Compose started at Mon Jun 23 08:15:03 UTC 2014
New package: libgit2-0.21.0-1.el7
C implementation of the Git core methods as a library with a solid
API
New package: perl-Text-Format-0.59-2.el7
Various subroutines to format text
Updated Packages:
On 22. 6. 2014 at 23:36:34, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
HI
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
This isn't for a plugin, but as a core feature:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955673
As previously noted, the yum functionality was originally a plugin but
Hello,
I'm about to bump FreeRDP in Rawhide to the newly released version 1.2.0
beta 1. This allows us to build Remmina that is currently FTBFS.
Of all the packages that are using FreeRDP, only Weston is the one for
which I don't have any commit access, so it needs to be rebuilt. I've
tested a
Am 23.06.2014 06:29, schrieb Gerald B. Cox:
I think there are much more important things to be concerned about than:
1. Childproofing software.
2. Writing software to protect against software bugs.
DNF already requires that you have root privileges
so what
in addition to requiring
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:25:46 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
snipped
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049310#c29
___
Regards
Frank
frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
Am 23.06.2014 11:28, schrieb Frank Murphy:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:25:46 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
snipped
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049310#c29
sounds like there is now a chance DNF get trustable until
Fedroa 22 is released which is for sure the
On 06/20/2014 09:10 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Dnf doesn't know anything about your network connection and I'm not even sure
it should ... I can imagine a high level orchestration tool for the entire
system to do stuff like this but that's out of our scope.
I just filed NetworkManager RFE
RFE: add
Jan Zelený wrote:
As always, patches are welcome.
http://www.xenoterracide.com/2010/05/dont-say-patches-welcome.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
Jan Zelený wrote:
As always, patches are welcome.
http://www.xenoterracide.com/2010/05/dont-say-patches-welcome.html
That link is nonsense. It *is* reasonable to ask people on a
*development mailing list* for
Hello all,
there is currently not so much things to configure in PostgreSQL from
systemd's service point of view (not taking postgresql.conf into account),
concretely, we configure PGPORT and PGDATA, from which the later is
important (and often re-configured to point e.g. to some dedicated mount
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
24 packages were orphaned
-
docker-registry [epel7] was orphaned by goldmann
Registry server for Docker
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/docker-registry
Hi
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:17 AM, drago01 wrote:
That link is nonsense. It *is* reasonable to ask people on a
*development mailing list* for patches ...
Perhaps but this is more a community of packagers and doing so here would
be viewed as an offhanded brush off but what I asked for is
This has got to be the silliest thing I've ever seen, but whatever.
You enter the command dnf remove dnf, and guess what? It removes dnf.
You enter the command dnf remove kernel, and guess what, it removes
the kernel. What a concept, it does what you tell it to do.
Not withstanding the fact
I know that a pistol can be dangerous and I can even shoot myself. I
keep it in a place where childrens can't reach it, so why bothering with
a safety lock? It can be cheaper making the pistol without it...
Il 23/06/2014 17:51, Gerald B. Cox ha scritto:
This has got to be the silliest thing
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 08:51:51 -0700,
Gerald B. Cox gb...@bzb.us wrote:
This has got to be the silliest thing I've ever seen, but whatever.
You enter the command dnf remove dnf, and guess what? It removes dnf.
You enter the command dnf remove kernel, and guess what, it removes
the kernel.
On Sun, 2014-06-22 at 18:43 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
on the other hand, there's a clear overlap with 'environment groups'. it
seems like we kinda have one type of group too many. :P
environments is
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 11:14 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Try yum update when the oldest installed kernel (and the running
kernel) is the only one that works and there is a new (still broken for
your system) kernel update available. In that case one really wouldn't
expect the running
Once upon a time, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to said:
Try yum update when the oldest installed kernel (and the running
kernel) is the only one that works and there is a new (still broken
for your system) kernel update available. In that case one really
wouldn't expect the running kernel be
Am 23.06.2014 18:44, schrieb Matthias Clasen:
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 11:14 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Try yum update when the oldest installed kernel (and the running
kernel) is the only one that works and there is a new (still broken for
your system) kernel update available. In that
On 23 June 2014 17:57, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
please come back to the real world
That doesn't sound very excellent. Do we have to start mentioning the
moderation word again?
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
Yeah, you're probably right. In that case we should probably explain the
difference somewhere - are you aware of anywhere it's currently written
down? There are no comments in the comps.xml files, no documentation in
Am 23.06.2014 18:47, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to said:
Try yum update when the oldest installed kernel (and the running
kernel) is the only one that works and there is a new (still broken
for your system) kernel update available. In that case one
Am 23.06.2014 19:00, schrieb Richard Hughes:
On 23 June 2014 17:57, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
please come back to the real world
That doesn't sound very excellent. Do we have to start mentioning the
moderation word again?
please don't quote out of context
thank you!
On 23 June 2014 18:00, Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
I have not seen any docs for comps.xml
At one point there was a RH developer working on a libcomps project --
if you can track down the project and the maintainer he's probably the
best person to ask for docs.
Richard.
--
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 23.06.2014 18:47, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to said:
Try yum update when the oldest installed kernel (and the running
kernel) is the only one that works and there is a new
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Mattia Verga mattia.ve...@tiscali.it
wrote:
I know that a pistol can be dangerous and I can even shoot myself. I keep
it in a place where childrens can't reach it, so why bothering with a
safety lock? It can be cheaper making the pistol without it...
Sigh A
Am 23.06.2014 19:14, schrieb Gerald B. Cox:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Mattia Verga mattia.ve...@tiscali.it
mailto:mattia.ve...@tiscali.it wrote:
I know that a pistol can be dangerous and I can even shoot myself. I keep
it in a place where childrens can't
reach it, so why
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 19:07 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 23.06.2014 18:47, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to said:
Try yum update when the oldest installed kernel (and the
On 23/06/14 17:51, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
Not withstanding the fact that:
1. You have to be in root mode to invoke
2. It lists everything it is going to do, and you have to explicitly say YES.
Assuming that it will always wants a yes to confirm, people will pretty fast
get used to
it and
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 19:21:43 +0200
Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
One thing I've seen a few times at the time Yum didn't have that
protection was « I don't do development, so I can remove Python »
It did lead to a few people not having Yum installed any more.
I don't
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:44:31 -0400,
Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
I would suggest that the fix for this is to not push broken kernels so
frequently that 'the oldest one is the only that works' becomes an
issue, and to introduce automatic testing that ensures you can at least
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
*stop* to insult people
It's not insulting people to state facts. Just because you are on this
ridiculous tirade doesn't mean that people aren't allow to push back on
this insanity. I've read your posts, and if
Reindl Harald writes:
Am 23.06.2014 18:47, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to said:
Try yum update when the oldest installed kernel (and the running
kernel) is the only one that works and there is a new (still broken
for your system) kernel update
Am 23.06.2014 19:21, schrieb Mathieu Bridon:
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 19:07 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
yes - simply because the chance that soemone wants to uninstall all
kernels, yum, dnf and finalyl rpm itself is very
Am 23.06.2014 19:30, schrieb Gerald B. Cox:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
*stop* to insult people
It's not insulting people to state facts. Just because you are on this
ridiculous tirade
which is
Il 23/06/2014 19:14, Gerald B. Cox ha scritto:
Sigh A gun doesn't require you to go into root mode before using it;
and it doesn't ask you if you are sure before you pull the trigger.
In my example this was exactly the case. I am the root, childrens are
users. And yes, it asks you if you're
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net said:
without that protection any what is that, i don't need it
and try to remove it brings the danger to ruin the setup
And the protection is already there - the list of dependent packages
that will be removed, followed by a confirmation
Am 23.06.2014 19:21, schrieb Jaroslav Nahorny:
Exactly. System warns you, but if you insist, it will allow you to rm
-rf /. The same is with dnf. It will show you the list of packages it's
going to remove, and ask you if you are sure this is what you want. What
more do we need?
ah you know
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 19:21:07 +0200,
Jaroslav Nahorny jaros...@hackerspace.pl wrote:
For me it is a totally reasonable and sane approach. If you claim there
are people who won't read the list of to-be-removed packages and blindly
hit *Y* - well, I belive you are right - there are such
Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net said:
without that protection any what is that, i don't need it
and try to remove it brings the danger to ruin the setup
And the protection is already there - the list of dependent packages
that will be removed,
You're reply is wrong on so many levels I just don't know where to begin.
Suffice to say if you continue to clutter up the forum with nonsense I
will push back.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 23.06.2014 19:30, schrieb Gerald B. Cox:
On
Am 23.06.2014 19:36, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net said:
without that protection any what is that, i don't need it
and try to remove it brings the danger to ruin the setup
And the protection is already there - the list of dependent packages
Once upon a time, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com said:
Well, yeah and everybody is reading the complete output of yum/dnf if
it's trying to remove hundreds of packages?
Well, yeah. First, if you think you are removing a leaf or minor
package and the package manager lists 100+ dependent
Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com said:
Well, yeah and everybody is reading the complete output of yum/dnf if
it's trying to remove hundreds of packages?
Well, yeah. First, if you think you are removing a leaf or minor
package and the package
Reindl Harald writes:
Am 23.06.2014 19:36, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net said:
without that protection any what is that, i don't need it
and try to remove it brings the danger to ruin the setup
And the protection is already there - the list of
Am 23.06.2014 19:53, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com said:
Well, yeah and everybody is reading the complete output of yum/dnf if
it's trying to remove hundreds of packages?
Well, yeah. First, if you think you are removing a leaf or minor
Reindl Harald writes:
Am 23.06.2014 19:21, schrieb Jaroslav Nahorny:
Exactly. System warns you, but if you insist, it will allow you to rm
-rf /. The same is with dnf. It will show you the list of packages it's
going to remove, and ask you if you are sure this is what you want. What
more
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 19:57 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com said:
Well, yeah and everybody is reading the complete output of yum/dnf if
it's trying to remove hundreds of packages?
Well, yeah. First, if you think
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:53:19 -0500,
Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com said:
Well, yeah and everybody is reading the complete output of yum/dnf if
it's trying to remove hundreds of packages?
Well, yeah. First, if you think you
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
It isn't just remove/erase operations. Updates can be problematic for
kernels. distro-sync can also remove some packages while updating or
downgrading others and that might catch some people by surprise.
And once in awhile
Am 23.06.2014 20:10, schrieb Jerry James:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
It isn't just remove/erase operations. Updates can be problematic for
kernels. distro-sync can also remove some packages while updating or
downgrading others and that might catch
Les Howell hlhow...@pacbell.net wrote on Mon 23 Jun 2014 20:04:56 CEST:
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 19:57 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com said:
Well, yeah and everybody is reading the complete output of yum/dnf if
it's trying to
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 20:21 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
Les Howell hlhow...@pacbell.net wrote on Mon 23 Jun 2014 20:04:56 CEST:
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 19:57 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com said:
Well, yeah and everybody
On 06/23/2014 04:23 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
What seems to be better approach is to have real configuration file, such one
for which '$ rpm -qc postgresql-server' would not be quiet. Lets say:
$ cat /etc/postgresql/postgresql
PGDATA=/some/other/place/than/default
I think for Fedora,
There is a reference to a clustering group inside the servers
category in comps-f21.xml.in, but no definition of clustering
anywhere that I can see. Also:
[comps]$ make validate
...
comps-f21.xml:46: element packagereq: Relax-NG validity error :
Element packagereq failed to validate attributes
On 06/23/2014 11:51 AM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
This has got to be the silliest thing I've ever seen, but whatever. You enter
the command dnf remove dnf, and guess what? It removes dnf. You enter the
command dnf remove kernel, and guess what, it removes the kernel. What a
concept, it does
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/23/2014 04:23 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
What seems to be better approach is to have real configuration file, such
one
for which '$ rpm -qc postgresql-server' would not be quiet. Lets say:
$ cat
Kevin Fenzi on bugzilla:
Hey folks. There are 47 people cc'ed on this bug.
Can we please be kind to them and refrain from discussion here unless you
have some new information that hasn't already been noted in the last 35
comments?
Quite a sensible comment. We got to this situation because
First of all thank you for your reasoned response. I simply disagree.
I understand the fact about require bugs, and the tons of dependent
packages. I've seen that also when I've tried to remove a package and
noticed it had a myriad of dependencies which would also be removed.
However, when I
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:07 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
yes - simply because the chance that soemone wants to uninstall all
kernels, yum, dnf and finalyl rpm itself is very low
You still did not give a simple case why someone with some sanity
On Jun 23, 2014 4:55 PM, Gerald B. Cox gb...@bzb.us wrote:
First of all thank you for your reasoned response. I simply disagree.
I understand the fact about require bugs, and the tons of dependent
packages. I've seen that also when I've tried to remove a package and
noticed it had a myriad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112166
Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112166
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112166
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Feel free to unorphan the el5 branch. I've requested for el5 and epel7 branches
for you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112166
--- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org ---
Thanks for the branch request Petr. I've taken the el5 branch too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=063
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@scrye.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=063
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|20 |19
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=063
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
76 matches
Mail list logo
