No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170622.n.0):
ID: 112254 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/112254
ID: 112290 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-
There will be an outage starting at 2017-06-24 16:00UTC, which will
last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run:
date -d '2017-06-24 16:00 UTC
Reason for outage:
There have been some performance probl
/*Adam Williamson*/ wrote on Fri, 23 Jun 2017 12:45:07 -0700:
On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 09:06 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
You have run into the purest form of open source, the "scratch your
own itch" case. You want to be able to do things that cannot be done
today, and nobody else is working on it.
On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 05:55 -0400, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> Many people do that and find it convenient, but I don't see how
> maintaining the same SPEC file for different distros is less of a
> maintenance burden
> than having a different SPEC for each distro/branch you want to
> support.
It
On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 09:06 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > You have run into the purest form of open source, the "scratch your
> > own itch" case. You want to be able to do things that cannot be done
> > today, and nobody else is working on it. It seems like you have a
> > really good foundation
# F26 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2017-06-26
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Time for some more blocker review! We got last week off, so we've had a
bit of a backlog show up. Currently there are 7 proposed blockers and
one proposed FE. If you have any ti
Tomas Mraz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the package p11-kit-trust needs to be multilib because it contains
> PKCS#11 .so object used for access to trusted CA certificate store.
> However because this package is a PKCS#11 module and not a regular
> shared library there is no p11-kit-trust-devel package wh
> logcheck → needs to be checked
It will break by this change.
I was not able to make it work on two machines. My system is cursed and
containers does not have such logs at all. Going to check on fresh VM.
However I was able to dive in the code and check how it works. It is
basically big collect
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2017-06-23 16:00 UTC'
Links to all issues below can
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 09:55:31AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On 23 June 2017 at 12:33, Haïkel wrote:
> 2017-06-23 12:39 GMT+02:00 James Hogarth :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Has anyone heard from kanarip or able to contact him?
>>
>> I've been attempting to contact for this bug:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223593
>>
>> If there's no response in one
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 09:55:31AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>> > The missing piece here is that I want to be able to construc
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 08:22:59AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> As for the scripts thing, I believe the way that debootstrap handles
> that is that the udebs (special debs for install environments) are
> unpacked to provide a minimal script run environment to execute
> apt+dpkg, and then qemu-user-st
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 09:55:31AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> > The missing piece here is that I want to be able to construct a rootfs
>> > or an image for an architecture that *isn
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 09:55:31AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > The missing piece here is that I want to be able to construct a rootfs
> > or an image for an architecture that *isn't* the same as my host
> > machine.
>
> For what purpose?
I do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464403
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 06:29:38AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> febootstrap takes a list of .rpms and builds a root filesystem that contains
> them.
febootstrap [if you're talking about the tool I wrote 8 years ago] is
obsolete.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://peopl
2017-06-23 12:39 GMT+02:00 James Hogarth :
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone heard from kanarip or able to contact him?
>
> I've been attempting to contact for this bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223593
>
> If there's no response in one week an issue will be filed with FESCo
> following t
Dne 23.6.2017 v 12:39 James Hogarth napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone heard from kanarip or able to contact him?
>
> I've been attempting to contact for this bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223593
>
> If there's no response in one week an issue will be filed with FESCo
> follo
Hi,
Has anyone heard from kanarip or able to contact him?
I've been attempting to contact for this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223593
If there's no response in one week an issue will be filed with FESCo
following the nonrepsonsive maintainer policy to review the ownership
What reasons would there be for some old packages (one going back to 5th
June) being stuck in f27-pending and not getting tagged into f27?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=427&order=-build_id&latest=1
Seems not to be blockage in the signing queue as other packages ar
Many people do that and find it convenient, but I don't see how maintaining the
same SPEC file for different distros is less of a maintenance burden
than having a different SPEC for each distro/branch you want to support.
And clearly, Fedora has diverged too much from any RHEL/epel buildroots
cu
On Friday, June 23, 2017 10:57:11 Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 10:11 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 09:57 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 17:15 +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > >
> > > > For the record, there appear to be only 25
Dne 23.6.2017 v 10:57 Mark Wielaard napsal(a):
> On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 10:11 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 09:57 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 17:15 +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
For the record, there appear to be only 25 binary packages that
d
On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 10:11 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 09:57 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 17:15 +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > For the record, there appear to be only 25 binary packages that
> > > depend on /bin coreutils paths[1];
> >
> > I just
Dne 22.6.2017 v 17:15 Petr Šabata napsal(a):
> While playing with Base Runtime container base images we noticed
> that some packages couldn't be installed with coreutils-single
> due to their /bin file dependencies. Unlike the original
> coreutils package, coreutils-single doesn't provide the
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 09:57 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 17:15 +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > While playing with Base Runtime container base images we noticed
> > that some packages couldn't be installed with coreutils-single
>
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Remove krb5-appl =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_krb5-appl
Change owner(s):
* Robbie Harwood (rharwood)
Remove src:krb5-appl (produces packages krb5-appl-clients and
krb5-appl-servers) from the distribution.
== Detailed Description ==
These pac
On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 17:15 +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
> While playing with Base Runtime container base images we noticed
> that some packages couldn't be installed with coreutils-single
> due to their /bin file dependencies. Unlike the original
> coreutils package, coreutils-single doesn't provide
29 matches
Mail list logo
