https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761539
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-4f7883722e has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-4f7883722e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:21 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 9:13:40 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> > the end goal of the modularity project is to enable
> > a fully modularized distribution
>
> Was this ever clarified anywhere? I highly doubt that it would have been
On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 9:13:40 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> the end goal of the modularity project is to enable
> a fully modularized distribution
Was this ever clarified anywhere? I highly doubt that it would have been able
to even begin, if that goal had been communicated.. Especially
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:11 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 9:07:51 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:05 AM John M. Harris Jr
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 6:26:31 PM MST Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > >
> > > > given
On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 9:07:51 PM MST Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:05 AM John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 6:26:31 PM MST Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > > given that we're talking about the need to migrate defaults
> >
> >
> >
> > To
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:05 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 6:26:31 PM MST Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > given that we're talking about the need to migrate defaults
>
> To clarify, that has not been decided, and a prominent option mentioned in
> this thread is the
On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 6:26:31 PM MST Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> given that we're talking about the need to migrate defaults
To clarify, that has not been decided, and a prominent option mentioned in
this thread is the option to simply require that there is a non-modular
package.
--
On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 8:59:18 PM MST Leigh Scott wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:44 AM, John M. Harris Jr
> > >
> > As previously mentioned in this thread, we already approved Steam for
> > F28.
> >
> >
> > This was also previously addressed earlier in this thread, where I
> >
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:44 AM, John M. Harris Jr
>
> As previously mentioned in this thread, we already approved Steam for
> F28.
>
>
> This was also previously addressed earlier in this thread, where I
> quoted the relevant portion of the policy in full. Please consider
> previous
On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 6:58:07 PM MST mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:44 AM, John M. Harris Jr
>
> wrote:
> > Proprietary software is certainly a subset of third party software,
> > however,
> > please read the Workstation group's own page about third party
> >
On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 7:01:49 PM MST mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:19 AM, Kevin Kofler
>
> wrote:
> > By actively offering the proprietary Chrome to the users instead of
> > explaining the above, you are actually pointing them towards using
> > proprietary
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:19 AM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
By actively offering the proprietary Chrome to the users instead of
explaining the above, you are actually pointing them towards using
proprietary software instead of Free Software for no reason.
I think you're probably right that people
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:44 AM, John M. Harris Jr
wrote:
Proprietary software is certainly a subset of third party software,
however,
please read the Workstation group's own page about third party
software.
According to that documentation, the Workstation group itself or
FESCo is
meant to
On Tue, 2019-10-15 at 23:52 +, devloca...@gmail.com wrote:
> I would like to log a serious issue with https://SoftwareCollections.org
>
> It says I need a Fedora ID.
>
> I go sign up for one, I am asked for a password, I input it twice when
> creating the account.
>
> I get an email that
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 10:57 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> Right now, there are two conflicting requirements in Fedora Modularity
> that we need to resolve.
>
> 1. Once a user has selected a stream, updates should follow that
> stream and not introduce incompatiblities. Selected streams should
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762085
Bug ID: 1762085
Summary: perl-Term-Table-0.014 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Term-Table
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761523
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-TCP-2.22-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761157
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761982
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-04183e6fbf
scapy-2.4.3-2.el8
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-1c488e885d
python-ecdsa-0.13.3-1.el8
4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761844
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761848
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761843
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761841
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
I would like to log a serious issue with https://SoftwareCollections.org
It says I need a Fedora ID.
I go sign up for one, I am asked for a password, I input it twice when creating
the account.
I get an email that says: "here is your new password" and that I must click on
a link to use this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756026
Bug 1756026 depends on bug 1756420, which changed state.
Bug 1756420 Summary: perl-Test-RequiresInternet for EL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756420
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756030
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756420
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-e7cdb404e5
libapreq2-2.13-2.el6
10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-5393542b88
opendmarc-1.3.2-1.el6
9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761523
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-TCP-2.22-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 12:16:06 PM MST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:42:33AM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 11:39:20 AM MST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 05:05:51PM +, John M. Harris, Jr. wrote:
> > > > There is a
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 2:08 PM Jerry James wrote:
> An update of mpfr from version 3.1.6 to version 4.0.2 is about to begin in
> Rawhide in a side tag:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/mpfr-4.0.2
>
> If you see a "Rebuild for mpfr 4" commit in your package repo, then please
>
I've added about 20 more talks and I believe that the talks are now all
public. There are a few left in the "bex review" bucket that are not
properly labeled. This may mean the talk didn't get recorded properly.
I am sorry for the delays.
regards,
bex
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 9:40 AM Michal
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> One of the early drivers of this discussion as I recall was chrome,
> which is definitely a third party software that is also proprietary.
And one where it is entirely pointless to install the proprietary version
because there is Chromium (i.e., the Free Software version) in
Matthew Miller wrote:
> Upgrades need to work, though. And they need to work regardless of whether
> we ban default modules or not. So, given that, I'm not _really_ seeing big
> differences in practice for the user beteen these two proposals, and the
> one (no default streams) negates one of the
Joe Orton wrote:
> If you don't want to ship any of your packages as modules I think that's
> great and you should continue doing that. On the other hand, I want to
> move a bunch of my packages to module-only because I think I can do a
> better job serving Fedora users that way.
How so? That is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761491
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1762023
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762023
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1761491
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762023
Bug ID: 1762023
Summary: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-List-SomeUtils
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-List-SomeUtils
Assignee:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:13 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> What's happening right now is the process of us trying something out
> and finding out where the problems are. That's what happens when you
> invent new stuff, it's harder than just carrying on doing the old
> stuff.
I agree Adam.
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762022
--- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot ---
Some deps are missing:
No matching package to install: 'perl(Crypt::DH)'
No matching package to install: 'perl(Math::BigInt::GMP)'
No matching package to install: 'perl(Module::Install::XSUtil)'
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762022
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1762021
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762021
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1762022
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762022
Bug ID: 1762022
Summary: perl-Crypt-DH-GMP for EL 8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-DH-GMP
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761858
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1762021
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762021
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1761858
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762021
Bug ID: 1762021
Summary: perl-Net-OpenID-Common for EL8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-OpenID-Common
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761860
--- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot ---
master rebuilds properly against epel8 target.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761856
--- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot ---
No matching package to install: 'perl(GTop)'
No matching package to install: 'perl(IPC::SharedCache)'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761855
--- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot ---
Missing BR: perl-GD is in epel-testing (perl-GD-2.71-1.el8).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761854
--- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot ---
master builds properly against epel8 target.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761852
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1761157
--- Comment #1 from Xavier
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761157
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1761852
Referenced Bugs:
Tomasz Torcz writes:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 01:56:11PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> Matthew Miller writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:36:15PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> >>> As package maintainers we all make technical decisions which have
>> >>> significant impact on our users
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761843
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761851
--- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot ---
master rebuilds properly against epel8 target.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761841
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761850
--- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot ---
master rebuilds properly against epel8 target.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761844
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761846
--- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot ---
master rebuilds properly against epel8 target.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761860
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1761842
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761842
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1761860
--- Comment #1 from Xavier
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761845
--- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot ---
Master rebuilds properly against epel8 target.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 14:17:50 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:48 AM Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
>
> One option is to roll the dice with -j2 and hope you get one of the nice
> builders. May be quicker overall to risk a OOM failure on a build or two until
> you get a good builder
Hi Orion,
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 15:37:57 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> I have no idea as I really don't know exactly what --enable-mpi-cxx does. I
> was surprised that it didn't appear to affect more packages.
F30 still seems to suffer from this issue. Any chance the fix could be
include
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761982
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761841
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Paul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761848
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761981
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring@fedoraproject.org's scratch build of
perl-SNMP-Info-3.70-1.fc29.src.rpm for rawhide completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761988
--- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot ---
perl-Crypt-CBC-2.33-25.el8 has already been built and can be added as an
override, thanks to Paul Howarth.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761849
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1761988
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761988
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1761849
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761988
Bug ID: 1761988
Summary: perl-Crypt-DES for EL8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-DES
Assignee: jpazdzi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761843
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Paul
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:48 AM Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 11:14:42 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I was doing good until I hit this one, went through all 8GB of swap...
> >
> > g++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus
> > compilation terminated.
> > make[4]:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:42:33AM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 11:39:20 AM MST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 05:05:51PM +, John M. Harris, Jr. wrote:
> > > There is a difference between ignoring proprietary software, and providing
> > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761848
--- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/18318
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/18319
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761849
--- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/18316
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/18317
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761982
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 13:58:11 +0530, Aniket Pradhan wrote:
>
> In the "Neuroscience query of the week" section, we hope to provide
> attendees with the chance to ask about a neuroscience topic that they
> are curious about.
I listened to this podcast today, and thought it was very good.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761983
Bug ID: 1761983
Summary: Requesting perl-Redis for EPEL8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Redis
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761982
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1761844
Referenced Bugs:
On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 11:39:20 AM MST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 05:05:51PM +, John M. Harris, Jr. wrote:
> > There is a difference between ignoring proprietary software, and providing
> > installation methods for it in the distro. It is against the first of the
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761844
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761982
Bug ID: 1761982
Summary: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-IPC-ShareLite
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IPC-ShareLite
Assignee:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 05:05:51PM +, John M. Harris, Jr. wrote:
> There is a difference between ignoring proprietary software, and providing
> installation methods for it in the distro. It is against the first of the
> Four Foundations, Freedom, to include these repositories. It's one thing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761981
Bug ID: 1761981
Summary: perl-SNMP-Info-3.70 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-SNMP-Info
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761981
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1626125
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1626125=edit
[patch] Update to 3.70 (#1761981)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 01:56:11PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Matthew Miller writes:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:36:15PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>> As package maintainers we all make technical decisions which have
> >>> significant impact on our users every day - whether that's in
Hi Marius and all,
I just don't see anything. Just a normal map. I don't get any security
warning, but I don't see any data either.
Javascript is working elsewhere for me, so I don't think that's the issue.
Kind regards,
Lailah
On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 at 23:19, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> hi,
>
>
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Co on 2019-10-16 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
At freenode@fedora-meeting
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the
following:
#meetingname EPEL
#topic
Matthew Miller writes:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:36:15PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>> As package maintainers we all make technical decisions which have
>>> significant impact on our users every day - whether that's in the
>>> choice of defaults, choice of build flags, or whatever. Honestly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761859
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761961
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1761859
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761961
Bug ID: 1761961
Summary: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Test-File-Contents
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-File-Contents
Assignee:
On 15. 10. 19 19:13, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
So, I see the following modules (in rawhide anyhow) that don't seem to
have non modular versions:
avocado
cri-o
django
dwm
eclipse
gimp
jmc
lizardfs
mysql
ninja
perl-bootstrap
stratis
Do all of those have default streams? I don't know all but I think
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:52 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:27 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:13 PM Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2019-10-15 at 11:35 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:22 AM Matthew Miller
There is a difference between ignoring proprietary software, and providing
installation methods for it in the distro. It is against the first of the Four
Foundations, Freedom, to include these repositories. It's one thing if the user
seeks out the software and installs it themselves, it's
On 10/14/19 6:19 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
John, the third-party software policy was approved after a long and
contentious debate:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:27 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:13 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2019-10-15 at 11:35 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:22 AM Matthew Miller
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:36:15PM +0200, Miro
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
