https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2284210
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
On 6/1/24 1:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 13:36 +0200, Jiri Konecny wrote:
To my knowledge it shouldn't be. Fedora Workstation is already running
on Wayland by default for quite some time and even Live ISO is already
Wayland. To my knowledge Wayland don't have issues with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283538
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2282000
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Getopt-Long-2.57-4.fc4 |perl-Getopt-Long-2.57-4.fc4
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-2235745ae4
apptainer-1.3.2-1.el8
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-9ef042c689
syncthing-1.27.7-1.el8
1
> Aoife Moloney writes:
> === VNC switch to RDP for remote GUI installations ===
I'm curious how my usual install workflow will be affected by this
change. I use the kickstart "vnc --connect" option extensively in my
workflow; I may have a bunch of installs running in parallel, and they
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-06-03/fesco.2024-06-03-19.01.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-06-03/fesco.2024-06-03-19.01.log.html
Text Minutes:
Hi all.
gnustep-make and gnustep-base will be updated in Rawhide to the
respective 2.9.2 and 1.3.0 releases.
Related dependencies will be rebuilt.
$ fedrq whatrequires gnustep-make* -F source
gnustep-base
$ fedrq whatrequires gnustep-base* -F source
gnustep-base
openvpn-auth-ldap
raidem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2284392
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2284392
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 5:34 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 04:09:51AM -0500, Jonathan Wright wrote:
> > I think it is time to get this discussed (and hopefully approved) in the
> > meeting. Valkey is the clear leader in my opinion, seems to be gaining the
> >
Hi,
On Monday, 2024-06-03 16:28:24 +0200, Reindl Harald (privat) wrote:
> Am 03.06.24 um 16:18 schrieb Eike Rathke:
> > So using %{buildroot} instead of %{_buildrootdir} would be an actual
> > replacement?
>
> you should have used %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT forever
>
On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 15:44:43 GMT, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
> Hi Ankur,
>
> merging https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qpdfview/pull-request/7 to
> rawhide and F40 would help since I'm waiting for this one only and
> there's no response to the PR yet. I can build into "my" side-tags, I
> just
Hi Panu,
On Monday, 2024-06-03 15:55:09 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> %{_buildrootdir} is nothing packages should be referring to, in any
> circumstance really. It's a potentially shared directory among arbitrary
> packages (in the traditional it's ~/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ ) and putting
>
Am Mi., 29. Mai 2024 um 15:01 Uhr schrieb Ankur Sinha :
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 14:04:20 GMT, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > Hi there
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> > mupdf 1.24.x release branch received another mostly bugfix release
> > which bumped soname nonetheless. Fixes are confirmed good to go for
> >
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 41 RC 20240603.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
For various reasons (mostly: people don't like debugging tools in
production), it's now necessary to add
BuildRequires: glibc-utils
to RPM spec files if you use LD_PRELOAD=libc_malloc_debug.so.0 in
package test suites during the build (we already discourage linking
against
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240602.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240603.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 73
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 19.71 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On 6/3/24 15:55, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 6/3/24 15:22, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi,
what did recently change in rawhide that the %{_buildrootdir} macro
isn't expanded as in
+ mkdir '%{_buildrootdir}/bin'
mkdir: cannot create directory ‘%{_buildrootdir}/bin’: No such file or
directory
+ :
+ cp
On 6/3/24 15:22, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi,
what did recently change in rawhide that the %{_buildrootdir} macro
isn't expanded as in
+ mkdir '%{_buildrootdir}/bin'
mkdir: cannot create directory ‘%{_buildrootdir}/bin’: No such file or directory
+ :
+ cp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2284210
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 14:22:37 +0200
Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what did recently change in rawhide that the %{_buildrootdir} macro
> isn't expanded as in
new rpm landed? But shouldn't %{buildroot} be used instead of
%{_buildrootdir} anyway?
Dan
> + mkdir
Hi,
what did recently change in rawhide that the %{_buildrootdir} macro
isn't expanded as in
+ mkdir '%{_buildrootdir}/bin'
mkdir: cannot create directory ‘%{_buildrootdir}/bin’: No such file or directory
+ :
+ cp /builddir/build/SOURCES/node-stdout-nonblocking-wrapper
'%{_buildrootdir}/bin'
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Locale-Codes` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
3.79 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-Codes/pull-request/33
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Locale-Codes` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
3.79 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-Codes/pull-request/32
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283360
Fedora Fails To Install changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(emmanuel@seyman.f
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Locale-Codes` that
you are following:
``
3.79 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-Codes/pull-request/33
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Locale-Codes` that
you are following:
``
3.79 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-Codes/pull-request/32
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2284210
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
I'm not able to tell, I'm not involved into Wayland enough.
Hi Ray, Jose do you know something about what is written below?
Jirka
On 31. 05. 24 19:16, Barry wrote:
On 31 May 2024, at 12:36, Jiri Konecny wrote:
To my knowledge Wayland don't have issues with graphics cards in general.
Isn’t
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday, 03
June at 13:00 UTC. The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone
to attend. You can join us over on Matrix in the Fedora Meeting channel:
https://matrix.to/#/#meeting:fedoraproject.org
You can use
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2024-06-03 19:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 04:09:51AM -0500, Jonathan Wright wrote:
> I think it is time to get this discussed (and hopefully approved) in the
> meeting. Valkey is the clear leader in my opinion, seems to be gaining the
> most traction, and is well on the way to making improvements with their
>
I think it is time to get this discussed (and hopefully approved) in the
meeting. Valkey is the clear leader in my opinion, seems to be gaining the
most traction, and is well on the way to making improvements with their
first major release of 8.0 due later this year.
Their team has been heavily
Hi,
For https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_Redis_With_Valkey
in FESCo ticket https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3203 we didn't make a
decision and decided to wait for the situation to clarify.
Has the status changed? Can we now say that Valkey is going to be the
default replacement that
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 9:09 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 2:56 AM Tomáš Popela wrote:
> >
> > Hi Stephen
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 7:15 PM Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> >>
> >> * AGREED: All packages currently included in ELN Extras will have
> >> an EPEL 10 branch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2284393
Bug ID: 2284393
Summary: perl-Log-Trivial-0.40-29.fc41 FTBFS: rm: cannot remove
'*.list': No such file or directory
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2284392
Bug ID: 2284392
Summary: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber-1.01-25.fc41 FTBFS: rm: cannot
remove '*.list': No such file or directory
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 2:56 AM Tomáš Popela wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 7:15 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>> * AGREED: All packages currently included in ELN Extras will have
>> an EPEL 10 branch created for them (@sgallagh:fedora.im, 16:28:51)
>
>
> Please exclude
Hi Stephen
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 7:15 PM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> * AGREED: All packages currently included in ELN Extras will have
> an EPEL 10 branch created for them (@sgallagh:fedora.im, 16:28:51)
>
Please exclude Thunderbird and Firefox from the EPEL 10 as they are
packaged in
40 matches
Mail list logo
