Orphaning xfontsel

I've orphaned xfontsel, one of the many possibly-older-than-thou X utilities. From the man page: xfontsel - point and click selection of X11 font names So it does support both point *and* click. Futuristic stuff indeed ;) Package is here if you want to take it:

[Bug 1950700] perl-Pod-Weaver-4.017 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950700 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Pod-Weaver-4.017-1.fc3 |perl-Pod-Weaver-4.017-1.fc3

[Bug 1950616] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-ECDSA-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950616 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-ECDSA-0. |perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-ECDSA-0.

[Bug 1949332] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-ECDSA-0.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949332 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-ECDSA-0. |perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-ECDSA-0.

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, Kevin Fenzi wrote: I'd be able and willing to assist here too, thanks for working on it! As far as sip6 goes, I'd venture the adjustment from v5 to v6 will be smaller than what v4 to v5 was. Yeah, agreed. Happy to work with you both and get this done. :) Okay, I'll

[Bug 1953981] perl-Graphics-TIFF-11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953981 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-08dbe510a4 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 1950700] perl-Pod-Weaver-4.017 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950700 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Pod-Weaver-4.017-1.fc3 |perl-Pod-Weaver-4.017-1.fc3

[Bug 1950616] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-ECDSA-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950616 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-ECDSA-0. |perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-ECDSA-0.

[Bug 1949332] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-ECDSA-0.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949332 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-ECDSA-0. |perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-ECDSA-0.

[Bug 1953981] perl-Graphics-TIFF-11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953981 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-2cb0937102 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 1954341] perl-Devel-Hide-0.0014 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954341 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Devel-Hide-0.0014-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=66826739 -- You

[Bug 1954342] New: perl-Devel-NYTProf-6.08 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954342 Bug ID: 1954342 Summary: perl-Devel-NYTProf-6.08 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Devel-NYTProf Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1954341] New: perl-Devel-Hide-0.0014 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954341 Bug ID: 1954341 Summary: perl-Devel-Hide-0.0014 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Devel-Hide Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Dynamic preemption support in Linux 5.12 kernel

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:30 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > I created a Fedora Workstation issue to track the progress, and figure > out if any or all of the desktops want to do full preemption by > default. > https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/228 Unless I missed a commit, it is x86_64 only

Re: New RPM submission

* Joan Moreau [27/04/2021 20:51] : > > Hi Emmanuel > > I am trying my best to foloow the process but I get nowhere > > Now I get a "koji" error ("AuthError: unable to obtain a session") That looks like a recurring kerberos issue. https://pagure.io/koji/issue/2063

Re: [Input Requested] Preset support for third-party services

On Tuesday, 27 April 2021 at 21:14, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I originally raised this as a question to FESCo[1], but I was asked to > bring it up on the Fedora Devel list. My apologies for taking so long > to get around to it. > > While looking into a preset request, I realized that the

Re: Bacula 11.0.2-3 for Fedora 33?

On 4/27/21 1:52 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 4/27/21 5:14 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 11:17:49 -0400 >> "Steven A. Falco" wrote: >>> Are there any additional instructions on how to update the bacula >>> database? >> >> Normally I would use

Re: KDE Autostart in F34

On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 20:03 +, Ravindra Kumar wrote: > > This desktop file need to be replaced by the systemd-user unit, > > IMO. > > Thanks Vitaly. We will look into converting it to systemd-user unit. > I believe that would work for all other desktop managers as well. Yeah, you might want

Re: KDE Autostart in F34

> This desktop file need to be replaced by the systemd-user unit, IMO. Thanks Vitaly. We will look into converting it to systemd-user unit. I believe that would work for all other desktop managers as well. Thanks, Ravindra ___ devel mailing list --

Re: KDE Autostart in F34

> I commented in the bug with some debugging steps to try. Thanks Rex. We can discuss this further in the bug. Thanks, Ravindra ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: New RPM submission

Hi Emmanuel I am trying my best to foloow the process but I get nowhere Now I get a "koji" error ("AuthError: unable to obtain a session") I tried "fedpkg request-repo --exception dovecot-fts-xapian" -> Lead some error ("fedpkg request-repo --exception dovecot-fts-xapian") I filed a "bug"

New Mock release v2.10

I'm pleased to announce that we have a new (small) Mock bugfix release. Worth mentioning is that there are many new config files in `mock-core-configs` package. Release notes are here: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Release-Notes-2.10 Updates: Fedora 34:

Re: Dynamic preemption support in Linux 5.12 kernel

I created a Fedora Workstation issue to track the progress, and figure out if any or all of the desktops want to do full preemption by default. https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/228 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[Input Requested] Preset support for third-party services

I originally raised this as a question to FESCo[1], but I was asked to bring it up on the Fedora Devel list. My apologies for taking so long to get around to it. While looking into a preset request, I realized that the guidelines[2] do not say anything at all about enabling default services that

Re: F34 update experience

rpm -qa | wc - reports 5939 On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:13 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > Dnia Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 04:08:38PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > napisał(a): > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:04:34AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > > > Updated F33 -> F34. Mostly went well, except there is

Re: Schedule for Tuesdays's FESCo Meeting (2021-04-27)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2021-04-27) === Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:01:49 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-04-27/fesco.2021-04-27-17.01.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: F34 update experience

Dnia Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 04:08:38PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napisał(a): > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:04:34AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > > Updated F33 -> F34. Mostly went well, except there is one thing which > > could be better. This is not new to F34 but has been there since the >

Re: Bacula 11.0.2-3 for Fedora 33?

On 4/27/21 5:14 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 11:17:49 -0400 "Steven A. Falco" wrote: Are there any additional instructions on how to update the bacula database? Normally I would use /usr/libexec/bacula/update_mysql_tables but I found in this case that it didn't work because it

[Bug 1953981] perl-Graphics-TIFF-11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953981 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 1918697] Upgrade perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder to 1.69

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918697 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: F35 Change: CompilerPolicy Change (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/27/21 8:52 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Tom Stellard wrote: I don't really want to get in into a debate about specific packages, but your general point that upstream preference may not be best for Fedora is a good one, and it's why the proposal was changed from "packagers should use

Schedule for Tuesdays's FESCo Meeting (2021-04-27)

Sorry for the late agenda. Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-04-27 17:00 UTC'

Re: F34 update experience

As I said, the machine has an ssd. But it has a very large number of packages. It's used for development so has lots of devel pkgs, and a large selection of the live. On Tue, Apr 27, 2021, 12:10 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:04:34AM

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 5:18 PM Dan Čermák wrote: > > Hi Mikolaj, > > Mikolaj Izdebski writes: > > > 5) automating the process of bootstrapping Maven and Ant with related > > components, so that new versions can be imported and built > > reproducibly and with consistent quality. > > You

Re: F34 update experience

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:04:34AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > Updated F33 -> F34. Mostly went well, except there is one thing which > could be better. This is not new to F34 but has been there since the > dnf system-upgrade. > > Running on a pretty decent laptop (core i7, 8GB, SSD). The issue

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-04-28 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname

Re: F35 Change: CompilerPolicy Change (System-Wide Change proposal)

Tom Stellard wrote: > I don't really want to get in into a debate about specific packages, but > your general point that upstream preference may not be best for Fedora is > a good one, and it's why the proposal was changed from "packagers should > use upstream preference" to "packagers should use

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 1:20 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > Long story short, I can no longer in good conscience be the primary > maintainer of (most) Java packages in Fedora. I am not using any of > them, I don't like Java or any other languages targeting the JVM, and > don't get me started on the

[Bug 1953981] perl-Graphics-TIFF-11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953981 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-08dbe510a4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-08dbe510a4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1953981] perl-Graphics-TIFF-11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953981 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-2cb0937102 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-2cb0937102 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1953981] perl-Graphics-TIFF-11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953981 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-035ae73038 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-035ae73038 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

On 27. 04. 21 16:49, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 9:26 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: I will orphan all Java packages I am the main admin of, later today. I've adopted the majority of Java packages that were orphaned by Fabio, primarily those that are related to Maven or Ant.

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

Hi Mikolaj, Mikolaj Izdebski writes: > 5) automating the process of bootstrapping Maven and Ant with related > components, so that new versions can be imported and built > reproducibly and with consistent quality. You might want to take a look at openSUSE's maven package:

[Bug 1953981] perl-Graphics-TIFF-11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953981 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1953981] perl-Graphics-TIFF-11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953981 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: Fedora Linux 34 is available now!

> I'm excited to announce the official release of Fedora Linux 34! > > The beta version has been very popular this time around, so I know you are > excited too. Please join me in thanking the thousands of people who work in > the Fedora Project every year and who make this amazing collaborative

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 9:26 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > I will orphan all Java packages I am the main admin of, later today. I've adopted the majority of Java packages that were orphaned by Fabio, primarily those that are related to Maven or Ant. I've been maintaining numerous Java packages in

Re: Kerberos and Fedora's 2FA UX

In the meantime, I created a simple BASH script that you can use: https://pagure.io/fedora-kinit/blob/main/f/fedora-kinit $ fedora-kinit --help Acquire a Kerberos ticket-granting ticket for Fedora Usage: /home/sgallagh/.local/bin/fedora-kinit [-u|--user ] [-h|--help] -u, --user: Fedora account

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 02:29:52PM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Sat, 24 Apr 2021, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:42:28PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > > > > > > OK, I'm going to make an attempt to move python-qt5 (and its friends) to > > > sip5. I'm planning to build

Fedora Linux 34 is available now!

I'm excited to announce the official release of Fedora Linux 34! The beta version has been very popular this time around, so I know you are excited too. Please join me in thanking the thousands of people who work in the Fedora Project every year and who make this amazing collaborative community

Fedora Linux 34 is available now!

I'm excited to announce the official release of Fedora Linux 34! The beta version has been very popular this time around, so I know you are excited too. Please join me in thanking the thousands of people who work in the Fedora Project every year and who make this amazing collaborative community

F34 update experience

Updated F33 -> F34. Mostly went well, except there is one thing which could be better. This is not new to F34 but has been there since the dnf system-upgrade. Running on a pretty decent laptop (core i7, 8GB, SSD). The issue is that the installation hangs a long time with no evidence of

[Bug 1950294] perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.080 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950294 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1949641] perl-Net-DAVTalk-0.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949641 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Kerberos and Fedora's 2FA UX

Dne 25. 04. 21 v 0:01 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): - (easy) supply a script/wrapper like Miroslav is showing as a part of the fedora-packager rpm package Yeah, we talked about this a while back, I am not sure why it wasn't implemented. ;( Would someone care to submit a PR to fedora-packager for

[Bug 1953981] New: perl-Graphics-TIFF-11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953981 Bug ID: 1953981 Summary: perl-Graphics-TIFF-11 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Graphics-TIFF Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Self Introduction Sergei Petrosian

Hello Fedora developers, I am a fairly new member of the team maintaining Ansible roles for managing linux - namely this repo [1] and this RPM [2] and would like to introduce myself to you. In the past

Re: Self Introduction: Anatoly Vildemanov

On 27.04.2021 12:11, Anatoly Vildemanov wrote: And I will do packages UCX for fedora For this could you please add me to “packager” group like member Hello and welcome to Fedora. Please follow this procedure: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers -- Sincerely,

Re: KDE Autostart in F34

On 27.04.2021 02:23, Ravindra Kumar wrote: It looks like KDE in Fedora 34 is not honoring open-vm-tools autostart script in /etc/xdg/autostart/vmware-user.desktop. GNOME seems to work fine. This desktop file need to be replaced by the systemd-user unit, IMO. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev

Re: question was: What do we think about always autoreconfing? was: Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal))

On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 09:27 +0200, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 3:30 PM David Cantrell > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:26:24AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > >Hijacking this thread originally about > > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 > > >

Self Introduction: Anatoly Vildemanov

Hi, My name is Anatoly Vildemanov, I work at Nvidia on UCX opensource project https://github.com/openucx/ucx My general responsibility is CI and CD And I will do packages UCX for fedora For this could you please add me to "packager" group like member Anatoly Vildemanov Sr. Software Engineer,

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210427.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210426.0): ID: 870854 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: Bacula 11.0.2-3 for Fedora 33?

On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 11:17:49 -0400 "Steven A. Falco" wrote: > This morning "dnf update" brought in bacula 11.0.2-3. Previously I > had been on 9.6.7-1. > > Apparently, the new bacula wants a different database version. I > have version 16, but it wants 1022. I was surprised by this myself

Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.17 alpha coming to rawhide near you (broken python-srpm-macros)

On 4/27/21 10:28 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 27. 04. 21 8:41, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 4/27/21 12:47 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: We see a problem with this construct: Source0:    %{pypi_source} It used to work: $ rpmspec -P python-asyncpg.spec | grep Source0 Source0:

[Bug 1953165] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.906 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953165 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1937686] Upgrade perl-Test-Script to 1.27

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937686 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Gnome BZ untouched for years #1414539

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 4:47 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 10:38 AM Michal Schorm wrote: > > > > How many more years can I expect it will take to resolve or at least > > seriously examine this following BZ? > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414539 > > > >

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

* Fabio Valentini [26/04/2021 21:19] : > > I am not using any of > them, I don't like Java or any other languages targeting the JVM, and > don't get me started on the horrid Java ecosystem. Thank you for all the work you've done, Fabio. Emmanuel

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210427.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210426.0): ID: 870728 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.17 alpha coming to rawhide near you (broken python-srpm-macros)

On 27. 04. 21 8:41, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 4/27/21 12:47 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: We see a problem with this construct: Source0:    %{pypi_source} It used to work: $ rpmspec -P python-asyncpg.spec | grep Source0 Source0:

Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.17 alpha coming to rawhide near you (broken python-srpm-macros)

On 27. 04. 21 8:41, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 4/27/21 12:47 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: We see a problem with this construct: Source0:    %{pypi_source} It used to work: $ rpmspec -P python-asyncpg.spec | grep Source0 Source0:

Re: The Death of Java (packages)

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 21:19:44 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Long story short, I can no longer in good conscience be the primary > maintainer of (most) Java packages in Fedora. I am not using any of > them, I don't like Java or any other languages targeting the JVM, and > don't

Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.17 alpha coming to rawhide near you (broken python-srpm-macros)

On 4/27/21 12:47 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 26. 04. 21 12:36, Panu Matilainen wrote: It's spring, it's raining sleet where I live, and it's also the season for new rpm in rawhide. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.17. The changes to the macro subsystem internals have been

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-04-27 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/04/27/report-389-ds-base-2.0.4-20210427git0a399a2b4.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to