Awesome, thanks for the update! I would certainly like to try out pantheon
soon . I'd be happy to help if required :)
On Sun, 8 Dec, 2019, 03:13 Fabio Valentini, wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 10:33 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >
> > On 12/7/19 7:36 AM, Harsh Jain wrote:
> > > when i tries to
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/12/08/report-389-ds-base-1.4.2.5-20191208gitd527003.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
The arm32 platform literally does not support the memory primitives needed to
safely to RDMA. If we enable the support, and someone uses it, there is
nothing we can do to prevent them running the risk of memory corruption. So we
probably need to exclude arm32 from all these packages, or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780871
Bug ID: 1780871
Summary: please build perl-Cairo for epel 8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Cairo
Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com
Hi all!
I'm working on bringing cutelyst to Fedora for my personal project.
Formally, I'm a C/C++ developer, but have a strong interest in RPM
packaging.
I've had some packaging experience through work by backporting glib2,
udisks2, and libmount to el6, as well as making pamixer and
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-070e713b93
tnef-1.4.18-1.el6
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-afbb452d62
proftpd-1.3.3g-13.el6
1
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
480 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
222 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c499781e80
python-gnupg-0.4.4-1.el7
219
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1777953
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778199
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775370
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774921
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775372
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775372
Bug 1775372 depends on bug 1775377, which changed state.
Bug 1775377 Summary: Build perl-Text-CSV for EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775377
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775377
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778465
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779031
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779909
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 2:57 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 08:18:21PM -0500, Langdon White wrote:
> > ## How to determine if you have an issue and how to fix it:
> >
> > run: ```sudo dnf list --installed *protobuf*```
> > if you get a result that looks like
> >
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 10:33 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 12/7/19 7:36 AM, Harsh Jain wrote:
> > when i tries to install pantheon desktop,it showed this package was missing
> > nothing provides libecal-1.2.so.19()(64bit) needed by
> > wingpanel-indicator-datetime-2.1.3-3.fc30.x86_64
> > according
On 12/7/19 7:36 AM, Harsh Jain wrote:
when i tries to install pantheon desktop,it showed this package was missing
nothing provides libecal-1.2.so.19()(64bit) needed by
wingpanel-indicator-datetime-2.1.3-3.fc30.x86_64
according to this, the wingpanel indicator package required is still on
fc30
Hi all.
`pymol` is currently a "dead package". I prepared a new src-rpm to
review it.
Review ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780849
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server:
Am 07.12.19 um 12:17 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
And disallow all the current default modular streams. Ship defaults as
traditional RPMs. Keep modularity for alternate versions.
+1
With the current tooling modularity must be optional as it requires manual
steps to fix packaging problems. With
On Sat, 2019-12-07 at 10:46 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 9:50 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> > I'm curious about this. I do get email notifications for all changes and
> > comments for all my own bodhi updates plus for every update that I
> > commented on. Have you turned
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780849
On 07/12/19 12:51, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 07. 12. 19 12:46, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> I'm interested.
>
> Cool. At this point, it would need a new package review (pymol was
> retired more than 8 weeks ago). Feel free to share it here, I can
On Sat, 2019-12-07 at 10:46 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 9:50 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> > I'm curious about this. I do get email notifications for all changes and
> > comments for all my own bodhi updates plus for every update that I
> > commented on. Have you turned
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 9:50 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> I'm curious about this. I do get email notifications for all changes and
> comments for all my own bodhi updates plus for every update that I
> commented on. Have you turned this off, or do you mean to say you're going
> to ignore bodhi
Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi said:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 04:49:15PM +, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > On 06/12/2019 16:41, Martin Kolman wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 08:38 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> > >
> > > > I also installed the Fedora 31 GeoIP packages and ran the geoipupdate,
> > > >
Il 07/12/19 17:49, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
> I'm curious about this. I do get email notifications for all changes and
> comments for all my own bodhi updates plus for every update that I commented
> on. Have you turned this off, or do you mean to say you're going to ignore
> bodhi emails?
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019, 17:30 Mattia Verga via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Il 06/12/19 21:51, Johannes Lips ha scritto:
> >> "Johannes Lips" >>
> >>
> >> We already have a tool for reporting issues and problems, and it's not
> >> bodhi. If there's a problem with an already
On Sat, 7 Dec 2019, 14:46 Justin Forbes, wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 5:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
>
>>
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39456403
>>
>> DEBUG util.py:596: No matching package to install: 'kernel'
>>
>> I can see that ppc64le was temporarily
On Sat, 2019-12-07 at 10:42 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I really think we should recommend 'dnf distro-sync', assuming it
> > actually does the job, as that should return *all* installed packages
> > from the newly-disabled modules to the non-modular builds, not just
>
Il 06/12/19 21:51, Johannes Lips ha scritto:
>> "Johannes Lips" >
>>
>> We already have a tool for reporting issues and problems, and it's not
>> bodhi. If there's a problem with an already pushed update, it needs to
>> be in bugzilla - where it's actually discoverable - not in bodhi, where
>> it
when i tries to install pantheon desktop,it showed this package was missing
nothing provides libecal-1.2.so.19()(64bit) needed by
wingpanel-indicator-datetime-2.1.3-3.fc30.x86_64
according to this, the wingpanel indicator package required is still on
fc30 , and libecal is not provided. I am
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 5:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39456403
>
> DEBUG util.py:596: No matching package to install: 'kernel'
>
> I can see that ppc64le was temporarily added to nobuildarches in
> kernel.spec, and then removed.
- Original Message -
> From: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2019 2:55:30 PM
> Subject: Re: modular protobuf issue (Dec. 6, 2019) recap
>
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 08:18:21PM -0500, Langdon White wrote:
>
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191206.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191207.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 148
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 212.00 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On 07.12.19 12:46, Antonio Trande wrote:
> I'm interested.
>
I'd be happy to co-maintain, if desired.
> On 07/12/19 12:20, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> On 07. 12. 19 11:53, Henrique Castro wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>> Pymol is a package that, integrated with python-rdkit and other python
>>> packages, makes
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 08:18:21PM -0500, Langdon White wrote:
> ## How to determine if you have an issue and how to fix it:
>
> run: ```sudo dnf list --installed *protobuf*```
> if you get a result that looks like
> ```protobuf.x86_64 3.6.1-6.module_f31+6793+1c93c38```
>
> you have encountered
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 2:05 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 01:52:52PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >First, done anyone have a working version of the script? Google
> returns
> >the github page which hasn't been updated in 3 years and currently
> fails
> >
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 14/165 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 07:58:07PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> Encrypting $HOME would certainly be "an incremental improvement", but it
> shouldn't be done unless the user chooses to do it, and it probably shouldn't
> be done using the same passphrase they use for their user account. That
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 07. 12. 19 10:44, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Langdon White wrote:
>>> ## What we can do going forward:
>>> * Increase the awareness of the policies for Fedora Modules
>>> * Investigate an "early warning system" that would indicate to packagers
>>> (modular and RPM) when they
On 07. 12. 19 12:46, Antonio Trande wrote:
I'm interested.
Cool. At this point, it would need a new package review (pymol was retired more
than 8 weeks ago). Feel free to share it here, I can take a look.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
I'm interested.
On 07/12/19 12:20, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 07. 12. 19 11:53, Henrique Castro wrote:
>> Hello!
>> Pymol is a package that, integrated with python-rdkit and other python
>> packages, makes the lives of people working with drug discovery (and
>> chemistry in general too) much
On 07. 12. 19 2:18, Langdon White wrote:
## How to determine if you have an issue and how to fix it:
run: ```sudo dnf list --installed *protobuf*```
if you get a result that looks like
```protobuf.x86_64 3.6.1-6.module_f31+6793+1c93c38```
you have encountered the problem. so please:
run:
We're down to just two ocaml packages which failed to build.
ocaml-tplib was already discussed.
ocaml-p3l requires the deprecated ocaml-x11 subpackage / X11 Graphics
module. In any case this package is obsolete and I will retire it.
It was essentially a research project into parallelism which
On 07. 12. 19 11:53, Henrique Castro wrote:
Hello!
Pymol is a package that, integrated with python-rdkit and other python packages,
makes the lives of people working with drug discovery (and chemistry in general
too) much easier. Unfortunately, the package is broken and not even build into
On 07. 12. 19 10:44, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Langdon White wrote:
## What we can do going forward:
* Increase the awareness of the policies for Fedora Modules
* Investigate an "early warning system" that would indicate to packagers
(modular and RPM) when they might be violating this policy
*
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39456403
DEBUG util.py:596: No matching package to install: 'kernel'
I can see that ppc64le was temporarily added to nobuildarches in
kernel.spec, and then removed. However there is no explanation in
git, and there was no successful
Hello!
Pymol is a package that, integrated with python-rdkit and other python
packages, makes the lives of people working with drug discovery (and chemistry
in general too) much easier. Unfortunately, the package is broken and not even
build into F31. The maintainer has not replied to a BZ
Adam Williamson wrote:
> I really think we should recommend 'dnf distro-sync', assuming it
> actually does the job, as that should return *all* installed packages
> from the newly-disabled modules to the non-modular builds, not just
> protobuf.
Unfortunately, you also need to "dnf module disable
Langdon White wrote:
> ## What we can do going forward:
> * Increase the awareness of the policies for Fedora Modules
> * Investigate an "early warning system" that would indicate to packagers
> (modular and RPM) when they might be violating this policy
> * Request dnf notify the user when they
Richard Shaw wrote:
> I guess I should say that part of my problem is that:
>
> 1. I didn't ask for/want a module.
This is exactly the problem with default module streams and why we (Miro
Hrončok and several other people including me) want to ban them.
Modules should not be forced onto users.
John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Friday, December 6, 2019 10:05:42 AM MST Przemek Klosowski via devel
> wrote:
>> Many systems have 8, 16 or even 32GB of RAM now. Mine has 16GB, and and
>> I regularly run out of memory because some Chrome tab is open to a
>> website that keeps reloading ads and
On Saturday, December 7, 2019, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 18:51 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > After reading this thread I think this is a more serious problem than
> just
> > this package. I had "assumed" modules were just normal, so I didn't
> > question them being
John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> That is simply not the case. While most new consumer x86_64 hardware comes
> with UEFI on by default, unless it came with Windows installed, Secure
> Boot is normally disabled.
Unfortunately, most hardware out there comes preinfected with Window$.
Kevin Kofler
I've also seen that there are some files in the newly created epel8 branch:
.cvsignore, Makefile and package.cnf.
I would like to do a `git merge master` to sync epel8 branch with fedora
rawhide, but doing that would delete these files... do I have to checkout every
single files one by one from
57 matches
Mail list logo
