Compose started at Wed Mar 26 08:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for x86_64
--
2ping-2.0-2.el7.noarch requires perl(Digest::CRC)
RemoteBox-1.7-1.el7.noarch requires rdesktop
RemoteBox-1.7-1.el7.noarch requires perl-Gtk2
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 16:53 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
2014-03-25 16:20 GMT-03:00 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com:
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 16:19 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi Fedora folks,
Since NetworkManager I suffer the same issue, release after release, ok,
it's not a
Il 21/mar/2014 12:59 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org ha scritto:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:28:26AM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
I agree with Jaroslav. I was looking forward to have a fourth
product to those three. KDE can help define what is needed for new
product, what must be
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 08:27 +0100, Robert Mayr wrote:
Il 21/mar/2014 12:59 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org ha
scritto:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:28:26AM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
I agree with Jaroslav. I was looking forward to have a fourth
product to those three. KDE
On 03/24/2014 12:48 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 03/22/2014 07:51 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 03/19/2014 10:59 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
And JDK5 might be good enough for the use
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:06:31PM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
If libvirt/qemu-system-x86_64 starts before vino-server (which is
common since we don't leave the vnc access on all the time). Then vino
only listens on ipv6 instead of ipv4 and ipv6. At that point no one can
connect to the
2014-03-26 8:47 GMT+01:00 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org:
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 08:27 +0100, Robert Mayr wrote:
[snip]
I think the same, if all spins become products we can also keep the
actual way. Fedora.next is a very good idea and I'm sure it will have
success, but it needs to
- Original Message -
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 05:07:35PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Alternative idea -- maybe identify all packages which are not ciritcal and
have an open merge review. Take those
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 08:17:36AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
When this goes to updates-testing for F20, please make a
devel-announce post describing what changes that Django package owners
should make in order to keep their package on Django 1.5 or older if
they need to.
Earlier today,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 08:13:24AM +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
If those packages are still not following current packaging guidelines
then they should not be closed otherwise what is the use of FPC and
their work, meetings, updating wiki pages all these efforts will be of
no use then for
- Original Message -
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD
On 03/19/2014 11:52 AM, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
What will happen to XFCE, LXDE, Mate, Cinnemon in Fedora.Next ?
The Workstation WG, looks like a Gnome only thing, will there be at
place of users of other DE's in Fedora.next ?
Just create a working group surrounding each of these desktop
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:59:13PM -0400, Christopher wrote:
I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not
necessarily as the default, but at least available in the repos. As it
stands, it's difficult to use a modern Fedora on projects that are
still developing against JDK 1.6.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:27:19PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
If we can keep the netinstall, which allows people to do exactly this,
then I really could careless what happens with workstation (and I'm
also a happy camper, as I imagine you and many others would be too).
I think generic, flexible
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Amplab Tachyon =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AmplabTachyon
Change owner(s): Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com
Amplab-Tachyon [1] is a fault tolerant distributed file system enabling
reliable file sharing at memory-speed across cluster frameworks.
Greetings!
This is a summary of FESCo's accepted Fedora 21 Changes for week 12
(2014-03-19 meeting).
Reminder: the Change Submission deadline for System Wide Change is due in less
than two weeks!
= System Wide Changes =
* u-boot syslinux by default
URL:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 08:13:24AM +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
If those packages are still not following current packaging guidelines
then they should not be closed otherwise what is the use of FPC and
their
* Christopher ctubb...@apache.org [2014-03-25 19:59]:
I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not
necessarily as the default, but at least available in the repos. As it
stands, it's difficult to use a modern Fedora on projects that are
still developing against JDK 1.6.
On 03/25/2014 06:45 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
* Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com [2014-03-24 11:41]:
On 03/22/2014 06:15 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Given the known large number of failures (OptionalJavadocs says 80% build
failure rate without saying that all are JavaDoc-related), we really
I'm not proposing having OpenJDK7 in Fedora 21. What I'm asking for is to have
them both for a month or two before obsoleting so transition can be smoother if
problems appear.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
From: Deepak Bhole dbh...@redhat.com
To:
On 03/25/2014 08:07 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
* Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com [2014-03-24 11:55]:
Blocking java-1.7.0-oepnjdk may also be required. This
makes it impossible to scratch-build Java packages using f21-build
target in current state.
Is there anything I
* Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com [2014-03-26 09:41]:
I'm not proposing having OpenJDK7 in Fedora 21. What I'm asking for is to
have them both for a month or two before obsoleting so transition can be
smoother if problems appear.
Ah okay, fair enough. I don't think that should be
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Scalar-List-Utils:
cae0bff5dea8a14962229369edc02bac Scalar-List-Utils-1.38.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
= Proposed System Wide Change: PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes For
Long-Running Services =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PrivateDevicesAndPrivateNetwork
Change owner(s): Lennart Poettering lennart at poettering dot net, Dan
Walsh, Kay Sievers
Let's make Fedora more secure by
Hi
On 2014-03-25 12:06, Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote:
I'm not sure where the bug is and it isn't really a big bug as much as
I need to be able to tell either vino or qemu-system-x what ports to
use.
You can change the default port which Vino listens on by changing the
value
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile:
0912c7b626e2fd5088979b8223d58092 MooseX-ConfigFromFile-0.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
= Proposed Self Contained Change: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC
Change owner(s): Petr Špaček pspa...@redhat.com
FreeIPA with integrated DNS server will support serving of DNSSEC secured
zones and automatic DNSSEC key maintenance.
This first
Greetings.
I've just orphaned:
npth|The New GNU Portable Threads library
Interested parties should feel free to take ownership.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
2014-03-26 13:10 GMT+01:00 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com:
#topic #1178 Fedora 21 scheduling strategy
.fesco 1178
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1178
Is there anything specific you'd like to discuss so I can prepare?
Otherwise I don't see much sense in having it on agenda
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Apache Mesos =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ApacheMesos
Change owner(s): Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com
Apache Mesos [1] is a cluster manager for sharing distributed application
frameworks. This change brings Mesos to Fedora, which many have
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
= Proposed System Wide Change: PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes For
Long-Running Services =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PrivateDevicesAndPrivateNetwork
Change owner(s): Lennart Poettering lennart at poettering dot net, Dan
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Apache Mesos =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ApacheMesos
Change owner(s): Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com
Apache Mesos [1] is a cluster manager for sharing distributed application
frameworks.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:29:35AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Apache Mesos [1] is a cluster manager for sharing distributed application
frameworks. This change brings Mesos to Fedora, which many have called a
micro-kernel for the data center.
Are we clustering Changes by products they
Am 26.03.2014 16:28, schrieb Bill Nottingham:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
= Proposed System Wide Change: PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes For
Long-Running Services =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PrivateDevicesAndPrivateNetwork
Change owner(s): Lennart
+1 Mesos is definitively an asset for the Fedora Cloud Product and
would fit in some of our use cases.
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 25 March 2014 13:53, Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Adam,
I've found that by default when I create a user, the checkbox in
NetworkManager that says
All users may connect to this network is checked!
If I uncheck anyway the network configuration files are in
On 26 March 2014 07:41, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/25/2014 06:45 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
* Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com [2014-03-24 11:41]:
On 03/22/2014 06:15 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Given the known large number of failures (OptionalJavadocs says 80%
build
perl-GnuPG-Interface has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch requires perl(MooX::late)
perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch requires perl(MooX::HandlesVia)
On i386:
perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch requires
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Deepak Bhole dbh...@redhat.com wrote:
* Christopher ctubb...@apache.org [2014-03-25 19:59]:
I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not
necessarily as the default, but at least available in the repos. As it
stands, it's difficult to use a modern
On 26 March 2014 10:29, Christopher ctubb...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Deepak Bhole dbh...@redhat.com wrote:
* Christopher ctubb...@apache.org [2014-03-25 19:59]:
I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not
necessarily as the default, but at least
- Original Message -
From: Christopher ctubb...@apache.org
To: Deepak Bhole dbh...@redhat.com, Development discussions related to
Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 6:29:55 PM
Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at
commit 9c4ba8abb795bbfde4e8a31cf0098fa1ac44f0ed
Author: Bill Pemberton wf...@worldbroken.com
Date: Wed Mar 26 12:51:08 2014 -0400
update to version 0.811
- fixes a bug that prevented many-to-many map records from being saved
to the database
.gitignore |1 +
On Wed 26 Mar 2014 05:29:55 PM CET Christopher wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Deepak Bhole dbh...@redhat.com wrote:
* Christopher ctubb...@apache.org [2014-03-25 19:59]:
I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not
necessarily as the default, but at least available in
On 03/26/2014 05:52 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
On Wed 26 Mar 2014 05:29:55 PM CET Christopher wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Deepak Bhole dbh...@redhat.com wrote:
* Christopher ctubb...@apache.org [2014-03-25 19:59]:
I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055297
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.811-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.811-1.el6
--
You are
On Wed 26 Mar 2014 01:19:52 PM CET Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:59:13PM -0400, Christopher wrote:
I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not
necessarily as the default, but at least available in the repos. As it
stands, it's difficult to use a modern
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055297
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.811-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.811-1.fc19
--
You are
commit 0c21768eff9403684969b6ab841f07525f76761a
Author: Bill Pemberton wf...@worldbroken.com
Date: Wed Mar 26 13:11:40 2014 -0400
update to version 0.811
- fixes a bug that prevented many-to-many map records from being saved
to the database
.gitignore |1 +
On 03/26/2014 08:46 AM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 08:13:24AM +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
If those packages are still not following current packaging guidelines
then they should not be closed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/26/2014 10:06 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
snip
Note that PrivateNetwork=yes should not be used for:
1. Services that actually require network access (with the
exception of daemons only needing socket activation) 2. Services
which may be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/26/2014 11:30 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.03.2014 16:28, schrieb Bill Nottingham:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
= Proposed System Wide Change: PrivateDevices=yes and
PrivateNetwork=yes For Long-Running Services =
Am 26.03.2014 18:52, schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
On 03/26/2014 11:30 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i just tried on F20 and PrivateDevices is not known sadly because
i have some services in mind where i would like that
Mär 26 15:51:55 testserver.rhsoft.net systemd[1]:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 26.03.2014 18:52, schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
On 03/26/2014 11:30 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i just tried on F20 and PrivateDevices is not known sadly because
i have some services in mind where i would like that
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2014-03-27 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
NOTE: US is on DST, so it's an hour later for them than normal. Also
note that most of the rest of the world should have DST this weekend, so
next
El 26/03/14 12:45, Stephen John Smoogen escribió:
On 25 March 2014 13:53, Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com
mailto:seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Adam,
I've found that by default when I create a user, the checkbox in
NetworkManager that says
All users may connect to this network
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2014-03-26)
===
Meeting started by mitr at 18:00:57 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-03-26/fesco.2014-03-26-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 08:21 +, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote:
On 25/03/14 03:00 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 17:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Saying that nobody wants this, it's madness, totally wacky,
almost all users are NOT going to put up with this is going
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:31:20PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
---
* init process (mitr, 18:01:03)
* sgallagh is here (sgallagh, 18:01:08)
FTR other people were too :)
--
Matthew Miller-- Fedora Project--mat...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
2014-03-26 20:51 GMT+01:00 James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org:
(approval and retirement sections already passed, /opt exception passed)
#topic #339 software collections in Fedora
.fpc 339
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/339
I can't help seeing this on the agenda for a long time (the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/26/2014 04:42 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:31:20PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
--- * init process (mitr, 18:01:03) * sgallagh is
here (sgallagh, 18:01:08)
FTR other people were too :)
I'll also
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/19/2014 11:52 AM, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
What will happen to XFCE, LXDE, Mate, Cinnemon in Fedora.Next ?
The Workstation WG, looks like a Gnome only thing, will there be at place
of users of other DE's in
Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hmmm... but NetworkManager should think in desktop users (ok, somewhat
power desktop users) that install a new release/distro and a user
configuration should be completely independent. Or at least give the
chance to save either systemwide or userwide. Anyway thanks for
Am 26.03.2014 22:47, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hmmm... but NetworkManager should think in desktop users (ok, somewhat
power desktop users) that install a new release/distro and a user
configuration should be completely independent. Or at least give the
chance to save either
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 16:57 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
El 26/03/14 12:45, Stephen John Smoogen escribió:
On 25 March 2014 13:53, Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com
mailto:seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Adam,
I've found that by default when I create a user, the checkbox in
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 13:43 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 03/26/2014 10:06 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
snip
Note that PrivateNetwork=yes should not be used for:
1. Services that actually require network access (with the
exception of daemons only needing socket activation) 2.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040414
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Amplab Tachyon =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AmplabTachyon
Change owner(s): Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com
Amplab-Tachyon [1] is a fault tolerant distributed file system enabling
reliable file sharing at memory-speed across cluster frameworks.
= Proposed Self Contained Change: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC
Change owner(s): Petr Špaček pspa...@redhat.com
FreeIPA with integrated DNS server will support serving of DNSSEC secured
zones and automatic DNSSEC key maintenance.
This first
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Apache Mesos =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ApacheMesos
Change owner(s): Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com
Apache Mesos [1] is a cluster manager for sharing distributed application
frameworks. This change brings Mesos to Fedora, which many have
72 matches
Mail list logo
