On 1/14/20 10:20 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:19:49AM -0600, Martin Jackson wrote:
In this vein (as other people have commented on this thread), I
think it would be great to give Fedora more visibility. Its absence
as a supported image in Azure, for instance, is
On 1/13/20 9:30 AM, Randy Barlow wrote:
On Sat, 2020-01-11 at 11:19 -0600, Martin Jackson wrote:
I don't know if things like pipx exist for other scripting
languages, but do other people think that's worth exploring?
(Currently pipx uses tox in what seems like a weird way, and we'd
need to
On 2020-01-13 11:34 p.m., Benson Muite wrote:
Speaking about howdy, I packaged it on COPR for testing purpose and
looking for improvement.
Great, may be of interest:
https://github.com/boltgolt/howdy/issues/233
I will take a look. Note that I fork the repo for improving upstream
codes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787958
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
518 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
259 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c499781e80
python-gnupg-0.4.4-1.el7
257
I am chiming in with a slightly long form of +1 because of the lack of
comments.
I think this is HUGE. To be able to connect to new use cases and ideas and
have the bonus of helping a downstream stay more closely connected feels
like a big win!
regards,
bex
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 5:54 AM
On Tue, 2020-01-14 at 08:13 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 07:55, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 6:01 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:21:40AM -0500, Josef Ridky wrote:
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone know, how can I
On Tue, 2020-01-14 at 05:21 -0500, Josef Ridky wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Does anyone know, how can I obsolete modular version of package?
>
> TL;DR
>
> I have one package (gimp) that is now available as RPM and Module at the same
> time in Fedora.
> Due of modular version makes issues to users
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791109
Bug ID: 1791109
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-8.31 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On 14. 01. 20 21:56, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 01. 20 21:14, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 02:21:24PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateNose
== Summary ==
The {{package|python-nose}} ({{package|python3-nose}}) package will
On 14. 01. 20 21:14, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 02:21:24PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateNose
== Summary ==
The {{package|python-nose}} ({{package|python3-nose}}) package will be
Hi,
There are a number of fc31 packages I'd like to see in EPEL so I can use
them for Centos7 for wok-3.0 and kimchi-3.0. Two that I need are:
python3-libguestfs
python3-pyparted
I also possibly need:
python3-pyparted as the pip module throws a error.
The ones I'd also like so I can avoid pip
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 02:21:24PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateNose
>
> == Summary ==
> The {{package|python-nose}} ({{package|python3-nose}}) package will be
> [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/deprecating-packages/
>
I have some concerns about this proposal. Given that this change was
essentially unanimously rejected, this line stood out to me:
> * As soon as feature is accepted by the community, there will be a
> smooth process to update baseline in the main Fedora, as all packages
> will be already
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateNose
== Summary ==
The {{package|python-nose}} ({{package|python3-nose}}) package will be
[https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/deprecating-packages/
deprecated] without replacement in [[Releases/32|Fedora 32]]. Nose is
dead
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:22 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> * Self-Contained Change deadline: 14 Jan
This should be 21 Jan. 14 Jan is the day I send the reminder email
(you know...today). Thanks to churchyard for catching this.
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 06:11:33PM +0100, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > For what it's worth, we do continue to work on these things. It's difficult
> > because we really do need to make sure we have solid legal protection.
> About the whole issue of bringing Fedora to WSL, I remember that there
> were
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790306
Tim Orling changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Co on 2020-01-15 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
At freenode@fedora-meeting
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the
following:
#meetingname EPEL
#topic
Hi,
we need to implement a password storage scheme plug-in for the 389
directory server. Especially we need to implement bcrypt support. We
checked the source code and documentation and found out that we need to
write a SLAPI_PLUGIN_PWD_STORAGE_SCHEME plugin.
Some plugins of this type are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791036
Bug ID: 1791036
Summary: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.44 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker
Keywords:
On Tue, 2020-01-14 at 17:40 +0100, Normand wrote:
> openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org has a strangely pending job that started 4
> month ago !
>
>
> https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests
> ===
> Medium: BuildFedora-Rawhide-20190928.n.2 of
> fedora-Rawhide-Server-dvd-iso.ppc64le
> Test:
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 17:30, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:19:49AM -0600, Martin Jackson wrote:
> > In this vein (as other people have commented on this thread), I
> > think it would be great to give Fedora more visibility. Its absence
> > as a supported image in Azure,
On 1/14/20 5:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2020-01-14 at 11:58 +0100, Normand wrote:
Hello Adam,
I am surprised by the number of errors for PowerPC on openqa stg since
20200110 compose:
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/group_overview/3
Is there some pending changes on those
On 14. 01. 20 17:22, Ben Cotton wrote:
Here are some upcoming deadlines in the Fedora 32 schedule. A more
detailed schedule, including team-specific task lists, is published to
the web[1].
* Self-Contained Change deadline: 14 Jan
The linked schedule says 2020-01-21.
* Mass rebuild begins 22
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 08:43:17 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-01-14 at 11:58 +0100, Normand wrote:
> > Hello Adam,
> >
> > I am surprised by the number of errors for PowerPC on openqa stg
> > since 20200110 compose:
> > https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/group_overview/3
> > Is
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 21:37:52 +0530, Samyak Jain wrote:
> Heya,
Hello Samyak, and welcome to Fedora!
> This is Samyak Jain, a 20-year old student, developer, and an avid learner.
> Also, as a third year undergraduate in the field of computer science, I have
> been an open-source learner and a
On Tue, 2020-01-14 at 11:58 +0100, Normand wrote:
> Hello Adam,
>
> I am surprised by the number of errors for PowerPC on openqa stg since
> 20200110 compose:
> https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/group_overview/3
> Is there some pending changes on those machines ?
>
> We do not have such
openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org has a strangely pending job that started 4
month ago !
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests
===
Medium: BuildFedora-Rawhide-20190928.n.2 of
fedora-Rawhide-Server-dvd-iso.ppc64le
Test: realmd_join_sssd@ppc64le (restarted)
Progress: 100 %
Started: 4
Here are some upcoming deadlines in the Fedora 32 schedule. A more
detailed schedule, including team-specific task lists, is published to
the web[1].
* Self-Contained Change deadline: 14 Jan
* Mass rebuild begins 22 Jan
* Keepalive Deadline for spins: 22 Jan
* Software String Freeze: 28 Jan
*
Here are some upcoming deadlines in the Fedora 32 schedule. A more
detailed schedule, including team-specific task lists, is published to
the web[1].
* Self-Contained Change deadline: 14 Jan
* Mass rebuild begins 22 Jan
* Keepalive Deadline for spins: 22 Jan
* Software String Freeze: 28 Jan
*
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:19:49AM -0600, Martin Jackson wrote:
> In this vein (as other people have commented on this thread), I
> think it would be great to give Fedora more visibility. Its absence
> as a supported image in Azure, for instance, is particularly
> noticeable, and the whole
Heya,
This is Samyak Jain, a 20-year old student, developer, and an avid learner.
Also, as a third year undergraduate in the field of computer science, I
have been an open-source learner and a contributor for a while now.
Coming to open-source contributions, I have contributed to the Debian
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 04:09:18PM +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> Based on the impact described above, I wouldn't consider the change
> system-wide.
>
> But I think we touch an interesting topic here: It seems our
> definition of Change is quite limited and focused on packaged changes.
>
I think, and this is my personal opinion, that Ubuntu is so popular,
because it is easy to use for everyone. You don't need to have much
technical knowledge to use Ubuntu for most thinks that non technical
user needs and it looks good.
Every time I'm trying to use Fedora the same way, I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790880
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
See the thread on the Council Discuss mailing list:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/council-discuss@lists.fedoraproje
ct.org/message/JD65B2SP3WWEWUCZ5HWVQGXJNPJ6HTLC/
(To avoid fragmentation, please reply to that thread rather than here.
Thanks!)
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790880
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790880
Bug ID: 1790880
Summary: perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.97 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-XML-LibXSLT
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 07:55, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 6:01 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:21:40AM -0500, Josef Ridky wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > Does anyone know, how can I obsolete modular version of package?
> > >
> > > TL;DR
> > >
> > > I
On Tuesday, 14 January 2020 at 11:21, Josef Ridky wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Does anyone know, how can I obsolete modular version of package?
>
> TL;DR
>
> I have one package (gimp) that is now available as RPM and Module at
> the same time in Fedora.
> Due of modular version makes issues to users
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 6:01 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:21:40AM -0500, Josef Ridky wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Does anyone know, how can I obsolete modular version of package?
> >
> > TL;DR
> >
> > I have one package (gimp) that is now available as RPM and Module at the
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 03:05, Benson Muite wrote:
>
> >> Thank you for the PDF. However, the presentation is sightly outdated
> >> given the listed hardware dating from 2008. Some modern laptops are
> >> equipped with a IR camera Windows Hello type device which could be
> >> suitable for iris
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:21:40AM -0500, Josef Ridky wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Does anyone know, how can I obsolete modular version of package?
>
> TL;DR
>
> I have one package (gimp) that is now available as RPM and Module at the
> same time in Fedora. Due of modular version makes issues to
Hello Adam,
I am surprised by the number of errors for PowerPC on openqa stg since
20200110 compose:
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/group_overview/3
Is there some pending changes on those machines ?
We do not have such errors in our local openqa server at IBM for same
compose versions.
Hi Josef,
As far as I know, it's not possible to do that right now in a generic way.
Right now it's best to avoid doing so in already released Fedora versions
(F30, F31) and only keep the changes for the next release (F32 rawhide).
The reason for this is that dnf (and libdnf that's used by
Hi folks,
Does anyone know, how can I obsolete modular version of package?
TL;DR
I have one package (gimp) that is now available as RPM and Module at the same
time in Fedora.
Due of modular version makes issues to users during system upgrade, I've
decided to remove (obsolete) modular version
On 1/14/20 10:34 AM, Benson Muite wrote:
On 1/14/20 9:00 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
On 2020-01-13 12:56 a.m., Benson Muite wrote:
On 1/12/20 9:38 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
The challenge about upstream is when they lack activity for years
and contributions are very difficult when
48 matches
Mail list logo
