POE-Test-Loops-1.354.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 6ef201e079c6995188c6a55a2c080cb9a97b50e0
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 24 19:21:57 2013 +0900
1.354 bump (just meta changes)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-POE-Test-Loops.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021383
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
perl-BerkeleyDB has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.x86_64 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On i386:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.i686 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On armhfp:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
slic3r has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On i386:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On armhfp:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Path-IsDev:
9ffbd766f6aa97205eaedba5ce219488 Path-IsDev-1.00.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 075a31a8fb12a8efad0216bc2d3ee7af9c04ef17
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 24 13:51:15 2013 +0200
1.00 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Path-IsDev.spec | 13 ++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021209
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
commit 0cdbf5fd1ab1ee15ab91d79e9807b203510f8051
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Oct 24 14:27:42 2013 +0200
0.4.1 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Path-FindDev.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022894
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016186
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
abi-compliance-checker-1.99.8.5-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abi-compliance-checker-1.99.8.5-1.fc19
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016186
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
abi-compliance-checker-1.99.8.5-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abi-compliance-checker-1.99.8.5-1.fc20
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016186
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
abi-compliance-checker-1.99.8.5-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abi-compliance-checker-1.99.8.5-1.fc18
--
79 matches
Mail list logo
